Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Final”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1963

Goddard summer workshop program in measurement and simulation of the space environment final report, jun. 18 - sep. 18, 1963

This Final Report describes the actual studies conducted by four Summer Workshop teams. The problems they tackled were suggested by various Goddard activities. All scientific groups within GSFC were invited to submit problems which they desired to be investigated in-house by the Summer Workshop. The groups met with the principal investigator (a visiting professor) of each team in a pre-Workshop conference held in May. Priorities were assigned to the many items submitted and a study program was formulated. Among the principal factors which determined the areas selected for investigation were: the time element, the availability of professor-specialists representing particular disciplines, and the Center's ability to support the effort in providing needed facilities and work space.

SIMULATION↗
NASA NTRS1966

Body-fixed, Three-Axis Reference System Study: Phase II Final Report

This Phase II Body-Fixed, Three-Axis Reference System Study Final Report is the result of a follow-on contract awarded by NASAIMSFC to TRW Systems in April 1966, under Contract No, NASS-20209. of the Phase I1 Study was to refine and supplement the strapdown inertial ’ reference assembly (SIRA), software, airborne computer, and alignment analyses performed during Phase I of the same contract. The purpose Specifically, the Phase I results in many areas were those which could be achieved using simplifying assumptions (linearization) and hand analyses. It was the purpose of the Phase I1 studies to investigate the validity of the Phase I results by means of more sophisticated computer simulations, in which no simplifying assumptions were made, for each of the areas analyzed. The Phase 11 analyses were directed, therefore, at confirming the analytical feasibility asserted by the Phase I results.

Source record↗