SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “LITHIUM”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS2003

Aging Optimization of Aluminum-Lithium Alloy C458 for Application to Cryotank Structures

Compared with aluminum alloys such as 2219, which is widely used in space vehicle for cryogenic tanks and unpressurized structures, aluminum-lithium alloys possess attractive combinations of lower density and higher modulus along with comparable mechanical properties. These characteristics have resulted in the successful use of the aluminum-lithium alloy 2195 (Al-1.0 Li-4.0 Cu-0.4 Mg-0.4 Ag-0.12 Zr) for the Space Shuttle External Tank, and the consideration of newer U.S. aluminum-lithium alloys such as L277 and C458 for future space vehicles. These newer alloys generally have lithium content less than 2 wt. % and their composition and processing have been carefully tailored to increase the toughness and reduce the mechanical property anisotropy of the earlier generation alloys such 2090 and 8090. Alloy processing, particularly the aging treatment, has a significant influence on the strength-toughness combinations and their dependence on service environments for aluminum-lithium alloys. Work at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center on alloy 2195 has shown that the cryogenic toughness can be improved by employing a two-step aging process. This is accomplished by aging at a lower temperature in the first step to suppress nucleation of the strengthening precipitate at sub-grain boundaries while promoting nucleation in the interior of the grains. Second step aging at the normal aging temperature results in precipitate growth to the optimum size. A design of experiments aging study was conducted for plate. To achieve the T8 temper, Alloy C458 (Al-1.8 Li-2.7 Cu-0.3 Mg-0.08 Zr-0.3 Mn-0.6 Zn) is typically aged at 300F for 24hours. In this study, a two-step aging treatment was developed through a comprehensive 2(exp 4) full factorial design of experiments study and the typical one-step aging used as a reference. Based on the higher lithium content of C458 compared with 2195, the first step aging temperature was varied between 175F and 250F. The second step aging temperatures was varied between 275F and 325F, which is in the range of the single-step aging temperature. The results of the design of experiments used for the T8 temper as well as a smaller set of experiments for the T6 temper will be presented. The process of selecting the optimum aging treatment, based on the measured mechanical properties at room and cryogenic temperature as well as the observed deformation mechanisms, will be presented in detail. The implications for the use of alloy C458 in cryotanks will be discussed.

Sova, B. J.↗

NASA NTRS2003

Aging Optimization of Aluminum-Lithium Alloy C458 for Application to Cryotank Structures

Compared with aluminum alloys such as 2219, which is widely used in space vehicle for cryogenic tanks and unpressurized structures, aluminum-lithium alloys possess attractive combinations of lower density and higher modulus along with comparable mechanical properties. These characteristics have resulted in the successful use of the aluminum-lithium alloy 2195 (Al-1.0 Li-4.0 Cu-0.4 Mg-0.4 Ag-0.12 Zr) for the Space Shuttle External Tank, and the consideration of newer U.S. aluminum-lithium alloys such as L277 and C458 for future space vehicles. These newer alloys generally have lithium content less than 2 wt. % and their composition and processing have been carefully tailored to increase the toughness and reduce the mechanical property anisotropy of the earlier generation alloys such 2090 and 8090. Alloy processing, particularly the aging treatment, has a significant influence on the strength-toughness combinations and their dependence on service environments for aluminum-lithium alloys. Work at NASA Marshall Space Flight Center on alloy 2195 has shown that the cryogenic toughness can be improved by employing a two-step aging process. This is accomplished by aging at a lower temperature in the first step to suppress nucleation of the strengthening precipitate at sub-grain boundaries while promoting nucleation in the interior of the grains. Second step aging at the normal aging temperature results in precipitate growth to the optimum size. A design of experiments aging study was conducted for plate. To achieve the T8 temper, Alloy C458 (Al-1.8 Li-2.7 Cu-0.3 Mg- 0.08 Zr-0.3 Mn-0.6 Zn) is typically aged at 300 F for 24 hours. In this study, a two-step aging treatment was developed through a comprehensive 24 full factorial design of experiments study and the typical one-step aging used as a reference. Based on the higher lithium content of C458 compared with 2195, the first step aging temperature was varied between 175 F and 250 F. The second step aging temperatures was varied between 275 F and 325 F, which is in the range of the single-step aging temperature. The results of the design of experiments used for the T8 temper as well as a smaller set of experiments for the T6 temper will be presented. The process of selecting the optimum aging treatment, based on the measured mechanical properties at room and cryogenic temperature as well as the observed deformation mechanisms, will be presented in detail. The implications for the use of alloy C458 in cryotanks will be discussed.

