Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Nuclear Reactor Testing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24

On-line monitoring for static and dynamic performance verification of I and C systems at Sizewell B nuclear power station - 329

Plant operations and maintenance (O and M) activities account for nearly 75% of the generation cost of a modern nuclear power plant (NPP). This is largely due to time-based maintenance strategies that are expensive, time-consuming, prone to error, and sometimes detrimental to plant equipment. In contrast, condition-based maintenance via on-line monitoring (OLM) can reduce costs, increase equipment availability, and improve safety. OLM uses signals from existing plant sensors to verify the performance of plant instrumentation and equipment while the plant is operating. The Sizewell B nuclear power station in the United Kingdom, a four-loop pressurized water reactor (PWR), uses OLM techniques for several condition-based performance verification activities including pressure, level, and flow transmitter calibration monitoring, resistance temperature detector (RTD) cross calibration, and dynamic performance monitoring of pressure, level, and flow sensing systems. The implementation of OLM has enabled the plant to extend the calibration intervals of its pressure, level, and flow transmitters from 18 to 54 months and has significantly reduced the amount of critical path time needed to perform RTD cross calibration testing (up to 36 hours). Dynamic performance monitoring of its pressure, level, and flow transmitters with OLM has enabled the plant to monitor transmitter and sensing line response degradation while the plant is operating at 100% power and has dramatically reduced testing time versus the traditional hydraulic ramp testing method. The Sizewell B OLM implementation provides valuable insights into on how to overcome the technical and regulatory challenges for widespread OLM adoption by the nuclear industry. This paper describes the technical and regulatory aspects of this implementation and includes detailed examples of static and dynamic performance testing results to demonstrate the types of capabilities of OLM. Analyzing existing signals with OLM technologies can provide significant cost and safety benefits for the existing fleet of nuclear power plants. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

The Virtual Test Bed (VTB) repository: a library of multiphysics reference reactor models using NEAMS tools

With the next generation of nuclear reactors under development, modeling and simulation (MS) tools are being developed by the Nuclear Energy Advanced Modeling and Simulation (NEAMS) program in order to support their design, licensing, and future operation. Mirroring the physical test beds currently under construction (i.e., EBR-II and ZPPR), the Virtual Test Bed (VTB) was launched by the National Reactor Innovation Center (NRIC) in collaboration with NEAMS to support the advanced reactor community. This collaborative effort, which involves multiple teams at both Idaho National Laboratory and Argonne National Laboratory aims to use NEAMS tools to model a wide range of reactor designs. Those models are automatically tested to ensure their continued functionality as the tools are further developed. Examples are extensively documented, each acting as a tutorial for applying the relevant NEAMS tools to that reactor design. Currently, five advanced reactor types (with a total of eight specific design variants) are simulated by a variety of different models. These models range from steady-state, core multiphysics simulations to integrated plant analysis during loss-of flow transients. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Experiment Assembly and Testing in Hot Cell in Support of Advanced Fuels Irradiation Testing

Follow-on experimentation of irradiated nuclear fuel is critical to understanding fuel behavior at different stages of the fuel lifecycle. Transient experiments using fuel with high burnup can enlarge understanding of fuel fragmentation, relocation and dispersal under various reactor accident situations. Assembling experiments with such fuel requires remote operations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Scaling Studies for Advanced High Temperature Reactor Concepts, Final Technical Report: October 2014—December 2017

