Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Li anode”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23

Failure analysis and design principles of silicon-based lithium-ion batteries using micron-sized porous silicon/carbon composite

Significant progresses have been made to overcome the fundamental challenges in silicon (Si)-based lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). However, much less work have been reported on the design and failure analysis these batteries for practical applications. In this work, we analyzed various cell design parameters affecting the performance of pouch cells using micron-sized porous Si with nano-pore structure and coated by pitch-carbon (p-Si/C). The correlation among particle level, electrode level, and cell level properties, especially the effect of electrode density on the volumetric capacity density of Si anode and full batteries have been systematically investigated. It is found that the corrosion of p-Si/C particle surface is the main failure mechanisms on the eventual capacity loss, while Li plating on anode electrode surface is the main reason for the fast capacity loss in later stage of cycling. The volumetric capacity of Si anode highly depends on both electrode density and the Si content. Moreover, the prelithiation of Si anodes is found to increase energy density while decreasing cycle life of Si-based full cells. Finally, the pathways and strategies for adoption of micron-sized p-Si/C anodes in LIBs have been proposed for their practical applications.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Operando FTIR investigation of salt dynamics in Li-ion batteries during fast charging

Li-ion batteries, when charged at fast-charging rates ($>$2C), suffer from reduced lifetimes and can undergo catastrophic failure. During high-rate charging, Li-ions are unable to rapidly transport through high-loading electrodes ($>$4 mAh cm −2 ). This results in unequal charge distributions, potentials, and utilization of the active material, which can lead to Li plating. Li-ion concentration polarization, in which Li-ions deplete in the anode and accumulate in the cathode during charging, precedes Li plating. An operando FTIR-ATR graphite/NMC cell developed in this research captured Li-ion concentration polarization in real-time. During fast charging, decreases in Li-ion concentration ($>$95%) were measured at the back of the anode. This is the first verification of complete Li-ion depletion within the anode at high C-rates. The measurements also showed graphite stage transition. A P2D model was developed for comparison to the operando measurements. The measurements agreed with the model in some cases, but disparities existed at high C-rates and loadings. In the experiment, the Li-ion concentration often failed to recover to 1.2 M until several hours after charging, whereas the model Li-ion concentration rapidly recovered. The contrast between the model and experiment results indicates that further investigation is required to improve understanding of Li-ion concentration dynamics during fast charging.

25 - ENERGY STORAGE↗

Anodic Activity of Hydrated and Anhydrous Iron (II) Oxalate in Li-Ion Batteries

We discuss the applicability of the naturally occurring compound Ferrous Oxalate Dihydrate (FOD) (FeC2O4·2H2O) as an anode material in Li-ion batteries. Using first-principles modeling, we evaluate the electrochemical activity of FOD and demonstrate how its structural water content affects the intercalation reaction and contributes to its performance. We show that both Li0 and Li+ intercalation in FOD yields similar results. Our analysis indicates that fully dehydrated ferrous oxalate is a more promising anodic material with higher electrochemical stability: it carries 20% higher theoretical Li storage capacity and a lower voltage (0.68 V at the PBE/cc-pVDZ level), compared to its hydrated (2.29 V) or partially hydrated (1.43 V) counterparts.

Keshavarz, Fatemeh↗

Anode Upcycling via Tailored Solvent Treatment

To achieve a truly closed-loop direct recycling process for lithium-ion batteries, all component materials must be recovered. To date, direct recycling method development has primarily focused on the high-value transition-metal cathode materials, while the inherently lower-value graphite has been challenging to recover in a cost-effective manner. However, end-of-life graphite contains a unique engineered value due to the presence of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Growth of the SEI during the cell's active lifetime stabilizes the electronically reactive graphite surface through an irreversible consumption of Li, and thus necessitates both excess lithiation of the cathode and a costly and time-intensive formation procedure during manufacturing. An optimized pre-formed SEI that capitalizes on existing SEI components from end-of-life batteries has the potential to significantly reduce cathode lithiation requirements and eliminate the critical bottleneck of formation cycling during cell remanufacturing. Further, retaining Li at the anode obviates the need for a separate Li leaching and recovery step, improving the overall efficiency of the direct recycling line. In this work, we present a novel approach to "upcycling" spent graphite through use of tailored chemical treatment to remove adverse (i.e., highly resistive and/or poorly passivating) SEI species while retaining beneficially passivating components. We have explored a rational set of solvents spanning a range of polarity, proticity, and molecular size to evaluate structure-property-performance relationships between applied solvent(s), removed and remaining SEI species, and electrochemical response of the resulting graphite product. Further, we have developed and optimized a robust and holistic analysis procedure that couples symmetric-cell electrochemical testing, multi-modal materials characterization, and advanced electrochemical modeling. These analysis results inform a set of correlative metrics for graphite performance relative to both solvent properties and upcycled SEI composition. We demonstrate effective tunability in the residual SEI composition by varying solvent identity and concentration, and report on several promising solvent systems that achieve comparable or performance to pristine graphite.

