Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “fuel assembly”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 415 records · Page 23

Metallic Fuel Performance Code Requirements for the Versatile Test Reactor Project

Metallic nuclear fuels have been proposed for use in several emerging nuclear reactor designs, and a number of codes have been developed to model these fuels and assess their performance. Qualification of these metallic nuclear fuels will ultimately require monitored irradiation of lead test assemblies, but the use of fuel performance codes can reduce the uncertainty associated with these efforts by quantifying uncertainties and estimating margins to failure ahead of time. In this work, metallic fuel performance code requirements are defined for the Versatile Test Reactor (VTR) project using input from the Experimental Breeder Reactor II functional requirements, operational requirements, and design criteria. This work focuses on the thermomechanical responses and irradiation behaviors of metallic fuel elements that are representative of the proposed VTR driver fuel design concepts. As such, many of the code requirements and physics/modeling discussions in this work are expected to be broadly applicable to metallic fuel applications outside of the VTR project.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Integration of the Back End of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

Management of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste consists of three main phases – storage, transportation, and disposal – commonly referred to as the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle. Current practice for commercial spent nuclear fuel management in the United States (US) includes temporary storage of spent fuel in both pools and dry storage systems at operating or shutdown nuclear power plants. Storage pools are filling to their operational capacity, and management of the approximately 2,200 metric tons of spent fuel newly discharged each year requires transferring older and cooler spent fuel from pools into dry storage. Unless a repository becomes available that can accept spent fuel for permanent disposal, projections indicate that the US will have approximately 136,000 metric tons of spent fuel in dry storage systems by mid-century, when the last plants in the current reactor fleet are decommissioned. Current designs for dry storage systems rely on large multi-assembly canisters, the most common of which are so-called “dual-purpose canisters” (DPCs). DPCs are certified for both storage and transportation, but are not designed or licensed for permanent disposal. The large capacity (greater number of spent fuel assemblies) of these canisters can lead to higher canister temperatures, which can delay transportation and/or complicate disposal. This current management practice, in which the utilities continue loading an ever-increasing inventory of larger DPCs, does not emphasize integration among storage, transportation, and disposal. This lack of integration does not cause safety issues, but it does lead to a suboptimal system that increases costs, complicates storage and transportation operations, and limits options for permanent disposal. This paper describes strategies for improving integration of management practices in the US across the entire back end of the nuclear fuel cycle. The complex interactions between storage, transportation, and disposal make a single optimal solution unlikely. However, efforts to integrate various phases of nuclear waste management can have the greatest impact if they begin promptly and continue to evolve throughout the remaining life of the current fuel cycle. A key factor that influences the path forward for integration of nuclear waste management practices is the identification of the timing and location for a repository. The most cost-effective path forward would be to open a repository by mid-century with the capability to directly dispose of DPCs without repackaging the spent fuel into disposalready canisters. Options that involve repackaging of spent fuel from DPCs into disposalready canisters or that delay the repository opening significantly beyond mid-century could add 10s of billions of dollars to the total system life cycle cost.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Preliminary Primary System Thermal Fluids Analysis of a Horizontal Compact HTGR

The Horizontal Compact High Temperature Gas Reactor (HC-HTGR) is being designed by a multi-disciplinary team of nuclear, mechanical, and structural engineers, under the support of a DOE-NE Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program’s Advanced Reactor Concepts-20 (ARC-20) award. The objective of this ARC-20 project is to deliver a conceptual design for the proposed HC-HTGR in 3 years and support its commercialization as a safe, low-cost HTGR. Argonne National Laboratory (Argonne) is collaborating on the thermal hydraulic design and analysis of the HC-HTGR reactor pressure vessel internals. The scope of this work includes ensuring the reactor is able to maintain maximum core temperatures below designated safety thresholds during normal operation, shutdown, and accident conditions. This report documents the preliminary thermal hydraulic analysis of the HC-HTGR core design performed with a 1D fluid-3D solid coupled model built using the System Analysis Module (SAM). This assembly level model was utilized to inform the core assembly design, predict the temperature distribution in the peak power assembly including the peak fuel temperature, coolant channel outlet temperatures, and graphite temperature gradients. A key result of this analysis was the determination that the peak fuel temperature remains below the safety threshold of 1250°C. Additionally, this model was used to assess the assembly coolant channel and bypass flow mass flow rate distribution. Following the assembly level analysis, attention turned to the development of a full core reduced order model to be used to predict the core wide coolant flow distribution and to model certain operational and accidental transients.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Load following power generation and power storage using REP and PEM technology