Computer simulations of nuclear reactor thermal-hydraulic phenomena are often used in the design and licensing of nuclear reactor systems. In order to assess the accuracy of these computer simulations, computer codes and methods are often validated against experimental data. This experimental data must be of sufficiently high quality in order to conduct a robust validation exercise. In addition, this experimental data is generally collected at experimental facilities that are of a smaller scale than the reactor systems that are being simulated due to cost considerations. Therefore, smaller scale test facilities must be designed and constructed in such a fashion to ensure that the prototypical behavior of a particular nuclear reactor system is preserved. The work completed through this project has resulted in scaling analyses and conceptual design development for a test facility capable of collecting code validation data for the following high temperature gas reactor systems and events— 1. Passive natural circulation core cooling system, 2. pebble bed gas reactor concept, 3. General Atomics Energy Multiplier Module reactor, and 4. prismatic block design steam-water ingress event. In the event that code validation data for these systems or events is needed in the future, significant progress in the design of an appropriate integral-type test facility has already been completed as a result of this project. Where applicable, the next step would be to begin the detailed design development and material procurement. As part of this project applicable scaling analyses were completed and test facility design requirements developed. Conceptual designs were developed for the implementation of these design requirements at the Oregon State University (OSU) High Temperature Test Facility (HTTF). The original HTTF is based on a ¼-scale model of a high temperature gas reactor concept with the capability for both forced and natural circulation flow through a prismatic core with an electrical heat source. The peak core region temperature capability is 1400°C. As part of this project, an inventory of test facilities that could be used for these experimental programs was completed. Several of these facilities showed some promise, however, upon further investigation it became clear that only the OSU HTTF had the power and/or peak temperature limits that would allow for the experimental programs envisioned herein. Thus the conceptual design and feasibility study development focused on examining the feasibility of configuring the current HTTF to collect validation data for these experimental programs. In addition to the scaling analyses and conceptual design development, a test plan was developed for the envisioned modified test facility. This test plan included a discussion on an appropriate shakedown test program as well as the specific matrix tests. Finally, a feasibility study was completed to determine the cost and schedule considerations that would be important to any test program developed to investigate these designs and events.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Enhancement of EM Pump Performance through Modeling and Testing

Liquid sodium has seen development as a nuclear reactor coolant in the United States for over 50 years. While sodium has many desirable characteristics as a heat transfer fluid, its reactivity poses numerous engineering challenges for even the most basic plant components like pumps. Despite the challenges, mechanical pumps have seen success in sodium service albeit at the expense of simplicity and flexibility. In fact, significant failures of these pumps have been recorded which can be attributed to their complexity. Notwithstanding the complexity, mechanical pumps are still widely proposed for the main circuit pump of sodium cooled reactors. However, an alternative to mechanical pumps are Electromagnetic Induction Pumps (EMIPs) which use the principle of the Lorentz Force. EMIPs avoid mechanically moving parts in contact with sodium which simplifies the design by avoiding mechanical wear and seals. Therefore, these pumps are generally safer and more reliable than their mechanical counterparts. That being said, EMIPs suffer from relatively low efficiencies that range from 5% to 45%. Some of the inefficiencies are inherent to the EMIPs pumps; namely, inefficiencies arise in the form of resistive heating losses in the fluid itself. However, other inefficiencies arise from Edge Effects which include Finite Length and Finite Width effects. Due to the significant safety advantages EMIPs have compared to mechanical pumps, there is a strong motivation to integrate these technologies into the design of Generation IV liquid-metal-cooled nuclear power plants. However, EMIPs have low efficiencies partly attributed to Edge Effects. Much of the literature focusing on Edge Effects is dated or simply does not exist in the public domain. More recently, numerical models of EMIPs have shown promising results. However, these models are often custom solvers or use complex software suits which limit their application. This report describes the work completed to understand Edge Effects in two EMIPs designs. These designs are the Annular Linear Induction Pump (ALIP) and Permanent Magnet Induction Pump (PMIP) also known as a Moving Magnet Pump (MMP). The methodology developed during this project aim at measuring key performance parameters (pressure-flowrate and efficiency-slip performance) using high temperature liquid-sodium. Baseline experimental measurements were then used to verify the accuracy of numerical models developed in the software suit ANSYS/FLUENT. On the experimental side, instrumentation was developed to characterize the pressure-flowrate and efficiency-slip performance of both the ALIP and PMIP in high-temperature liquid-sodium. Additionally, instrumentation was developed to measure potential output pressure pulsations and the magnetic field distributions. Moreover, a specialized ALIP was constructed to study the impacts magnetic field tapering, also known as coil grading, on the Finite Length Effect. Lastly, experimental performance curves of the PMIP were collected at 300 oC and 600 oC and compared to analytical theory which accounted for Finite Width Effects. These results showed that the Finite Width Effect and non-uniform magnetic field in a PMIP impact the performance. On the numerical side, models were developed using the software suit FLUENT/ANSYS. These methods were initially compared against a simple MHD flow in a Permanent Magnet Electromagnet Flowmeter (PMEMFM). The results were significant in that they showed agreeance between the numerical model and demonstrated that PMEMFM’s could be calibrated numerically. These modeling methods were then applied to a prototypic PMIP. Results showed that this simple model provided reasonably accurate results of the PMIP p-Q performance.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor LEU Fuel Element Flow Test Preliminary Design

