Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Entry Vehicle”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29

Fiber Optics Sensing System (FOSS) deployment on Low-Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID)

Low-Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator (LOFTID) is a technology demonstration of an inflatable aeroshell to slow down and protect heavy and valuable payloads when entering atmospheres such as those of the Earth and Mars. The ultimate project goal is to enable future payload deliveries to Mars. The LOFTID is based on more than a decade of development of the hypersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerator (HIAD) technology, which consists of a stack of the inflatable concentric rings that make up the inflatable structure that is covered with a Flexible Thermal Protection System (FTPS) and, when combined, form the inflatable aeroshell. The goal of the LOFTID demonstration was to verify that a flexible heat shield, packed into a small-volume payload, can be inflated exoatmospherically to sizes much larger than that of the launch vehicle fairing and survive re-entry into the Earth atmosphere while withstanding a temperature excess of 1,600 °C. The LOFTID is part of Technology Demonstration Missions (TDM) under the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD). The NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center (AFRC) (Edwards, California) is part of the LOFTID program, where a space-launch version of the fiber optic sensing system (FOSS) is integrated into the avionics bay of the re-entry vehicle to provide high-spatial-density temperature measurements in three strategic locations of the vehicle. The program is part of a partnership agreement between the NASA Launch Service Program (LSP) at Kennedy Space Center (KSC) (Merritt Island, Florida) and the main Center of the LOFTID program at NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC) (Hampton, Virginia). This paper will first give a brief introduction of the FOSS, then discuss how the FOSS was integrated into LOFTID, in terms of fiber sensor integration into various sections of the vehicle, as well as integration of the FOSS interrogator into the avionics bay. Finally, data analysis during the LOFTID re-entry will be discussed.

Allen R Parker↗

ADEPT Sounding Rocket One (SR-1) Flight Test

A sounding rocket flight test was conducted on a mechanically-deployed entry vehicle (DEV) known as the Adaptable Deployable Entry and Placement Technology (ADEPT). This flight test was a major milestone in a technology development campaign for ADEPT: the application of ADEPT for small secondary payloads. The test was conducted above White Sands Missile Range (WSMR), New Mexico on a SpaceLoft XL rocket on September 12, 2018. The first objective of the SR-1 flight test was to demonstrate that ADEPT could transform from a compact stowed configuration, separate from the launch vehicle, and successfully deploy exo-atmospherically into the desired low ballistic coefficient entry configuration. The second objective was to characterize the aerodynamic performance of the deployed configuration in order to evaluate the faceted blunt body geometry dynamic stability characteristics as it decelerated from supersonic to subsonic speeds.The ADEPT DEV had several sensors on-board and also leveraged third-party data sources for post-flight analysis and trajectory reconstruction. Based upon data review, the launch vehicle met exo-atmospheric delivery performance requirements of spin rate, no re-contact, separation velocity, and delivery altitude. The unique ADEPT forebody geometry (blunted octagonal pyramid, 0.7 m diameter at the rib tips) and aftbody configuration has never flown before. The forebody half cone angle at the ribs is 70 deg, while the half cone angle mid gore is 68.5 deg. The aftbody, where the 3U CubeSat 'payload' resides is a rectangular prism that extends ~ ½ the minimum forebody diameter behind the nose. Understanding DEV blunt body dynamic stability performance is critical for determining how they can be employed for atmospheric entry, descent and landing.The primary data products were used to perform flight mechanics analysis and reconstruct the as-flown trajectory. On-board video recovered post-flight demonstrated that the DEV achieved and maintained the desired entry configuration. Post-flight analyses showed that the vehicle met the threshold of achieving stable flight below Mach = 0.8. The ADEPT project has focused on ballistic, axisymmetric shapes as the logical 'first step' in mission infusion applications. With the current maturation and development of the ballistic (non-lifting) 1 m class ADEPT, the next step in ADEPT maturation is the focus on configurations that are capable of generating lift in order to accomplish aerocapture and precision landing mission capabilities. ADEPT is particularly attractive for evaluating various guidance and control approaches as the deployable structure enables attachment points for various actuation methods such as control surfaces, moving mass elements, or RCS thrusters. The ADEPT sounding rocket flight test provided a low-cost means of achieving significant system level maturity for the 1 m class ADEPT configuration. A description of the technology, system components, flight test execution, and conclusions will be described.

