DOE OSTI2016
Fuel cycle options (FCOs) with thorium-based fuels have characteristics that may have benefits for meeting certain objectives, such as transuranic actinide inventory management and overall natural resource utilization. Neutron irradiation of thorium and uranium-233 results in negligible production of transuranic actinides. This advantage is compromised, to a degree, when thorium fuels are used in conjunction with uranium-238; however, strategic reprocessing and fuel use (e.g., recycle of plutonium and/or minor actinides) can be used to manage this problem. Furthermore, thorium FCOs with reprocessing can extend the availability of natural nuclear resources by breeding new fissile material, recovering and recycling unused material, and achieving high burnups. In instances where natural thorium is more readily available than uranium, FCOs which use thorium may be preferable from sustainability and energy security perspectives. However, many hybrid uranium-thorium FCOs struggle to perform well in this regard, since large amounts of external fissile material (and therefore natural uranium) are required to breed the required uranium-233. DOE's evaluation and screening effort reports that for every metric ton (MT) of U-233 bred in a light water reactor for reuse, about 1000 MT of natural uranium are required to support such breeding, much of which is used inefficiently due to enrichment. The combination of HWRs and thorium-based fuels has the potential to reduce this consumption of natural uranium resources. Because heavy water moderates neutrons without significant absorption, fissile material requirements are lower compared to those of LWRs. This has enabled conventional 'once-through' HWRs to operate with only slightly-enriched or even natural uranium. Also, HWRs can be combined with LWRs in multistage FCOs where used LWR fuel can be processed and the remaining fissile content is sufficient to support use as fuel in HWRs in spite of the presence of neutron poisons (e.g., uranium-236); this concept has been demonstrated at a research scale in Korea. Thus, additional energy is extracted from the same initial natural uranium feed and uranium enrichment effort. Another consideration with using thorium-based fuels in HWRs is the current limited operational experience of the reactors and associated fuel cycle facilities using these fuels. However, work continues internationally towards gaining further experience. For example, at equilibrium the third stage of India's planned Three-Stage Nuclear Power Program uses thorium/uranium-233 or thorium/plutonium fuels with a fissile supply from second-stage fast reactors. Further, China plans to experiment with low-enriched uranium (LEU)-Th CANFLEX fuel bundles in a once-through configuration in its HWRs and a long-term objective is to transition to thorium use in a closed HWR FCO. Vanderbilt University (VU) and Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) are characterizing multi-stage, thermal-reactor FCOs that incorporate thorium and examining their potential performance. This paper presents insights from the examination of FCOs which consider the synergy of HWRs and thorium. Two multi-stage FCOs which incorporate thorium-based fuels in HWRs have been examined for their potential, one which uses recycled PWR uranium oxide fuel in conjunction with thorium in an HWR, and another that uses recycled HWR fuel in an MSR which also includes thorium. Both of the systems studied offer resource utilization improvements as compared to a once-through LWR fueled with low-enrichment uranium and highlight the potential synergy of thorium and HWRs. (authors)
11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