As part of the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA) mission to minimize the civilian use of weapon-grade highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuels, the NNSA Office of Material Management and Minimization Conversion Program is collaborating with six U.S. High Performance Research Reactors (USHPRR), including one critical facility, to convert from the use of HEU to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. The conversion objectives for the USHPRR are to develop LEU fuel element designs that will ensure safe reactor operations and maintain the existing experimental facilities performance. The work is being conducted through many interrelated activities that are being completed by stakeholders across organizations. Within the Reactor Conversion (RC) Pillar of the USHPRR Project, four of the USHPRR, including the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR-II, also referred to as MITR), have progressed through preliminary fuel element design using the proposed monolithic alloy of uranium- 10 wt% molybdenum (U-10Mo). Preliminary fuel element design and safety analyses have been completed for MITR. This work has relied on preliminary data for properties, performance, and fabrication tolerances for the fuel systems that have been produced by the Fuel Qualification (FQ), Fuel Fabrication (FF), and RC Pillars of the USHPRR Project.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

ENDF/B-VIII.0 Covariance Data Development and Testing for Advanced Reactors

This report documents the ENDF/B-VIII.0 covariance data development and testing performed at Oak Ridge National Laboratory performed under the auspices of the US Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy. This work supports modeling and simulation of advanced reactor designs in the US by analyzing, validating and improving the nuclear data that provide underlying physics for calculations. This report assesses nuclear data uncertainty information for neutron cross sections, provided in the form of covariance matrices, in the 2018 ENDF/B-VIII.0 library. A review and interpretation of some of the issues with the current covariance library is provided. A new approach to augment the ENDF/B-VIII.0 covariance matrix to accurately reflect uncertainties in the results of modeling and simulation reliant on the current nuclear data library is documented. Rigorous testing of the ENDF/B-VIII.0 covariance data is documented. Finally, the performance of the ENDF/B-VIII.0 covariance data for advanced reactor applications is assessed.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

HTTR-GT/H2 test plant - conceptual design study on new intermediate heat exchanger - 18747

Japan Atomic Energy Agency is developing a nuclear cogeneration demonstration test facility named HTTR-GT/H2 that is connected to the existing test reactor HTTR. In the facility, an intermediate heat exchanger (IHX) at maximum service temperature of 900 deg. C is to be newly constructed to supply the high temperature helium flows to both the helium gas turbine system and the hydrogen production system. The conceptual design study on the IHX is conducted considering the future application to the Gas Turbine High Temperature Reactor 300 Cogeneration (GTHTR300C). Several new concepts are proposed and incorporated in the demonstrating IHX design in order to (1) ease integration of the IHX with the gas turbine system to simplify the cogeneration plant layout; (2) allow conventional low-cost steel for construction of the IHX pressure vessel and nozzles; (3) flexibility to accommodate thermal expansion of the bundle and internal structures.; (4) maintaining the structural integrity at elevated service temperature range. This paper describes the conceptual design study results for the IHX and technical issues to be solved in the future design phases. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Enhancing TREAT’s Pulsing Capabilities Using TREAT Upgrade Fuel

The Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) at Idaho National Laboratory is an air-cooled, thermal, heterogeneous facility used to test reactor materials in simulated accident conditions by inducing fission heating with intense neutron pulses. TREAT operated from 1959 until 1994 with the primary goal of testing fast reactor fuels and was brought back online in 2017 to re-establish DOE's nuclear fuels transient testing capabilities. Beginning in the late 1970s, Idaho National Laboratory worked in conjunction with other organizations to increase TREAT's capability for in-pile testing. While these upgrades had not been implemented by the time the reactor was put into standby mode, new assemblies and graphite-urania fuel blocks with increased uranium concentrations had already been designed and fabricated. This project, as part of Idaho National Laboratory's Department of Reactor Physics, modeled the TREAT Upgrade (TU) fuel assemblies in MCNP and implemented them in an existing TREAT model. Calculations were performed using INL's high performance computer to find a critical combination of TU and standard fuel and this geometry's excess reactivity. Future work will include calculating a power coupling factor in the experiment, determining power peaking factors throughout the core, and assessing how much reactivity would be added by replacing the Inconel-625 cladding with silicon carbide.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor LEU Fuel Element Flow Test Conceptual Design