Cassell, Alan↗

Planetary/DOD entry technology flight experiments. Volume 1: Executive summary

The feasibility of using the space shuttle to launch planetary and DoD entry flight experiments was examined. The results of the program are presented in two parts: (1) simulating outer planet environments during an earth entry test, the prediction of Jovian and earth radiative heating dominated environments, mission strategy, booster performance and entry vehicle design, and (2) the DoD entry test needs for the 1980's, the use of the space shuttle to meet these DoD test needs, modifications of test procedures as pertaining to the space shuttle, modifications to the space shuttle to accommodate DoD test missions and the unique capabilities of the space shuttle. The major findings of this program are summarized.

Christensen, H. E.↗

Trading Robustness Requirements in Mars Entry Trajectory Design

One of the most important metrics characterizing an atmospheric entry trajectory in preliminary design is the size of its predicted landing ellipse. Often, requirements for this ellipse are set early in design and significantly influence both the expected scientific return from a particular mission and the cost of development. Requirements typically specify a certain probability level (6-level) for the prescribed ellipse, and frequently this latter requirement is taken at 36. However, searches for the justification of 36 as a robustness requirement suggest it is an empirical rule of thumb borrowed from non-aerospace fields. This paper presents an investigation into the sensitivity of trajectory performance to varying robustness (6-level) requirements. The treatment of robustness as a distinct objective is discussed, and an analysis framework is presented involving the manipulation of design variables to effect trades between performance and robustness objectives. The scenario for which this method is illustrated is the ballistic entry of an MSL-class Mars entry vehicle. Here, the design variable is entry flight path angle, and objectives are parachute deploy altitude performance and error ellipse robustness. Resulting plots show the sensitivities between these objectives and trends in the entry flight path angles required to design to these objectives. Relevance to the trajectory designer is discussed, as are potential steps for further development and use of this type of analysis.

Lafleur, Jarret M.↗

Dragonfly Entry and Descent Flight Mechanics Modeling and Analysis for Mission PDR

Dragonfly is a New Frontiers Program mission led by Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory (APL) which will deliver a rotorcraft lander to Saturn’s moon, Titan [1]. Relative to previous studies presented, Dragonfly recently passed its mission Preliminary Design Review (PDR) [2]. This study presents the updated design and analysis performed for the Dragonfly mission PDR. The entry vehicle analysis includes the phases of entry and descent prior to cruise stage separation until lander separation. These results discuss the robustness of the overall entry sequence as assessed through a Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis as well as sensitivity analysis.

Modeling↗

Pterodactyl: An Uncoupled Range Control Approach to Fully Numerical Predictor-Corrector Entry Guidance

