Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Solid electrolyte interphase”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 469 records · Page 26

Regulated Breathing Effect of Silicon Negative Electrode for Dramatically Enhanced Performance of Li-Ion Battery

Si is an attractive negative electrode material for lithium ion batteries due to its high specifi c capacity (≈3600 mAh g –1 ). However, the huge volume swelling and shrinking during cycling, which mimics a breathing effect at the material/electrode/cell level, leads to several coupled issues including fracture of Si particles, unstable solid electrolyte interphase, and low Coulombic effi ciency. In this work, the regulation of the breathing effect is reported by using Si–C yolk–shell nanocomposite which has been well-developed by other researchers. The focus is on understanding how the nanoscaled materials design impacts the mechanical and electrochemical response at electrode level. For the fi rst time, it is possible to observe one order of magnitude of reduction on breathing effect at the electrode level during cycling: the electrode thickness variation reduced down to 10%, comparing with 100% in the electrode with Si nanoparticles as active materials. The Si–C yolk–shell nanocomposite electrode exhibits excellent capacity retention and high cycle effi ciency. In situ transmission electron microscopy and fi nite element simulations consistently reveals that the dramatically enhanced performance is associated with the regulated breathing of the Si in the new composite, therefore the suppression of the overall electrode expansion.

Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory↗

Crossover Effects in Batteries with High–Nickel Cathodes and Lithium–Metal Anodes

It is well understood that cathode-to-anode crossover, especially of transition-metal ions, can significantly impact the long-term cycling of lithium-ion batteries. The dissolved transition-metal ions in lithium-ion cells deposit on the graphite anode, disrupt the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI), and catalyze further side reactions. Meanwhile, crossover effects in lithium-metal batteries have rarely been studied. This study is the first to investigate crossover effects in lithium-metal batteries with high-nickel layered-oxide cathodes. It is shown that the crossover of transition-metal ions from LiNi 0.9 Mn 0.05 Co 0.05 O 2 has minimal effect on the lithium-metal anode (LMA) due to the following reasons. The catalytic transition metals 1) have less effect on an inherently reactive LMA, 2) are diluted in a thicker SEI, and 3) are produced in overall lower quantity due to the limited cycle life of the LMA. Conversely, the LMA generates soluble decomposition products that cross over to the cathode even during early cycling. This crossover accelerates impedance growth and capacity fade at the cathode and is partially responsible for the mismatch between the performance of half and full-cells with layered-oxide cathodes. Finally, this study highlights the need for better battery design with LMA, potentially including electrolyte or cell modifications.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

High Current-Density-Charging Lithium Metal Batteries Enabled by Double-Layer Protected Lithium Metal Anode

The practical application of lithium (Li) metal anode (LMA) is still hindered by non-uniformity of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), formation of "dead" Li, and continuous consumption of electrolyte although LMA has an ultrahigh theoretical specific capacity and a very low electrochemical redox potential. Herein, we report a facile protection strategy for LMA using a double layer (DL) coating that consists of a polyethylene oxide (PEO)-based bottom layer which is highly stable with LMA and promotes uniform ion flux, and a cross-linked polymer-based top layer which prevents solvation of PEO layer in electrolytes. Li deposited on DL-coated Li (DL@Li) exhibits a smoother surface and much larger size than that deposited on bare Li. The LiF/Li 2 O enriched SEI layer generated by the salt decomposition on top of DL@Li further suppresses the side reactions between Li and electrolyte. Driven by the abovementioned advantageous features, the DL@Li||LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 cells demonstrate capacity retention of 92.4% after 220 cycles at a current density of 2.1 mA cm -2 (C/2 rate) and stability at a high charging current density of 6.9 mA cm -2 (1.5C rate). These results indicate that the DL protection is promising to overcome the rate limitation of LMAs and high energy-density Li metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Demarcating the Impact of Electrolytes on High–Nickel Cathodes and Lithium–Metal Anode