As part of the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA’s) mission to minimize the civilian use of weapon-grade highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuels, the NNSA Office of Material Management and Minimization (M 3 ) Conversion Program is collaborating with six U.S. High Performance Research Reactors (USHPRR), including one critical facility, to convert from the use of HEU to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. The M 3 conversion objectives for the USHPRR are to develop LEU fuel element designs that will ensure safe reactor operations and maintain the existing experimental performance of each facility. The work is being conducted through many interrelated activities that are being completed by stakeholders across organizations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

Enhancing TREAT's pulsing abilities using TREAT upgrade fuel. SULI Intern Report

The Transient Reactor Test Facility (TREAT) at Idaho National Laboratory is an air-cooled, thermal, heterogeneous facility used to test reactor materials in simulated accident conditions by inducing fission heating with intense neutron pulses. TREAT operated from 1959 until 1994 with the primary goal of testing fast reactor fuels and was brought back online in 2017 to re-establish DOE’s nuclear fuels transient testing capabilities. Beginning in the late 1970s, Idaho National Laboratory worked in conjunction with other organizations to increase TREAT’s capability for in-pile testing. While these upgrades had not been implemented by the time the reactor was put into standby mode, new assemblies and graphite-urania fuel blocks with increased uranium concentrations had already been designed and fabricated. This project, as part of Idaho National Laboratory’s Department of Reactor Physics, modeled the TREAT Upgrade (TU) fuel assemblies in MCNP and implemented them in an existing TREAT model. Calculations were performed using INL’s high performance computer to find a critical combination of TU and standard fuel and this geometry’s excess reactivity. Future work will include calculating a power coupling factor in the experiment, determining power peaking factors throughout the core, and assessing how much reactivity would be added by replacing the Inconel-625 cladding with silicon carbide.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗

Fast Reactor Fuel Testing Considerations

The slide deck is to be presented in a public (i.e., no content restrictions) panel session titled "Versatile Test Reactor: Current Developments" at the 2021 ANS Virtual Annual Meeting. The slides will be used for opening remarks and to present to the audience the technical considerations that motivate the experiment capabilities being incorporated into the Versatile Test Reactor. The line plot included on slide is copied directly from a journal publication, as cited. The values use to make the bar chart come from an open document (ANL-NSE-1) available on OSTI.gov, and are from the EBR-II Mark-VA U-Pu-Zr core design, which was never used. They will be described simply as an unused but illustrative EBR-II core design, and for the purpose of making the point that a range of irradiation and in-service conditions need to be addressed when testing and qualifying a new fuel design for a fast reactor.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Advanced Test Reactor Neutron Dosimetry Report

Results of neutron dosimetry measurements in ATR for cycle 173A-1 are presented. Cobalt and nickel wires were installed in numerous irradiation locations for the duration of the cycle. The specific activity of these wire segments can be used in conjunction with the presented cycle history information to determine the thermal- and fast-neutron fluence rates for each irradiation position during the cycle using the referenced standard test methods.