anode recycling↗

Free-standing ultrathin lithium metal–graphene oxide host foils with controllable thickness for lithium batteries

Thin (≤20 μm) and free-standing Li metal foils would enable precise prelithiation of anode materials and high-energy-density Li batteries. Existing Li metal foils are too thick (typically 50 to 750 μm) or too mechanically fragile for these applications. Here, we developed a facile and scalable process for the synthesis of an ultrathin (0.5 to 20 μm), free-standing and mechanically robust Li metal foil within a graphene oxide host. In addition to low areal capacities of ~0.1 to 3.7 mAh cm –2 , this Li foil also has a much-improved mechanical strength over conventional pure Li metal foil. Our Li foil can improve the initial Coulombic efficiency of graphite (93%) and silicon (79.4%) anodes to around 100% without generating excessive Li residue, and increases the capacity of Li-ion full cells by 8%. In conclusion, the cycle life of Li metal full cells is prolonged by nine times using this thin Li composite anode.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Tailored Solvent Treatment for Optimized Production of Upcycled Anodes from End-Of-Life Li-Ion Batteries

Recycling processes for lithium-ion batteries typically overlook graphite because of its lower market value relative to that of transition-metal-containing cathode materials. However, graphite recovered from cycled lithium-ion batteries holds additional engineered value associated with the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI). The SEI contributes critical electronic passivation of the graphite surface but becomes highly resistive with extended cycling, yielding poor cell performance. In this work, we apply tailored solvent treatment to end-of-life (EOL) graphite anodes to selectively remove adverse SEI components while retaining beneficially passivating species. We evaluate a series of polar protic solvents to achieve targeted removal of SEI components and control selectivity through rational variation in solvent properties. The physiochemical properties of treatment solvents correlate with both the retained SEI composition and the corresponding electrochemical performance of solvent-treated “upcycled” graphite anodes. Within the initial set of solvents evaluated, top-performing candidates show capacity and Coulombic efficiency nearly equivalent to those of an analogous pristine anode, as well as promising electrochemical performance enhancement with regard to irreversible capacity-loss metrics. This study establishes critical design principles for an optimized anode upcycling method that enhances the value of recycled graphite by retaining and upgrading the SEI.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Lithium‐Containing Hybrid SEI Layer Enabling High Mass Loading and Anode‐Less Sodium Metal Batteries

Abstract The continuous rupturing and rebuilding of unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer during cycling would block Na + diffusion and induce Na dendrite formation, ultimately limiting the practical application of high‐energy‐density sodium metal batteries. Herein, a hybrid SEI layer containing Li‐species is dexterously constructed on the surface of sodium metal anode. Li‐containing inorganic components (Li 3 N, LiF, and Li 2 CO 3 ) are introduced to stabilize the Na/electrolyte interface and enhance the mechanical and diffusion kinetic properties of the SEI layer, which can reduce the side reactions and gas generation, regulate Na + flux during cycling and promote rapid Na + migration for uniform dendrite‐free Na deposition. As a result, the constructed Na symmetric cells achieve low overpotential and long cycle life of 5900, 1800, and 500 h at current densities of 3, 10, and 30 mA cm −2 , respectively. Furthermore, the full cells paired with the Na₃V₂(PO₄)₃ cathode demonstrate high specific capacity and excellent cycle stability, even at an ultra‐high cathode loading of 39.3 mg cm −2 and a low N/P ratio (negative/positive electrode capacity ratio of 1.21).