The ever-growing demand for low-cost, high-energy-density lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) makes high-nickel layered oxide cathodes, especially LiNiO 2 (LNO), one of the most appealing candidates. However, poor structural and surface instability that leads to a short cycle life remains a formidable challenge. Herein, a systematic investigation of LNO performance in two different electrolytes (a conventional carbonate-based LP57 electrolyte and an ether-based localized high-concentration electrolyte (LHCE)) with different charge cut-off voltages is presented. These findings show that the cathode-electrolyte reactivity is the main factor dictating the performance degradation of LNO at high voltages rather than bulk integrity. While LHCE can provide good stability beyond 4.2 V with a robust, uniform solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer on the Li-metal anode, there is no significant difference in cyclability at 4.15 V (96% capacity retention after 200 cycles) for both LP57 and LHCE. From LNO symmetric cells, carbonate-based electrolyte is found to be good for LNO stability while ether-based electrolyte is beneficial toward Li-metal anode. Furthermore, a suitable electrolyte or a low cut-off voltage is necessary to maintain a decent cycle life. Altogether, this work highlights the impact of electrolyte and cut-off voltage on LNO and Li-metal, which can help guide the development of cells based on LNO.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Sucrose‐Based Dense, Pure, and Highly‐Crystalline Graphitic Materials for Lithium‐Ion Batteries

At present, most synthetic graphite materials commonly used as anode active ingredients in lithium-ion cells are produced by graphitization of petroleum cokes. The carbon footprint associated with synthetic graphite production is significant. Thus, bio-derived and cheap precursors, such as saccharides, would be an attractive alternative for the sustainable production of graphitic carbons. However, they are non-graphitizing at temperatures as high as 3000 °C, preserving the curved, fullerene-like structure of graphene layers and microporosity. Consequently, many lithium ions are consumed during the formation of solid electrolyte interphase films and passivated in the nanovoids. Here, a method for the production of pure, crystalline, graphitic materials based on sucrose disposed of microporosity is presented, which also works with a variety of saccharides and other organic precursors of hard carbons—generally considered incapable of such transformation. This process employs catalytic graphitization by Si particles at high temperatures. Finally, the electrochemical response of such derived sucrose-based graphite in Li-ion half-cells demonstrated its feasibility to serve as an anode active material for rechargeable Li-ion batteries.

Si particles↗

In Situ Cyclized Polyacrylonitrile Coating: Key to Stabilizing Porous High-Entropy Oxide Anodes for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries

High-entropy oxides (HEOs) composed of multiple metal elements have attracted great attention as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) due to the synergistic effects of various metal species. However, the practical applications of HEOs are still plagued by poor conductivity, unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) and poor cycling stability. In this work, nanosized (FeCoNiCrMn) 3 O 4 HEO (NHEO) is prepared successfully by the NaCl-assisted mechanical ball-milling strategy. Novelly, polyacrylonitrile (PAN) is used as the binder and then in situ thermochemically cyclized to construct a cyclized PAN (cPAN) outer layer onto NHEO (NHEO-cPAN). The in situ formed cPAN coating not only improves the electrical conductivity, but also reinforces the structural and interfacial stability, and thereby, the resulted NHEO-cPAN electrode exhibits significantly enhanced rate and cyclic performance. Specifically, NHEO-PAN500 electrode delivers a high reversible capacity of 560 mAh g –1 at 5 A g –1 and a high-capacity retention of 83% over 800 cycles at 3 A g –1 . Furthermore, the structural evolution and electrochemical behavior of NHEO-PAN electrode during discharge/charge is systematically investigated by operando X-ray diffraction, in situ impedance spectroscopy and ex situ high-resolution transmission electron microscopy. Therefore, this work provides new insights into the engineering of electrode and interphase for high-performance HEO electrode materials, potentially enlightening the practical applications of HEO-based LIBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Chemo‐Mechanics Interplay Dictates Interface Instability and Asymmetry in Plating and Stripping of Sodium Metal Electrodes