Sova, B. J.↗

NASA NTRS2007

Use of Ionic Liquids in Rod-Coil Block Copolyimides for Improved Lithium Ion Conduction

Solvent-free, solid polymer electrolytes (SPE) have the potential to improve safety, increase design flexibility and enhance performance of rechargeable lithium batteries. Solution based electrolytes are flammable and typically incompatible with lithium metal anodes, limiting energy density. We have previously demonstrated use of polyimide rod coil block copolymers doped with lithium salts as electrolytes for lithium polymer batteries. The polyimide rod blocks provide dimensional stability while the polyethylene oxide (PEO) coil portions conduct ions. Phase separation of the rods and coils in these highly branched polymers provide channels with an order of magnitude improvement in lithium conduction over polyethylene oxide itself at room temperature. In addition, the polymers have been demonstrated in coin cells to be compatible with lithium metal. For practical use at room temperature and below, however, at least an order of magnitude improvement in ion conduction is still required. The addition of nonvolatile, room temperature ionic liquids has been shown to improve the ionic conductivity of high molecular weight PEO. Herein we describe use of these molten salts to improve ionic conductivity in the rod-coil block copolymers.

Meador, Mary Ann B.↗

NASA NTRS1991

Mixed solvent electrolytes for ambient temperature secondary lithium cells

The present invention comprises an improved electrolyte for secondary lithium-based cells as well as batteries fabricated using this electrolyte. The electrolyte is a lithium containing salt dissolved in a non-aqueous solvent, which is made from a mixture of ethylene carbonate, ethylene propylene diene terpolymer, 2-methylfuran, and 2-methyltetrahydrofuran. This improved, mixed solvent electrolyte is more conductive than prior electrolytes and much less corrosive to lithium anodes. Batteries constructed with this improved electrolyte utilize lithium or lithium alloy anodes and cathodes made of metal chalcogenides or oxides, such as TiS.sub.2, NbSe.sub.3, V.sub.6 O.sub.13, V.sub.2 O.sub.5, MoS.sub.2, MoS.sub.3, CoO.sub.2, or CrO.sub.2, dissolved in a supporting polymer matrix, like EPDM. The preferred non-aqueous solvent mixture comprises approximately 5 to 30 volume percent ethylene carbonate, approximately 0.01 to 0.1 weight percent ethylene propylene diene terpolymer, and approximately 0.2 to 2 percent 2-methylfuran, with the balance being 2-methyltetrahydrofuran. The most preferred solvent comprises approximately 10 to 20 volume percent ethylene carbonate, about 0.05 weight percent ethylene propylene diene terpolymer, and about 1.0 percent 2-methylfuran, with the balance being 2-methyltetrahydrofuran. The concentration of lithium arsenic hexafluoride can range from about 1.0 to 1.8 M; a concentration 1.5 M is most preferred. Secondary batteries made with the improved electrolyte of this invention have lower internal impedance, longer cycle life, higher energy density, low self-discharge, and longer shelf life.

Shen, David H.↗

NASA NTRS1995

Method for fabricating carbon/lithium-ion electrode for rechargeable lithium cell

The method includes steps for forming a carbon electrode composed of graphitic carbon particles adhered by an ethylene propylene diene monomer binder. An effective binder composition is disclosed for achieving a carbon electrode capable of subsequent intercalation by lithium ions. The method also includes steps for reacting the carbon electrode with lithium ions to incorporate lithium ions into graphitic carbon particles of the electrode. An electrical current is repeatedly applied to the carbon electrode to initially cause a surface reaction between the lithium ions and to the carbon and subsequently cause intercalation of the lithium ions into crystalline layers of the graphitic carbon particles. With repeated application of the electrical current, intercalation is achieved to near a theoretical maximum. Two differing multi-stage intercalation processes are disclosed. In the first, a fixed current is reapplied. In the second, a high current is initially applied, followed by a single subsequent lower current stage. Resulting carbon/lithium-ion electrodes are well suited for use as an anode in a reversible, ambient temperature, lithium cell.