A hydrogen generation system for generating hydrogen and electrical power includes a power supply, a reformer-electrolyzer-purifier (REP) assembly including at least one fuel cell including an anode and a cathode separated by an electrolyte matrix, at least one low temperature fuel cell, and a hydrogen storage. The at least one fuel cell is configured to receive a reverse voltage supplied by the power supply and generate hydrogen-containing gas in the anode of the at least one fuel cell. The at least one low temperature fuel cell is configured to receive the hydrogen-containing gas output from the REP assembly. The at least one low temperature fuel cell is configured to selectably operate in a power generation mode in which the hydrogen-containing gas is used to generate electrical power and a power storage mode in which the hydrogen-containing gas is pressurized and stored in the hydrogen storage.

Jahnke, Fred C.↗

Surface Decoration of Platinum Catalysts by ZrO 2– x Nanoclusters for Durable Fuel Cell Applications

Improving the activity and durability of carbon-supported platinum catalysts for the oxygen-reduction reaction (ORR) in acidic electrolytes is crucial to reducing the high overpotentials and power loss over time in proton-exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs). We found that platinum nanoparticle catalyst deposited on an engineered carbon support in the presence of zirconium enabled higher ORR activity and 25% better retention in electrochemically active surface area (ECSA), thereby improving durability. The use of zirconium precursor in the carbon synthesis process led to the formation of atomically dispersed Zr and ZrO 2 nanoparticles on the support. Upon Pt deposition and subsequent heat treatment, the ZrO 2 particles preferentially rearranged on and around the platinum nanoparticles in a chemically reduced form as zirconium suboxide (ZrO 2-x ) surface-decorated nanoclusters, which mitigated Pt nanoparticle coarsening. Finally, analysis of the here-to-fore unknown catalyst structure as well as its performance and durability in a PEM fuel cell membrane electrode assembly (MEA) is discussed.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Integrating Advanced Modeling and Accelerated Testing for a Modernized Fuel Qualification Paradigm

With the increasing interest in sodium fast reactor technology, as seen by applications to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission for the OKLO Aurora plant, fuel testing for the TerraPower Traveling Wave Reactor, and the impending construction and startup of the versatile test reactor (VTR), a modernized, accelerated approach to fuel qualification is needed. To guide this effort, a Phenomena Identification Ranking Table–styled analysis was performed for a U-Pu-Zr sodium-free annular fuel system. This analysis evaluated a series of fuel design properties and parameters against their contributions to key fuel performance phenomena. The resulting priority parameters were then reviewed against existing modeling and experimental capabilities to support investigation of the highest-priority parameters. A pathway for qualification was then established using highthroughput, high-volume experiments from MiniFuel and FAST in parallel with advanced physics-based model development. This effort outlines how the first stages of qualification can be reduced from the typical 20+-year development cycle to 5 to 7 years by deploying accelerated irradiation testing platforms. As with any accelerated test, these methods are prototypic in some aspects and less so in others; however, by coupling with advanced fuel performance modeling and simulation capabilities, the larger space of irradiation parameters and material response provided offers advantages for the validation of physics-based models supporting the deployment of novel fuel designs. As a test case, this paper utilizes a proposed Mark II fuel system for the upcoming VTR. Thus, an accelerated qualification method can be tested for the development of MARK II driver fuel so that by the time of VTR startup, lead test assemblies for a Mark II fuel can be initiated.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Impact of recent ENDF nuclear data update, high initial enrichment and high burnup fuel on critical experiments applicability determination via the integral index c k for burnup credit validation

