Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “labs facilities”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Brilliant Execution of Smart Labs: Employing Best Practices to Improve Safety and Reduce Energy for Sustainable Labs: Preprint

Laboratory buildings often dominate the energy use on research campuses, consuming three to four times the energy of a typical office building. In most cases, these facilities are defined as “mission critical,” with excessive energy use as simply an unfortunate truth that cannot be avoided without compromising safety. However, case studies indicate cost savings opportunities of up to 40% in laboratories (compared to standard practices) by employing energy efficient design strategies that also improve the safety of lab spaces (Better Buildings 2018). To help stakeholders implement improvement measures, the Smart Labs Toolkit describes a proven approach to optimizing performance of laboratories and critical control environments in new or existing facilities. The Toolkit outlines distinct phases for building a successful Smart Labs program that include: Plan, Assess, Optimize, and Manage. Each phase has specific tasks, training videos, and resources to educate users, support the efforts of key stakeholders, and maximize benefits for the organization in implementing high-performance labs. The Toolkit also includes case studies from the 17 Better Buildings Smart Labs Accelerator partners, sharing lessons learned and supporting the Smart Labs approach to safe, efficient world class science. This paper reviews the technology choices for implementing Smart Labs ventilation strategies, controls, and other efficiency measures. Better Building Smart Lab Accelerator partners provide case study examples of safety and energy-savings results of using Smart Labs approaches.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
NASA NTRS1998

Continuation of the University of Michigan Sounding Rocket Program

This interim report gives the activity on this grant through 31 October 1998, and the planned activities for the next fiscal year. A Project Initiation Conference (PIC) was held at the Wallops Flight Facility (WFF), with planning for the launch of flight 36.174 in Fall 1998. However, following the PIC, the WFF personnel decided that the experiment telemetry system had to be completely rewired, which required substantial design and wiring changes on the experiment side of the payload. These costs had not been anticipated in the FY98 budget, and used up considerable resources of the experimenters. In addition, the telemetry re-design was not completed until Fall 1998, so that there was no opportunity for a launch in 1998 (the Jupiter window closes in late November 1998 and it will reopen in late summer 1999). A Design Review was held by telecon with WFF personnel on 26 October 1998, with plans for the 36.174 launch now in late August 1999 with a launch window which extends into winter 2000. On a more positive note, we have been developing a vacuum UV calibration chamber in Michigan's Space Physics Research Lab, for future measurements of our experiment components, and this facility is now undergoing initial measurements of various calibration lamps in preparation for testing of the telescope UV reflective efficiency. This facility will greatly increase our ability to optimize our experiment for UV efficiency, which has been lacking in the past, and it will be made available for support of other NASA missions at Michigan and for visitors from other institutions. For the next flight 36.174, the following activities will be accomplished: (1) prepare the experiment, including replacement and upgrading of critical components, at University of Michigan; (2) pre-integrate the payload at the Wallops Flight Facility; (3) perform final far-UV calibration of instrument (4) perform final alignment, integration, and electrical checks at WSMR; (5) launch payload from WSMR and check condition of recovered payload; (6) perform post-flight calibration, if necessary and applicable (7) reduce and analyze flight data. The following pages contain information from the experimenter package for the Design Review for the next flight, 36.174, listing the plans, changes, and schedule for this flight.

Clarke, John↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wireless Sensor Instrumentation for Distributed Sensing in Ground-Test Facilities

Wireless sensors have a number of advantages over wired sensors for flexible or temporary diagnostic deployment in a field or lab setting. Relative to wireless alternatives, traditional wired systems encounter limitations including spatial and weight constraints, maintenance costs, and signal integrity in high-noise environments. Ground-test facilities often face these challenges and cause increase down-time costs and failure of data integrity. This paper describes the development and implementation of flexible wireless sensor boards for applications within ground-test facilities using different network architectures. These boards implement state-of-the- art STM32 microprocessor chips for high-speed data acquisition and computational power. Additionally, the design integrates long-range radio transceivers with power output of +20dBm, easily reaching 2 km range, while maintaining high interference immunity and minimizing current consumption. The wireless sensor boards were implemented to demonstrate performance through benchmark testing and by taking distributed electrically-isolated measurements on a high-voltage lab apparatus while using different network architectures. Although this test case is in a laboratory setting, this network architecture could be easily repurposed for various other forms of monitoring.

