NASA NTRSDate not supplied
Perhaps the most important question about Venus is whether it ever had a hydrosphere: liquid water, oceans, and thus an environment suitable for life as we know it. The D/H of Venus’ atmosphere suggests extensive water loss, and climate models may be consistent with global oceans. Rocks dating from that epoch may be preserved in Venus’ tesserae (and especially Ishtar Terra) – inferred to of felsic or silicic rock, which would suggest abundant water. However, the exact elemental compositions of tesserae (silicic or not) will be difficult to retrieve and most of Venus’ surface is basalt flows and volcanic constructs, inferred to be much younger than the oceanic epoch. Remotely sensed data are (and will be) ambiguous about the specific rock types that make up tesserae, and lander spacecraft are almost certain (in the near term) to avoid the rough and precipitous topography of the tesserae and touch down instead on flat, safe basaltic plains or volcanic rises. ‘Recent’ basalts at Venus’ surface could preserve chemical tracers of an ancient aqueous past, if their source regions (material that was re-melted) had been affected by water. This scenario occurs on Earth in Island Arc Basalts (IAB), where their compositions are thought to reflect aqueous alteration of parental midocean ridge basalts (MORB) and incorporation of oceanic sediments. Ancient Venus might have supported plate tectonic and thus have had IAB equivalents; absent plate tectonics, basalt affected by aqueous alteration could have been cycled into its mantle by burial under thick sections of later basalt. Our purpose is to suggest specific chemical clues in current basalts that would permit recognition of those with a history of aqueous interactions from those that did not. We compare Earth’s Ocean Island Basalts (OIB) that involved little water with IAB that show chemical effects ascribable to water. It is not clear that Venus’ basalts can be mapped into terrestrial tectonic settings; however, it seems reasonable that aqueous geochemical processes could have (had) similar effects on both planets.