Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Trajectory analysis”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 451 records · Page 25

A combined Eulerian-Lagrangian two-phase flow analysis of SSME HPOTP nozzle plug trajectories. I - Methodology

A computer code has been developed for the analysis of SSME (Space Shuttle Main Engine) HPOTP (High Pressure Oxidizer Turbo Pump) nozzle plug trajectories in the turnaround duct downstream of the turbine. The algorithm is based on a combined Eulerian-Lagrangian analysis originally developed for the study of two-phase flows. The Lagrangian part of this analysis has been enhanced to include three-dimensional particle motion and the effect of particle-wall collisions in complex geometries (with a large number of boundaries). The sensitivity of the nozzle plug trajectories to a variety of parameters has been determined, via the qualitative analysis of a select number of computed trajectories. The results of extensive parametric studies have been reported in a companion paper.

De Jong, Frederik J.↗

Survey of optimization techniques for nonlinear spacecraft trajectory searches

Mathematical analysis of the optimal search of a nonlinear spacecraft trajectory to arrive at a set of desired targets is presented. A high precision integrated trajectory program and several optimization software libraries are used to search for a converged nonlinear spacecraft trajectory. Several examples for the Galileo Jupiter Orbiter and the Ocean Topography Experiment (TOPEX) are presented that illustrate a variety of the optimization methods used in nonlinear spacecraft trajectory searches.

Wang, Tseng-Chan↗

An IR Sounding-Based Analysis of the Saharan Air Layer in North Africa

Intense daytime surface heating over barren-to-sparsely vegetated surfaces results in dry convective mixing. In the absence of external forcing such as mountain waves, the dry convection can produce a deep, well-mixed, nearly isentropic boundary layer that becomes a well-mixed residual layer in the evening. These well-mixed layers (WML) retain their unique mid-tropospheric thermal and humidity structure for several days. To detect the SAL and characterize its properties, AIRS Level 2 Ver. 6 temperature and humidity products (2003-Present) are evaluated against rawinsondes and compared to model analysis at each of the 55 rawinsonde stations in northern Africa. To distinguish WML from Saharan air layers (WMLs of Saharan origin), the detection involved a two-step process: 1) algorithm-based detection of WMLs in dry environments (less than 7 g per kilogram mixing ratio) 2) identification of Sahara air layers (SAL) by applying Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory (HYSPLIT) back trajectories to determine the history of each WML. WML occurrence rates from AIRS closely resemble that from rawinsondes, yet rates from model analysis were up to 30% higher than observations in the Sahara due to model errors. Despite the overly frequent occurrence of WMLs from model analysis, HYSPLIT trajectory analysis showed that SAL occurrence rates (given a WML exists) from rawinsondes, AIRS, and model analysis were nearly identical. Although the number of WMLs varied among the data sources, the proportion of WMLs which were classified as SAL was nearly the same. The analysis of SAL bulk properties showed that AIRS and model analysis exhibited a slight warm and moist bias relative to rawinsondes in non-Saharan locations, but model analysis was notably warmer than rawinsondes and AIRS within the Sahara. The latter result is likely associated with the dearth of available data assimilated by model analysis in the Sahara. The variability of SAL thicknesses was reasonably captured by both AIRS and model analysis, but the former favor layers than are thinner than observations. Finally, further analysis of HYSPLIT trajectories revealed that fewer than 10% and 33% of all SAL back trajectories passed through regions with notable precipitation (>100 mm accumulated along the trajectory path) or Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD greater than 0.4, 75th percentile of AOD) on average, respectively. Trajectory analysis indicated that only 57% of Saharan and 24% of non-Saharan WMLs are definitively of Saharan origin (Saharan requirement: Two consecutive days in Sahara and 24 or more of those hours within 72 hours of detection). Non-SAL WMLs either originate from local-to-regionally generated residual layers or from mid-latitude air streams that do not linger over the Sahara for a sufficient time period. Initial analysis shows these non-SAL WMLs tend to be both notably cooler and slightly moister than their SAL counter parts. Continuing analysis will address what role Saharan and non-Saharan air masses characteristics may play on local and regional environmental conditions.

