Results for “System Analysis Code” — Page 23

DOE OSTI2026

Nuclear Data Libraries Sensitivity Studies for ORSA Using SCALE

Subcritical assemblies offer valuable training capabilities in nuclear criticality safety (NCS) for individuals handling fissile material. At Oak Ridge National Laboratory(ORNL), the Oak Ridge Subcritical Assembly (ORSA), a new experimental facility, is being established to provide hands-on training for the Nuclear Criticality Safety Program (NCSP).It is essential to accurately determine the neutron multiplication factor (keff) to ensure that ORSA remains subcritical and safe during operations. This study investigated the sensitivity of keff to variations across Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF/B) libraries, consisting of ENDF/B-VII.1, ENDF/B-VIII.0, and ENDF/B-VIII.1. The analysis was conducted using the CSAS6 sequence in the SCALE-6.3 code system. Individual isotopes in the ORSA model were replaced one at a time with ENDF/B-VII.1 as the base library and changing to ENDF/B-VIII.0or ENDF/B-VIII.1. The results demonstrated that the changes in keffof the nuclides associated with the ORSA model were mostly within the uncertainty of the base model (~24 pcm), except for primary nuclides like Uranium-235and H-poly with few other nuclides. The relative delta keff values of Uranium-235 and H-poly, expressed in pcm, were +280 and -212 in ENDF/B-VIII.0 and +332 and -275 in ENDF/B-VIII.1, respectively, which were notable changes in reactivity. These results demonstrated that ORSA was largely insensitive to variations across these nuclear data libraries.

Hong, Evan [North Carolina State University]↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Coupled Reactor and Engine Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Modeling Methodology

The design and development process of a Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) system requires extensive multiphysics modeling to couple the neutron physics and thermal feedback effects to determine the reactor’s power shape. Propulsion system performance codes utilize this power shape to determine NTP key performance parameters. While the power shape is heavily dependent on the temperature profile and geometry of the reactor, many analyses either assume a constant power shape, or use neutronics analysis to determine a power shape for a specific reactor configuration. The development of a coupling interface for a propulsion system performance code and a Monte Carlo neutron transport code (OpenMC) allows for the reactor power shape to be calculated in a Picard iteration.

Jacob Stonehill↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Coupled Reactor and Engine Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Modeling Methodology

The design and development process of a Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) system requires extensive multiphysics modeling to couple the neutron physics and thermal feedback effects to determine the reactor’s power shape. Propulsion system performance codes utilize this power shape to determine NTP key performance parameters. While the power shape is heavily dependent on the temperature profile and geometry of the reactor, many analyses either assume a constant power shape, or use neutronics analysis to determine a power shape for a specific reactor configuration. The development of a coupling interface for a propulsion system performance code and a Monte Carlo neutron transport code (OpenMC) allows for the reactor power shape to be calculated in an iteration loop. The interface utilizes a file share system to transfer geometry dimensions, temperatures, and material identifiers to OpenMC, which is used to perform a neutron transport simulation of a design like the government Testing Reference Design reactor. The interface is then able to post-process the results from OpenMC and use the same file share system to share a power shape and other important neutron transport parameters to the system performance code. Initial results show that neglecting the changes to power shape when comparing reactor configurations can yield inaccurate results. Furthermore, utilizing propellants other than hydrogen gas can cause significant changes to the power shape, and thus, the thermal performance of a specific reactor design. This methodology is being expanded to allow for multiple families of NTP reactors to be analyzed, including block moderator, particle bed, and NERVA-derived reactors.

multiphysics coupling↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Coupled Reactor and Engine Nuclear Thermal Propulsion Modeling Methodology

The design and development process of a Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) system requires extensive multiphysics modeling to couple the neutron physics and thermal feedback effects to determine the reactor’s power shape. Propulsion system performance codes utilize this power shape to determine NTP key performance parameters. While the power shape is heavily dependent on the temperature profile and geometry of the reactor, many analyses either assume a constant power shape, or use neutronics analysis to determine a power shape for a specific reactor configuration. The development of a coupling interface for a propulsion system performance code and a Monte Carlo neutron transport code (OpenMC) allows for the reactor power shape to be calculated in an iteration loop. The interface utilizes a file share system to transfer geometry dimensions, temperatures, and material identifiers to OpenMC, which is used to perform a neutron transport simulation of a design like the government Testing Reference Design reactor. The interface is then able to post-process the results from OpenMC and use the same file share system to share a power shape and other important neutron transport parameters to the system performance code. Initial results show that neglecting the changes to power shape when comparing reactor configurations can yield inaccurate results. Furthermore, utilizing propellants other than hydrogen gas can cause significant changes to the power shape, and thus, the thermal performance of a specific reactor design. This methodology is being expanded to allow for multiple families of NTP reactors to be analyzed, including block moderator, particle bed, and NERVA-derived reactors.