Entry, descent, and landing (EDL) has been identified as a core area of investment in NASA's Strategic Technology Investment Plan (NASA STIP). STIP lists the space technologies needed to help achieve NASA's science, technology, and exploration goals across the agency. Within the EDL core area, deployable hypersonic decelerators, also known as deployable entry vehicles (DEVs), have been identified as an area of investment, due to its potential to revolutionize payload delivery methods to Earth and other planets. These vehicles, which can deploy their heat shields or alter their shape before entry, exploit an increased and more effective drag ratio by using less mass than traditional blunt body vehicles with rigid aeroshells. DEVs like Adaptive Deployable Entry and Placement Technology (ADEPT) and Hypersonic Inflatable Aerodynamic Decelerator (HIAD) have demonstrated the capability of transporting the equivalent science payloads of blunt body rigid aeroshells, while using a significantly smaller diameter when stowed within a launch vehicle. While DEVs' increased energy dissipation for less mass is an attractive feature, their ability to contract and expand would require advancements in the current state-of-the-art guidance and control (G&C) architectures used by traditional rigid vehicles. Pterodactyl, a project funded by NASA's Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD), aims to provide feasible integrated G&C solutions for DEVs, complete with optimized vehicle designs and packaging analyses. Structural and aerodynamic analyses for the explored control systems suggested a need for a bank angle guidance algorithm, a heritage guidance approach that has been used in many entry precision targeting vehicles, as well as an additional need for the development of a non-bank angle guidance. For this reason, Pterodactyl will consider four different G&C configurations during its design phase: i) a reaction control system for bank (sigma) control, ii) a mass movement system for angle of attack (alpha) sideslip (beta) control, iii) flaps for alpha - beta control, and iv) flaps for sigma control. To increase the applicability of each proposed integrated G&C architecture, an 11 km/s lunar return demonstration mission is selected to stress the developed technology capability. The Lifting Nano-ADEPT (LNA) vehicle is chosen as the DEV to demonstrate the integrated solutions. This paper will detail the trajectory design for a lunar return mission, using the validated bank control guidance algorithm Fully Numerical Predictor-Corrector Entry Guidance (FNPEG) and a newly developed guidance algorithm: FNPEG Uncoupled Range Control (URC). FNPEG-URC diverges from traditional bank angle guidances by producing alpha and beta commands to thereby decouple downrange and crossrange control. This presentation will discuss the development and overall performance of FNPEG and FNPEG-URC for each of the four G&C configurations. Successful G&C configurations are defined as those that can deliver payloads to the intended descent and landing site while abiding by trajectory constraints in the face of dispersions.

Johnson, Breanna↗

Impact of Vehicle Flexibility on IRVE-II Flight Dynamics

The Inflatable Re-entry Vehicle Experiment II (IRVE-II) successfully launched from Wallops Flight Facility (WFF) on August 17, 2009. The primary objectives of this flight test were to demonstrate inflation and re-entry survivability, assess the thermal and drag performance of the reentry vehicle, and to collect flight data for refining pre-flight design and analysis tools. Post-flight analysis including trajectory reconstruction outlined in O Keefe3 demonstrated that the IRVE-II Research Vehicle (RV) met mission objectives but also identified a few anomalies of interest to flight dynamics engineers. Most notable of these anomalies was high normal acceleration during the re-entry pressure pulse. Deflection of the inflatable aeroshell during the pressure pulse was evident in flight video and identified as the likely cause of the anomaly. This paper provides a summary of further post-flight analysis with particular attention to the impact of aeroshell flexibility on flight dynamics and the reconciliation of flight performance with pre-flight models. Independent methods for estimating the magnitude of the deflection of the aeroshell experienced on IRVE-II are discussed. The use of the results to refine models for pre-flight prediction of vehicle performance is then described.

Bose, David M.↗

Ceramic-ceramic shell tile thermal protection system and method thereof

A ceramic reusable, externally applied composite thermal protection system (TPS) is proposed. The system functions by utilizing a ceramic/ceramic upper shell structure which effectively separates its primary functions as a thermal insulator and as a load carrier to transmit loads to the cold structure. The composite tile system also prevents impact damage to the atmospheric entry vehicle thermal protection system. The composite tile comprises a structurally strong upper ceramic/ceramic shell manufactured from ceramic fibers and ceramic matrix meeting the thermal and structural requirements of a tile used on a re-entry aerospace vehicle. In addition, a lightweight high temperature ceramic lower temperature base tile is used. The upper shell and lower tile are attached by means effective to withstand the extreme temperatures (3000 to 3200F) and stress conditions. The composite tile may include one or more layers of variable density rigid or flexible thermal insulation. The assembly of the overall tile is facilitated by two or more locking mechanisms on opposing sides of the overall tile assembly. The assembly may occur subsequent to the installation of the lower shell tile on the spacecraft structural skin.

