SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “simulation testbed”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 397 records · Page 22

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS2017

A Linear Analysis for the Flight Path Control of the Cassini Grand Finale Orbits

Cassini’s Grand Finale Mission begins after the last targeted Titan flyby on April 22, 2017 and ends with a series of 22 ballistic orbits each passing within a few thousand kilometers of the cloud tops of Saturn, ultimately impacting the planet on September 15, 2017. Despite the ballistic nature of the trajectory, the absence of targeted maneuvers throughout the final orbits causes position uncertainties to grow exponentially with time, posing a significant difficulty for the science sequence planning team. Thus, a strategy that incorporates trajectory correction maneuvers was developed to significantly reduce dispersions from the reference path and maintain dispersions below 250 km (1- ). In this paper, the linear method used to determine the optimal number and location of the maneuvers to control the trajectory, along with the corresponding targets, is detailed. A nonlinear Monte Carlo trajectory dispersion tool served as a testbed to validate the linear analysis results. Based on orbit determination covariance sampling with Monte Carlo simulations, the linear approach allowed the Cassini maneuver analysts to run thousands of maneuver combinations in little time, eventually finding an optimal strategy with three statistical maneuvers ( V99 < 1.5 m/s) to adequately control most of the trajectory.

Vaquero, Mar↗

NASA NTRS1993

CFM technologies for space transportation: Multipurpose hydrogen testbed system definition and tank procurement

The development of a test bed tank and system for evaluating cryogenic fluid management technologies in a simulated upper stage liquid hydrogen tank is covered. The tank is 10 ft long and is 10 ft in diameter, and is an ASME certified tank constructed of 5083 aluminum. The tank is insulated with a combination of sprayed on foam insulation, covered by 45 layers of double aluminized mylar separated by dacron net. The mylar is applied by a continuous wrap system adapted from commercial applications, and incorporates variable spacing between the mylar to provide more space between those layers having a high delta temperature, which minimizes heat leak. It also incorporates a unique venting system which uses fewer large holes in the mylar rather than the multitude of small holes used conventionally. This significantly reduces radiation heat transfer. The test bed consists of an existing vacuum chamber at MSFC, the test bed tank and its thermal control system, and a thermal shroud (which may be heated) surrounding the tank. Provisions are made in the tank and chamber for inclusion of a variety of cryogenic fluid management experiments.

Fox, E. C.↗

NASA NTRS1993

Experience in using SIMD and MIMD parallelism for computational fluid dynamics

One of the key objectives of the Applied Research Branch in the Numerical Aerodynamic Simulation (NAS) Systems Division at NASA Ames Research Center is the accelerated introduction of highly parallel machines into a fully operational environment. In this report we summarize some of the experiences with the parallel testbed machines at the NAS Applied Research Branch. We discuss the performance results obtained from the implementation of two computational fluid dynamics (CFD) applications, an unstructured grid solver and a particle simulation, on the Connection Machine CM-2 and the Intel iPSC/860.

Simon, Horst D.↗

NASA NTRS2005

Higher-Order Spectral Analysis of a Nonlinear Pitch and Plunge Apparatus

Simulated aeroelastic responses of a nonlinear pitch and plunge apparatus are analyzed using various statistical signal processing techniques including higher-order spectral methods. A MATLAB version of the Nonlinear Aeroelastic Testbed Apparatus (NATA) at the Texas A&M University is used to generate various aeroelastic response data including limit cycle oscillations (LCO). Traditional and higher-order spectral (HOS) methods are applied to the simulated aeroelastic responses. Higher-order spectral methods are used to identify critical signatures that indicate the transition from linear to nonlinear (LCO) aeroelastic behavior.