Abstract The development of practical sodium (Na) metal batteries is hindered by key challenges including dendrite growth, dead metal formation, and unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) growth. A fundamental understanding of the chemo‐mechanical interactions at the Na/SEI interface is critical for designing stable Na metal electrodes. In this work, the coupled electrochemical‐mechanical processes governing the morphological evolution and stability of Na metal during plating and stripping are investigated. The heterogeneous nature of transport and morphological interactions at the Na/SEI interface is revealed to result in nonuniform mechanical overpotentials and reaction fronts, eventually leading to Na filaments or pits. The spatio‐temporal evolution of stress heterogeneities during Na plating and stripping is shown to be asymmetric, manifesting in varying morphological nonuniformities and instability modes. The crucial role of external pressure in modulating the electrochemical‐transport interactions, the mechanical response of Na, and the localized reaction currents and stresses at the Na/SEI interface is demonstrated. At different external pressure conditions, the correlation between transport heterogeneities in the SEI and the onset and propagation of interface instability has been delineated. This work highlights the need for synergistic tailoring of external pressure and SEI heterogeneity toward achieving stable electrodeposition and dissolution in Na metal electrodes.

Singla, Aditya [School of Mechanical Engineering P↗

Crossover Effects of Transition‐Metal Ions on Lithium‐Metal Anode in Localized High Concentration Electrolytes

Abstract The stability of the solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) is critical to the cycle life of lithium‐metal batteries (LMBs). While the crossover effect of transition‐metal ions from cathode to anode is extensively studied in lithium‐ion batteries with graphite anodes, its impact on LMBs remains largely unexplored. Herein, this study investigates the electrochemical and chemical properties of SEI layers formed on lithium‐metal anodes in localized high‐concentration electrolytes (LHCEs) containing dissolved transition‐metal ions (Ni 2+ , Mn 2+ , and Co 2+ ). It is demonstrated that transition‐metal ions in LHCEs reduce the coulombic efficiency (CE) and significantly degrade the cycle life of LMBs. Time‐of‐flight secondary‐ion mass spectrometry (ToF‐SIMS) reveals that SEI structures differ depending on the dissolved TM ion, with Mn 2+ and Co 2+ inducing severe destabilization, and Ni 2+ exhibiting a less severe impact. These findings underscore the detrimental effects of transition‐metal crossover effects in LMB systems.

Guo, Zezhou [Materials Science and Engineering Pro↗

Flexible Aqueous Li‐Ion Battery with High Energy and Power Densities

Abstract A flexible and wearable aqueous symmetrical lithium‐ion battery is developed using a single LiVPO 4 F material as both cathode and anode in a “water‐in‐salt” gel polymer electrolyte. The symmetric lithium‐ion chemistry exhibits high energy and power density and long cycle life, due to the formation of a robust solid electrolyte interphase consisting of Li 2 CO 3 ‐LiF, which enables fast Li‐ion transport. Energy densities of 141 Wh kg −1 , power densities of 20 600 W kg −1 , and output voltage of 2.4 V can be delivered during >4000 cycles, which is far superior to reported aqueous energy storage devices at the same power level. Moreover, the full cell shows unprecedented tolerance to mechanical stress such as bending and cutting, where it not only does not catastrophically fail, as most nonaqueous cells would, but also maintains cell performance and continues to operate in ambient environment, a unique feature apparently derived from the high stability of the “water‐in‐salt” gel polymer electrolyte.