Wireless Sensor Network↗
NASA NTRS1992

Opportunities for research on Space Station Freedom

NASA has allocated research accommodations on Freedom (equipment, utilities, etc.) to the program offices that sponsor space-based research and development as follows: Space Science and Applications (OSSA)--52 percent, Commercial Programs (OCP)--28 percent, Aeronautics and Space Technology (OAST)--12 percent, and Space Flight (OSF)--8 percent. Most of OSSA's allocation will be used for microgravity and life science experiments; although OSSA's space physics, astrophysics, earth science and applications, and solar system exploration divisions also will use some of this allocation. Other Federal agencies have expressed an interest in using Space Station Freedom. They include the National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Geological Survey, National Science Foundation, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and U.S. Departments of Agriculture and Energy. Payload interfaces with space station lab support equipment must be simple, and experiment packages must be highly contained. Freedom's research facilities will feature International Standard Payload Racks (ISPR's), experiment racks that are about twice the size of a Spacelab rack. ESA's Columbus lab will feature 20 racks, the U.S. lab will have 12 racks, and the Japanese lab will have 10. Thus, Freedom will have a total of 42 racks versus 8 for Space lab. NASA is considering outfitting some rack space to accommodate small, self-contained payloads similar to the Get-Away-Special canisters and middeck-locker experiment packages flown on Space Shuttle missions. Crew time allotted to experiments on Freedom at permanently occupied capability will average 25 minutes per rack per day, compared to six hours per rack per day on Spacelab missions. Hence, telescience--the remote operation of space-based experiments by researchers on the ground--will play a very important role in space station research. Plans for supporting life sciences research on Freedom focus on the two basic goals of NASA 's space life sciences program: to ensure the health, safety, and productivity of humans in space and to acquire fundamental knowledge of biological processes. Space-based research has already shown that people and plants respond the same way to the microgravity environment: they lose structure. However, the mechanisms by which they respond are different, and researchers do not yet know much about these mechanisms. Life science research accommodations on Freedom will include facilities for experiments designed to address this and other questions, in fields such as gravitational biology, space physiology, and biomedical monitoring and countermeasures research.

Phillips, Robert W.↗
NASA NTRS1984

STS science and applications payloads - An evolving perspective

The present investigation is mainly concerned with a reexamination of the Spacelab payload process. The candidate missions are considered in connection with discipline payloads or laboratories. Attention is given to the Space Biomedical Laboratory (SBL), the Space Plasma Lab (SPL), the Astronomy Research Laboratory (Astro), the Shuttle High Energy Astrophysics Laboratory (SHEAL), the Shuttle Infrared Telescope Facility (SIRTF), the Solar Optical Telescope (SOT), the Materials Sciences Laboratory (MLS), the Environmental Observations Mission (EOM), the Shuttle Radar Lab (SRL), the International Microgravity Laboratory (IML), and the Payload of Opportunity Carrier (POOC). The POOC is a low cost means of placing experiments aboard the Shuttle in the cargo bay.

Sander, M. J.↗
DOE OSTI2026

Structured electrolytes facilitate Grotthuss-type transport for enhanced proton-coupled electron transfer reactions

Concentrated hydrogen-bonded electrolytes (CoHBEs) are structured, electrochemically stable, less-volatile alternatives to aqueous and dilute nonaqueous electrolytes, however, with high viscosities that limit molecular diffusion. This work provides an understanding of the proton conduction mechanism in CoHBEs based on mixtures of acids and azoles and establishes a link between the structurally dictated transport properties and the proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) reaction rates that can be leveraged for enhancing electrochemical reactions. Diffusion and relaxation NMR studies suggest a breaking of the viscosity–conductivity tradeoff, where at high azole concentrations (>45 mol%), Grotthuss transport is more likely with lowered proton transfer energy barriers between the azole and the acid according to the machine learning (ML) accelerated ab initio path integral MD (AI-PIMD) simulations. Proton conduction pathways are found to be switchable between the hydrogen bonding networks of the acid and the azole, with imidazole chain forming structures better facilitating Grotthuss hopping. Supported by small-angle neutron scattering studies, the chains are found to have six member molecules on average with maximum of 3 to 4 imidazole/imidazoliums at 50 to 60 mol%. Despite their high viscosities, the measured PCET rates for quinones and phenazines measured in the protic CoHBEs present relatively high electron transfer rate constants (k 0 ~ 10 −4 cm/s), validated by rotating disc electrode and scanning electrochemical microscopy measurements. The results demonstrate that strategic tuning of hydrogen-bond donor–acceptor interactions enables the decoupling of proton transport and viscosity, thereby impacting PCET reactions.