Xia, Li [State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistr↗

Engineering Approaches to Dendrite free Lithium Anodes

This is the Final Technical Report of the work that was completed related to development of dendrite free anodes for Li-metal batteries. The report contains full details of all the strategies that were employed to overcome this pernicious problems of dendrite formation of lithium metal during cycling of Li-metal and Li-ion batteries. Various approaches were developed to understand the formation of dendrites and mitigation strategies were then developed to overcome this severe problem. In doing so novel multi-component alloys as well as structurally isomorphous alloys have been developed. In addition coating strategies were also developed to overcome the formation of dendrites. The novel approaches related to development of novel alloys using economic cost effective and scalable approaches. The new approaches will easily advance the science of lithium metal alloys and dendrite free anodes including current collectors. Development of this new technology will have immense benefit to providing new high energy density batteries of tremendous benefit to the public since cost effective and safe high energy density batteries will be possible with this new technology.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Low-cost iron trichloride cathode for all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries

The dominant chemistries of lithium-ion batteries on the market today still rely on flammable organic liquid electrolytes and cathodes containing scarce metals, such as cobalt or nickel, raising safety, cost and environmental concerns. Here we show a FeCl 3 cathode that costs as little as 1% of the cost of a LiCoO 2 cathode or 2% of a LiFePO 4 cathode. Once coupled with a solid halide electrolyte and a lithium-indium (Li–In) alloy anode, it enables all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries without any liquid components. Notably, FeCl 3 exhibits two flat voltage plateaux between 3.5 and 3.8 V versus Li + /Li, and the solid cell retains 83% of its initial capacity after 1,000 cycles with an average Coulombic efficiency of 99.95%. Combined neutron diffraction and X-ray absorption spectroscopy characterizations reveal a Li-ion (de)intercalation mechanism together with a Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ redox process. Further, our work provides a promising avenue for developing sustainable battery technologies with a favourable balance of performance, cost and safety.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Cycling Performance and Structure Evolution of Co-Free Lithium- and Manganese-Rich Layered Oxides in Lithium-Ion Batteries

Lithium- and manganese-rich (LMR) layered oxides are high-capacity cathode materials that are being considered for electric vehicle (EV) lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Here, we investigate the electrochemical cycling behavior of cells containing a cobalt-free LMR oxide, 0.3Li 2 MnO 3 ·0.7LiMn 0.5 Ni 0.5 O 2 , paired with either Li or graphite anodes. Two- and three-electrode cells are cycled under varying conditions to examine the effects of oxide activation, upper cutoff voltage, separator type, and electrolyte composition. Post-cycling characterization of harvested electrodes, with electrochemical, X-ray absorption spectroscopy, and solid-state 6 Li nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques, are used to correlate cell performance changes with redox state evolution in the oxide and Li inventory shifts in the cell. Our results show that capacity fade and impedance rise primarily originate at the graphite anode and LMR cathode, respectively. Notably, while Ni undergoes reversible redox, Mn shows no evidence of bulk redox activity even in highly-aged electrodes: only relithiated LMR electrodes show some reduction of Mn. Graphite electrodes degrade due to particle isolation and SEI growth, exacerbated by Mn dissolution and deposition on graphite anodes. These findings highlight the coupled structural and electrochemical degradation mechanisms in LMR/graphite cells and underscore lithium inventory retention and electrode interfacial stability as critical factors for enhancing long-term performance.

Badami, Pavan P. [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL↗

Evidence of Zintl Intermediate Phase and Its Impacts on Li and Na Storage Performance of Pb-Based Alloying Anodes

Anode materials based on conversion and alloying reactions are promising to achieve high energy density of advanced sodium-ion batteries (SIBs). While the chemical similarities between sodium and lithium as alkali elements make the benchmarking strategy practical in developing new high-performance anodes, simply borrowing the anode material from one system to the other does not always guarantee success unless it is based on sound understanding of both Li- and Na-reaction mechanisms. In this work, we report the Na storage performance of a Pb-based anode and its fundamental reaction dynamics. In contrast to its excellent electrochemical performances in Li cells (reversible ~600 mAh/g), the newly developed Pb@PbO–C nanocomposite anode has limited electrochemical Na reaction properties showing moderate capacity and rate performances (~300 mAh/g at 20 mA/g). Synchrotron-based X-ray diffraction and absorption spectroscopy studies reveal the fundamental differences in the Na and Li reaction mechanism of the Pb-based anode. Further, unlike Li reaction, the unique Na reaction mechanism involves the formation of a highly ionic NaPb Zintl phase, which comprises tetrahedral Pb 4 clusters, as an intermediate phase. The strong covalent character of the Pb 4 Zintl clusters adversely affects the electronic conductivity and thus limits the electrochemical performance of the Pb-based anode in Na cells. These findings provide new insights applicable to developing high-performance alloying anode materials.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

