Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “nuclear data evaluation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2016

Nuclear Data Sheets for A = 183

Evaluated nuclear structure and decay data for all nuclides with mass number A=183 (Yb, Lu, Hf, Ta, W, Re, Os, Ir, Pt, Au, Hg, Tl, Pb) are presented here. At, Po and Fr have not yet been observed, but for prediction of ground state and/or isomer properties see, e.g., 2015Bh08 (At, Fr), 2013Ba41 (Tl), 2013Ho05 (Po). This evaluation includes structure and decay data information available by 15 April 2015 and supersedes that by R.B. Firestone published in Nuclear Data Sheets65, 589 (1992) (literature cutoff 9 January 1991), and subsequent revisions by C.M. Baglin for {sup 183}Au in ENSDF database (literature cutoff 13 March 1999), {sup 183}Hg in Nuclear Data Sheets91, 117 (2000) (literature cutoff 25 September 2000), {sup 183}Tl in Nuclear Data Sheets95, 49 (2002) (literature cutoff 1 January 2002) and {sup 183}Pb in ENSDF (literature cutoff 6 January 2003). Since the prior Nuclear Data Sheets publication of this mass chain: {sup 183}Yb (2012Ku26) and {sup 183}Pb (2006An11, 2006Se18, 2007De09, 2009Se13) have been observed; our knowledge of high–spin states has been significantly expanded for {sup 183}Ta (2009Sh17), {sup 183}W (1999Sa60), {sup 183}Re (1998Ha51, 2001Sh41), {sup 183}Au (2002Jo18, 2005So01) and {sup 183}Tl (2001Mu26, 2004Ra28); a large amount of new structure information for {sup 183}W has been obtained from transfer reactions (1997Pr02, 2011Bo09), (n,n'γ) (1993Pr09) and thermal neutron capture (1993Pr09, 1997Pr02, 2011Bo09, 2014Hu02), as well as from the two–photon cascade study by 2005Su29.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2017

White Paper on Nuclear Data Needs and Capabilities for Basic Science

Reliable nuclear structure and reaction data represent the fundamental building blocks of nuclear physics and astrophysics research, and are also of importance in many applications. There is a continuous demand for high-quality updates of the main nuclear physics databases via the prompt compilation and evaluation of the latest experimental and theoretical results. The nuclear physics research community benefits greatly from comprehensive, systematic and up-to-date reviews of the experimentally determined nuclear properties and observables, as well as from the ability to rapidly access these data in user-friendly forms. Such credible databases also act as a bridge between science, technology, and society by making the results of basic nuclear physics research available to a broad audience of users, and hence expand the societal utilization of nuclear science. Compilation and evaluation of nuclear data has deep roots in the history of nuclear science research, as outlined in Appendix 1. They have an enormous impact on many areas of science and applications, as illustrated in Figure 2 for the Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF) database. The present workshop concentrated on the needs of the basic nuclear science community for data and capabilities. The main role of this community is to generate and use data in order to understand the basic nuclear forces and interactions that are responsible for the existence and the properties of all nuclides and, as a consequence, to gain knowledge about the origins, evolution and structure of the universe. Thus, the experiments designed to measure a wealth of nuclear properties towards these fundamental scientific goals are typically performed from within this community.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Recommended Nuclear Structure and Decay Data for A=206 Isobars

Here, evaluated nuclear structure and decay data for all nuclei with mass number A=206 ( 206 Pt, 206 Au, 206 Hg, 206 Tl, 206 Pb, 206 Bi, 206 Po, 206 At, 206 Rn, 206 Fr, 206 Ra and 206 Ac), are presented. All available experimental data are compiled and evaluated, and best values for level and γ-ray energies, quantum numbers, lifetimes, γ-ray intensities and transition probabilities, as well as other nuclear properties, are recommended. Inconsistencies and discrepancies that exist in the literature are discussed. A number of computer codes (https://www-nds.iaea.org/public/ensdf_pgm/) developed by members of the NSDD network were used during the evaluation process. This work supersedes the earlier evaluation by F.G. Kondev (2008Ko21), published in Nuclear Data Sheets 109, 1527 (2008).