multiphysics coupling↗

NASA NTRS1991

Industrial Code Development

The industrial codes will consist of modules of 2-D and simplified 2-D or 1-D codes, intended for expeditious parametric studies, analysis, and design of a wide variety of seals. Integration into a unified system is accomplished by the industrial Knowledge Based System (KBS), which will also provide user friendly interaction, contact sensitive and hypertext help, design guidance, and an expandable database. The types of analysis to be included with the industrial codes are interfacial performance (leakage, load, stiffness, friction losses, etc.), thermoelastic distortions, and dynamic response to rotor excursions. The first three codes to be completed and which are presently being incorporated into the KBS are the incompressible cylindrical code, ICYL, and the compressible cylindrical code, GCYL.

Shapiro, Wilbur↗

NASA NTRS1985

CELCAP: A Computer Model for Cogeneration System Analysis

A description of the CELCAP cogeneration analysis program is presented. A detailed description of the methodology used by the Naval Civil Engineering Laboratory in developing the CELCAP code and the procedures for analyzing cogeneration systems for a given user are given. The four engines modeled in CELCAP are: gas turbine with exhaust heat boiler, diesel engine with waste heat boiler, single automatic-extraction steam turbine, and back-pressure steam turbine. Both the design point and part-load performances are taken into account in the engine models. The load model describes how the hourly electric and steam demand of the user is represented by 24 hourly profiles. The economic model describes how the annual and life-cycle operating costs that include the costs of fuel, purchased electricity, and operation and maintenance of engines and boilers are calculated. The CELCAP code structure and principal functions of the code are described to how the various components of the code are related to each other. Three examples of the application of the CELCAP code are given to illustrate the versatility of the code. The examples shown represent cases of system selection, system modification, and system optimization.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS1987

Reliability and throughput analysis of a concatenated coding scheme

The performance of a concatenated coding scheme for error control in ARQ systems is analyzed for both random-noise and burst-noise channels. In particular, the probability of undetected error and the system throughput are calculated. In this scheme, the inner code is used for both error correction and error detection, and the outer code is used for error detection only. Interleaving/deinterleaving is assumed within the outer code. A retransmission is requested if either the inner code or the outer code detects the presence of errors. Various coding examples are considered. The results show that concatenated coding can provide extremely high system reliability (i.e., low probability of undetected error) and high system throughput.

Deng, Robert H.↗

NASA NTRS1993

Utilization of recently developed codes for high power Brayton and Rankine cycle power systems

Two recently developed FORTRAN computer codes for high power Brayton and Rankine thermodynamic cycle analysis for space power applications are presented. The codes were written in support of an effort to develop a series of subsystem models for multimegawatt Nuclear Electric Propulsion, but their use is not limited just to nuclear heat sources or to electric propulsion. Code development background, a description of the codes, some sample input/output from one of the codes, and state future plans/implications for the use of these codes by NASA's Lewis Research Center are provided.

Doherty, Michael P.↗

NASA NTRS1998

An Investigation of Reliability Models for Ceramic Matrix Composites and their Implementation into Finite Element Codes