Yang, Chongyin↗

Review of Emerging Potassium–Sulfur Batteries

Abstract This is the first review on potassium–sulfur (K–S) batteries (KSBs), which are emerging metal battery (MB) systems. Since KSBs are quite new, there are fundamental questions regarding the electrochemistry of S‐based cathode and of K metal anode, as well as the holistic aspects of full‐cell performance. The manuscript begins with a critical discussion regarding the potassium–sulfur electrochemistry and on how it differs from the much better‐known lithium–sulfur. Cathodes are discussed next, focusing on the role of sulfur structure, carbon host chemistry and porosity, and electrolytes in establishing the reversible potassium sulfide K 2 S n phase sequence, the parasitic polysulfide shuttle, pulverization‐driven capacity fade, etc. Following is a discussion of solid‐state electrolytes (SSEs), including of hybrid solid–liquid systems that show much promise. Potassium metal anodes are then critically reviewed, emphasizing electrolyte reactions to form stable versus unstable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), covering the current understanding of potassium dendrites, and highlighting the deep‐eutectic K–Na alloying approaches for room temperature liquid anodes. The manuscript concludes with K–S batteries, focusing on cell architectures and providing quantitative performance comparisons as master plots. Unanswered scientific/technological questions are identified, emerging research opportunities are discussed, and potential experimental and simulation‐based studies that can unravel these unknowns are proposed.

Ding, Jia↗

Stable Potassium Metal Anodes with an All-Aluminum Current Collector through Improved Electrolyte Wetting

This is the first report of successful potassium metal battery anode cycling with an aluminum-based rather than copper-based current collector. Dendrite-free plating/stripping is achieved through improved electrolyte wetting, employing an aluminum-powder-coated aluminum foil “Al@Al,” without any modification of the support surface chemistry or electrolyte additives. The reservoir-free Al@Al half-cell is stable at 1000 cycles (1950 h) at 0.5 mA cm -2 , with 98.9% cycling Coulombic efficiency and 0.085 V overpotential. The pre-potassiated cell is stable through a wide current range, including 130 cycles (2600 min) at 3.0 mA cm -2 , with 0.178 V overpotential. Al@Al is fully wetted by a 4 m potassium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide-dimethoxyethane electrolyte (θCA = 0°), producing a uniform solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) during the initial galvanostatic formation cycles. On planar aluminum foil with a nearly identical surface oxide, the electrolyte wets poorly (θCA = 52°). This correlates with coarse irregular SEI clumps at formation, 3D potassium islands with further SEI coarsening during plating/stripping, possibly dead potassium metal on stripped surfaces, and rapid failure. The electrochemical stability of Al@Al versus planar Al is not related to differences in potassiophilicity (nearly identical) as obtained from thermal wetting experiments. Additionally, planar Cu foils are also poorly electrolyte-wetted and become dendritic. The key fundamental takeaway is that the incomplete electrolyte wetting of collectors results in early onset of SEI instability and dendrites.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Dual-Solvent Li-Ion Solvation Enables High-Performance Li-Metal Batteries

Novel electrolyte designs to further enhance the lithium (Li) metal battery cyclability are highly desirable. Here, fluorinated 1,6-dimethoxyhexane (FDMH) is designed and synthesized as the solvent molecule to promote electrolyte stability with its prolonged –CF 2 – backbone. Meanwhile, 1,2-dimethoxyethane is used as a co-solvent to enable higher ionic conductivity and much reduced interfacial resistance. Combining the dual-solvent system with 1 m lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI), high Li-metal Coulombic efficiency (99.5%) and oxidative stability (6 V) are achieved. Using this electrolyte, 20 µm Li||NMC batteries are able to retain ≈80% capacity after 250 cycles and Cu||NMC anode-free pouch cells last 120 cycles with 75% capacity retention under ≈2.1 µL mAh -1 lean electrolyte conditions. Such high performances are attributed to the anion-derived solid-electrolyte interphase, originating from the coordination of Li-ions to the highly stable FDMH and multiple anions in their solvation environments. This work demonstrates a new electrolyte design strategy that enables high-performance Li-metal batteries with multisolvent Li-ion solvation with rationally optimized molecular structure and ratio.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Multifunctional Separator Allows Stable Cycling of Potassium Metal Anodes and of Potassium Metal Batteries

