Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Lab Testing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 523 records · Page 29

Impact of Space Radiation on Plant Seeds: from Arabidopsis thaliana to Crops

One of the major concerns for long-term exploration missions beyond the Earth’s magnetosphere is radiation risk, primarily from solar particle events (SPE) and galactic cosmic rays (GCR). With the goal of manned Mars exploration, the production of fresh food during long-duration space missions provides critical nutritional supplementation and may also benefit astronauts’ behavioral health. However, the effects of space radiation on plants and plant propagules have not been sufficiently investigated and characterized. This is the final report of our project to summarize the findings of the effect of space radiation exposure on plant seeds from morphometrics, nutritional values, to molecular machenisms. In this study, we evaluated the effect of simulated GCR (using dry seeds) or SPE (using hydrated seeds) on seeds of Arabidopsis, Mizuna mustard, ‘Outredgeous’ red romaine lettuce, and ‘Red Robin’ dwarf tomato. Seeds were exposed to various doses of simulated space radiation scenarios, either acutely or at a low dose rate (LDR), using the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory (NSRL) facility at Brookhaven National Lab (BNL). Exposure to simulated GCR or SPE at the levels tested had no significant impact on the germination rate in Arabidopsis and crop seeds; however, GCR reduced the viability of lettuce and tomato seeds. Overall, the morphological changes of the seedlings cultured from irradiated seeds were dose- and ion quality- dependent, with heavier ions causing more severe damage. These changes ranged from cotyledon deformation, shortened root length, smaller seedling size, and other signs of stress, depending on the seed types. Both 40 and 80 cGy (LDR) exposures of GCR or SPE significantly affected tomato early seedling development, delayed tomato fruiting, and reduced the total yield of tomato. Altered nutritional values were also found in edible biomass, especially for the GCR 80 cGy (LDR) groups. Underlying mechanisms were furtherly evaluated using transcriptomic analysis. For both GCR and SPE, 40 cGy showed some effects, but to a much lesser extent compared with 80 cGy, which can be considered as the “maximum permissible exposure” for the seed types we evaluated in this study. The impact of space radiation on seeds potentially affects the ability of plants to adapt to other environmental stresses (e.g. microgravity, water stress, and hardware constraints) as well as susceptibility to plant diseases, which need to be furtherly investigated. This research is funded by NASA’s Human Research Program.

J T Richards↗

Impact of Space Radiation on Plant Seeds: from Arabidopsis thaliana to Crops

One of the major concerns for long-term exploration missions beyond the Earth’s magnetosphere is radiation risk, primarily from solar particle events (SPE) and galactic cosmic rays (GCR). With the goal of manned Mars exploration, the production of fresh food during long-duration space missions provides critical nutritional supplementation and may also benefit astronauts’ behavioral health. However, the effects of space radiation on plants and plant propagules have not been sufficiently investigated and characterized. This is the final report of our project to summarize the findings of the effect of space radiation exposure on plant seeds from morphometrics, nutritiaonal values, to molecular machenisms. In this study, we evaluated the effect of simulated GCR (using dry seeds) or SPE (using hydrated seeds) on seeds of Arabidopsis, Mizuna mustard, ‘Outredgeous’ red romaine lettuce, and ‘Red Robin’ dwarf tomato. Seeds were exposed to various doses of simulated space radiation scenarios, either acutely or at a low dose rate (LDR), using the NASA Space Radiation Laboratory (NSRL) facility at Brookhaven National Lab (BNL). Exposure to simulated GCR or SPE at the levels tested had no significant impact on the germination rate in Arabidopsis and crop seeds; however, GCR reduced the viability of lettuce and tomato seeds. Overall, the morphological changes of the seedlings cultured from irradiated seeds were dose- and ion quality- dependent, with heavier ions causing more severe damage. These changes ranged from cotyledon deformation, shortened root length, smaller seedling size, and other signs of stress, depending on the seed types. Both 40 and 80 cGy (LDR) exposures of GCR or SPE significantly affected tomato early seedling development, delayed tomato fruiting, and reduced the total yield of tomato. Altered nutritional values were also found in edible biomass, especially for the GCR 80 cGy (LDR) groups. Underlying mechanisms were furtherly evaluated using transcriptomic analysis. For both GCR and SPE, 40 cGy showed some effects, but to a much lesser extent compared with 80 cGy, which can be considered as the “maximum permissible exposure” for the seed types we evaluated in this study. The impact of space radiation on seeds potentially affects the ability of plants to adapt to other environmental stresses (e.g. microgravity, water stress, and hardware constraints) as well as susceptibility to plant diseases, which need to be furtherly investigated. This research is funded by NASA’s Human Research Program.

