SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
- Background - MPATH Ground Control Station (GCS) - Design Approach - Software Features - Initial Usability Results - Simulated Flight Activity - Real Flight Activity - Multi-Aircraft Control Flight Assessment - Design Recommendations
The DRF team in collaboration with the California Civil Air Patrol (CAP), executed a field test that identified a preliminary set of data and reasoning service areas that can be enabled and enhanced by DRF to potentially bring forth improved accuracy and reduced latency to CAP’s mission critical decision making, in wildfire detection.
There are multiple opportunities to utilize Data & Reasoning Fabric technologies in wildfire response: (1) Supporting autonomous agents to discover data sources and transact with systems, (2) Fusing data in real-time, and (3) Supporting complex operations in a dynamic real-time environment .
In order for UTM to support safe multiple UAS operations within and beyond visual line of sight, data related to weather, 3D structures, other aircraft, etc. must be made available. To support safe operations data must be collected and maintained considering security and resilience.
Interns are a large part of our success at NASA. Let's take a look at the important work and contributions these students have made to the Data & Reasoning Fabric project.
Introduction of DRF team members and is in conjunction with the Data and Reasoning Fabric (DRF) Project, and can be reviewed in the related records.
This document is a poster for imaginAviation 2023 that describes multi-aircraft operations in the National Airspace.
This work computationally investigated the rotor blade vortex-induced separation recently observed during an aerodynamic rotor test campaign in the NASA Langley Research Center 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel. Two separate approaches (i.e., airfoil modification and blade tip modification) were studied to mitigate the vortex-induced separation. Low-fidelity tools based on blade element momentum theory were shown to mispredict the rotor inflow and were also shown to not capture the vortex-induced separation caused by perpendicular blade-vortex interaction. This misprediction was exploited to isolate the aerodynamic thrust deficit caused by the vortex-induced separation (i.e., 20%) from the thrust deficit due to inflow variation (i.e., 31%). High-fidelity tools were shown to reasonably predict aerodynamic forces within 13% and flow separation when compared to experimental results. The modified airfoil variant of the baseline rotor effectively mitigated the vortex-induced separation while the blade tip modified variant still showed separation, though the size and strength of the vortex was reduced. Acoustic predictions were underpredicted by 10 dB from preliminary measurements taken in the untreated wind tunnel. Broadband noise contributions from different rotor blade sections showed that self-noise due to flow separation and other turbulent boundary layer mechanisms was the dominant noise source for all three rotor cases, followed by blade-wake interaction noise caused by perpendicular blade-vortex interactions.
This paper describes an efficient computational approach for aircraft aerodynamic model development intended for use in flight dynamics simulations. A commercial surface-vorticity flow solver called FlightStream is employed to predict performance, stability, and control characteristics for a NASA subscale electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft in its isolated-airframe configuration. A framework is described to rapidly convert OpenVSP geometry into a form compatible with the FlightStream software. FlightStream predictions for the variation of aerodynamic force and moment coefficients with airflow angles and control surface deflection angles are compared to static wind-tunnel data to illustrate the process and assess the accuracy of FlightStream solutions. The results and approach presented in this paper are encouraging for use in rapid aerodynamic modeling and flight dynamics simulation development early in the aircraft design process.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Trust and attention allocation are pivotal determinants in human-automation interaction. However, there are scarce empirical findings regarding the relationship between trust and attention allocation. Observations from our previous work suggested there may be a negative correlation between trust in automation and eye movement towards automation, though no formal analysis of these data had been conducted to quantify this relationship. The present meta-analysis examined the relationship between three dimensions of trust in automation (performance, process, and purpose) and visual attention allocation to the automation. Specifically, we applied Cumming’s (2014) meta-analysis technique to combine evidence across three experiments. Results indicated a negative correlation between trust in automation and visual sampling of the automated system monitoring task for performance-based trust, but not for process- or purpose-based trust. These findings suggest that operators scanned the automation’s behavior less frequently when indicating higher performance-based trust towards the automation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
As the governing body of flight operations in the highly anticipated emergent area of Upper Class E airspace (60,000 ft and above), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has recognized the potential for a possible extensible traffic management system for new entrants into this domain. Following the successes with Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Traffic Management (UTM) and Advanced / Urban Air Mobility (AAM / UAM) Traffic Management programs, FAA put forth an initial concept of operations for supporting the start of the Upper Class E Traffic Management (ETM) concept. Like UTM and AAM / UAM, ETM is envisioned to also be a community-based, industry driven cooperative management concept. However, tailoring it to be adaptable to the atmospheric communication, navigation, and surveillance deficits, as well as the diverse vehicle and mission profiles operating in the ETM environment will be the challenge. As such, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Ames Research Center has been investigating several technologies that will help enable industry in the development of this new type of cooperative operating environment. These technologies are being prototyped and will be tested in a collaborative evaluation of an initial ETM system in late 2023. The evaluation will concentrate on building out ETM system technologies that will inform the participants regarding operational intent sharing, strategic conflict detection, and the resultant deconfliction process. In addition to the technical aspects, key roles and responsibilities will need to be defined. This will be done through exploring community-agreed upon Cooperative Operating Practices (COPs) that include procedures and capabilities to aid in timely, strategic conflict identification and resolution to be developed during the evaluation. As an initial step to the evaluation, the ETM research team at NASA Ames solicited industry feedback on various aspects of ETM operations from subject matter experts. A virtual tabletop walkthrough session was held over a two-day period to follow a roadmap through the functional steps needed to build COPs, focusing on strategic conflict detection and resolution. Overall, the ETM tabletop provided insights into how the community wanted to instantiate the generation and sharing of operational intent, detect strategic conflicts and resolve those conflicts using a preliminary set of procedural community-agreed upon COPs.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
As the governing body of flight operations in the highly anticipated emergent area of Upper Class E airspace (60,000 ft and above), the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has recognized the potential for a possible extensible traffic management system for new entrants into this domain. Following the successes with Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Traffic Management (UTM) and Advanced / Urban Air Mobility (AAM / UAM) Traffic Management programs, FAA put forth an initial concept of operations for supporting the start of the Upper Class E Traffic Management (ETM) concept. Like UTM and AAM / UAM, ETM is envisioned to also be a community-based, industry driven cooperative management concept. However, tailoring it to be adaptable to the atmospheric communication, navigation, and surveillance deficits, as well as the diverse vehicle and mission profiles operating in the ETM environment will be the challenge. As such, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Ames Research Center has been investigating several technologies that will help enable industry in the development of this new type of cooperative operating environment. These technologies are being prototyped and will be tested in a collaborative evaluation of an initial ETM system in late 2023. The evaluation will concentrate on building out ETM system technologies that will inform the participants regarding operational intent sharing, strategic conflict detection, and the resultant deconfliction process. In addition to the technical aspects, key roles and responsibilities will need to be defined. This will be done through exploring community-agreed upon Cooperative Operating Practices (COPs) that include procedures and capabilities to aid in timely, strategic conflict identification and resolution to be developed during the evaluation. As an initial step to the evaluation, the ETM research team at NASA Ames solicited industry feedback on various aspects of ETM operations from subject matter experts. A virtual tabletop walkthrough session was held over a two-day period to follow a roadmap through the functional steps needed to build COPs, focusing on strategic conflict detection and resolution.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.