electrokinetics↗
DOE OSTI2025

Suppression of pair beam instabilities in a laboratory analogue of blazar pair cascades

The generation of dense electron–positron pair beams in the laboratory can enable direct tests of theoretical models of γ-ray bursts and active galactic nuclei. We have successfully achieved this using ultrarelativistic protons accelerated by the Super Proton Synchrotron at (CERN). In the first application of this experimental platform, the stability of the pair beam is studied as it propagates through a meter-length plasma, analogous to TeV γ-ray-induced pair cascades in the intergalactic medium. It has been argued that pair beam instabilities disrupt the cascade, thus accounting for the observed lack of reprocessed GeV emission from TeV blazars. If true, this would remove the need for a moderate strength intergalactic magnetic field to explain the observations. We find that the pair beam instability is suppressed if the beam is not perfectly collimated or monochromatic, hence the lower limit to the intergalactic magnetic field inferred from γ-ray observations of blazars is robust.

blazar jets↗
DOE OSTI2026

Lifetime extension of legacy CEBAF LLRF hardware

A significant portion of the Low-Level Radio Frequency (LLRF) hardware in Jefferson Lab’s CEBAF is from the original construction of the facility using 1980’s CAMAC technology. Of the fifty-three zones in CEBAF, thirty-six of them are legacy hardware. The age of the legacy system has led to difficulties in maintaining the hardware due to parts going obsolete without suitable drop in replacements. Continued operation of the legacy system is required as the installation of LLRF 3.0 systems is costly and cannot be completed in a short period of time with the available resources. The most pressing failure in the legacy system was a failing buffer card, which is responsible for communication between the EPICs network and individual RF control modules. A new buffer card was designed as a transparent, drop in, replacement so that upgrades are simply a matter of swapping the existing legacy hardware. This buffer card upgrades a single point failure component and promises to extend the operable lifetime of CEBAF’s legacy systems.

Accelerator Physics↗
DOE OSTI2024

Compact Superconducting RF Accelerators for Water Treatment

Jefferson Lab is actively exploring the environmental applications of compact irradiation facilities utilizing Superconducting Radio Frequency (SRF) accelerator technology ? a well-established technology primarily used in large research machines. Recent advancements, such as the application of thin films of superconducting alloys in radio frequency (RF) resonators and the development of high-capacity cryocoolers, have made it feasible to employ this key technology in compact, standalone irradiation facilities. The main advantage over conventional systems based on normal conducting technology is the significantly enhanced efficiency in beam power generation, enabling exposure to substantially higher radiation doses. In the realm of addressing contaminants in wastewater treatment, particularly concerning persistent substances known as "forever chemicals," this technology presents an attractive solution, given the required considerable effort i.e. dose to break them down. Experiment Numbers:

Vennekate, John↗
DOE OSTI2022

Lasers for the observation of multiple order nuclear reactions

Nuclear reaction rates become nonlinear with respect to flux (cm −2 s −1 ) in extreme environments such as those found during stellar nucleosynthesis and terrestrial nuclear detonations. To observe these effects directly in the laboratory, extremely high particle fluences (cm −2 ) are necessary but not sufficient. Reactor-based neutron sources, such as the Institut Laue-Langevin’s high-flux neutron reactor, were previously the closest to meeting this challenge, albeit over ∼hour time scales. In ultra-high flux environments, where multiple reactions occur on picosecond time scales, nuclei are unable to return to their ground states between reactions; consequently, reactions take place on excited nuclei. To accurately model high-flux environments, data on the cross-sections of excited nuclear states are required, which differ significantly from those of ground states due to spin/parity effects. In order to replicate these effects in the laboratory, short high-fluence pulses on the order of the lifetime of a typical nuclear excited state (generally ≲1 ns) are required. Particle beams generated by high-intensity lasers are uniquely positioned to meet this need with the potential to produce fluences of 10 17 protons/cm 2 and 10 22 neutrons/cm 2 over a few pico-seconds or less. In addition to providing a quantitative analysis of the rates of multiple rapid reactions in general, the present work examines a number of laser-based experiments that could be conducted in the near future to observe multiple rapid reactions for laboratory-based astrophysics and the measurement of exotic cross-sections.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
NASA NTRS2003