J.T. Richards↗

MSFC ISHM and Automation Capabilities Supporting Moon to Mars Operations

Presently we are positioned to be product focused - Understandably so, since we have been developing a product for the last decade - Focused on developing a single system per mission Going forward we need to look at the system of systems and the coordination among systems that are designed differently, talk differently, and fail differently - Adaptation of the tools we’ve developed along the way - Developing lab to let us, industry, and academia partners to develop and test and evaluate and compare approaches

Tristan Lane↗

T-Cell Shenanigans: The Impact of MHC Pathway & Lipid Metabolism Genes on T-Cell Differentiation in the Thymus

Astronaut health and proper immune function are key to the success and sustainability of long term missions in space. While previous studies have observed adaptive immune dysfunction such as diminished WBC counts and cytokine production during spaceflight, the underlying mechanisms behind why immune function worsens are poorly understood. Using transcriptomic data analyzed from mouse thymus tissues available from the GLDS-421 experiment on the Rodent Research-9 mission, we used the GeneLab standardized RNA-Seq pipeline and identified four genes that were largely dysregulated (p<0.05): lipid metabolic genes Hpgd and Pgr and cell cycle regulator genes Cenpe and Kif11. We analyzed how these genes regulate the MHC-TCR interaction, and used this understanding to propose a novel mechanism for alterations to T-cell differentiation. In our experimental methodology, we propose to use 36 transgenic CD4-CD8 mice and 12 wild-type mice from the Jackson Lab to create a microgravity-simulating hindlimb unloading model and test our hypothesis. By silencing the aforementioned genes using custom siRNA based primers, we will use flow cytometry and RNA-Seq to quantify Treg counts in comparison to naive CD4+ cells, Alamar Blue assay for observing the metabolic activity in T-cells, and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) to observe the general immune response in terms of T-cell differentiation. We hope this methodology will improve our knowledge of MHC-TCR interaction, contribute to a better understanding of the mechanisms of autoimmune diseases such as lupus, and improve the success rate of newer cancer treatments such as CAR-T cell therapy.

GL4HS↗

Influence of Source Type on Acoustic Liner Impedance in No Flow

This paper presents findings from a study conducted under a challenge of the International Forum for Aviation Research (IFAR), which consists of partners from various national research labs around the world. A series of normal incidence impedance tube tests are performed to identify differences in acoustic impedance for various types of source excitations. These source types include single-tone, multitone, and broadband. To better understand these differences, six unique acoustic liners are tested using these source types at various sound pressure levels and frequencies. Multitone sources of up to five discrete frequencies at a time (both harmonic and nonharmonic excitations) are included. Predictions are also shown to assess capability of capturing source type in the acoustic liner design process. It is determined that impedance behavior due to single-tone and broadband source excitations is largely well-understood and predictable. Multitone source excitations, however, yield unpredictable impedance characteristics that appear highly dependent on the summed coherent waveform that is incident upon the acoustic liner. Future work on this topic is warranted to improve impedance prediction capability of multitone excitation.

acoustic liner impedance multitone prediction sour↗

NASA AREAL Testbed and UE Power Quality Testing

A large number of electrified aircraft propulsion systems currently in development consist of high-voltage direct current (HVDC) power systems and utilization equipment (UE). There is a need for industry consensus standards and guidelines in order to support the development and verification of these rapidly maturing systems, user equipment, and associated technologies. To support the aforementioned need, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Revolutionary Vertical Lift Technology (RVLT) Project is performing ongoing power quality testing on HVDC power systems and associated UE. The testing described in this paper describes the UE testing completed to date in the NASA Advanced Reconfigurable Electrified Aircraft Lab (AREAL).