Silva, Walter A.↗

NASA NTRS2014

GeoLab: A Geological Workstation for Future Missions

The GeoLab glovebox was, until November 2012, fully integrated into NASA's Deep Space Habitat (DSH) Analog Testbed. The conceptual design for GeoLab came from several sources, including current research instruments (Microgravity Science Glovebox) used on the International Space Station, existing Astromaterials Curation Laboratory hardware and clean room procedures, and mission scenarios developed for earlier programs. GeoLab allowed NASA scientists to test science operations related to contained sample examination during simulated exploration missions. The team demonstrated science operations that enhance theThe GeoLab glovebox was, until November 2012, fully integrated into NASA's Deep Space Habitat (DSH) Analog Testbed. The conceptual design for GeoLab came from several sources, including current research instruments (Microgravity Science Glovebox) used on the International Space Station, existing Astromaterials Curation Laboratory hardware and clean room procedures, and mission scenarios developed for earlier programs. GeoLab allowed NASA scientists to test science operations related to contained sample examination during simulated exploration missions. The team demonstrated science operations that enhance the early scientific returns from future missions and ensure that the best samples are selected for Earth return. The facility was also designed to foster the development of instrument technology. Since 2009, when GeoLab design and construction began, the GeoLab team [a group of scientists from the Astromaterials Acquisition and Curation Office within the Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science (ARES) Directorate at JSC] has progressively developed and reconfigured the GeoLab hardware and software interfaces and developed test objectives, which were to 1) determine requirements and strategies for sample handling and prioritization for geological operations on other planetary surfaces, 2) assess the scientific contribution of selective in-situ sample characterization for mission planning, operations, and sample prioritization, 3) evaluate analytical instruments and tools for providing efficient and meaningful data in advance of sample return and 4) identify science operations that leverage human presence with robotic tools. In the first year of tests (2010), GeoLab examined basic glovebox operations performed by one and two crewmembers and science operations performed by a remote science team. The 2010 tests also examined the efficacy of basic sample characterization [descriptions, microscopic imagery, X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyses] and feedback to the science team. In year 2 (2011), the GeoLab team tested enhanced software and interfaces for the crew and science team (including Web-based and mobile device displays) and demonstrated laboratory configurability with a new diagnostic instrument (the Multispectral Microscopic Imager from the JPL and Arizona State University). In year 3 (2012), the GeoLab team installed and tested a robotic sample manipulator and evaluated robotic-human interfaces for science operations.

Evans, Cynthia↗

NASA NTRS2017

Dynamic Testbed Demonstration of WFIRST Coronagraph Low Order Wavefront Sensing and Control (LOWFS/C)

To maintain the required performance of WFIRST Coronagraph in a realistic space environment, a Low Order Wavefront Sensing and Control (LOWFS/C) subsystem is necessary. The LOWFS/C uses a Zernike wavefront sensor (ZWFS) with the phase shifting disk combined with the starlight rejecting occulting mask. For wavefront error corrections, WFIRST LOWFS/C uses a fast steering mirror (FSM) for line-of-sight (LoS) correction, a focusing mirror for focus drift correction, and one of the two deformable mirrors (DM) for other low order wavefront error (WFE) correction. As a part of technology development and demonstration for WFIRST Coronagraph, a dedicated Occulting Mask Coronagraph (OMC) testbed has been built and commissioned. With its configuration similar to the WFIRST flight coronagraph instrument the OMC testbed consists of two coronagraph modes, Shaped Pupil Coronagraph (SPC) and Hybrid Lyot Coronagraph (HLC), a low order wavefront sensor (LOWFS), and an optical telescope assembly (OTA) simulator which can generate realistic LoS drift and jitter as well as low order wavefront error that would be induced by the WFIRST telescope’s vibration and thermal changes. In this paper, we will introduce the concept of WFIRST LOWFS/C, describe the OMC testbed, and present the testbed results of LOWFS sensor performance. We will also present our recent results from the dynamic coronagraph tests in which we have demonstrated of using LOWFS/C to maintain the coronagraph contrast with the presence of WFIRST-like line-of-sight and low order wavefront disturbances.

