Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Mission design”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Considerations For Waste-to-Base Future Research Paths

Developing innovative technologies to reprocess low value waste into high value base products will enable a new “Waste-to-Base” (WtB) capability leading to innovative approaches to space mission design. Systems engineers and mission architects will work together under a new paradigm in logistics planning. Equipment, components, packaging, storage, and structures will be understood not only by functional requirements, but also in terms of useful lifetimes and materials of construction. The advent of a new technical discipline - reprocess engineering - will grow from the intersection between chemical, mechanical, and systems engineering, mission design, and logistics planning. A crowdsourcing approach was employed to gather low Technology Readiness Level (TRL) concepts into workable solutions for issues in trash management, CO 2 processing, foam reprocessing, and fecal processing. The results of the crowdsourcing activities are summarized along with a discussion for future technology development work.

Logistics reduction↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Considerations For Waste-to-Base Future Research Paths

Developing innovative technologies to reprocess low value waste into high value base products will enable a new “Waste-to-Base” (WtB) capability leading to innovative approaches to space mission design. Systems engineers and mission architects will work together under a new paradigm in logistics planning. Equipment, components, packaging, storage, and structures will be understood not only by functional requirements, but also in terms of useful lifetimes and materials of construction. The advent of a new technical discipline - reprocess engineering - will grow from the intersection between chemical, mechanical, and systems engineering, mission design, and logistics planning. A crowdsourcing approach was employed to gather low Technology Readiness Level (TRL) concepts into workable solutions for issues in trash management, CO2 processing, foam reprocessing, and fecal processing. The results of the crowdsourcing activities are summarized along with a discussion for future technology development work.

Logistics reduction↗
NASA NTRS1983

Mission and trajectory design for a Venus radar mapper mission

Results are presented for a mission and trajectory design for a Venus Radar Mapper mission that will place a SAR in a nearly polar orbit around Venus. The mission is intended to obtain images of at least 70% of the planet's surface at a line-pair resolution of 1 km and to produce global maps of the planet's topography and gravity field. The mission design criteria are discussed, along with the spacecraft flight system, the mission performance and domains, a mission profile, the mapping orbit and SAR coverage, and the data acquisition strategy.

Kwok, J. H.↗
NASA NTRS2007

Crew Exploration Vehicle Environmental Control and Life Support Design Reference Missions

In preparation for the contract award of the Crew Exploration Vehicle (CEV), the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) produced two design reference missions for the vehicle. The design references used teams of engineers across the agency to come up with two configurations. This process helped NASA understand the conflicts and limitations in the CEV design, and investigate options to solve them.

Lewis, John F.↗
NASA NTRS2021

Generation-based Evolutionary Tool for the Optimization of Constellations (GenETOC)

With the rapid growth in the capabilities of smaller satellites, satellite architectures that replace a single, extremely capable spacecraft with multiple, cheaper ones are gaining in popularity. Unfortunately, the orbit design process for constellations can be significantly more involved, especiallywhen the relative placement of the individual spacecraft within the constellation is not constrained by mission and/or science objectives. Optimizing a satellite constellation in the presence of multiple, competing objectives is a highly complex problem to which many traditional mathematical optimization methods cannot be applied and few tools exist to help mission designers search for promising candidate mission designs. The Generation-based Evolutionary Tool for the Optimization of Constellations (GenETOC) has been created to search for near-optimal constellation design options. GenETOC combines a modified version of the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA II) with STK Components libraries (a 3rdparty .NET package created by Analytical Graphics Inc.) to create a framework that enables a mission designer to generate a simulation that models the design problem and obtain a family of potential, near-optimal solutions that can be investigated more in detail.

mission design↗
NASA NTRS2003

Interplanetary optical navigation 101

The JPL Navigation and Mission Design Section has two related tasks: Mission Design: calculate a nominal trajectory which meets the diverse needs of the scientists on a particular mission. Locate deterministic maneuvers required to fly the nominal trajectory, while locating statistical maneuvers which correct errors in the actual trajectory. Navigation estimates the flight path of a spacecraft (orbit determination) using three fundamental data sets: ground based astrometric data; radio metric tracking data (Doppler, range).

mission design↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Active Swarm Resiliency in the HelioSwarm Mission

Designed to observe plasma turbulence dynamics in solar wind over a distributed volume of space, the HelioSwarm mission comprises a primary chief spacecraft and eight smaller deputy satellites in uniquely assigned “loops” of periodic relative motion in a P/2 lunar resonant orbit. If one or more deputies fail, this multi-satellite architecture facilitates resiliency for science goals through repositioning of satellites to contingency loops. This strategy of Active Swarm Resiliency mitigates risk by modeling quantitative results ahead of time for mission operators to make informed decisions. Responsive actions meet minimum science objectives based on past and predicted system performance, an approach with applications to future missions with similar architecture and requirements.