electrified aircraft↗

Dynamic Sampling of Cabin VOCs during the Mission Operations Test of the Deep Space Habitat

The atmospheric composition inside spacecraft is dynamic due to changes in crew metabolism and payload operations. A portable FTIR gas analyzer was used to monitor the atmospheric composition of four modules (Core lab, Veggie Plant Atrium, Hygiene module, and Xhab loft) within the Deep Space Habitat '(DSH) during the Mission Operations Test (MOT) conducted at the Johnson Space Center. The FTIR was either physically relocated to a new location or the plumbing was changed so that a different location was monitored. An application composed of 20 gases was used and the FTIR was zeroed using N2 gas every time it was relocated. The procedures developed for operating the FTIR were successful as all data was collected and the FTIR worked during the entire MOT mission. Not all the 20 gases in the application sampled were detected and it was possible to measure dynamic VOC concentrations in each DSH location.

Monje, Oscar↗

Shuttle Imaging Radar-C mission operations - Technology test bed for Earth Observing System synthetic aperture radar

The mission operations for the Space Radar Lab (SRL), particularly in the areas of real-time replanning and science activity coordination, are presented. The two main components of SRL are the Shuttle Imaging Radar-C and the X-Band Synthetic Aperture Radar. The Earth Observing System SAR will be a multispectral, multipolarization radar satellite that will provide information over an entire decade, permitting scientists to monitor large-scale changes in the earth's environment over a long period of time.

Trimble, J. P.↗

Flight-Tested Hardware Options Currently Available to Support Fruit Fly Science Missions on ISS

The Fruit Fly Lab team at Ames Research Center has developed and flown several versions of hardware to ISS that have been utilized to conduct research using the model organism, Drosophila melanogaster. These sets of hardware vary in complexity and capabilities and can be matched to experiments based on specific aims objectives and considerations for cost, updownmass, and crew time requirements. The team has multiple investigators slated to utilize this hardware on near-term missions to ISS, and is expecting more from future calls for proposals.

Fruit Fly↗

Spacecraft Avionics Software Development Then and Now: Different but the Same

NASA has always been in the business of balancing new technologies and techniques to achieve human space travel objectives. NASA s historic Software Production Facility (SPF) was developed to serve complex avionics software solutions during an era dominated by mainframes, tape drives, and lower level programming languages. These systems have proven themselves resilient enough to serve the Shuttle Orbiter Avionics life cycle for decades. The SPF and its predecessor the Software Development Lab (SDL) at NASA s Johnson Space Center (JSC) hosted flight software (FSW) engineering, development, simulation, and test. It was active from the beginning of Shuttle Orbiter development in 1972 through the end of the shuttle program in the summer of 2011 almost 40 years. NASA s Kedalion engineering analysis lab is on the forefront of validating and using many contemporary avionics HW/SW development and integration techniques, which represent new paradigms to NASA s heritage culture in avionics software engineering. Kedalion has validated many of the Orion project s HW/SW engineering techniques borrowed from the adjacent commercial aircraft avionics environment, inserting new techniques and skills into the Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle (MPCV) Orion program. Using contemporary agile techniques, COTS products, early rapid prototyping, in-house expertise and tools, and customer collaboration, NASA has adopted a cost effective paradigm that is currently serving Orion effectively. This paper will explore and contrast differences in technology employed over the years of NASA s space program, due largely to technological advances in hardware and software systems, while acknowledging that the basic software engineering and integration paradigms share many similarities.

Mangieri, Mark L.↗

Pratt and Whitney Overview and Advanced Health Management Program

Hardware Development Activity: Design and Test Custom Multi-layer Circuit Boards for use in the Fault Emulation Unit; Logic design performed using VHDL; Layout power system for lab hardware; Work lab issues with software developers and software testers; Interface with Engine Systems personnel with performance of Engine hardware components; Perform off nominal testing with new engine hardware.