Kondev, F. G. [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), ↗
DOE OSTI2018

IAEA CIELO Evaluation of Neutron-induced Reactions on 235 U and 238 U Targets

Evaluations of nuclear reaction data for the major uranium isotopes 238 U and 235 U were performed within the scope of the CIELO Project on the initiative of the OECD/NEA Data Bank under Working Party on Evaluation Co-operation (WPEC) Subgroup 40 coordinated by the IAEA Nuclear Data Section. Both the mean values and covariances are evaluated from 10 -5 eV up to 30 MeV. The resonance parameters of 238 U and 235 U were re-evaluated with the addition of newly available data to the existing experimental database. The evaluations in the fast neutron range are based on nuclear model calculations with the code EMPIRE–3.2 Malta above the resonance range up to 30 MeV. 235 U(n,f), 238 U(n,f), and 238 U(n,γ) cross sections and 235 U(n th ,f) prompt fission neutron spectrum (PFNS) were evaluated within the Neutron Standards project and are representative of the experimental state-of-the-art measurements. The Standards cross sections were matched in model calculations as closely as possible to guarantee a good predictive power for cross sections of competing neutron scattering channels. 235 U(n,γ) cross section includes fluctuations observed in recent experiments. 235 U(n,f) PFNS for incident neutron energies from 500 keV to 20 MeV were measured at Los Alamos Chi-Nu facility and re-evaluated using all available experimental data. While respecting the measured differential data, several compensating errors in previous evaluations were identified and removed so that the performance in integral benchmarks was restored or improved. Covariance matrices for 235 U and 238 U cross sections, angular distributions, spectra and neutron multiplicities were evaluated using the GANDR system that combines experimental data with model uncertainties. Unrecognized systematic uncertainties were considered in the uncertainty quantification for fission and capture cross sections above the thermal range, and for neutron multiplicities. Evaluated files were extensively benchmarked to ensure good performance in reactor calculations and fusion-related systems. New comprehensive evaluations show excellent agreement with available differential data and integral performance better than current evaluated data libraries, and represent a step forward in a quest for better nuclear data for applications.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2019

Bias Between ENDF/B-VIII and ENDF/B-VII.1 for LEU Pin Array Systems

Extensive testing of new cross section data is performed in SCALE prior to its release. The release of ENDF/B-VIII.0 requires the generation and testing of new data libraries which are planned to be included in the release of SCALE 6.3 in 2019 or 2020. KENO benchmark results have been published previously for beta and final releases of ENDF/B-VIII.0 using the entire Verified, Archived Library of Inputs and Data (VALID). This work presents an energy-dependent change in the results for low-enriched uranium (LEU) pin array systems. The process of identifying the difference is highlighted as a case study to determine how data testing and benchmarking can be performed to provide more detailed feedback to the data community on potential data deficiencies.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Updated Gadolinium Validation in SCALE 6.3.0 using ENDF/B-VIII.0 Data [Slides]

This presentation provides a brief recap of the ANS Summer meeting in 2018 with a discussion of the results. The presentation also provides an overview of new models and states that all new models have been checked but have not yet been added to the VALID library. It also states that the models were originally created as part of a master's thesis or summer internships. Additionally, all models have been rerun in SCALE 6.3.0 using CE ENDF/B-VIII.0 library. In conclusion, this project has facilitated a significant expansion of validation set containing gadolinium, including 13 cases previously in VALID plus 99 new cases. The completion of IPPE HST experiments confirm no clear trend as a function of concentration or spectrum. Solid absorber cases also show no clear trends and LANL HMT experiments have significant discrepancies in Gd alloy cases. While almost half of the total gadolinium-bearing cases from the ICSBEP Handbook are considered here, the presentation recognizes that there is more work to be done.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2019

L3:RTM.MCH.P19.06: Neutronics UQ

This report summarizes some of the work performed in the last year on the nuclear data uncertainty tasks using the multipole representation. This approach was proposed to provide a simple and integrated way of evaluating the nuclear data uncertainty in a Monte Carlo simulation and evaluating their impact on multigroup cross sections. As previously described, the windowed multipole format allows for a resonance based representation of the cross sections with direct Doppler broadening. This representation also lends itself nicely to the evaluation of sensitivities of resonance parameters and the direct perturbation of resonance parameters in the simulation environment. Both of these approaches rely on the need of conversion of the covariance data (File 32 of the ENDF library) into a pole and residues form: i.e. into a multipole covariance. Section 5 details the current pathways that have been used so far to achieve this. In order to verify the conversion process of the covariance data, the sensitivies to the resonance parameters and the sampling from these parameters, an analytical benchmark of the slowing process was developed. The benchmark provides a closed-form solution for the flux in the presence of Hydrogen and multiple resonant nuclides. Section 2 details the analytical benchmark and provides the closed-form solutions for the flux and its sensitivity to resonance parameters. A verification of the proposed methodology is performed and compared with the analytic solution to demonstrate the accuracy of the benchmark and the applicability of our embedded resonance perturbation approach in a small Monte Carlo code. Papers are currently being drafted documenting the benchmark and the generation of sensitivities. As paths to best generate multipole covariance matrices are being compared, we also explored new methods to propagate nuclear data uncertainty across the Monte Carlo neutron transport calculation. Section 4 studies the use of multipole covariance matrices to perform sensitivity analysis. Section 3.2 documents the results of our investigations into a new way of propagating nuclear data uncertainty across Monte Carlo transport simulations by sampling new epistemic cross sections for each new neutron.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Complex radius in the R-matrix algorithm for inclusion of direct capture component [Slides]