In 2012, NUREG/CR-7109 reported on the validation of burnup credit calculations involving major and minor actinides and major fission products which was investigated for pressurized and boiling water reactor (PWR and BWR) fuel enrichments up to 5 wt% 235 U and assembly-average burnups up to 60 GWd/MTU. Recently, there has been interest in increasing the maximum enrichment used in PWR fuel as high as 8 wt% 235 U and correspondingly increasing the maximum assembly-average burnups to approximately 75 GWd/MTU. These proposed increases in enrichment and burnup necessitate reinvestigation of the validation basis for k eff calculations for this expanded application space. Additionally, the 2012 study was performed by using the Evaluated Nuclear Data File (ENDF)/B-VII.0 nuclear data with the SCALE 6 covariance library, and the effects of using the newly released ENDF/B-VII.1 and ENDF/B-VIII.0 nuclear data and covariance libraries should be evaluated. In this work, published in NUREG/CR-7309 in 2025, the validation assessment was performed consistently with NUREG/CR-7109: modeling irradiated fuel assemblies in the Generic Burnup Credit (GBC)-32 cask defined in NUREG/CR-6747. The TSUNAMI-3D sequence was used to generate sensitivity data for the application model, and the data were compared with sensitivity data from select benchmark models. The integral parameter c k is the metric of similarity used in this study and is consistent with NUREG/CR-7109, where a c k value in excess of 0.8 indicates sufficient similarity for use in validation. A new set of benchmark experiments with sensitivity data has been assembled for this effort. The number of experiments with available sensitivity data is now 2,104, compared to 474 in NUREG/CR-7109. This increase was facilitated by the efforts of the Nuclear Energy Agency to generate sensitivity data for a majority of the experiments in the International Criticality Safety Benchmark Evaluation Project (ICSBEP) Handbook to supplement the data available in the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Verified, Archived Library of Inputs and Data (VALID). The complete set of benchmarks considered here includes experiments for low-enriched uranium (LEU), intermediate enriched uranium (IEU), and a mixture of uranium and plutonium (MIX) from the ICSBEP Handbook and VALID, as well as ORNL models of the Haut Taux de Combustion (HTC) experiments and other potentially relevant models not included in VALID. The updated similarity study shows that none of the extended burnup and higher enrichment combinations considered show a significant decrease in the number of potentially applicable experiments, meaning sufficient critical experiments exist for the validation of BUC criticality safety calculations, with initial enrichments up to 8 wt% 235 U and burnups up to 80 GWd/MTU. Additionally, both the ENDF/B-VII.1 and ENDF/B-VIII.0 nuclear data libraries can be used for validation since the number of critical experiments applicable for validation increases for most cases with the most recent nuclear data compared to the previous one. As in previous BUC validation studies, the French HTC experiments are the most similar in a majority of the application cases studied, especially from representative discharge burnups ranging from 40 to 80 GWd/MTU. In conclusion, these results match the conclusions presented in NUREG/CR-7109 regarding validation of the primary actinides in BUC analyses.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

An Experimental Investigation of Multilayer Flow in a Slide Die Coating Process

Roll-to-roll coating technology has been actively applied not only for conventional film production but also for emerging energy devices such as organic solar cells, organic light emitting diodes, batteries, smart windows, and fuel cells. The devices are multilayer structures requiring several coating and drying steps when implemented in a serial fashion, which increases capital costs and energy consumption. Simultaneous multilayer (ML) coating technologies present an opportunity for cost reductions and improved process efficiency by reducing equipment footprint and the number of process steps. In this talk, we experimentally investigate ML slide die coating flow for the manufacturing of fuel cell membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs). For ML slide coating, understanding fluid properties such as density, surface tension, and viscosity are necessary for stable flows and limiting intermixing of the miscible layers. Here, we utilize a design-of-experiment methodology - Box-Behnken design (BBD) - to correlate ink formulation parameters to fluid properties. Using the ink properties obtained from the BBD, we performed numerical flow simulations to obtain a proper process conditions to guide experimental coating trials. Finally, experimental verification is performed on a ML slide die and a degree of miscibility was observed for various ink formulation conditions.