Inabinett, Calvin↗

Design and Applications of Tethered Spacecraft Simulators

Small, tethered spacecraft, or space tugs, are a promising space capability. They can be deployed on tethers and used for a wide variety of in-space activities; a large portion of which fall under in-space servicing, assembly, manufacturing (ISAM) functions. This includes functions such as structural mating and assembly, servicing, proximity operations, capture, docking, mating, and relocation. However, there is a great deal of work to be done to raise the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) of the capabilities needed to fully realize these capabilities. The Flat Floor Robotics Lab (FFRL) at NASA’s Marshall Spaceflight Center (MSFC) has been working on space tug development for several years. The eponymous floor is 44 by 86 feet, made from a self-leveling epoxy. This creates an extremely smooth surface that air bearings can float on with very little friction, creating a simulation of zero gravity in a two-dimensional plane. The lab has several platforms of various sizes that act as vehicle simulators for testing sensors, control algorithms, mechanisms, etc. One of these platforms is a small spacecraft simulator, which can be tethered to simulate a space tug. In the last several months, the FFRL team has been working with MSFC’s welding group to conduct a laser beam welding demonstration on air bearing platforms. This demo is utilizing a space tug simulator to fly up to a floating weld platform, where two parts are clamped together and laser welded. The space tug simulator has an air bearing to provide float, as well as several actuated air thrusters to provide propulsion and make the simulator maneuverable. Currently, flights of this simulator are completed by a human operator. An RF hand controller sends signals to both actuate and fire three sets of thrusters on the simulator. This makes any maneuvers of the space tug highly subject to human error, and operators must have dedicated practice time before being able to perform maneuvers with any sufficient reliability. For the current laser welding demonstration, human operated performance is sufficient, but future implementations of in-space welding and other ISAM efforts will require higher precision, reliability, and autonomy. MSFC has funded a project that will allow a small team in the FFRL to develop the next generation of space tug simulator, which will be automated. Closed loop control will allow a user to command a position, or set of positions, that the simulator will be able to “fly” to on its own. This Maneuverable Automated Tethered Spacecraft (MATS) simulator will have configurable design, to allow a variety of payloads and mission configurations to be demonstrated on the air bearing floor. This will be an invaluable test bed for low and mid TRL advancement for space tether mission subsystems, such as more advanced demonstrations of in-space welding. Once one MATSS is constructed and demonstrated effectively, several more can be built, enabling more advanced tether missions; Electric Sail test beds, sensor arrays, and other science-enabling missions. This paper will detail the design and test of the FFRL’s MATS simulator, including efforts to establish closed loop control and autonomous capabilities. It will also detail use cases for this technology, and how it will further develop both develop science and exploration missions.

Space Tethers↗

Recent Ground-based Test Results for the Closed Loop Two-Phase Flow Chilldown Test Module for Future Integration with the Flow Boiling and Condensation Experiment onboard International Space Station

Effective cryogenic fluid management is important to the success of future manned and unmanned NASA missions, and the transfer line chilldown process is recognized as a key technological challenge. To address this challenge, the Two-phase Flow and Thermal Management Lab (TFTML) at Case Western Reserve University is collaborating with NASA Glenn Research Center to develop, test and deploy a closed loop two-phase flow chilldown test section onboard the International Space Station to be integrated with the current Flow Boiling and Condensation Experiment (FBCE) module. The final results of this project will create the first chilldown process database under pure and sustained microgravity conditions and will significantly advance the understanding of the chilldown process for cryogenic fluid management. In the present work, the ground-based test results of the closed loop SS-316 chilldown test section in a horizontal configuration at varying inlet mass flow rates (3-40 g/s) and inlet liquid subcooling (5-35 0C) are presented. The working fluid is PF-5060 and the chilldown curves captured the entire quenching curve involving the different boiling regimes and temperature transition points viz., film boiling, Leidenfrost/re-wetting point, transition boiling, critical heat flux (CHF), nucleate boiling, onset of nucleate boiling (ONB) and single-phase liquid flow regions, when the test section is pre-heated to around 250 0C. The major findings of the present study are, (i) the bottom part of the test section sees a lower re-wetting temperature due to the horizontal flow configuration, (ii) the re-wetting temperatures are relatively unaffected by inlet liquid mass flow rates though the increase in mass flow rates reduce the chilldown time, and (iii) the re-wetting temperatures decrease with decrease in inlet liquid subcooling. Further, preliminary flow visualization studies in a transparent pyrex test section will also be presented to understand the intricate flow boiling regime transitions during the chilldown process.