New Engineering Concepts to High Energy Density Li-S Batteries

Li-S batteries (LSBs) with energy densities > 500 Wh/kg @ C/5 and >1000 cycles, cycle life operating over wide temperatures has been identified to be critical for meeting the global energy demands. Progress is however, very much limited due to several major hurdles related to the following: (a) poor Li' reaction kinetics (conductivity/diffusivity) enabling full reversible S conversion to Li2S, (b) inferior electron (e) conductivity, specific capacity and cycle life due to electrolyte soluble species of polysulfides (PSs) formed with the reaction of Li ions with sulfur migrating to anode, (c) unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) formation and finally, (d) dendrites that are formed on the Li metal anode severely limiting the cycle life due to polarization at the solid/liquid interfaces causing safety, inferior capacity, energy density, rate, and cycle life issues. Creation of a fully functional economical ≤$80/kWh, high energy density LSBs is vital for enabling its widespread commercial deployment and use in current and next generation electric vehicles.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Reactive Fe anode for electrolytic reduction of solid metal oxide in molten LiCl-Li 2 O

Iron metal was investigated for use as a consumable anode for electrolytic reduction of solid metal oxides in molten LiCl-Li 2 O (2.0 - 2.4 wt%). Tests were performed where the potential of Fe anodes was increased incrementally from 0.1 to 1.0 V (vs Ni/NiO). Oxide formation on the anode started at a potential of 0.4 V and was identified as FeO via X-ray diffraction. In the absence of a pre-formed oxide layer, severe attack of the anode started at a potential of 0.7 V and was accompanied by an increase in Fe concentration in the salt. When an oxide layer was allowed to form on the anode, the Fe concentration did not increase in the salt. O 2 was detected in the headspace gas at an anode potential of 1.0 V only when an oxide layer was present on the anode. Finally, the results of this study support the idea that an inexpensive sacrificial anode could be an ideal replacement for expensive Pt that is currently widely used for this process.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Recovery of High Value Anode Materials for a Closed Loop Li-ion Battery Recycling Process (Final Report)

Battery Resourcers’ goal with this Small Business Innovative Research Phase 1 project was to produce high quality and high purity graphite generated from its Li-ion battery recycling technology. Battery Resourcers’ technology recovers cathode material from a broad spectrum of Li-ion battery regardless of size, shape or chemistry. In Battery Resourcers existing model, the graphite is recovered to be used as a reductant and therefore the battery materials cost or recycling cost is not lowered by the recovery of the graphite. Currently, Battery Resourcers is piloting its lithium ion battery recycling process and the recovered LiNi 0.33 Mn 0.33 Co 0.33 O 2 (NMC111) or LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 (NMC111) cathode materials have shown that they can outperform existing commercial NMC111 cathode materials while being produced at a projected lower cost. Battery Resourcers and its subcontractor WPI have demonstrated the same success with the recovered graphite for anode materials. The success of this award will enable Battery Resourcers offer lowest cost anode materials while reducing the carbon footprint of the battery industry. This will potentially lower the cost of EV by lowering the upfront cost of the battery and the end of life disposal costs. The technical objectives of this Phase 1 research project are to purify the recovered graphite from Battery Resourcers leaching process and demonstrate it is viable to be used in new electric vehicle lithium ion batteries. This project demonstrated that Battery Resourcers can recover graphite with less than 2% impurities. To separate the graphite from other materials Battery Resourcers will employed new filtering techniques and chemical processing methods.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Investigating the Effects of Lithium Deposition on the Abuse Response of Lithium-Ion Batteries