28 EE - Advanced Manufacturing Office (EE-5A)↗

Transition core modeling for extended enrichment, accident tolerant fuel using PARCS/Polaris

Current plans and efforts from reactor operators and vendors to include extended enrichment (EE) and accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) in current reactor fleets motivate the study of these changes in reactor physics analysis. This work uses the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission core simulator PARCS to do the core calculation and SCALE Polaris lattice physics code to generate the required homogenized, few-group constants. The lattice model used is based on the GE-14 10x10 assemblies with UO{sub 2} fuels. Both nominal core and transition core are studied in this work, and both cores use GE-14 10x10 assemblies with UO{sub 2} fuel. The nominal core uses regular UO{sub 2} fuel with a maximum enrichment of 5 wt % and ZIRC-2 cladding. The ATF transition core uses FeCrAl cladding and regular UO{sub 2} fuel, while the EE-ATF transition core uses FeCrAl cladding with UO{sub 2} fuel with 8 max wt % enrichment. The accuracy presented in the colorset models verified the capability of the PARCS/Polaris procedures for the transition core analysis. For the whole core calculation, the ATF and EE-ATF transition core models were made in addition to the nominal core model. The core parameters to study are the core power distribution and power peaking factor, doppler temperature coefficients, and control rod worth at cold zero power and hot full power. Comparing the core parameters of the transition cores with the nominal core in PARCS, the results suggest that there is no unexpected outcome for the implementation of ATF and EE fuels. (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Nuclear Safety [Vol. 36, No. 2, July-December 1995]

Nuclear Safety is a journal that covers significant issues in the field of nuclear safety. Its primary scope is safety in the design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power reactors worldwide and the research and analysis activities that promote this goal, but it also encompasses the safety aspects of the entire nuclear fuel cycle, including fuel fabrication, spent-fuel processing and handling, and nuclear waste disposal, the handling of fissionable materials and radioisotopes, and the environmental effects of all these activities. Table of Contents for this issue follows. THE CHORNOBYL ACCIDENT: 195 The Chornobyl Accident Revisited, Part III: Chernobyl Source Term Release Dynamics and Reconstruction of Events During the Active Phase, A. R. Sich; GENERAL SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS: 218 Second ANS Workshop on the Safety of Soviet-Designed Nuclear Power Plants, R. A. Bari; 234 Elements of a Nuclear Criticality Safety Program, C. M. Hopper; 243 Rickover, Excellence, and Criticality Safety Programs, R. E. Wilson; ACCIDENT ANALYSIS: 249 Transient Analysis of the PIUS Advanced Reactor Design with the TRAC-PF1/MOD2 Code, B. E. Boyack, J. L Steiner, S. C. Harmony, H. J. Stumpf, and J. F. Lime; 278 The Hierarchy-By-Interval Approach to Identifying Important Models that Need Improvement in Severe-Accident Simulation Codes, T. J. Heames, M. Khatib-Rahbar, J. E. Kelly, R. P. Jenks-Johnson, and Y.-S. Chen; 290 RELAP5/MOD3 Code Coupling Model, R. P. Martin; 299 Missiles Caused by Severe Pressurized-Water Reactor Accidents, R. Krieg; DESIGN FEATURES: 310 Validation of COMMIX with Westinghouse AP-600 PCCS Test Data, J. G. Sun, T. H. Chien, J. Ding, and W T. Sha; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: 321 Spent Nuclear Fuel Characterization for a Bounding Reference Assembly for the Receiving Basin for Off-Site Fuel, S. D. Kahook, R. L. Garrett, L. R. Canas, and M J. Beckum; OPERATING EXPERIENCES: 332 Reactor Shutdown Experience, Compiled by J. W. Cletcher; U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION INFORMATION AND ANALYSES: 335 Reactor Coolant System Blowdown at Wolf Creek on September 17, 1994, J. V. Kauffman and S. L. Israel; RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: 344 Reports, Standards, and Safety Guides, D. S. Oueener; 349 Proposed Rule Changes as of June 30, 1995; ANNOUNCEMENTS: 320 Symposium on Acceptability of Risk From Radiation—Application to Manned Space Flight; 320 24th DOE/NRC Nuclear Air Cleaning and Treatment Conference; 361 Radiation Biology and Radiation Protection— Modern Developments and Tendencies in Radiation Biology; 362 1997 IEEE Sixth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants; 354 The Authors; 360 Reviewers of Nuclear Safety, Vol. 36.