Fault Management↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Active Swarm Resiliency in the HelioSwarm Mission

Designed to observe plasma turbulence dynamics in solar wind over a distributed volume of space, the HelioSwarm mission comprises a primary chief spacecraft and eight smaller deputy satellites in uniquely assigned “loops” of periodic relative motion in a P/2 lunar resonant orbit. If one or more deputies fail, this multi-satellite architecture facilitates resiliency for science goals through repositioning of satellites to contingency loops. This strategy of Active Swarm Resiliency mitigates risk by modeling quantitative results ahead of time for mission operators to make informed decisions. Responsive actions meet minimum science objectives based on past and predicted system performance, an approach with applications to future missions with similar architecture and requirements.

Fault Management↗
NASA NTRS2016

NASA's Space Launch System: An Evolving Capability for Exploration

Designed to meet the stringent requirements of human exploration missions into deep space and to Mars, NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) vehicle represents a unique new launch capability opening new opportunities for mission design. While SLS's super-heavy launch vehicle predecessor, the Saturn V, was used for only two types of missions - launching Apollo spacecraft to the moon and lofting the Skylab space station into Earth orbit - NASA is working to identify new ways to use SLS to enable new missions or mission profiles. In its initial Block 1 configuration, capable of launching 70 metric tons (t) to low Earth orbit (LEO), SLS is capable of not only propelling the Orion crew vehicle into cislunar space, but also delivering small satellites to deep space destinations. With a 5-meter (m) fairing consistent with contemporary Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicles (EELVs), the Block 1 configuration can also deliver science payloads to high-characteristic-energy (C3) trajectories to the outer solar system. With the addition of an upper stage, the Block 1B configuration of SLS will be able to deliver 105 t to LEO and enable more ambitious human missions into the proving ground of space. This configuration offers opportunities for launching co-manifested payloads with the Orion crew vehicle, and a new class of secondary payloads, larger than today's cubesats. The evolved configurations of SLS, including both Block 1B and the 130 t Block 2, also offer the capability to carry 8.4- or 10-m payload fairings, larger than any contemporary launch vehicle. With unmatched mass-lift capability, payload volume, and C3, SLS not only enables spacecraft or mission designs currently impossible with contemporary EELVs, it also offers enhancing benefits, such as reduced risk and operational costs associated with shorter transit time to destination and reduced risk and complexity associated with launching large systems either monolithically or in fewer components. As this paper will demonstrate, SLS represents a unique new capability for spaceflight, and an opportunity to reinvent space by developing out-of-the-box missions and mission designs unlike any flown before.