Microgravity Emissions Laboratory Testing of the Light Microscopy Module Control Box Fan

The Microgravity Emissions Laboratory (MEL) was developed at the NASA Glenn Research Center for the characterization, simulation, and verification of the International Space Station (ISS) microgravity environment. This Glenn lab was developed in support of the Fluids and Combustion Facility (FCF). The MEL is a six-degrees-of-freedom inertial measurement system that can characterize the inertial response forces (emissions) of components, subrack payloads, or rack-level payloads down to 10 7g. The inertial force output data generated from the steady-state or transient operations of the test article are used with finite element analysis, statistical energy analysis, and other analysis tools to predict the on-orbit environment at specific science or rack interface locations. Customers of the MEL have used benefits in isolation performance testing in defining available attenuation during the engineering hardware design phase of their experiment s development. The Light Microscopy Module (LMM) Control Box (LCB) fan was tested in the MEL in June and July of 2002. The LMM is planned as a remotely controllable on-orbit microscope subrack facility that will be accommodated in an FCF Fluids Integrated Rack on the ISS. The disturbances measured in the MEL test resulted from operation of the air-circulation fan within the LCB. The objectives of the testing were (1) to identify an isolator to be added to the LCB fan assembly to reduce fan-speed harmonics and (2) to identify the fan-disturbance forcing functions for use in rack-response analysis of the LMM and Fluids Integrated Rack facility. This report describes the MEL, the testing process, and the results from ground-based MEL LCB fan testing.

McNelis, Anne M.↗
NASA NTRS2011

NASA Planning for Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle Ground Operations

The NASA Orion Ground Processing Team was originally formed by the Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Constellation (Cx) Project Office's Orion Division to define, refine and mature pre-launch and post-landing ground operations for the Orion human spacecraft. The multidisciplined KSC Orion team consisted of KSC civil servant, SAIC, Productivity Apex, Inc. and Boeing-CAPPS engineers, project managers and safety engineers, as well as engineers from Constellation's Orion Project and Lockheed Martin Orion Prime contractor. The team evaluated the Orion design configurations as the spacecraft concept matured between Systems Design Review (SDR), Systems Requirement Review (SRR) and Preliminary Design Review (PDR). The team functionally decomposed prelaunch and post-landing steps at three levels' of detail, or tiers, beginning with functional flow block diagrams (FFBDs). The third tier FFBDs were used to build logic networks and nominal timelines. Orion ground support equipment (GSE) was identified and mapped to each step. This information was subsequently used in developing lower level operations steps in a Ground Operations Planning Document PDR product. Subject matter experts for each spacecraft and GSE subsystem were used to define 5th - 95th percentile processing times for each FFBD step, using the Delphi Method. Discrete event simulations used this information and the logic network to provide processing timeline confidence intervals for launch rate assessments. The team also used the capabilities of the KSC Visualization Lab, the FFBDs and knowledge of the spacecraft, GSE and facilities to build visualizations of Orion pre-launch and postlanding processing at KSC. Visualizations were a powerful tool for communicating planned operations within the KSC community (i.e., Ground Systems design team), and externally to the Orion Project, Lockheed Martin spacecraft designers and other Constellation Program stakeholders during the SRR to PDR timeframe. Other operations planning tools included Kaizen/Lean events, mockups and human factors analysis. The majority of products developed by this team are applicable as KSC prepares 21st Century Ground Systems for the Orion Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle and Space Launch System.