In the low-energy range there are two possible physical mechanisms for γ-ray emissions. While both mechanisms emit γ-rays, the compound radiative capture (CRC) process is generated by the formation of a compound nucleus state before γ-emission. CRC has a characteristic resonance structure in the cross section, The direct radiative capture (DRC) process goes to the final state by the electromagnetic radiation of the incident neutron. DRC has a smooth behavior in the cross section. For light nuclei, a non-negligible component of the neutron capture process can be often associated to DRC process. Although these two mechanisms should be described by a unified theoretical formalism, in the nuclear data libraries, the CRC and DRC components are evaluated and reported separately. The updated R-matrix algorithm will allow the ability to implicitly include correlations between CRC and DRC mechanisms, to improve the quality of nuclear data evaluations, and to facilitate simple large-scale applicability to current nuclear data evaluations.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2025

Constraining the impact of chlorine as a neutron absorber in next-gen fast reactor designs

The role of chlorine as a neutron poison and as a seed for producing radioactive waste in nuclear systems has driven a renewed interest to improve its nuclear data uncertainties. Additionally, basic and applied science programs that use CLYC (Cs 2 LiYCl 6 :Ce) detectors for neutron spectroscopy and monitoring are also very sensitive to any change in chlorine nuclear data for simulations of the detector response. In this work, sensitivities relevant for these different applications are addressed through simulations of the efficiency of CLYC detectors in a fast fission spectrum when applying new chlorine nuclear data as input. These simulations are validated by an experimental measurement using CLYC detectors coupled to an ionization chamber loaded with a 252 Cf spontaneous fission source. The results are then used to obtain the first reliable direct measurement of the 35 Cl(n,p 0 ) and summed Cl(n,p+n,α) fission spectrum average cross sections, found to be 54.7(32) and 105.0(98) mb, respectively. The results are within uncertainty of calculated fission spectrum averaged cross sections based on recently re-evaluated chlorine nuclear data, which confirm recent impact studies performed for the Molten Chloride Reactor Experiment. Meanwhile, there currently exists only one published criticality benchmark experiment that is sufficiently sensitive to chlorine nuclear data. Discrepancies are found with this set of criticality safety benchmarks, which are more sensitive to thermal and epithermal neutron energies than the energies, above 100 keV, tested in this current work. Hence, there is still a need to re-evaluate the chlorine nuclear data at lower energies to assess these discrepancies. Interpretation of the data from future “faster” criticality benchmarks, which are needed for next-gen fast reactor designs, benefit from the improved constraints on the chlorine nuclear data validated in this work.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2024

Investigation of Benchmark $k$ eff Sensitivity and Uncertainty for 239 Pu fission in Specific Energy Ranges

Nuclear data at intermediate energies (from 1 to 100s of keV) are evaluated based on scarce differential data and theory unable to capture physics’ expected structure. There is also a lack of integral data. This is a known deficiency and is challenging to address. Calculated effective multiplication factor, k eff , values for intermediate energy experiments are ~25× further from experiment than for fast energies and are often well outside the experimental uncertainties. The goal of the PARADIGM (PARallel Approach of Differential and InteGral Measurements) project is to significantly re duce the uncertainties of intermediate energy nuclear data for 239 Pu. To this end, PARADIGM simultaneously optimizes experiments at both the Los Alamos Neutron Science Center (LANSCE) and National Criticality Experiments Research Center (NCERC). The combined set of data will inform new intermediate-energy nuclear data. By execution of differential and integral experiments, establishment of new theory, and undertaking nuclear data evaluation in parallel, the timeline to deliver improved nuclear data to users will be reduced significantly that is to three years. For the PARADIGM project, it was decided to optimize an integral experiment for two neutron energy ranges, within the full intermediate energy range. The low energy range goes from 1 to 30 keV, while the higher energy range goes from 30 to 600 keV. This work focuses on nuclear data sensitivities and uncertainties for 239 Pu fission for existing experiments in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP). When designing new experiments, it is important to understand what benchmarks currently exist. For a more traditional experiment design (in which a specific application model(s) exists), comparisons would be made between the application model(s) and existing benchmarks. For PARADIGM, there is no specific application model, but instead the specific nuclear data reaction and energy ranges of interest can be explored for existing benchmarks.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2022