ISS↗

Overview of Integrated Random Vibration Testing of the NASA Orion Crew Survival Suit

The launch ascent and abort random vibration environments from NASA’s Orion spacecraft drove the need to test the NASA Orion Crew Survival Suit as an integrated system with exposure to the design levels. In order to properly characterize component responses, a series of integrated tests were designed to incorporate the interaction between a crew member, suit, seat, and the attenuation system. The first Development Test (2017) included human subjects, and was performed with early development seat and suit components, and low level inputs. It provided a baseline for frequency response and behavior of the integrated system. The next two tests, Development Test (2019) and Qualification Test (2020), used manikin surrogates to represent the crew member and increasing levels of component hardware fidelity in order to test to higher input levels. Testing was performed at NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) and Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Vibration Labs and provided the input levels required to represent the ascent and abort vehicle profiles as well as recorded component response behavior from accelerometer instrumentation and high speed cameras. Inspection of the suit and related components showed that for all seat orientations, and input environments, no damage occurred. Additional pre and post-test checks confirmed the functionality of all suited hardware. Response data of the suited components generally showed heavy attenuation across most of the tested frequency range. Transmissibility plots showed some amplification of components at lower frequency ranges. Overall this series of integrated tests showed that 1) the use of surrogate manikins in the tests were adequate for representing crew in a vibration environment, 2) full vibration levels for ascent and abort were heavily attenuated in the suit components and were non-damaging, and 3) the suit and related components are qualified for the Orion random vibration environments.

Jeffrey D Suhey↗

Overview of Integrated Random Vibration Testing of the NASA Orion Crew Survival Suit

The launch ascent and abort random vibration environments from NASA’s Orion spacecraft drove the need to test the NASA Orion Crew Survival Suit as an integrated system with exposure to the design levels. In order to properly characterize component responses, a series of integrated tests were designed to incorporate the interaction between a crew member, suit, seat, and the attenuation system. The first Development Test (2017) included human subjects, and was performed with early development seat and suit components, and low level inputs. It provided a baseline for frequency response and behavior of the integrated system. The next two tests, Development Test (2019) and Qualification Test (2020), used manikin surrogates to represent the crew member and increasing levels of component hardware fidelity in order to test to higher input levels. Testing was performed at NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) and Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Vibration Labs and provided the input levels required to represent the ascent and abort vehicle profiles as well as recorded component response behavior from accelerometer instrumentation and high speed cameras. Inspection of the suit and related components showed that for all seat orientations, and input environments, no damage occurred. Additional pre and post-test checks confirmed the functionality of all suited hardware. Response data of the suited components generally showed heavy attenuation across most of the tested frequency range. Transmissibility plots showed some amplification of components at lower frequency ranges. Overall this series of integrated tests showed that 1) the use of surrogate manikins in the tests were adequate for representing crew in a vibration environment, 2) full vibration levels for ascent and abort were heavily attenuated in the suit components and were non-damaging, and 3) the suit and related components are qualified for the Orion random vibration environments.

Jeffrey Suhey↗

Evaluation of Contaminant-Promoted Ignition in Scuba Equipment and Breathing Gas Delivery Systems

As the underwater diving industry continues to use greater concentrations of oxygen in their scuba systems, ignition of contaminants in these systems becomes a greater concern. Breathing gas makeup and distribution systems typically combine pure oxygen with various diluents to supply high-pressure cylinders for scuba applications. The hazards associated with these applications of oxygen and NITROX (oxygen and nitrogen mixture) gases require an evaluation of inherent contaminant levels and their associated promoted-ignition thresholds in these environments. In this study, several scuba component assemblies were tested after one year of use at the NASA Johnson Space Center Neutral Buoyancy Lab. The components were rapidly impacted with 50% NITROX gas to demonstrate their ignition resistance, then disassembled to evaluate their cleanliness. A follow-up study was then performed on the ignition thresholds of hydrocarbon-bascd oil films in oxygen and NITROX environments in an attempt to define the cleaning requirements for these systems. Stainless steel tubes were contaminated and verified to known levels and placed in a pneumatic impact test system where they were rapidly pressurized with the test gas. Ignitions were determined using a photodiode connected to the end of the contaminated tube. The results of the scuba component tests, cleanliness evaluation, and contaminant ignition study are discussed and compared for 50% NITROX and 100% oxygen environments.