Zhou, Hanying↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Creating the Environment for Exploration Habitats

The Crew and Thermal Systems Division’s (CTSD) 20 Foot Chamber has undergone significant modifications to support NASA’s future human exploration missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. Existing chamber systems such as Vacuum/Repress, Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC), and Fire Suppression System (FSS), were upgraded, while new systems such as Air Revitalization and Gas Distribution were added. In addition, the chamber was outfitted with crew quarters, hygiene areas, storage, and workspaces. Teams across the Johnson Space Center (JSC) worked together to overcome the logistical and operational challenges of the planned test parameters. The ultimate goal was to create an analog testbed in which a maximum of 8 human test subjects could safely live and work for at least 11 days in the same conditions (reduced pressures, Oxygen concentrations, etc.) as those expected inside a base spacecraft. This would allow researchers to study the effects of such environments on humans and to validate proposed Prebreathe Protocols to enable the safe performance of surface extravehicular activities (EVAs). Over the last eighteen months, the CTSD Systems Test Branch has performed six tests of varying lengths and atmospheres for both NASA and commercial partners. To date, researchers now have collected data on 48 test subjects in the course of 42 days and over 130 simulated EVAs. This paper will discuss the history of the 20 Foot Chamber, its long road to becoming an analog testbed for human exploration, and the capabilities that make it a unique, world class facility for NASA and commercial human exploration missions. It will provide an overview of past and future testing, and the lessons learned along the way.

Cristina Aurora Anchondo↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Creating the Environment for Exploration Habitats

Cristina A Anchondo↗

NASA NTRS2024

Creating the Test Environment for Exploration Habitats

The Crew and Thermal Systems Division’s (CTSD) 20 Foot Chamber has undergone significant modifications to support NASA’s future human exploration missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. Existing chamber systems such as Vacuum/Repress, Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC), and Fire Suppression System (FSS), were upgraded, while new systems such as Air Revitalization and Gas Distribution were added. In addition, the chamber was outfitted with crew quarters, hygiene areas, storage, and workspaces. Teams across the Johnson Space Center (JSC) worked together to overcome the logistical and operational challenges of the planned test parameters. The ultimate goal was to create an analog testbed in which a maximum of eight human test subjects could safely live and work for at least 11 days in the same conditions (e.g., reduced pressures, oxygen concentrations, and so on) as those expected inside a base spacecraft. This would allow researchers to study the effects of such environments on humans and to validate proposed Prebreathe Protocols to enable the safe performance of surface extravehicular activities (EVAs). Over the last 18 months, the CTSD Systems Test Branch has performed six tests of varying lengths and atmospheres for both NASA and commercial partners. To date, researchers now have collected data on 48 test subjects in the course of 42 days and over 130 simulated EVAs. This paper will discuss the history of the 20 Foot Chamber, its long road to becoming an analog testbed for human exploration, and the capabilities that make it a unique, world class facility for NASA and commercial human exploration missions. It will provide an overview of past and future testing and the lessons learned along the way.

Cristina A Anchondo↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Creating the Test Environment for Exploration Habitats

The Crew and Thermal Systems Division’s (CTSD) 20 Foot Chamber has undergone significant modifications to support NASA’s future human exploration missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. Existing chamber systems such as Vacuum/Repress, Heating Ventilation and Air Conditioning (HVAC), and Fire Suppression System (FSS), were upgraded, while new systems such as Air Revitalization and Gas Distribution were added. In addition, the chamber was outfitted with crew quarters, hygiene areas, storage, and workspaces. Teams across the Johnson Space Center (JSC) worked together to overcome the logistical and operational challenges of the planned test parameters. The ultimate goal was to create an analog testbed in which a maximum of eight human test subjects could safely live and work for at least 11 days in the same conditions (e.g., reduced pressures, oxygen concentrations, and so on) as those expected inside a base spacecraft. This would allow researchers to study the effects of such environments on humans and to validate proposed Prebreathe Protocols to enable the safe performance of surface extravehicular activities (EVAs). Over the last 18 months, the CTSD Systems Test Branch has performed six tests of varying lengths and atmospheres for both NASA and commercial partners. To date, researchers now have collected data on 48 test subjects in the course of 42 days and over 130 simulated EVAs. This paper will discuss the history of the 20 Foot Chamber, its long road to becoming an analog testbed for human exploration, and the capabilities that make it a unique, world class facility for NASA and commercial human exploration missions. It will provide an overview of past and future testing and the lessons learned along the way.