Riccitiello, Salvatore R.↗

Aerocapture: An Enabling Technology for Flagship-Class Uranus Orbiter and Probe Mission

Introduction: The current decadal survey published by the National Academies of Sciences has informed National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) to prioritize the study of the Ice Giants, especially Uranus. To gather the required data that addresses the science questions raised in this survey, a mission to Uranus with an orbiter and atmospheric probe must be designed. The Uranus Orbiter and Probe (UOP) study, which the survey identified as the flagship mission of this decade, proposes a 2031 launch to take advantage of a Jupiter fly-by and utilizes a fully propulsive orbit insertion design with an Earth-to-Uranus transit times ranging from 13 to 15 years. This fully propulsive orbit insertion at Uranus will be very fuel expensive (wet mass percentages of around 60-70\%) thereby leaving less mass for the scientific payload and additional planetary probes. In addition, scientists are more interested in visiting Uranus before 2049, when the Spring Equinox will occur, as it allows studying Uranus seasons not seen during Voyager 2's flyby in 1987. A NASA Flagship-Class mission would require at least 10 years of lead time prior to launch thereby making the 2031 launch to take advantage of the Jupiter fly-by extremely challenging. The consequence of missing the Jupiter fly-by and launching in the late 2030s is the challenge of a fully-propulsive mission like UOP to have a feasible alternative interplanetary trajectory that reaches Uranus before 2050. As an alternative, to address the shortcomings of the fully propulsive mission, one can design a mission to Uranus using aerocapture. What is aerocapture: Aerocapture is an atmospheric maneuver that uses aerodynamic forces generated by flight within a planetary atmosphere to decelerate and achieve orbit insertion. Using aerocapture allows one to provide the change in velocity (Delta V) needed to slow down from the approach hyperbolic trajectory to achieve the desired captured orbit around the target planet using aerodynamic forces of the vehicle (lift and drag). Using aerodynamic forces instead of fully-propulsive maneuvers results in significant savings in the fuel. Furthermore, aerocapture can also allow one to consider interplanetary trajectories with higher approach hyperbolic velocities, thus reducing the mission transit times. Aerocapture as an enabling technology: To use aerocapture as an enabling technology for the Uranus exploration mission, one would require an integrated system-level design, including a Thermal Protection System (TPS), hardware needed for aerodynamic modulation, and autonomous Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GNC) systems. Aerocapture has yet to be demonstrated, despite considering it for several past missions. Recent advancements in TPS and GNC capabilities show the potential for using rigid, heritage entry vehicle configurations already flown at other planetary bodies for Uranus aerocapture. Aerocapture can be a robust technology that can deliver spacecraft to Uranus science orbits while substantially increasing on-orbit payload mass (more than 40\%) that can enable robust atmospheric entry probes. Additionally, the aerocapture maneuver would reduce the interplanetary transit time by 2–5 years (15-30\%) relative to fully-propulsive orbit insertion. Recent work has shown that one can conduct a flagship-class mission in a shorter period than fully-propulsive missions if using aerocapture. What does aerocapture bring in for a Uranus Mission: Using aerocapture for a Uranus orbiter and atmospheric probe mission can provide one with considerable propellant savings. Spacecraft in interplanetary trajectories to Uranus typically need an Delta V in orders of kilometers per second to insert into science orbit. One would require thousands of kilograms of fuel to achieve such a Delta V using a traditional fully propulsive maneuver, leaving less mass for payload during the mission launch. Aerocapture can reduce the propulsion needs by dissipating energy in the sizable atmosphere of Uranus without a significant mass increase due to the need for an aeroshell. One can use the mass savings achieved using the aerocapture to reduce the launch vehicle requirements. In addition, one can also have additional science instruments on the orbiter or create a robust instrumentation suite on an atmospheric probe that can significantly increase the science outcome of the Uranus exploration mission. Furthermore, since aerocapture performance is relatively insensitive to increases in hyperbolic excess velocity, one can design the interplanetary trajectory to arrive at Uranus faster, reducing the interplanetary transit time and operations cost. All these savings, achieved using aerocapture, could help fit a larger class mission, such as the Uranus mission within a smaller capital, e.g., a Flagship-class orbiter mission in a New Frontiers class capital. Summary: This talk will provide an overview of how aerocapture can enable the Uranus exploration mission. Specifically, this talk will discuss the latest advancements made in the Uranus aerocapture study, such as investigating interplanetary trajectories with higher hyperbolic approach velocities and their implications on the aero heating and the TPS design, incorporating FNPAG (an advanced numerical-predictor guidance) and comparison of multiple navigation approaches. In addition, this talk will focus on mechanical design that can house more than one atmospheric probe and the six degrees of freedom simulation of aerocapture at Uranus. Findings from a recent NASA Space Technology Mission Directorate (STMD)-funded activity studying the aerocapture as an enabling technology for a Uranus orbiter will be presented. Using the science payload recommended by the Decadal Survey for Uranus exploration, this work shows many improvements over the baseline fully-propulsive mission. These improvements include a shorter cruise phase, flexibility in launch opportunities late into the 2030s while reaching Uranus before the 2050 equinox for the desired science opportunities, and lower propellant mass needs. This talk will highlight how aerocapture can be utilized for Uranus science orbit insertion using a lower-risk, heritage entry vehicle configuration used extensively as a Mars entry, descent, and landing vehicle. Furthermore, this talk will explore how the demonstration of aerocapture at Earth can benefit the aerocapture-enabled Uranus mission.