Huang, Chen-Kuo↗

NASA NTRS2007

A Synopsis of Interfacial Phenomena in Lithium-Based Polymer Electrolyte Electrochemical Cells

The interfacial regions between electrode materials, electrolytes and other cell components play key roles in the overall performance of lithium-based batteries. For cell chemistries employing lithium metal, lithium alloy or carbonaceous materials (i.e., lithium-ion cells) as anode materials, a "solid electrolyte interphase" (SEI) layer forms at the anode/electrolyte interface, and the properties of this "passivating" layer significantly affect the practical cell/battery quality and performance. A thin, ionically-conducting SEI on the electrode surface can beneficially reduce or eliminate undesirable side reactions between the electrode and the electrolyte, which can result in a degradation in cell performance. The properties and phenomena attributable to the interfacial regions existing at both anode and cathode surfaces can be characterized to a large extent by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and related techniques. The intention of the review herewith is to support the future development of lithium-based polymer electrolytes by providing a synopsis of interfacial phenomena that is associated with cell chemistries employing either lithium metal or carbonaceous "composite" electrode structures which are interfaced with polymer electrolytes (i.e., "solvent-free" as well as "plasticized" polymer-binary salt complexes and single ion-conducting polyelectrolytes). Potential approaches to overcoming poor cell performance attributable to interfacial effects are discussed.

Baldwin, Richard S.↗

DOE OSTI2022

Lithium-sulfur battery with high sulfur loading

A lithium-sulfur battery cathode including conductive porous carbon particles vacuum infused with sulfur and a conductive collector substrate to which the sulfur infused porous carbon particles are deposited. The sulfur infused carbon particles are encapsulated by an encapsulation polymer, the encapsulation polymer having ionic conductivity, electronic conductivity, polysulfide affinity, or combinations thereof. A lithium-sulfur battery including the lithium-sulfur battery cathode, a lithium anode and an electrolyte disposed between the sulfur cathode and the lithium anode is also provided. Methods of producing the sulfur cathode for use in a lithium-sulfur battery by a hybrid vacuum-and-melt method are also provided.

Henslee, Brian E.↗

DOE OSTI2022

Rapid pyrolysis to form super ionic conducting lithium garnets

A method of preparing a lithium-ion conducting garnet via low-temperature solid-state synthesis is disclosed. The lithium-ion conducting garnet comprises a substantially phase pure aluminum-doped cubic lithium lanthanum zirconate (Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 14 ). The method includes preparing nanoparticles comprising lanthanum zirconate (La 2 Zr 2 O 7 -np) via pyrolysis-mediated reaction of lanthanum nitrate (La(NO 3 ) 3 ) and zirconium nitrate (Zr(NO 3 ) 4 ). The method also includes pyrolyzing a solid-state mixture comprising the La 2 Zr 2 O 7 -np, lithium nitrate (LiNO 3 ), and aluminum nitrate (Al(NO 3 ) 3 ) to give the Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 14 and thereby prepare the lithium-ion conducting garnet. A lithium-ion conducting garnet prepared via the method is also disclosed.

Daemen, Luc L.↗

DOE OSTI2023

Stabilized lithium metal oxide electrode material and method of preparation

A stabilized lithium metal oxide cathode material comprises microparticles of lithium metal oxide in which individual particles thereof a core of lithium metal oxide and a coating of a different lithium metal oxide surrounding the core. There is an interface layer between the cores and the coatings in which there are gradients of metal ions in the direction of coating to core. The materials are made by a three stage process involving coprecipitating precursor metal hydroxide core particles at a controlled pH; coprecipitating a different metal hydroxide coating on the particles without controlling the pH; and then calcining the resulting coated precursor particles with lithium hydroxide to form the stabilized lithium metal oxide material.

Lipson, Albert L.↗

DOE OSTI2023

Electrolytes for lithium batteries with carbon and/or silicon anodes

Electrolytes for lithium ion batteries with carbon-based, silicon-based, or carbon- and silicon-based anodes include a lithium salt; a nonaqueous solvent comprising at least one of the following components: (i) an ester, (ii) a sulfur-containing solvent, (iii) a phosphorus-containing solvent, (iv) an ether, (v) a nitrile, or any combination thereof, wherein the lithium salt is soluble in the solvent; a diluent comprising a fluoroalkyl ether, a fluorinated orthoformate, a fluorinated carbonate, a fluorinated borate, or a combination thereof, wherein the lithium salt has a solubility in the diluent at least 10 times less than a solubility of the lithium salt in the solvent; and an additive having a different composition than the lithium salt, a different composition than the solvent, and a different composition than the diluent.