The development of modeling approaches for the failure analysis of ceramic-based material systems used in high temperature environments was the primary objective of this research effort. These materials have the potential to support many key engineering technologies related to the design of aeropropulsion systems. Monolithic ceramics exhibit a number of useful properties such as retention of strength at high temperatures, chemical inertness, and low density. However, the use of monolithic ceramics has been limited by their inherent brittleness and a large variation in strength. This behavior has motivated material scientists to reinforce the monolithic material with a ceramic fiber. The addition of a second ceramic phase with an optimized interface increases toughness and marginally increases strength. The primary purpose of the fiber is to arrest crack growth, not to increase strength. The material systems of interest in this research effort were laminated ceramic matrix composites, as well as two- and three- dimensional fabric reinforced ceramic composites. These emerging composite systems can compete with metals in many demanding applications. However, the ongoing metamorphosis of ceramic composite material systems, and the lack of standardized design data has in the past tended to minimize research efforts related to structural analysis. Many structural components fabricated from ceramic matrix composites (CMC) have been designed by "trial and error." The justification for this approach lies in the fact that during the initial developmental phases for a material system fabrication issues are paramount. Emphasis is placed on demonstrating feasibility rather than fully understanding the processes controlling mechanical behavior. This is understandable during periods of rapid improvements in material properties for any composite system. But to avoid the ad hoc approach, the analytical methods developed under this effort can be used to develop rational structural design protocols.

Duffy, Stephen F.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Terminal Area Size and Switching Technique Analysis for Unmanned Aircraft Systems Operations

Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) need to be able to comply with the Code of Federal Regulations Part 91 ‘see and avoid’ requirement. Detect and avoid (DAA) is an essential enabler for integrating UAS into the National Airspace System. A DAA system is a suite of sensors, trackers, and alerting and guidance algorithms that assists a remote pilot in maintaining separation from airborne traffic. Previous works have focused on operations transiting to and from Class A or special use airspace. More recent efforts have defined DAA system requirements for operations in and around the airport terminal environment. In continuation of this effort, this paper defines the DAA Terminal Area (DTA) size and switching technique for the DAA Well Clear (DWC) volume while transitioning between en route and the terminal area.

Unmanned Aircraft Systems↗

NASA NTRS1998

Visual Computing Environment Workshop

The Visual Computing Environment (VCE) is a framework for intercomponent and multidisciplinary computational simulations. Many current engineering analysis codes simulate various aspects of aircraft engine operation. For example, existing computational fluid dynamics (CFD) codes can model the airflow through individual engine components such as the inlet, compressor, combustor, turbine, or nozzle. Currently, these codes are run in isolation, making intercomponent and complete system simulations very difficult to perform. In addition, management and utilization of these engineering codes for coupled component simulations is a complex, laborious task, requiring substantial experience and effort. To facilitate multicomponent aircraft engine analysis, the CFD Research Corporation (CFDRC) is developing the VCE system. This system, which is part of NASA's Numerical Propulsion Simulation System (NPSS) program, can couple various engineering disciplines, such as CFD, structural analysis, and thermal analysis.

Lawrence, Charles↗

NASA NTRS1989

Transient analysis techniques in performing impact and crash dynamic studies

Because of the emphasis being placed on crashworthiness as a design requirement, increasing demands are being made by various organizations to analyze a wide range of complex structures that must perform safely when subjected to severe impact loads, such as those generated in a crash event. The ultimate goal of crashworthiness design and analysis is to produce vehicles with the ability to reduce the dynamic forces experienced by the occupants to specified levels, while maintaining a survivable envelope around them during a specified crash event. DYCAST is a nonlinear structural dynamic finite element computer code that started from the plans systems of a finite element program for static nonlinear structural analysis. The essential features of DYCAST are outlined.

Pifko, A. B.↗

NASA NTRS2001

Multidisciplinary Aerospace Systems Optimization: Computational AeroSciences (CAS) Project

The report describes a method for performing optimization of a system whose analysis is so expensive that it is impractical to let the optimization code invoke it directly because excessive computational cost and elapsed time might result. In such situation it is imperative to have user control the number of times the analysis is invoked. The reported method achieves that by two techniques in the Design of Experiment category: a uniform dispersal of the trial design points over a n-dimensional hypersphere and a response surface fitting, and the technique of krigging. Analyses of all the trial designs whose number may be set by the user are performed before activation of the optimization code and the results are stored as a data base. That code is then executed and referred to the above data base. Two applications, one of the airborne laser system, and one of an aircraft optimization illustrate the method application.