Nicholls, Stephen D.↗

Keplerian Analysis for Versatile Evaluation of Arbitrary Trajectories

Designing interplanetary missions is an iterative process, with a tight coupling between mission analysis and vehicle design. The ability to simultaneously process both analyses early on can provide significant benefits in both the concept formulation and in overall mission feasibility. To implement such a simultaneous analysis process, there is a need to model interplanetary trajectories rapidly while maintaining an acceptable level of fidelity. Many simple patched conics tools make too many assumptions to satisfactorily address all relevant constraints and objectives, while full-fidelity trajectory design tools often require more time and expertise than is available in early conceptual studies. Hence, some form of middle-ground modeling tool would provide value. This paper introduces the development of such a tool using Python. This tool, Keplerian Analysis for Versatile Evaluation of Arbitrary Trajectories (KAVEAT), implements a patched conics method that enforces continuity of state (time, mass, position, velocity) through all transitions between various spheres of influence on the trajectory. The trajectory is constructed in an object-oriented manner, dynamically assembling unique maneuvers such as departure burns, heliocentric transfers (ballistic or with electric propulsion), and planetary flybys (powered or unpowered). Each maneuver has its own specific set of basic inputs needed to define it. The tool then takes these defined maneuvers, strings them together creating all the interdependencies required, and solves for the ideal trajectory using a gradient-based optimizer.

Katherine T McBrayer↗

Compatibility of TOPEX/Poseidon trajectory propagation with JPL and GSFC/FDF operational software

Two independent trajectory software systems are used to perform the TOPEX/Poseidon operational orbit determination and propagation: the Goddard Trajectory Determination System (GTDS) at the GSF/FDF and the Double Precision Trajectory System (DPTRAJ) at JPL. GTDS is used for operational tracking and TDRS-based orbit determination. DPTRAJ is used for ephemeris generation necessary to conduct day-to-day mission operations. This paper describes the DPTRAJ/GTDS trajectory comparison analysis conducted jointly by JPL and GSFC to ensure the compatibility of these two independent trajectory software systems.

Salama, Ahmed↗

Trajectories for High Specific Impulse High Specific Power Deep Space Exploration

Preliminary results are presented for two methods to approximate the mission performance of high specific impulse high specific power vehicles. The first method is based on an analytical approximation derived by Williams and Shepherd and can be used to approximate mission performance to outer planets and interstellar space. The second method is based on a parametric analysis of trajectories created using the well known trajectory optimization code, VARITOP. This parametric analysis allows the reader to approximate payload ratios and optimal power requirements for both one-way and round-trip missions. While this second method only addresses missions to and from Jupiter, future work will encompass all of the outer planet destinations and some interstellar precursor missions.

Polsgrove, T.↗

Recovery from Missed Thrust During Gateway's NRHO Insertion Using Auxiliary Propulsion

Various strategies are assessed by which the first two elements of Gateway could recover from missed thrust events during insertion into a Near Rectilinear Halo Orbit (NRHO). Recovery strategies are assessed in terms of their ability to maintain the desired NRHO insertion epoch ad well as their cost in terms of additional time and ∆v required to reach the NRHO. Strategies utilize a 50 kW Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) system onboard the Power and Propulsion Element (PPE). Recovery solutions are found that, in the event of a missed thrust arc during the Insertion Phase of the Gateway Lunar Transit, deliver the space-craft into the NRHO within three additional revolutions (roughly 21 days) and 80 m/s ∆v.

missed thrust↗

Casper-1, Part 6: Uncertainty Quantification, Factor Effects, and Outlier Analysis for an On-Board Airplane Trajectory Prediction Function

This report presents data analysis results for a simulation-based approach named CASPEr (Characterization of Airplane State Prediction Error) to characterize the performance of onboard energy state and automation mode prediction functions for terminal area arrival and approach phases of flight over a wide range of conditions. In particular, the results include quantification of energy state (i.e., altitude and airspeed) prediction performance, models for prediction performance as a function of initial energy state (i.e., initial altitude, airspeed, and weight) and weather factors, and analysis of outlier prediction performance. Wind speed, wind direction, and wind gradient were found to be major factors in energy state prediction performance. Initial energy and gust intensity were also significant factors in airspeed prediction performance. Furthermore, the results suggest that errors in automation mode prediction may be a major contributor to outlier prediction performance.