Xu, Wu↗

DOE OSTI2023

Electrolytes for lithium-ion batteries operating at extreme conditions

Electrolytes for lithium ion batteries with carbon-based, silicon-based, or carbon- and silicon-based anodes include a lithium salt; a nonaqueous solvent comprising at least one of the following components: (i) an ester, (ii) a sulfur-containing solvent, (iii) a phosphorus-containing solvent, (iv) an ether, (v) a nitrile, or any combination thereof, wherein the lithium salt is soluble in the solvent; a diluent comprising a fluoroalkyl ether, a fluorinated orthoformate, a fluorinated carbonate, a fluorinated borate, a fluorinated phosphate, a fluorinated phosphite, or any combination thereof, wherein the lithium salt has a solubility in the diluent at least 10 times less than a solubility of the lithium salt in the solvent; and an additive having a different composition than the lithium salt, a different composition than the solvent, and a different composition than the diluent. In some electrolytes, the nonaqueous solvent comprises an ester.

Cao, Xia↗

DOE OSTI2023

Methods of making lithium ion conducting sulfide glass

A lithium ion-conductive solid electrolyte including a freestanding inorganic vitreous sheet of sulfide-based lithium ion conducting glass is capable of high performance in a lithium metal battery. Such an electrolyte is also manufacturable, and readily adaptable for battery cell and cell component manufacture, in a cost-effective, scalable manner using an automated machine based system, apparatus and methods based on inline spectrophotometry to assess and inspect the quality of such vitreous solid electrolyte sheets and associated components. Suitable manufacturing methods can involve providing a sulfur precursor, providing a boron precursor material having lithium as a second constituent, combining the sulfur and boron precursor materials to form a precursor mixture, melting the mixture, and cooling the melt to form a solid lithium ion conducting glass. The glass may have a Li+ conductivity of at least 10 −5 S/cm. The boron precursor material may be synthesized by reducing boron oxide to boron metal by heating the boron oxide in direct contact with lithium metal.

Visco, Steven J.↗

DOE OSTI2023

Method for recovering and recycling electrolyte salts from lithium batteries

A method for recovering a lithium electrolyte salt from spent batteries comprises first extracting electrolyte from shredded batteries (e.g., spent batteries at the end of their useful lifetime) with an organic carbonate solvent; concentrating the extracted electrolyte in vacuo to form a solid lithium electrolyte salt that is solvated with the organic carbonate; and then extracting solvent from the solvated, solid lithium electrolyte salt with supercritical CO 2 to purify the lithium electrolyte salt sufficiently for reuse in lithium batteries. In the first extraction, the organic carbonate solvent is selected based on the solubility of the lithium electrolyte salt in the solvent, as well as the volatility of the solvent to facilitate the concentration process. The supercritical CO 2 is preferably held at a pressure in the range of about 1,500 to about 30,000 psi and is passed through a bed or column of the solvated salt.

Lipson, Albert L.↗

DOE OSTI2024

Stabilized lithium metal oxide electrode material and method of preparation

Lipson, Albert L.↗

DOE OSTI2020

Solvation Rule for Solid-Electrolyte Interphase Enabler in Lithium-Metal Batteries

Despite the exceptionally high energy density of lithium metal anodes, the practical application of lithium-metal batteries (LMBs) is still impeded by the instability of the interphase between the lithium metal and the electrolyte. To formulate a functional electrolyte system that can stabilize the lithium-metal anode, the solvation behavior of the solvent molecules must be understood because the electrochemical properties of a solvent can be heavily influenced by its solvation status. Here, we unambiguously demonstrated the solvation rule for the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) enabler in an electrolyte system. In this study, fluoroethylene carbonate was used as the SEI enabler due to its ability to form a robust SEI on the lithium metal surface, allowing relatively stable LMB cycling. The results revealed that the solvation number of fluoroethylene carbonate must be ≥ 1 to ensure the formation of a stable SEI in which the sacrificial reduction of the SEI enabler subsequently leads to the stable cycling of LMBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2023

