Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “libraries”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 433 records · Page 24
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

The Evolution of the Impact Evidence Library Methods – What We Learned

During fiscal years 2020-2022 NASA’s Human Research Program, Exploration Medical Capability Element has worked to source this evidence for the model. During the process several lessons learned have been identified and drive recommendations for future efforts. The ICL 1.0: Spaceflight Medical Operational expertise should be consulted regarding the addition of future conditions. A clinician experienced with the nuances of spaceflight is recommended to have a minimum of 20 hours per condition to adequately source the evidence. Condition definitions should be carefully crafted to maintain mutual exclusivity. Common side effects from medications, common and consequential incidental findings in laboratory studies, and consequential side effects of diagnostic and procedural capabilities should be considered for inclusion as unique conditions in future iterations of the ICL 1.0. Incidence: Spaceflight incidence, although based on small population sizes, is the gold standard. Terrestrial incidence should be applied cautiously. Probability of minor vs. severe cases of the condition: Data informing severity probability of the medical condition are nearly always terrestrial. Special attention should be paid to this metric as it drives outcomes in the model and terrestrial data often overestimate severity of expected cases in spaceflight. Condition duration: Three clinical phases currently exist in the model. They represent the time necessary for diagnosis, treatment/convalescence/recurrence, and the remaining duration of the mission after maximal recovery, respectively. Further subdivision of acute and convalescent treatment/recurrence is recommended. Probability of need for evacuation: Surrogates for “Return to Definitive Care” were chosen prior to data collection. In most cases these surrogates were “need for hospitalization” or “need for surgery.” For many conditions these may not be realistic drivers of “Return to Definitive Care” and should be re-examined. Probability of Crew Mortality: Terrestrial mortality data is difficult to apply to astronauts who, invariably, have less comorbidities than terrestrial subjects. It must be applied judiciously. The proportion of mission tasks impaired by the condition: “Task Impairment” was assigned to each condition prior to the condition duration data becoming available. Future efforts should assign Task Impairment as the final step in sourcing the evidence.

A.J. Kreykes↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Optimizing a Small RNAseq Analysis Pipeline for NASA GeneLab Using Open-Source Tools and Libraries

Small RNA sequencing (small RNAseq) is a powerful tool for studying the regulation of gene expression in various organisms. Small RNAseq has been leveraged in space biology research to study how expression of small RNAs, e.g. micro RNAs (miRNAs), small interfering RNAs (siRNAs), and piwi-interacting RNAs (piRNAs), change upon exposure to the space environment. NASA GeneLab currently hosts small RNAseq raw data derived from space-relevant experiments on the Open Science Data Repository (OSDR). To maximize the accessibility of these data to the scientific community, in addition to hosting raw data, which is only interpretable by bioinformaticians, GeneLab plans to process all small RNAseq datasets and make those processed data available to the scientific community via the OSDR. In this study, we present the development of the GeneLab standardized pipeline for processing small RNAseq datasets. Using human, plant, and synthetic small RNAseq datasets, we interrogate various open-source software and publicly available databases to evaluate their accuracy and reproducibility in each step of the pipeline. For quality control and adapter detection and trimming, we evaluated TrimGalore!, FASTX, SeqKit, and DNApi methods to optimize alignment to reference genomes. We compared BWA, Bowtie, and Bowtie2 to determine the optimal alignment tool. For each alignment tool we also assessed various reference databases, including Ensembl reference genomes and different types of small RNA reference databases, including genome, hairpin, and miRNA references from the miRbase and MirGeneDB databases. To quantify the aligned data, we compared SAMtools, HTSeq, and RSEM for counting alignment events from each alignment tool used. Finally, we evaluated various tools, including DESeq2 and EdgeR, for data normalization and subsequent differential expression analysis. We will present the results from our comparative analyses for each pipeline step and propose a consensus pipeline for processing small RNAseq data derived from various organisms exposed to the space environment.

SmallRNAseq, NASA GeneLab, quality control, adapte↗