Crumbly, Christopher M.↗
NASA NTRS2008

Mission and Navigation Design for the 2009 Mars Science Laboratory Mission

NASA s Mars Science Laboratory mission will launch the next mobile science laboratory to Mars in the fall of 2009 with arrival at Mars occurring in the summer of 2010. A heat shield, parachute, and rocket-powered descent stage, including a sky crane, will be used to land the rover safely on the surface of Mars. The direction of the atmospheric entry vehicle lift vector will be controlled by a hypersonic entry guidance algorithm to compensate for entry trajectory errors and counteract atmospheric and aerodynamic dispersions. The key challenges for mission design are (1) develop a launch/arrival strategy that provides communications coverage during the Entry, Descent, and Landing phase either from an X-band direct-to-Earth link or from a Ultra High Frequency link to the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter for landing latitudes between 30 deg North and 30 deg South, while satisfying mission constraints on Earth departure energy and Mars atmospheric entry speed, and (2) generate Earth-departure targets for the Atlas V-541 launch vehicle for the specified launch/arrival strategy. The launch/arrival strategy employs a 30-day baseline launch period and a 27-day extended launch period with varying arrival dates at Mars. The key challenges for navigation design are (1) deliver the spacecraft to the atmospheric entry interface point (Mars radius of 3522.2 km) with an inertial entry flight path angle error of +/- 0.20 deg (3 sigma), (2) provide knowledge of the entry state vector accurate to +/- 2.8 km (3 sigma) in position and +/- 2.0 m/s (3 sigma) in velocity for initializing the entry guidance algorithm, and (3) ensure a 99% probability of successful delivery at Mars with respect to available cruise stage propellant. Orbit determination is accomplished via ground processing of multiple complimentary radiometric data types: Doppler, range, and Delta-Differential One-way Ranging (a Very Long Baseline Interferometry measurement). The navigation strategy makes use of up to five interplanetary trajectory correction maneuvers to achieve entry targeting requirements. The requirements for cruise propellant usage and atmospheric entry targeting and knowledge are met with ample margins.

Mission design↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Implementation of a Six Degree of Freedom Precision Lunar Landing Algorithm Using Dual Quaternion Representation

In this study, a powered descent guidance algorithm using a unit dual quaternion represen- tation of the vehicle dynamics is implemented in a high-fidelity simulation and on representative flight hardware. This Dual-Quaternion Guidance (DQG) algorithm is applied to the precision lunar landing problem which levies complex constraints upon the trajectory, including state triggered attitude constraints to enable terrain-relative navigation and hazard detection as well as real-time requirements for landing site re-designation. The investigation explores DQG’s usefulness as a mission design tool as well as a real-time guidance algorithm and defines real-time performance requirements for the hazard detection and avoidance (HDA) re-targeting phase of precision lunar landing. The experiment is presented in two parts. First, DQG is implemented within a high-fidelity Monte Carlo simulation to tune the algorithm’s parameters for the simulated vehicle, to refine the mission design, and to develop guidance update timing requirements to perform the HDA maneuver. DQG generates trajectories online for the divert which are tracked by the vehicle’s inner-loop controllers to the targeted landing site. Second, DQG is run on representative hardware to demonstrate real-time operation through a divert maneuver. These results allow for rapid, flexible, optimal mission design satisfying complex constraints, and for the definition of real-time performance requirements for the HDA operations inherent in precision lunar landing. The HDA divert maneuver is found to require guidance trajectory updates in less than three seconds. DQG is found to be too slow to meet this update timing on the descent and landing computer (DLC) in its current implementation. DQG running on alternative hardware can meet the update rate requirement. Algorithm implementation improvements are also recommended which are expected to speed up computation sufficiently to meet requirements on the DLC.

GN&C↗
DOE OSTI2023

Mission-driven design methodology for optical systems

Disclosed are devices, systems and methods for a mission-driven design framework for optical systems. An exemplary method for improving the design of an optical system includes receive a first plurality of parameters indicative of performance requirements of the optical system, receive a second plurality of parameters representative of characteristics of one or more components in the optical system, generate a mathematical representation that combines the first plurality of parameters and the second plurality of parameters, perform a sensitivity analysis to obtain a ranking of parameters from the first plurality of parameters and the second plurality of parameters, select, based on the ranking of the parameters, at least one parameter that produces a largest change in the mathematical representation, and produce a constraint file comprising the at least one parameter for ingestion by a design tool to enable the design of the optical system.

Higbee, Shawn D.↗
NASA NTRS2000

Human Health and Performance Aspects of the Mars Design Reference Mission

This paper will describe the current planning for exploration-class missions, emphasizing the medical, and human factors aspects of such expeditions. The details of mission architecture are still under study, but a typical Mars design reference mission comprises a six-month transit from Earth to Mar, eighteen months in residence on Mars, and a six-month transit back to Earth. Physiological stressors will include environmental factors such as prolonged exposure to radiation, weightlessness in transit, and hypogravity and a toxic atmosphere while on Mars. Psychological stressors will include remoteness from Earth, confinement, and potential interpersonal conflicts, all complicated by circadian alterations. Medical risks including trauma must also be considered. Results of planning for assuring human health and performance will be presented.