Forsyth, Elliott T.↗

Stem Cell-Based Regenerative Health in Microgravity

The research of Dr. Almeida's Lab at NASA Ames focuses on the effects of microgravity mechanical unloading on stem-cell-based tissue regeneration. The research focuses on testing the broad hypothesis that mechanical load from gravity at 1 g is required for normal adult stem cell proliferation and differentiation during tissue regeneration. Research from the lab has provides evidence supporting the hypothesis in various biological models, including newt tail regeneration, mouse bone and bone marrow in whole animals, and mouse embryonic stem cells all exposed to microgravity during spaceflight. Using these models, the lab has identified overexpression of the cell cycle inhibitor p21/CDKN1a as a candidate molecular mediator mechanism of bone marrow mesenchymal and hematopoietic lineage tissue regenerative arrest in microgravity. The labis currently focused on using p21/CDKN1a null mouse and cell culture approaches in microgravity to test the gravity tissue regeneration hypothesis.

stem cells microgravity regeneration↗

An Evaluation of Extended Reality Technologies for Use in Verification Testing at NASA 2024 HRP IWS Abstract

BACKGROUND At NASA, verification testing is the formal process of ensuring that a product conforms to requirements set by a project or program. Some verification methods, such as Demonstrations and Test, require either the end product or a mockup of the product with sufficient fidelity to stand-in for the product during the test. Traditionally, these mockups have been physical (e.g., foam-core and wood) but there is growing interest in exploring new methods for testing with these mockups. These methods include virtual reality (VR), mixed reality, and augmented reality which are collectively referred to as eXtended Reality (XR) technologies. VR has already been adopted and used by many in the aerospace industry as a tool for use in early design phases (e.g., developmental testing) and may have the most potential for use in verification tests. Benefits of using VR mockups offer cost effectiveness, ease of iteration, simulation of hazardous conditions (e.g., an egress through a hatch with smoke obscuring vision), and the ability to simulate microgravity conditions, which are challenging to do with physical mockups. However, the validity of test results obtained from VR mockup demonstrations or testing, compared to the current gold standard of physical mockups, remains uncertain. It is unlikely that there is one clean answer as there are many different types of verification outcomes and each XR technology must be evaluated on its own merits. This is not an issue during developmental testing as the design is still in flux and the total success of the design is not dependent upon the results of a developmental test. Verification tests, however, only happen once, assuming no change to the design, and the results are used to certify the product. Therefore, establishing the validity of XR mockup-based verification outcomes is essential before considering them for any use in verification tests. OBJECTIVE AND METHOD To address this concern, the Human Research Program has funded a project to explore and qualify how XR technologies might be used in verification demonstration and testing at NASA. Currently, we are conducting a review of the literature on the utilization of XR mockups for design activities, prototyping, and user testing. We are employing the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats (SWOT) analysis method to identify the pros, cons, and barriers to adoption of XR technologies for verification testing at NASA. Additionally, we are developing a framework to guide the deployment of XR mockups for verification tests. Building upon available evidence from the literature and subject-matter expert feedback, our goal for the framework is to provide guidelines for which forms of XR mockups are suitable for a given verification test, when only physical mockups should be employed and to highlight areas for which more evidence is needed. To further refine our framework and to contribute to the body of evidence, we are planning a lab-based experiment comparing a VR mockup to a physical twin for a set of select verification outcomes. ANTICIPATED RESULTS In this presentation, we will present the work we conducted to evaluate XR technologies for use in verification tests at NASA. We will summarize and report our findings from the SWOT analysis and our lab-based study, and we will present the current state of the XR Technologies for Verification Testing framework. We will conclude by summarizing remaining work and future directions for the project. Technologies for Verification Testing framework. We will conclude by summarizing remaining work and future directions for the project.

Extended Reality↗