05 NUCLEAR FUELS↗

Nuclear Safety [Vol. 36, No. 2, July-December 1995]

Nuclear Safety is a journal that covers significant issues in the field of nuclear safety. Its primary scope is safety in the design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of nuclear power reactors worldwide and the research and analysis activities that promote this goal, but it also encompasses the safety aspects of the entire nuclear fuel cycle, including fuel fabrication, spent-fuel processing and handling, and nuclear waste disposal, the handling of fissionable materials and radioisotopes, and the environmental effects of all these activities. Table of Contents for this issue follows. THE CHORNOBYL ACCIDENT: 195 The Chornobyl Accident Revisited, Part III: Chernobyl Source Term Release Dynamics and Reconstruction of Events During the Active Phase, A. R. Sich; GENERAL SAFETY CONSIDERATIONS: 218 Second ANS Workshop on the Safety of Soviet-Designed Nuclear Power Plants, R. A. Bari; 234 Elements of a Nuclear Criticality Safety Program, C. M. Hopper; 243 Rickover, Excellence, and Criticality Safety Programs, R. E. Wilson; ACCIDENT ANALYSIS: 249 Transient Analysis of the PIUS Advanced Reactor Design with the TRAC-PF1/MOD2 Code, B. E. Boyack, J. L Steiner, S. C. Harmony, H. J. Stumpf, and J. F. Lime; 278 The Hierarchy-By-Interval Approach to Identifying Important Models that Need Improvement in Severe-Accident Simulation Codes, T. J. Heames, M. Khatib-Rahbar, J. E. Kelly, R. P. Jenks-Johnson, and Y.-S. Chen; 290 RELAP5/MOD3 Code Coupling Model, R. P. Martin; 299 Missiles Caused by Severe Pressurized-Water Reactor Accidents, R. Krieg; DESIGN FEATURES: 310 Validation of COMMIX with Westinghouse AP-600 PCCS Test Data, J. G. Sun, T. H. Chien, J. Ding, and W T. Sha; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS: 321 Spent Nuclear Fuel Characterization for a Bounding Reference Assembly for the Receiving Basin for Off-Site Fuel, S. D. Kahook, R. L. Garrett, L. R. Canas, and M J. Beckum; OPERATING EXPERIENCES: 332 Reactor Shutdown Experience, Compiled by J. W. Cletcher; U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION INFORMATION AND ANALYSES: 335 Reactor Coolant System Blowdown at Wolf Creek on September 17, 1994, J. V. Kauffman and S. L. Israel; RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: 344 Reports, Standards, and Safety Guides, D. S. Oueener; 349 Proposed Rule Changes as of June 30, 1995; ANNOUNCEMENTS: 320 Symposium on Acceptability of Risk From Radiation—Application to Manned Space Flight; 320 24th DOE/NRC Nuclear Air Cleaning and Treatment Conference; 361 Radiation Biology and Radiation Protection— Modern Developments and Tendencies in Radiation Biology; 362 1997 IEEE Sixth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants; 354 The Authors; 360 Reviewers of Nuclear Safety, Vol. 36.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Monolithic ATF MiniFuel Sample Capsules Ready for HFIR Insertion