Charles, John B.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Natural environment application for NASP-X-30 design and mission planning

The NASA/MSFC Mission Analysis Program has recently been utilized in various National Aero-Space Plane (NASP) mission and operational planning scenarios. This paper focuses on presenting various atmospheric constraint statistics based on assumed NASP mission phases using established natural environment design, parametric, threshold values. Probabilities of no-go are calculated using atmospheric parameters such as temperature, humidity, density altitude, peak/steady-state winds, cloud cover/ceiling, thunderstorms, and precipitation. The program although developed to evaluate test or operational missions after flight constraints have been established, can provide valuable information in the design phase of the NASP X-30 program. Inputting the design values as flight constraints the Mission Analysis Program returns the probability of no-go, or launch delay, by hour by month. This output tells the X-30 program manager whether the design values are stringent enough to meet his required test flight schedules.

Johnson, D. L.↗
NASA NTRS1993

The first lunar outpost: The design reference mission and a new era in lunar science

The content of the First Lunar Outpost (FLO) Design Reference Mission has been formulated and a 'strawman' science program has been established. The mission consists of two independent launches using heavy lift vehicles that land directly on the lunar surface. A habitat module and support systems are flown to the Moon first. After confirmation of a successful deployment of the habitat systems, the crewed lunar lander is launched and piloted to within easy walking distance (2 km) of the habitat. By eliminating the Apollo style lunar orbit rendezvous, landing sites at very high latitudes can be considered. A surface rover and the science experiments will accompany the crew. The planned stay time is 45 days, two lunar days and one night. A payload of 3.3 metric tons will support a series of geophysics, geology, astronomy, space physics, resource utilization, and life science experiments. Sample return is 150 to 200 kg. The rover is unpressurized and can carry four astronauts or two astronauts and 500 kg of payload. The rover can also operate in robotic mode with the addition of a robotics package. The science and engineering experiment strategy is built around a representative set of place holder experiments.

Lofgren, Gary E.↗
NASA NTRS2017

Initial Results of Heuristic Guided Orbit Selection for a Low Frequency Radio Interferometric Spacecraft Constellation

A constellation of radio telescope spacecraft can leverage interferometry to accurately image distant objects throughout the universe, but mission design must balance among many interrelated constraints. In particular, the number of craft and the selection of time-varying orbital parameters play a pivotal role in determining what interferometric baselines are feasible with respect to different targets, and thus drives the breadth and quality of data available to the constellation. The large combinatorial orbit configuration space and competing concerns present a challenging problem that is not well addressed by traditional mission design processes. This paper describes application of automated optimization methods to help direct mission design effort to the most promising dynamic constellation geometries: those that achieve broad interferometric coverage but remain cost-effective and resilient to failures. Several automatic heuristic-driven optimization algorithms representing complementary search strategies were created to explore among concrete constellation configuration plans. Evaluation of each candidate constellation plan was accelerated by efficiently combining precomputed caches of orbital and interferometric data. Results indicate that leveraging automated optimization for constellation mission design is both practical and illuminating: generated solutions provided both evidence for existing design intuitions as well as fresh insights into novel configurations.

Hernandez, Sonia↗
NASA NTRS2006

Designing capture trajectories to unstable periodic orbits around Europa

The hostile environment of third body perturbations restricts a mission designer's ability to find well-behaved reproducible capture trajectories when dealing with limited control authority as is typical with low-thrust missions. The approach outlined in this paper confronts this shortcoming by utilizing dynamical systems theory and an extensive preexisting database of Restricted Three Body Problem (RTBP) periodic orbits. The stable manifolds of unstable periodic orbits are utilized to attract a spacecraft towards Europa. By selecting an appropriate periodic orbit, a mission designer can control important characteristics of the captured state including stability, minimum altitudes, characteristic inclinations, and characteristic radii among others. Several free parameters are optimized in the non-trivial mapping from the RTBP to a more realistic model. Although the ephemeris capture orbit is ballistic by design, low-thrust is used to target the state that leads to the capture orbit, control the spacecraft after arriving on the unstable quasi-periodic orbit, and begin the spiral down towards the science orbit. The approach allows a mission designer to directly target fuel efficient captures at Europa in an ephemeris model. Furthermore, it provides structure and controllability to the design of capture trajectories that reside in a chaotic environment.

low-thrust↗