Rational designs to enable 10-min fast charging and long cycle life in lithium-ion batteries

A daunting challenge in the design of lithium ion batteries (LiBs) is enabling 10-min extreme fast charging (XFC) while achieving appreciable charge acceptance and cycle life. This desirable outcome requires both a comprehensive understanding of LiB operation and aging behavior at different length scales and careful optimization. Lithium plating has been a critical bottleneck because, at XFC rates, it consumes cyclable lithium causing distinct aging and safety concerns even in moderate-loading LiBs. Here, we propose combining multiple solutions, including materials-to-electrode design-to-charging protocols, that are intended to overcome limitations in lithium-ion transport in the electrolyte phase, thus enabling 10-min XFC in LiBs. Some implemented strategies include cathode chemistry, optimized carbon binder domain in the cathode, dual layer anode design, improved separator and advanced electrolyte. Further, innovative charging protocols in moderately loading (~3 mAh/cm 2 anode/2.7 mAh/cm 2 cathode) single-layer pouch cells are proposed, together with demonstrated 10-min XFC with higher charge acceptance between 87.3 and 92.1% (or 2–2.1 mAh/cm 2 ) for 600 cycles without lithium plating. This methodical study with well-defined cells shows promise in combining multiple solution strategies to enable 10-min XFC, charting a pathway to achieve XFC in higher-loading energy-optimized LiBs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2022

Combined Effects of Uniform Applied Pressure and Electrolyte Additives in Lithium-Metal Batteries

The development of lithium-metal batteries with good performance and long lifetimes requires fundamental insight into the mechanisms underlying performance improvements from individual design strategies and the interactions between multiple improvement approaches. Here, in this work, we investigated the individual and combined effects of applied pressure and a LiAsF 6 electrolyte additive on the performance of anode-free lithium-metal batteries; we employed various pressure application methods, which vary both in magnitude and uniformity. Both approaches individually improve cycling performance of anode-free lithium-metal batteries. Pressure increases the cycling efficiency at both the anode and cathode by promoting improved morphologies, while the LiAsF 6 additive additionally improves performance at the anode by enhancing the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) properties. The combination of uniform applied pressure and a LiAsF 6 electrolyte additive produces lithium-metal batteries with cycling performance higher than can be achieved with either approach alone. This additional performance improvement is able to be realized due to the complementary rather than competitive nature of the mechanisms underlying applied pressure (lithium morphology) and electrolyte additives (SEI properties). Our results highlight the importance of moving beyond the investigation of isolated design strategies and demonstrate that superior cycling can be achieved by combining multiple approaches.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

DOE OSTI2023

Selecting the Optimal Fluorinated Ether Co-Solvent for Lithium Metal Batteries

To guide the selection of a suitable fluorinated ether (FE) co -solvent for lithium metal batteries, it is crucial to understand the relationship between the organic structures of the FEs and the electrochemical performance of an FE-containing electrolyte. In this work, 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoro-1-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)ethane (FEE), 1,1,2,2-tetrafluoro-3-(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethoxy)-propane (TTE), and 1,2-bis(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethoxy)ethane (OFDEE) were chosen as representative FE co-solvents because of their distinct structural properties. The structure-activity relationship between the FEs and the electrochemical performance of Li||LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 (Li||NMC622) cells was correlated and quantified by Fourier-transform infrared and multi-dimensional nuclear magnetic resonance techniques. Sand's model was also employed to assess the extent of lithium dendrite formation in the cells using various FE electrolytes. The cycling performance of Li||NMC622 cells using different FE co-solvents follows the order FEE > TTE > OFDEE. Further, since the direct measurement of Sand's time is difficult, we introduced relative Sand's time to probe the diffusion behavior of each electrolyte, and the results showed that the best performance was obtained in the electrolyte with the longest relative Sand's time. Moreover, the lithium metal cell using the electrolyte with FEE co-solvent showed similar capacity retention compared with the baseline electrolyte at room temperature, but it demonstrated significantly improved low-temperature performance. The results indicate that FEE is a promising co-solvent candidate for improving the low-temperature performance of lithium metal batteries because it possesses not only non-solvating behavior but also very low viscosity and non-flammability. The advanced electrolyte LiPF 6 -FEC-DMC-FEE enables very stable cycling of lithium metal batteries at various temperatures.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