Letchworth, Gary↗
NASA NTRS2012

Microgravity Science Glovebox (MSG) Space Sciences's Past, Present, and Future on the International Space Station (ISS)

The Microgravity Science Glovebox (MSG) is a double rack facility designed for microgravity investigation handling aboard the International Space Station (ISS). The unique design of the facility allows it to accommodate science and technology investigations in a "workbench" type environment. MSG facility provides an enclosed working area for investigation manipulation and observation in the ISS. Provides two levels of containment via physical barrier, negative pressure, and air filtration. The MSG team and facilities provide quick access to space for exploratory and National Lab type investigations to gain an understanding of the role of gravity in the physics associated research areas.

Spivey, Reggie A.↗
NASA NTRS2017

NASA Facilities for Airframe and Engine Icing

This presentation is intended for a technical audience. It describes NASA Glenn's two icing-capable facilities, the Icing Research Tunnel (IRT) and the Propulsion Systems Lab (PSL). The presentation contains stock images publicly available from NASA and other sources.

Icing Research Tunnel (IRT)↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Response of a Bifurcated Shock Train to Combustion Drive Force Dynamics

A bifurcated normal shock train in a Mach 2.2 constant area, rectangular duct is investigated in the combustion driven Air Force Research Lab RC-18 Sub-scale Direct Connect Supersonic Combustion Facility. High-speed shadowgraph images are captured simultaneously with high-speed wall static pressure measurements along the isolator and combustor walls. The establishment of the shock train following ignition is studied to better understand the flow pathways and fluid dynamical mechanisms that link combustor dynamics to the motions and stability of the isolator shock train. To that end, cross-spectral and wavelet analysis is leveraged to determine the spectral and temporal characteristics of upstream traveling disturbances on the isolator-combustor system in RC-18.

Shock Train↗
DOE OSTI2024

Compact Superconducting RF Accelerators for Water Treatment

Jefferson Lab is actively exploring the environmental applications of compact irradiation facilities utilizing Superconducting Radio Frequency (SRF) accelerator technology ? a well-established technology primarily used in large research machines. Recent advancements, such as the application of thin films of superconducting alloys in radio frequency (RF) resonators and the development of high-capacity cryocoolers, have made it feasible to employ this key technology in compact, standalone irradiation facilities. The main advantage over conventional systems based on normal conducting technology is the significantly enhanced efficiency in beam power generation, enabling exposure to substantially higher radiation doses. In the realm of addressing contaminants in wastewater treatment, particularly concerning persistent substances known as "forever chemicals," this technology presents an attractive solution, given the required considerable effort i.e. dose to break them down. Experiment Numbers:

Vennekate, John↗
NASA NTRS2002

SD46 Facilities and Capabilities

The displays for the Materials Conference presents some of the facilities and capabilities in SD46 that can be useful to a prospective researcher from University, Academia or other government labs. Several of these already have associated personnel as principal and co-investigators on NASA peer reviewed science investigations. 1. SCN purification facility 2. ESL facility 3. Static and Dynamic magnetic field facility 4. Microanalysis facility 5. MSG Investigation - PFMI 6. Thermo physical Properties Measurement Capabilities.

Ramachandran, N.↗
NASA NTRS2015

Replacement of HCFC-225 Solvent for Cleaning NASA Propulsion Oxygen Systems

Since the 1990's, when the Class I Ozone Depleting Substance (ODS) chlorofluorocarbon‐113 (CFC‐113) was banned, NASA's propulsion test facilities at Marshall Space Flight Center (MSFC) and Stennis Space Center (SSC) have relied upon hydrochlorofluorocarbon‐225 (HCFC‐225) to safely clean and verify the cleanliness of large scale propulsion oxygen systems. Effective January 1, 2015, the production, import, export, and new use of HCFC‐225, a Class II ODS, was prohibited by the Clean Air Act. In 2012 through 2014, leveraging resources from both NASA and the Defense Logistics Agency ‐ Aviation Hazardous Minimization and Green Products Branch, test labs at MSFC, SSC, and Johnson Space Center's White Sands Test Facility (WSTF) collaborated to seek out, test, and qualify a replacement for HCFC‐225 that is both an effective cleaner and safe for use with oxygen systems. This presentation summarizes the tests performed, results, and lessons learned. It also demonstrates the benefits of cross‐agency collaboration in a time of limited resources.

Lowrey, Nikki M.↗