Several advanced nuclear fuel concepts are being considered throughout the nuclear industry. Implementation of these concepts could increase accident tolerance or enhance performance beyond the capabilities of the UO₂-based nuclear fuel currently in use. Qualification and deployment of any new fuel requires rigorous irradiation testing to demonstrate performance under representative normal and off-normal operating conditions. The traditional approach for qualifying new fuels requires exhaustive execution of many integral fuel tests. However, due to the long timeframe for executing these integral tests and the limited number of available materials test reactors, this approach is becoming impractical. To accelerate fuel qualification, Oak Ridge National Laboratory developed the MiniFuel irradiation vehicle for use in conducting accelerated separate effects irradiation testing of a wide range of nuclear fuel materials in the High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR). The first MiniFuel irradiations performed in the facility tested sol gel–derived uranium nitride kernels and tristructural isotropic (TRISO)-coated particle fuels. This report describes the preparation and assembly of the first set of monolithic MiniFuel irradiations conducted to support accident-tolerant fuel (ATF) development and accelerated fuel qualification. Two irradiation targets containing a variety of UO₂ and U₃Si₂ disk fuel specimens were fabricated and assembled for irradiation to burnups of 8-10 and 28-40 MWd/kg U. The target irradiation temperature is 450-550°C. Irradiation of U₃Si₂ will provide new data regarding the irradiation performance of a candidate ATF to complement current ATF-1 integral experiments being performed in the Advanced Test Reactor. UO₂ samples were included as a reference so that the results from the MiniFuel experiments can be compared with the extensive UO₂ fuel performance database. The monolithic MiniFuel capsules were successfully assembled, welded, and tested per HFIR requirements and are ready for insertion into the reactor. Pictures of the assembly process are included in this report. The experiment is planned for insertion into the HFIR during cycle 487 in April 2020.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

IMPACT-01 Assembly Overview [Slides]

The Irradiated Material Properties Accelerated Characterization Test (IMPACT) series of experiments will irradiate three metallic fuel alloy specimens with embedded thermal conductivity probes in the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR). Metallic fuel alloys have long been under investigation for use in advanced reactors on account of their high thermal conductivity. Metallic fuel undergoes dramatic microstructural changes early in life due to fission gas swelling until ~2-3 at% burnup when pores interconnect, thus allowing fission gas to escape into the fuel pin plenum and swelling effectively ceases. The evolution of metallic fuel thermal conductivity during this early phase has never been successfully measured in situ. This experiment will be designed to use advances in measurement sciences to characterize how thermal transport properties evolve while in reactor. The IMPACT experiment consists of three metallic fuel rodlets with thermal conductivity probes axially centered within the fuel specimen. This presentation is an overview of the IMPACT-01 assembly process with a focus MFC fuel fabrication and experiment assembly steps.

11 - NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Assembly of MiniFuel Targets for Irradiation of U-Mo Fuel Specimens in the High Flux Isotope Reactor

To support the development of advanced low-enriched uranium for use in nuclear reactors, irradiation testing of U-Mo disk specimens was performed at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) High Flux Isotope Reactor (HFIR) to collect experimental irradiation data on this type of fuel at pressurized water reactor–relevant temperatures. U-Mo is a uranium alloy that has superior dimensional stability relative to alpha-phase uranium metal and has a substantially higher uranium density compared to UO 2 . U-Mo disks specimens were fabricated at Idaho National Laboratory and inserted into MiniFuel targets for HFIR irradiation. Three MiniFuel targets were successfully assembled, welded, tested, and delivered to HFIR, along with their quality assurance documentation. The targets were inserted into HFIR’s inner vertical experiment facility within the permanent beryllium reflector. Each target contains six disk specimens and will be irradiated in HFIR for three, four, and eight cycles, with target temperatures between 250 and 500°C. This report summarizes the experiment design, test matrix, pre-characterization of specimens, and experiment assembly.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Fine Gradient Electrode and Micro Porous Layer Structures for Improved Heavy Duty Fuel Cells (Final Report)