Kodiyalam, S.↗

NASA NTRS1980

The Build System - Integration and management of large software avionic systems

The Build System comprises the software tools and procedures creating the flight memory load for the Space Shuttle Backup Flight System. The system has six functions: (1) configuration management, which insures that the memory load contains the proper modules, all clearly marked; (2) source translation, which translates the source code into a relocatable machine code; (3) module integration, which combines and assigns memory locations to all the object modules produced in source translation; (4) static code analysis, which verifies the integration process; (5) deliverables generation, which yields release documentation and deliverable items; and (6) release maintenance, which controls all system patches subsequent to release. Further developments will include more automation in the producing of patches from source-code updates and system requirements for tracking.

Mayer, J. T. B.↗

NASA NTRS1998

Development of Tripropellant CFD Design Code

A tripropellant, such as GO2/H2/RP-1, CFD design code has been developed to predict the local mixing of multiple propellant streams as they are injected into a rocket motor. The code utilizes real fluid properties to account for the mixing and finite-rate combustion processes which occur near an injector faceplate, thus the analysis serves as a multi-phase homogeneous spray combustion model. Proper accounting of the combustion allows accurate gas-side temperature predictions which are essential for accurate wall heating analyses. The complex secondary flows which are predicted to occur near a faceplate cannot be quantitatively predicted by less accurate methodology. Test cases have been simulated to describe an axisymmetric tripropellant coaxial injector and a 3-dimensional RP-1/LO2 impinger injector system. The analysis has been shown to realistically describe such injector combustion flowfields. The code is also valuable to design meaningful future experiments by determining the critical location and type of measurements needed.

Farmer, Richard C.↗

NASA NTRS1988

A comparison of the various helicopter mathematical models used in the methodology assessment

Various features of the computer codes used in the helicopter industry and by government agencies for rotorcraft aeroelastic stability analysis are compared. Mathematical rigor in modeling rotorcraft is given primarily to the rotor-system dynamic behavior; the aerodynamic modeling is still limited to strip theory and to uneven application of corrections for stall, reversed flow, yawed flow, radial flow, and unsteady aerodynamic effects. The forward-flight regime analysis is included in five of the 11 codes surveyed. However, only two of these codes are capable of a Floquet analysis for aeroelastic stability. For the hover regime, nine of the 11 codes use eigen-analysis approach. The remaining codes perform a harmonic analysis of the transient response of system.

Stephens, Wendell B.↗

NASA NTRS1994

Radiant Energy Measurements from a Scaled Jet Engine Axisymmetric Exhaust Nozzle for a Baseline Code Validation Case

A non-flowing, electrically heated test rig was developed to verify computer codes that calculate radiant energy propagation from nozzle geometries that represent aircraft propulsion nozzle systems. Since there are a variety of analysis tools used to evaluate thermal radiation propagation from partially enclosed nozzle surfaces, an experimental benchmark test case was developed for code comparison. This paper briefly describes the nozzle test rig and the developed analytical nozzle geometry used to compare the experimental and predicted thermal radiation results. A major objective of this effort was to make available the experimental results and the analytical model in a format to facilitate conversion to existing computer code formats. For code validation purposes this nozzle geometry represents one validation case for one set of analysis conditions. Since each computer code has advantages and disadvantages based on scope, requirements, and desired accuracy, the usefulness of this single nozzle baseline validation case can be limited for some code comparisons.

Baumeister, Joseph F.↗

NASA NTRS2019

Computational Performance of Progressive Damage Analysis of Composite Laminates using Abaqus/Explicit with 16 to 512 CPU Cores

The computational scaling performance of progressive damage analysis using Abaqus/ Explicit is evaluated and quantified using from 16 to 512 CPU cores. Several analyses were conducted on varying numbers of cores to determine the scalability of the code on five NASA high performance computing systems. Two finite element models representative of typical models used for progressive damage analysis of composite laminates were used. The results indicate a 10 to 15 times speed up scaling from 24 to 512 cores. The run times were modestly reduced with newer generations of CPU hardware. If the number of degrees of freedom is held constant with respect to the number of cores, the model size can be increased by a factor of 20, scaling from 16 to 512 cores, with the same run time. An empirical expression was derived relating run time, the number of cores, and the number of degrees of freedom. Analysis cost was examined in terms of software tokens and hardware utilization. Using additional cores reduces token usage since the computational performance increases more rapidly than the token requirement with increasing number of cores. The in- crease in hardware cost with increasing cores was found to be modest. Overall the results show relatively good scalability of the Abaqus/Explicit code on up to 512 cores.

Bergan, A. C.↗