173A↗

The ATWS analysis of the HTR-10GT core induced by the earthquake - 18489

The 10 MW High Temperature Gas Cooled Test Reactor (HTR-10) has been built in Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET) and has been operating successfully since the beginning of 2003. The core outlet temperature of HTR-10 is 700 deg. C. To verify the technology of gas-turbine direct cycle, at first INET had a plan to increase its core outlet temperature to 750 deg. C and use a helium gas turbine instead of the steam generator (then the reactor is called HTR-10GT). Though HTR-10 has good intrinsic safety, the design basic accidents and beyond design basis accidents of HTR-10GT must be analyzed according to China s nuclear regulations due to changed operation parameters. THERMIX code system is used to study the Anticipated Transient Without Scram (ATWS) caused by an earthquake. The gravity acceleration of the earthquake will make the porosity of the pebble bed smaller, which will thus induce a positive reactivity. The packing fraction of the HTR-10GT core will increase to 0.64 from 0.61, while a reactivity of 1.24% will be inserted into an initial core and 0.788% for an equilibrium core. Then the reactor power increased and the temperature of the core increased. When the neutron flux of power measuring range exceeded 123% and the reactor period becomes less than 20 seconds, the reactor should scram. It was supposed that all the control rods in the reflectors had been blocked and the reactor could not scram. Thus the accident went on and the core temperature and the system pressure increased but the reactor shutdown at last because of its natural negative temperature reactivity feedback mechanism. The residual heat would be removed out of the core by the cavity cooling system. During the accident sequence the maximum fuel temperature was 1223 deg. C. If a temperature coefficient error of 20% was considered during analyzing, the peak temperature of the fuel during the ATWS will reach 1266 deg. C. It was a little higher than 1230 deg. C --the fuel temperature limitation of HTR-10. Now the sphere fuel used in HTR-10GT will also be used in HTR-PM and the temperature limitation has been raised to 1620 deg. C, so the HTR-10GT is safe during the ATWS caused by an earthquake. The paper also compares the analysis result of HTR10-GT to those of HTR-10. The results shows that the HTR-10GT is still safe during the accident though its operating temperature is higher than HTR-10. (authors)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

University of Missouri Research Reactor LEU Fuel Element Flow Test Conceptual Design

As part of the U.S. National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA’s) mission to eliminate or minimize the civilian use of weapon-grade highly enriched uranium (HEU) fuels, the NNSA Office of Material Management and Minimization (M 3 ) Conversion Program is collaborating with six U.S. High Performance Research Reactors (USHPRR), including one critical facility, to convert from the use of HEU to low-enriched uranium (LEU) fuel. The M 3 conversion objectives for the USHPRR are to develop LEU fuel-element designs that will ensure safe reactor operations, as well as maintain the existing experimental performance of each facility. The work is being conducted through many interrelated activities that are being completed by stakeholders across organizations.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗

INL transient reactor restart progress

The United States Department of Energy (DOE) has authorized resumption of transient testing and the restart of the Transient Reactor Test (TREAT) facility. The TREAT reactor was used from 1959 to 1994 to conduct more than 2800 nuclear fuel transient tests prior to being placed in standby in 1994. The plant was extensively upgraded shortly before it was placed in standby. Present day assessments revealed that a sound infrastructure remains at the plant. The assessments included extensive walk-downs and subsequent functional testing. The testing was broad in scope, but ensured that any plant operability issues, including age related degradation were discovered and resolved. The primary age related degradation found was capacitors in Reactor Trip System and Automatic Reactor Control System power supplies. The majority of low voltage power supplies required replacement. Although minimal degradation was evident, in some cases elastomers such as hydraulic hoses were preemptively replaced to take advantage of the existing maintenance window and ensure future reliable operation. Configuration management has been extensively reviewed and the plant components re-labeled using modern standards. The re-labeling required extensive work including updates to plant drawings and procedures. The plant organization has been established to restart the reactor and will subsequently seamlessly transition to reactor operations. For the restart effort, the operating organization is being supplemented by subcontractors including some personnel who were involved in TREAT historical operations. During 2015 and the first half of 2016 substantial progress has been made to renew reactor systems and infrastructure, update procedures and configuration management documents, and put in place a qualified operating organization. Reactor startup is anticipated no later than 2018. (author)

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗

Scoping Study of Effects on the Advanced Test Reactor’s Center Flux Trap Due to Various Loadings in the H and Inner A Test Positions

This study determined the effects experienced by the In-Pile Tube, of the Advanced Test Reactor’s center flux trap, due to various loading configurations of the H and Inner A positions. The effects of concern included: the axial profile of the linear heat generation rate of each fuel rodlet, the axial flux shape, and spectrum, in the fuel, and cladding, of each rodlet, and the total fission heating rate of the entire In-Pile Tube. Additionally, the reactivity worth of each configuration, relative to an ATR configuration with water filling all concerning test positions, was determined. The test positions were filled with commonly used test specimens, backup test specimens, and homogeneous substances. The study was performed using the modeling software MCNP6.2.

21 SPECIFIC NUCLEAR REACTORS AND ASSOCIATED PLANTS↗