Transition Benefits of using Low Enriched Uranium Fuel in Fast Reactors
An Evaluation and Screening (E and S) study of nuclear fuel cycle options was recently conducted for the U.S. Department of Energy to identify a relatively small number of promising fuel cycle options with the potential for achieving substantial improvements compared to the current nuclear fuel cycle in the U.S. This study considered the entire fuel cycle, i.e., the complete nuclear energy system from mining to disposal including both once-through and recycle fuel cycles, and identified four options that were most promising, offering the highest benefits compared to the current cycle. The E and S study considered performance at steady-state when evaluating the potential benefits and challenges to achieving that eventual end state. Based on the steady-state findings from the E and S, a methodology was developed for extending the evaluation of the fuel cycle options over the period of transition from the current state of the U.S. fuel cycle to a completely new system. Such methods are being applied to a range of potential transition scenarios involving the aforementioned most promising options, with the goal of identifying issues and challenges associated with such transitions. For the first detailed analysis of transition, a single example scenario of transition was developed in order to implement the methodology. The timescales, assumptions, and specifications of this example scenario were chosen to be representative of a reasonable transition from the current state of the U.S. fuel cycle to a fuel cycle that will continuously recycle U/Pu in fast critical reactors (referred to as 'EG23'). The results represent just one transition pathway, but not necessarily the best or optimized solution for that specific scenario. These transition scenarios were modeled using nuclear fuel cycle systems codes in order to provide the time-dependent mass flows and inventories, reactor/facility capacities and throughputs, and system behavior that were used for performance analyses. These analyses of the example scenario identified a number of potential system issues that can be applied generally, but they did not consider the much broader transition space (scenarios involving various FR startup fuels, different cooling times, growth rates, recycling technologies, etc.). Therefore, additional studies were performed to inform over a broad range of these potential transition pathways. The main focus of this paper is on the results of these additional analyses for transition pathways that involve the use of low enriched uranium fuel as the initial startup fuel for fast reactors during transition. (authors)