Aerocapture↗

Ballistic Lunar Return Trajectories for Sustainable Cargo Return and Entry System Technology Development

As part of the sustained approach for the lunar Gateway and Artemis program as a whole, NASA is extending the logistics supply chain beyond low Earth orbit and to the Moon. This supply chain includes the possibility of lunar sample and cargo return. To enable these future return missions, the possibility for incorporating demonstration payloads including various entry, descent, and landing technologies is examined. Possible implementations include deployable entry vehicles, high speed sample return capsules, aeroassist technologies, and control technologies for guided hypersonic flight. The mission concepts utilize the secondary payload capabilities provided on a relatively low-cost logistic module. The logistic module may perform close Earth flyby, pointing, and release of return systems prior to disposal, with reentry velocities for payloads on the order of 11.5 km/sec. In this paper, we study the various return mission architectures available during the Artemis program to define the range of mission possibilities. Potential options include a reusable logistics module using a hypersonic inflatable aerodynamic decelerator, externally mounted entry system vehicle technologies, and a reusable sample return vehicle using a similar inflatable architecture with a feathered configuration with applied aerodynamic control. In these cases, the use of a ballistic lunar return trajectory is assumed, and a sensitivity analysis of midcourse corrections and the possibility of a lunar gravity assist for refining Earth entry interface points is provided. Furthermore, a novel controller for controlling a vehicle during reentry imposing heating limitations is introduced.

Matthew M. Wittal↗

TPSAS-NF1676L-27428-DND

Hypersonic aerodynamic uncertainties can have a significant influence on the predicted performance of the Entry, Decent and Landing (EDL) phases for an atmospheric entry vehicle. - Particularly for vehicles using a ballistic (un-guided) entry. - Clearly demonstrated by the effect some uncertainties can have on the location and size of the predicted landing footprint. It is the job of the flight mechanics engineer is to consolidate all environmental and vehicle models (along with their uncertainties) at his/her disposal into a simulation to provide the best possible estimate of the vehicle performance. As is often the case, however, the prediction is only be as good as the models and inputs used to develop that prediction.

Robert Maddock↗

Tethered space recovery vehicle deployment/re-entry demonstration

The feasibility of utilizing existing Space Re-entry Vehicle (SRV) hardware for a Shuttle Orbiter-based tethered SRV deployment and re-entry demonstration using the Small Expendable Deployer System has been investigated. Options for mounting the SRV in the Orbiter, modifications and additions required to the existing SRV hardware have been defined. Flight demonstration scenarios from the Orbiter have been investigated, and re-entry motion and targeting uncertainties have been determined.

