Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Wicked”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

456 records · Page 26
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

USM3D-ME Solutions for RANS Test Suite of High-Fidelity CFD Verification Workshop 2024

USM3D-ME solutions for the High-Fidelity CFD Verification Workshop 2024 are presented. Solutions are computed for the Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations using the Spalart-Allmaras one equation turbulence model, SA-neg-QCR2000-R, that is enhanced with a nonlinear correction to the turbulence stresses and a correction for flow rotation. USM3D-ME solutions have been computed for the three verification cases, namely, a Joukowski airfoil, a subsonic three-dimensional flow around an extruded NACA 0012 wing in tunnel, and subsonic flow around a high-lift wing-body configuration. Iterative convergence of USM3D-ME solutions on several grids within various grid families is demonstrated. Grid convergence of integrated forces, pitching moment and sectional variations of surface pressure and skin friction are also presented.

CFD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Discovery: Strategic Foresight – Helping Aviation Find Problems Worth Solving

Strategic foresight is used in the early stages of the CAS (Convergent Aeronautics Solutions) process. We discover trends, needs, and capabilities from interviews with diverse groups of people, data analytics tools, and from publications. These are analyzed in the context of future scenarios to uncover problem areas that have the highest possible impact on the broadest number of people while ensuring that we are prepared for the future.

Foresight↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

WMLES for the Fifth High-Lift PredictionWorkshop Cases Using FUN3D

This paper presents solution assessments and grid convergence studies for the test cases outlined in the Fifth High-Lift Prediction Workshop (HLPW-5), focusing on the high-lift Common Research Models (CRM-HL). The study utilizes a wall-modeled large-eddy simulation (WMLES) methodology developed in the unstructured-grid, node-centered flow solver FUN3D. The second-order accurate simulations conducted in this study utilize a finite-volume spatial discretization and an implicit temporal scheme. Large-scale turbulent features are resolved away from the wall, with small-scale effects captured by the Vreman subgrid-scale model. An equilibrium wall function uses the first grid point off the wall serving as the critical interface between the wall model and the large-eddy simulation region, thus requiring careful placement in grid design. WMLES solutions are assessed for HLPW-5 cases, including a clean wing-body configuration and geometry-buildup configurations corresponding to the 5.1\% ONERA CRM-HL model. Grid-convergence studies are systematically conducted using uniformly refined grids. Moreover, simulation results and grid sensitivity are presented for the NASA 5.2\% CRM-HL configuration at both moderate and flight-scale Reynolds numbers. Overall, WMLES results are satisfactory and agree well with available experimental data, especially on sufficiently fine grids.

high-lift aerodynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

USM3D-ME Contributions to the 5th AIAA High Lift Prediction Workshop

This paper presents the results of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations conducted by NASA’s flow solver, mixed-element USM3D (USM3D-ME), for the 5th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop. As part of the Fixed-Grid RANS Technology Focus Group (TFG), these simulations were performed to assess the accuracy and efficiency of the USM3D-ME solutions in predicting high-lift flows. The High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) served as the primary geometry. Several CRM-HL configurations were used for three case studies: a verification study (Case 1), a configuration buildup study (Case 2), and a Reynolds-number variation study (Case 3). Overall, USM3D-ME RANS results aligned with the solutions selected by the Fixed-Grid RANS TFG and available wind tunnel data Simulations for Cases 1 and Configuration 2.1 achieved machine-zero residual convergence, with aerodynamic coefficients converging to steady-state values. However, Configurations 2.2-2.4 and Case 3 encountered iterative- and grid-convergence challenges, particularly at high angles of attack. Compared with the experimental data available for Configurations 2.2-2.4, close agreement was demonstrated at low angles of attack. However, for angles of attack approaching the maximum lift conditions, the predicted lift coefficient and pitching moment deviated from experimental values. The drag-coefficient predictions were in a relatively good agreement, however, slight overpredictions were observed at the highest angle of attack corresponding to the maximum-lift condition. Although iterative convergence for Configurations 2.2-2.4 at high angles of attack remains a persistent challenge, averaging aerodynamic coefficients over the last 5000 iterations yielded satisfactory agreement with the available wind tunnel experimental data. During the workshop, the lack of iterative convergence was attributed to the vortex structures emanating from the slat brackets. To investigate this issue further, post-workshop simulations were conducted on Configuration 2.2. In one study, RANS simulations were performed on a simplified geometry with the slat brackets removed. The second study focused on performing URANS simulations on the original Configuration 2.2 geometry. Preliminary results from both studies are presented and compared with wind tunnel data for Configuration 2.2. Consistent with the findings of other participants in the Fixed-Grid RANS TFG, this study emphasizes the necessity for further exploration and advancement in RANS technology for predicting high-lift flows.

CFD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

USM3D-ME Contributions to the 5th AIAA High Lift Prediction Workshop

This paper presents the results of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations conducted by the NASA flow solver, mixed-element USM3D (USM3D-ME), for the 5th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop. As part of the Fixed-Grid RANS Technology Focus Group (TFG), these simulations were performed to assess the accuracy and efficiency of the USM3D-ME solutions in predicting high-lift flows. The High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) served as the primary geometry. Several CRM-HL configurations were used for three case studies: a verification study (Case 1), a configuration buildup study (Case 2), and a Reynolds-number variation study (Case 3). Overall, USM3D-ME RANS results aligned with the solutions selected by the Fixed-Grid RANS TFG and available wind tunnel data. Simulations for Case 1 and Configuration 2.1 achieved machine-zero residual convergence, with aerodynamic coefficients converging to steady-state values. However, Configurations 2.2-2.4 and Case 3 encountered iterative- and grid-convergence challenges, particularly at high angles of attack. Compared with the experimental data available for Configurations 2.2-2.4, close agreement was demonstrated at low angles of attack. However, for angles of attack approaching the maximum lift conditions, the predicted lift coefficient and pitching moment deviated from experimental values. The drag-coefficient predictions were in relatively good agreement, however, slight overpredictions were observed at the highest angle of attack corresponding to the maximum-lift condition. Although iterative convergence for Configurations 2.2-2.4 at high angles of attack remains a persistent challenge, averaging aerodynamic coefficients over the last 5000 iterations yielded satisfactory agreement with the available wind tunnel experimental data. During the workshop, the lack of iterative convergence was attributed to the vortex structures emanating from the slat brackets. To investigate this issue further, post-workshop simulations were conducted on Configuration 2.2. In one study, RANS simulations were performed on a simplified geometry with the slat brackets removed. The second study focused on performing unsteady RANS (URANS) simulations on the original Configuration 2.2 geometry. Preliminary results from both studies are presented and compared with wind tunnel data for Configuration 2.2. Consistent with the findings of other participants in the Fixed-Grid RANS TFG, this study emphasizes the necessity for further exploration and advancement in RANS technology for predicting high-lift flows.

Aerodynamics↗