The commercial deployment of Heavy Duty Fuel Cells(HDFC) for applications such as large trucks (for example, Class 8 capable of carrying 50,000 lb. loads) depends vitally on achieving high efficiency and durability at reasonable costs. Furthermore, the HDFC must operate under practical conditions such as with fuel and air impurities, multiple stop-start cycles, and under the extremes of climate our planet offers – from hot and cold to dry and wet. These conditions place a premium on the stability and utilization of the materials comprising the membrane electrode assemblies (MEAs) powering the fuel cell. and the current catalysts, MicroPorous Layers, and Electrode structures and additives are insufficient for these needs. In Phase I Pajarito and Advent will develop durable electrocatalysts, MicroPorous Layer and electrode additives, and electrode structures for heavy duty fuel cells designed for zero-emission long-haul trucking. The electrocatalyst products are designed to solve the challenging durability and performance needs of fuel cells designed for long life and high efficiency through a combination of uniquely structured designed catalysts as well as new MicroPorous Layers (MPLs) and electrode structure additives. These improved materials will provide Pajarito both an expanded commercial opportunity in electrocatalysts, as well as new markets for MPL and electrode additives. The resulting public benefits include improved economics of fuel cells, a leading zero-emission technology for mobility, as well as reduced reliance on the critical minerals and metals used in the heavy-duty trucks industry. Possible follow-up Phase II and III projects would add full MEA products based on the Phase I efforts catalysts and additives, with full system validation by leading Fuel Cell Truck developers.

08 HYDROGEN↗

System Analysis Modeling and Intermodal Transportation for Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel

This is a technical presentation that does not take into account contractual limitations or obligations under the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste (Standard Contract) (10 CFR Part 961). For example, under the provisions of the Standard Contract, spent nuclear fuel in multi-assembly canisters is not an acceptable waste form, absent a mutually agreed to contract amendment.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Nitrogen-Doped PtNi Catalysts on Polybenzimidazole-Functionalized Carbon Support for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells

PtM (M = 3d transition metals) alloys are known as the promising oxygen reduction reaction catalysts and have been considered as the replacement of pure Pt catalysts for the commercialization of proton exchange membrane fuel cells. Although great progress has been made in the past three decades, the performance and durability of PtM catalysts still face stringent challenges from practical applications. Functionalization of a catalyst carbon support with nitrogen-contained groups can add charges onto its surface, which can be utilized to build a more complete ionomer/catalyst interface, to reduce the catalyst particle size, and to improve particle size distribution. Nitriding of PtNi catalysts can effectively improve the catalyst activity and stability by the modification of lattice strain. Hereby, we propose a synergistic approach of combining polybenzimidazole-grafted Vulcan XC72 carbon as the catalyst carbon support and the nitriding of PtNi to develop PtNiN/XC72-polybenzimidazole catalysts. Such PtNiN/XC72-PBI catalysts exhibit the excellent performance of fuel cell membrane electrode assembly (i.e., mass activity, 440 mA mgPt –1 ; electrochemical surface area, 51 m 2 gPt –1 ; and rated power density, 836 mW cm –2 ) as well as promising catalyst stability. The developed PtNiN/XC72-PBI meets the US DOE 2020 targets of mass activity for the fuel cell catalysts. This work provides a novel approach and a promising pathway on the development of the catalyst using such a synergistic approach-modification of the catalyst structure by nitrogen doping and functionalization of carbon support by polybenzimidazole for both high performance and high durability.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