Chris Briggs↗

NASA NTRS1980

Status of noise technology for advanced supersonic cruise aircraft

Developments in acoustic technology applicable to advanced supersonic cruise aircraft, particularly those which relate to jet noise and its suppression are reviewed. The noise reducing potential of high radius ratio, inverted velocity profile coannular jets is demonstrated by model scale results from a wide range of nozzle geometries, including some simulated flight cases. These results were verified statistically at large scale on a variable cycle engine (VCE) testbed. A preliminary assessment of potential VCE noise sources such as fan and core noise is made, based on the testbed data. Recent advances in the understanding of flight effects are reviewed. The status of component noise prediction methods is assessed on the basis of recent test data, and the remaining problem areas are outlined.

Stone, J. R.↗

NASA NTRS1991

A simple 5-DOF walking robot for space station application

Robots on the NASA space station have a potential range of applications from assisting astronauts during EVA (extravehicular activity), to replacing astronauts in the performance of simple, dangerous, and tedious tasks; and to performing routine tasks such as inspections of structures and utilities. To provide a vehicle for demonstrating the pertinent technologies, a simple robot is being developed for locomotion and basic manipulation on the proposed space station. In addition to the robot, an experimental testbed was developed, including a 1/3 scale (1.67 meter modules) truss and a gravity compensation system to simulate a zero-gravity environment. The robot comprises two flexible links connected by a rotary joint, with a 2 degree of freedom wrist joints and grippers at each end. The grippers screw into threaded holes in the nodes of the space station truss, and enable it to walk by alternately shifting the base of support from one foot (gripper) to the other. Present efforts are focused on mechanical design, application of sensors, and development of control algorithms for lightweight, flexible structures. Long-range research will emphasize development of human interfaces to permit a range of control modes from teleoperated to semiautonomous, and coordination of robot/astronaut and multiple-robot teams.

Brown, H. Benjamin, Jr.↗

NASA NTRS2003

Investigation of Combined Motor/Magnetic Bearings for Flywheel Energy Storage Systems

Dr. Hofmann's work in the summer of 2003 consisted of two separate projects. In the first part of the summer, Dr. Hofmann prepared and collected information regarding rotor losses in synchronous machines; in particular, machines with low rotor losses operating in vacuum and supported by magnetic bearings, such as the motor/generator for flywheel energy storage systems. This work culminated in a presentation at NASA Glenn Research Center on this topic. In the second part, Dr. Hofmann investigated an approach to flywheel energy storage where the phases of the flywheel motor/generator are connected in parallel with the phases of an induction machine driving a mechanical actuator. With this approach, additional power electronics for driving the flywheel unit are not required. Simulations of the connection of a flywheel energy storage system to a model of an electromechanical actuator testbed at NASA Glenn were performed that validated the proposed approach. A proof-of-concept experiment using the D1 flywheel unit at NASA Glenn and a Sundstrand induction machine connected to a dynamometer was successfully conducted.

Hofmann, Heath↗

NASA NTRS2004

ORION-II: A True Formation Flying Mission in LEO

The final report for the Orion-II project is taken from Chapter 5 of "CDGPS-Based Relative Navigation for Multiple Spacecraft," a thesis by Megan Mitchell submitted to the MIT Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, June 2004. This chapter begins with a comparison of the simulation architecture for the original and current simulation setups. Next, the changes made to the individual components of the navigation system are described. Finally, tests performed with a Spirent Simulator at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC) are discussed. In addition to the development of the testbed components described, a new clean room facility was developed in the Orion Laboratory at MIT.

How, Jonathan P.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Numerical Modeling of No Vent Filling of a Cryogenic Tank with Thermo-dynamic Vent System Assisted Injector