Here, this is the first report of a multifunctional separator for potassium-metal batteries (KMBs). Here, double-coated tape-cast microscale AlF 3 on polypropylene (AlF 3 @PP) yields state-of-the-art electrochemical performance: symmetric cells are stable after 1000 cycles (2000 h) at 0.5 mA cm –2 and 0.5 mAh cm –2 , with 0.042 V overpotential. Stability is maintained at 5.0 mA cm –2 for 600 cycles (240 h), with 0.138 V overpotential. Postcycled plated surface is dendrite-free, while stripped surface contains smooth solid electrolyte interphase (SEI). Conventional PP cells fail rapidly, with dendrites at plating, and “dead metal” and SEI clumps at stripping. Potassium hexacyanoferrate(III) cathode KMBs with AlF 3 @PP display enhanced capacity retention (91% at 100 cycles vs 58%). AlF 3 partially reacts with K to form an artificial SEI containing KF, AlF 3 , and Al 2 O 3 phases. The AlF 3 @PP promotes complete electrolyte wetting and enhances uptake, improves ion conductivity, and increases ion transference number. The higher of K + transference number is ascribed to the strong interaction between AlF 3 and FSI – anions, as revealed through 19 F NMR. The enhancement in wetting and performance is general, being demonstrated with ester- and ether-based solvents, with K-, Na-, or Li- salts, and with different commercial separators. In full batteries, AlF 3 prevents Fe crossover and cycling-induced cathode pulverization.

NMB↗

A Sodium–Antimony–Telluride Intermetallic Allows Sodium-Metal Cycling at 100% Depth of Discharge and as an Anode-Free Metal Battery

In this work, repeated cold rolling and folding is employed to fabricate a metallurgical composite of sodium–antimony–telluride Na 2 (Sb 2/6 Te 3/6 Vac 1/6 ) dispersed in electrochemically active sodium metal, termed “NST-Na.” This new intermetallic has a vacancy-rich thermodynamically stable face-centered-cubic structure and enables state-of-the-art electrochemical performance in widely employed carbonate and ether electrolytes. NST-Na achieves 100% depth-of-discharge (DOD) in 1 m NaPF 6 in G2, with 15 mAh cm –2 at 1 mA cm –2 and Coulombic efficiency (CE) of 99.4%, for 1000 h of plating/stripping. Sodium-metal batteries (SMBs) with NST-Na and Na 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 (NVP) or sulfur cathodes give significantly improved energy, cycling, and CE (>99%). An anode-free battery with NST collector and NVP obtains 0.23% capacity decay per cycle. Imaging and tomography using conventional and cryogenic microscopy (Cryo-EM) indicate that the sodium metal fills the open space inside the self-supporting sodiophilic NST skeleton, resulting in dense (pore-free and solid electrolyte interphase (SEI)-free) metal deposits with flat surfaces. The baseline Na deposit consists of filament-like dendrites and “dead metal”, intermixed with pores and SEI. Density functional theory calculations show that the uniqueness of NST lies in the thermodynamic stability of the Na atoms (rather than clusters) on its surface that leads to planar wetting, and in its own stability that prevents decomposition during cycling.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Crossover Effects in Lithium–Metal Batteries with a Localized High Concentration Electrolyte and High–Nickel Cathodes

While crossover effects, such as transition–metal dissolution, are well–understood in lithium–ion batteries, there is a limited understanding of the effect of crossed–over chemical species in cells with oxide cathodes and lithium–metal anodes. In this work, the effects of cathode–to–anode and anode–to–cathode crossover are explored in cells with a high–nickel cathode, lithium–metal anode, and a localized high–concentration electrolyte (LHCE). Dramatic differences are found among cells; a lithium–metal anode paired with a high–nickel cathode has three times less solid–electrolyte interphase growth than a lithium–metal anode paired with lithium metal. Meanwhile, the cathode paired with lithium metal has 2–3 times higher capacity fade than the same cathode paired with graphite. Decomposition and crossover of the FSI salt is identified as the main source of these changes. The fluorine in the salt is first stripped off at the lithium–metal anode, and the remaining sulfur and nitrogen cross over to the cathode. Although the reduction in fluorine content harms the surface stability of the cathode, the lithium–metal anode benefits from the increased fluorine content. Furthermore, because the lithium–metal anode is typically the bottleneck for cells with thin lithium, crossover is a major factor in the enhanced performance of lithium–metal batteries with LHCE.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