Florence, D.↗

Mars Science Laboratory Heatshield Flight Data Analysis

NASA Mars Science Laboratory (MSL), which landed the Curiosity rover on the surface of Mars on August 5th, 2012, was the largest and heaviest Mars entry vehicle representing a significant advancement in planetary entry, descent and landing capability. Hypersonic flight performance data was collected using MSLs on-board sensors called Mars Entry, Descent and Landing Instrumentation (MEDLI). This talk will give an overview of MSL entry and a description of MEDLI sensors. Observations from flight data will be examined followed by a discussion of analysis efforts to reconstruct surface heating from heatshields in-depth temperature measurements. Finally, a brief overview of MEDLI2 instrumentation, which will fly on NASAs Mars2020 mission, will be presented with a discussion on how lessons learned from MEDLI data affected the design of MEDLI2 instrumentation.

Mars↗

Low Lift-to-Drag Morphing Shape Design

One advantage of the low lift-to-drag (L/D) inflatable vehicle being evaluated for the human Mars Entry, Descent, and Landing Architecture Study (EDLAS) is the lower launch mass compared to the other concepts being considered. Mass reduction is achieved by using a strong but lightweight inflatable structure and by eliminating the need for a backshell. Performance analysis has shown that additional mass savings is achievable using entry guidance technologies that reduce powered descent propellant mass by directly controlling angle of attack and sideslip, rather than the traditional bank angle control approach used by the current state-of-the-art Mars Science Laboratory entry vehicle. Two methods of implementing this guidance scheme are presented, one uses aerodynamic flaps, the other changes or morphs the shape of the inflatable aeroshell during flight. This paper describes both control methods for the EDLAS low-L/D vehicle, including the aerodynamic model of the aerosurfaces and various methods to achieve the morphing shape deflection (internal motors, shifting tori, etc.). Results of trajectory performance simulations for both the aerodynamic flap and morphing designs are also presented along with details of mechanical implementation options available to ground test the system.

Alicia Dwyer Cianciolo↗

Aeroheating Environments of Aerocapture Systems for Uranus Orbiters

Aeroheating environments for an aerocapture system enabling flagship-class science at Uranus are presented. Applicability of a low lift-to-drag entry vehicle aeroshell with flight heritage for Martian entries is considered in the context of an end-to-end Uranus orbiter and probe mission design using aerocapture for orbit insertion. A feasible trajectory space for aerocapture orbit insertion based on various launch opportunities and interplanetary trajectories yield atmosphere-relative entry velocities between 22 km/s and 31 km/s with maximum freestream densities on the order of 10−5 kg/m3. A preliminary study of the aerothermal environments for the entire trajectory space is discussed followed by a more detailed study of the nominal design trajectories. Design conditions are based on laminar, thermochemical nonequilibrium Navier-Stokes flowfield simulations with coupled radiation transport for full lift-up (deep) and lift-down (shallow) design trajectories. Convective heating is found to be the dominant heating mode, with radiation accounting for only 1 % to 5 % of the total heat flux for the design trajectories. The peak design conditions are found to be 422 W/cm2 for heat flux, 10.5 kPa for pressure, 149 Pa for shear stress, and 88.1 kJ/cm2 for the total heat load.

Uranus↗

Aeroheating Environments of Aerocapture Systems for Uranus Orbiters

Aeroheating environments for an aerocapture system enabling flagship-class science at Uranus are presented. Applicability of a low lift-to-drag entry vehicle aeroshell with flight heritage for Martian entries is considered in the context of an end-to-end Uranus orbiter and probe mission design using aerocapture for orbit insertion. A feasible trajectory space for aerocapture orbit insertion based on various launch opportunities and interplanetary trajectories yield atmosphere-relative entry velocities between 22 km/s and 31 km/s with maximum freestream densities on the order of 10 −5 kg/m 3 . A preliminary study of the aerothermal environments for the entire trajectory space is discussed followed by a more detailed study of the nominal design trajectories. Design conditions are based on laminar, thermochemical nonequilibrium Navier-Stokes flowfield simulations with coupled radiation transport for full lift-up (deep) and lift-down (shallow) design trajectories. Convective heating is found to be the dominant heating mode, with radiation accounting for only 1 % to 5 % of the total heat flux for the design trajectories. The peak design conditions are found to be 422 W/cm 2 for heat flux, 10.5 kPa for pressure, 149 Pa for shear stress, and 88.1 kJ/cm 2 for the total heat load.

Aerocapture↗