This paper presents a multi-node finite volume model of No Vent Filling (NVF) of a cryogenic tank with Thermo-dynamic Vent System (TVS) assisted injector, using the Generalized Fluid System Simulation Program (GFSSP), a general purpose flow network code. NVF tests were conducted in a CRYOgenic Orbital Testbed (CRYOTE) tank which was filled by liquid nitrogen using a TVS assisted injector with vent valve closed during the entire filling process. In TVS assisted injector, the liquid flow splits into two streams: one stream is routed to a Joule-Thomson (J-T) orifice where the flow immediately flashes from liquid to vapor or two phase mixture because the downstream to J-T leg is maintained at vacuum level.; the other stream is injected into the tank after being cooled by cold vapor of J-T leg in a heat exchanger. The flow through J-T leg is also used to cool the outer metal matrix of the injector which in turn cools the vapor in the tank ullage. The cooling of vapor in the ullage by cold injector surface reduces ullage pressure that allows liquid to enter and fill the tank. An integrated numerical model of the test set up was developed. The model included the dual lines of TVS assisted injector, tank and tank wall. The tank was discretized into multiple fluid nodes and branches to represent the ullage and liquid nitrogen and multiple solid nodes to represent the tank wall and structure. The heat transfer between solid to fluid was calculated from pool boiling correlations which include film, transition, and nucleate boiling, as well as natural convection during pre- and post-boiling. The model also accounts for the condensation of vapor at ullage-injector interface and when it comes in contact with the liquid spray. The predicted pressure, resident mass, wall temperature in the tank were compared with the test data.

Alok Majumdar↗

NASA NTRS2000

Realistic Development and Testing of Fission System at a Non-Nuclear Testing Facility

The use of resistance heaters to simulate heat from fission allows extensive development of fission systems to be performed in non-nuclear test facilities, saving time and money. Resistance heated tests on a module has been performed at the Marshall Space Flight Center in the Propellant Energy Source Testbed (PEST). This paper discusses the experimental facilities and equipment used for performing resistance heated tests. Recommendations are made for improving non-nuclear test facilities and equipment for simulated testing of nuclear systems.

Godfroy, Tom↗

NASA NTRS2015

Airborne Simulation of Launch Vehicle Dynamics

In this paper we present a technique for approximating the short-period dynamics of an exploration-class launch vehicle during flight test with a high-performance surrogate aircraft in relatively benign endoatmospheric flight conditions. The surrogate vehicle relies upon a nonlinear dynamic inversion scheme with proportional-integral feedback to drive a subset of the aircraft states into coincidence with the states of a time-varying reference model that simulates the unstable rigid body dynamics, servodynamics, and parasitic elastic and sloshing dynamics of the launch vehicle. The surrogate aircraft flies a constant pitch rate trajectory to approximate the boost phase gravity turn ascent, and the aircraft's closed-loop bandwidth is sufficient to simulate the launch vehicle's fundamental lateral bending and sloshing modes by exciting the rigid body dynamics of the aircraft. A novel control allocation scheme is employed to utilize the aircraft's relatively fast control effectors in inducing various failure modes for the purposes of evaluating control system performance. Sufficient dynamic similarity is achieved such that the control system under evaluation is configured for the full-scale vehicle with no changes to its parameters, and pilot-control system interaction studies can be performed to characterize the effects of guidance takeover during boost. High-fidelity simulation and flight-test results are presented that demonstrate the efficacy of the design in simulating the Space Launch System (SLS) launch vehicle dynamics using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Armstrong Flight Research Center Fullscale Advanced Systems Testbed (FAST), a modified F/A-18 airplane (McDonnell Douglas, now The Boeing Company, Chicago, Illinois), over a range of scenarios designed to stress the SLS's Adaptive Augmenting Control (AAC) algorithm.

airborne simulation↗

NASA NTRS1993

The Mini-Mast CSI testbed: Lessons learned

The Mini-Mast testbed was one of the first large scale Controls-Structure-Interaction (CSI) systems used to evaluate state-of-the-art methodology in flexible structure control. Now that all the testing at Langley Research Center has been completed, a look back is warranted to evaluate the program. This paper describes some of the experiences and technology development studies by NASA, university, and industry investigators. Lessons learned are presented from three categories: the testbed development, control methods, and the operation of a guest investigator program. It is shown how structural safety margins provided a realistic environment to simulate on-orbit CSI research, even though they also reduced the research flexibility afforded to investigators. The limited dynamic coupling between the bending and torsion modes of the cantilevered test article resulted in highly successful SISO and MIMO controllers. However, until accurate models were obtained for the torque wheel actuators, sensors, filters, and the structure itself, most controllers were unstable. Controls research from this testbed should be applicable to cantilevered appendages of future large space structures.

Tanner, Sharon E.↗