Verification and validation testing and tools: comparison between MCNP code versions and nuclear data libraries [Slides]

This presentation discusses the primary goal of software testing which is to test the code for correctness. It also discusses the results for individual suites and the role of validation and verification also referred to in the presentation as V&V. In summation, the V&V framework enables easy comparison between calculations performed with different code versions and/or nuclear data libraries. This entire framework will be distributed with the upcoming MCNP6.3 release. V&V test suites shown and several that were not (Criticality, LAQGSM, Lockwood) will be distributed in the new framework.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2026

IRMA

IRMA (In)elastic Representation of Materials As S(α,β) evaluations IRMA turns one phonon model into three outputs that usually require three separate tool chains: an evaluated nuclear-data file, predicted neutron-scattering spectra, and scattering kernels for Monte Carlo transport. The three outputs draw on a single, consistent description of the material, so the evaluation, the spectroscopy that can validate it, and the transport that uses it always agree about the physics. Nuclear data. IRMA writes ENDF-6 File 7 thermal scattering evaluations on automatically constructed (α, β) grids. This part reimplements and generalizes NJOY's LEAPR: the classic kernels reproduce freshly generated NJOY2016 tapes digit for digit and published reference tapes to about 1e-4, and the generalized paths add the exact coherent one-phonon term, anisotropic Debye-Waller tensors, coherent elastic for arbitrary crystals, and a per-species partition for polyatomic materials. The tapes feed NJOY, AMPX, FUDGE, and every transport code downstream of them. Neutron spectroscopy. The irma.spectra forward model projects the same physics onto an instrument's kinematics and resolution: INS spectra for VISION and generic indirect geometries, and 2-D S(Q,E) powder maps for direct-geometry spectrometers, from a phonopy model or straight from a phonon DOS. It can be used to predict a proposed measurement before beam time; in analysis, it supplies the calculated single-scattering counterpart of a measured spectrum, from the same material description the evaluation was built from. Monte Carlo transport. The irma.ncrystal exporter writes per-temperature scattering kernels for the companion NCrystal plugin, so McStas, OpenMC, and other NCrystal-aware codes sample the same physics. The exported kernels carry the per-site anisotropic Debye-Waller tensors, keeping directional coherent-elastic physics that NCrystal's standard scalar treatment does not represent. With the same physics inside a transport code, an entire beamline becomes a virtual experiment: IRMA's end-to-end validation ran a custom McStas implementation of the ARCS spectrometer, assembled from the existing McVine and McStas models, against measured data. From a bare crystal structure. The irma mlip front end builds the phonon model itself: a structure file and a choice of potential are enough. Nine pretrained machine-learned interatomic potentials are supported, on a laptop CPU, with no first-principles calculation; an approximate phonon model for a new material costs minutes, not a DFT campaign, and the build emits prefilled inputs for all three outputs. The result is a good starting point rather than a finished evaluation: survey-quality physics with every parameter exposed for review. A converged atomistic calculation enters the same way, as a phonopy model, when higher fidelity is needed.

Ramic, Kemal [Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)↗
DOE OSTI2022

Systematic trends of 0 2 + , 1 1 - , 3 1 - and 2 1 + excited states in even-even nuclei

Here, the spin and parity ( J π ) assignments in even-even nuclei were reviewed across the nuclear chart using the Evaluated Nuclear Structure Data File (ENSDF). The prevalence of 2$+\atop{1}$ first or lowest excited states is confirmed. The properties of 0$+\atop{2}$, 1$-\atop{1}$, and 3$-\atop{1}$ lowest excited states were reexamined using the ENSDF data evaluation procedures. The J π systematic trends and correlations between level quantum numbers and nuclear physics phenomena are discussed.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