Li deposition at the graphitic anode is widely reported in literature as one of the leading causes of capacity fade in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). Previous literature has linked Li deposition resulting from low-temperature ageing to diminished safety characteristics, however no current research has probed the effects of Li deposition on the abuse response of well-characterized cells. Using overtemperature testing, a relationship between increased concentrations of Li deposition and exacerbated abuse response in 1 Ah pouch cells has been established. A novel Li deposition technique is also investigated, where cells with n:p < 1 (anode-limiting) have been cycled at a high rate to exploit Li + diffusion limitations at the anode. Scanning Electron Microscopy of harvested anodes indicates substantial Li deposition in low n:p cells after 20 cycles, with intricate networks of Li(s) deposits which hinder Li + intercalation/deintercalation. Peak broadening and decreased amplitude of differential capacity plots further validates a loss of lithium inventory to Li + dissolution, and Powder X-ray Diffraction indicates Li + intercalation with staging in anode interstitial sites as the extent of Li deposition increases. A cradle-to-grave approach is leveraged on cell fabrication and testing to eliminate uncertainty involving the effects of cell additives on Li deposition and other degradation mechanisms.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Effect of cathode on crosstalk in Si-based lithium-ion cells

Crosstalk between the cathode and the anode in Li-ion batteries has a great impact on performance, safety and cycle lifetime. However, a systematic investigation of crosstalk behavior in silicon (Si)-based cells with various cathode materials has not been reported. We investigated the crosstalk behavior of a Si anode coupled with one of the following cathodes—LiCoO 2 (LCO), LiNi 0.5 Mn 0.3 Co 0.2 (NMC532), and LiFePO 4 (LFP)—in a full cell. For each electrochemical couple, we compared electrolyte decomposition products, solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) chemistry, and degradation mechanisms during cycling. From a very early stage of cycling, each couple showed different crosstalk behavior; different electrolyte decomposition products and SEI chemistry on the Si anodes were seen. Specifically, the formation and growth mechanism of Si SEI differ depending on cathode materials. For the LFP system, the Si SEI rich in LiF and inorganic species, which is stable and robust. It forms at an early stage of cycle. As a result, the SEI of Si from the LFP system well tolerates SEI breakage due to mechanical changes of Si and suppresses Li loss, resulting in stable cycle life.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Wide Operating Temperature Range Electrolytes for High Voltage and High Specific Energy Li-Ion Cells

A number of electrolyte formulations that have been designed to operate over a wide temperature range have been investigated in conjunction with layered-layered metal oxide cathode materials developed at Argonne. In this study, we have evaluated a number of electrolytes in Li-ion cells consisting of Conoco Phillips A12 graphite anodes and Toda HE5050 Li(1.2)Ni(0.15)Co(0.10)Mn(0.55)O2 cathodes. The electrolytes studied consisted of LiPF6 in carbonate-based electrolytes that contain ester co-solvents with various solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) promoting additives, many of which have been demonstrated to perform well in 4V systems. More specifically, we have investigated the performance of a number of methyl butyrate (MB) containing electrolytes (i.e., LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate (EC) + ethyl methyl carbonate (EMC) + MB (20:20:60 v/v %) that contain various additives, including vinylene carbonate, lithium oxalate, and lithium bis(oxalato)borate (LiBOB). When these systems were evaluated at various rates at low temperatures, the methyl butyrate-based electrolytes resulted in improved rate capability compared to cells with all carbonate-based formulations. It was also ascertained that the slow cathode kinetics govern the generally poor rate capability at low temperature in contrast to traditionally used LiNi(0.80)Co(0.15)Al(0.05)O2-based systems, rather than being influenced strongly by the electrolyte type.

Li-ion Battery↗

Probing the Effectiveness in Stabilizing Lithium Metal Anodes through Functional Additives

A variety of electrolyte additives were comprehensively evaluated to understand their relative capability in stabilizing lithium metal anode. Although the Li||Cu test is an effective test to rule out ineffective additives, a reliable assessment of individual additives cannot be obtained just by a single evaluation method. Therefore, various methods must be combined to truly assess the stabilization of a lithium anode. Moreover, it was also discovered that a significant depletion of electrolytes occurred during the end-of-life of the lithium batteries, which partially contributed to the sudden failure of the lithium batteries during cycling. However, the main culprit of the sudden failure was identified as the significant increase in the resistance of the lithium metal anode. Further, when used as an additive, cyclic fluorinated carbonates are the most effective in stabilizing the lithium anode and improving the cycling performance of lithium batteries among all the common additives. Despite its cost-effectiveness, the additive in the conventional electrolyte approach provides insufficient protection for lithium metal due to the complete consumption of the additive materials, which is necessary to repair the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI). Therefore, it is suggested that a larger ratio (>15 wt %) of the SEI former should be employed to achieve effective lithium stabilization.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