Torres-Pomales, Wilfredo↗

Use of Forecast Atmosphere for Earth Entry, Descent, and Landing Modeling

Flight mechanics simulations are used to characterize the performance of Earth entry, descent, and landing vehicles. Atmospheric prediction models are often a key component of these simulations. Global atmospheric models are used for both engineering design due to their ability to define atmospheric properties over a large swath of locations and times as well as used for the availability of atmospheric uncertainties in the models that can be used in statistical performance analysis. However for day-of-flight operations, the use of forecast atmospheres based on more current measurements are beneficial to the accuracy of the performance prediction, including landing locations. Reanalysis of these forecasts can also be used for post-flight analysis, including trajectory reconstruction. This paper describes how forecast atmospheres can be beneficial for Earth entry, descent, and landing analysis and ways these models can be implemented in simulations.

Soumyo Dutta↗

ADEPT Sounding Rocket One (SR-1) Flight Test

A sounding rocket flight test was conducted on a mechanically-deployed entry vehicle (DEV) known as the Adaptable Deployable Entry and Placement Technology (ADEPT). This flight test was a major milestone in a technology development campaign for ADEPT: the application of ADEPT for small secondary payloads. The test was conducted above White Sands Missile Range (WSMR), New Mexico on a SpaceLoft XL rocket on September 12, 2018. The first objective of the SR-1 flight test was to demonstrate that ADEPT could transform from a compact stowed configuration, separate from the launch vehicle, and successfully deploy exo-atmospherically into the desired low ballistic coefficient entry configuration. The second objective was to characterize the aerodynamic performance of the deployed configuration in order to evaluate the faceted blunt body geometry dynamic stability characteristics as it decelerated from supersonic to subsonic speeds.The ADEPT DEV had several sensors on-board and also leveraged third-party data sources for post-flight analysis and trajectory reconstruction. Based upon data review, the launch vehicle met exo-atmospheric delivery performance requirements of spin rate, no re-contact, separation velocity, and delivery altitude. The unique ADEPT forebody geometry (blunted octagonal pyramid, 0.7 m diameter at the rib tips) and aftbody configuration has never flown before. The forebody half cone angle at the ribs is 70 deg, while the half cone angle mid gore is 68.5 deg. The aftbody, where the 3U CubeSat 'payload' resides is a rectangular prism that extends ~ ½ the minimum forebody diameter behind the nose. Understanding DEV blunt body dynamic stability performance is critical for determining how they can be employed for atmospheric entry, descent and landing.The primary data products were used to perform flight mechanics analysis and reconstruct the as-flown trajectory. On-board video recovered post-flight demonstrated that the DEV achieved and maintained the desired entry configuration. Post-flight analyses showed that the vehicle met the threshold of achieving stable flight below Mach = 0.8. The ADEPT project has focused on ballistic, axisymmetric shapes as the logical 'first step' in mission infusion applications. With the current maturation and development of the ballistic (non-lifting) 1 m class ADEPT, the next step in ADEPT maturation is the focus on configurations that are capable of generating lift in order to accomplish aerocapture and precision landing mission capabilities. ADEPT is particularly attractive for evaluating various guidance and control approaches as the deployable structure enables attachment points for various actuation methods such as control surfaces, moving mass elements, or RCS thrusters. The ADEPT sounding rocket flight test provided a low-cost means of achieving significant system level maturity for the 1 m class ADEPT configuration. A description of the technology, system components, flight test execution, and conclusions will be described.

Cassell, Alan↗