Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Astromaterials”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3

Meca500 Robotic Arm Developments Towards Astromaterials Curation Applications

As a part of the ongoing efforts to develop new curation tools and techniques for astromaterials within the Astromaterials Acquisition and Curation office at NASA’s Johnson Space Center, we are developing a variety of manually and electrically controlled micromanipulation systems. Most current techniques require manual manipulation, and in some cases the manipulation task is being done entirely freehand. The motorized systems avail-able are restricted to three degrees of freedom and use proprietary control systems. For example, the MicroSupport AxisPro manipulation system currently used in microscale particle experiments is limited in its range of motion, as it can only move the manipulators in a three axis Cartesian range over a predetermined area above microscope slides. While having an efficient user interface, the control system is proprietary and prevents custom development and optimization to extend the viable applications of the system. In order to address some of these limitations, we have been testing robotic designs with multiple degrees of freedom and of a variety of designs. We are currently investigating the Meca500 robotic arm by Mecademic as a potential manipulation system to overcome some of these obstacles.

Cowden, T. R.↗

A METHOD TO REDUCE BIOBURDEN IN ASTROMATERIALS CURATION FACILITIES WITHOUT INTRODUCING UNWANTED CONTAMINATION

Introduction: NASA curates its Astromaterials collections in cleanrooms that are carefully monitored for particulate, inorganic and trace metal contamination. Current sample collections are not particularly susceptible to organic contamination or biological alteration. However, new collections like those from the OSIRIS-REx and Hayabusa2 missions will have organic contamination requirements and are susceptible to biodegradation. It will be necessary sterilize or at least disinfect curation labs, as well as tools and equipment in a manner that does not introduce additional contamination and does not affect the samples 1. Current curation cleaning procedures utilize isopropyl alcohol which offers some bioburden reduction, but is not effective against spore-forming bacteria or fungal spores 2. We present a modified disinfection method that uses ultrapure hydrogen peroxide to reduce bioburden inside curation labs and glove boxes without introducing contamination or damaging curation equipment. We tested this method in the meteorite processing lab as well as on a glovebox being cleaned for use in processing ANGSA (Apollo Next Generation Sample Analysis) samples and present the results of those tests. We discuss the limitations of this method and describe potential situations in which it will not be applicable. The CDC guidelines for disinfection andsterilization in healthcare facilities discusses over 15different methods for reducing bioburden in hospitalsettings 3. The most common method, steamsterilization, is well suited to sterilizing curationprocessing tools but cannot easily be used to sterilizecleanroom surfaces or large equipment likegloveboxes. Chemical sterilization with bleach(NaOCl) is also a common strategy in healthcare andpharmaceutical settings that presents materialcompatibility issues as well as serious inorganiccontamination concerns for curation facilities.Introducing a new source of Na and Cl into curationlabs is not acceptable. Other chemical methods likeethylene oxide, formaldehyde, iodophors andquaternary ammonium compounds could introduceorganic and inorganic contamination. We chose tofocus on hydrogen peroxide because it is generallycompatible with commonly used curation materialslike stainless steel, aluminum and Teflon and becauseit decomposes to oxygen and water. The CDCguidelines for hydrogen peroxide specify using a 7.5wt% solution at 25 ̊C with a contact time of 30 minutesfor high level disinfection and 6 hours for sterilization.High level disinfection is defined as a technique thatwill kill all microorganisms except large numbers ofbacterial spores 3. Methods: We prepared a solution of 7.5 wt%hydrogen peroxide from a stock solution of ultrapure30 wt% peroxide (JT Baker) and curation gradeultrapure water. This ultrapure water is already used incuration cleaning procedures and thus is not consideredand additional source of contamination. We conducteda materials compatibility test by exposing unanodizedand anodized 6061 T6 Al alloy to the peroxide solutionfor up to six hours and periodically inspecting thesurfaces for visible defects. We used this peroxide todisinfect the floor of the meteorite processing lab andthe interior of a curation glovebox by exposing thesesurfaces to the peroxide solution for 30 min. Thesurfaces were swabbed with a dry macrofoam swabbefore (Puritan Brand 2518051PFRNDFD) and afterperoxide treatment to collect microbes present on thesurfaces. Microbes were extracted by sonication fromthe swab into 15 ml of PBS (phosphate buffered saline)and inoculated onto the following media: TSA (trypticsoy agar) BA (blood agar), R2A (Reasoners 2 agar),Potato Dextrose Agar, Saboraud Dextrose Agar andSaboraud Dextrose Agar with 0.1 mg/ mlchloramphenicol. Four TSA plates and two BA plateswere inoculated with 0.1 ml of PBS each andincubated at 35 and 37 for 48 hours. Two R2A°C°Cplates (0.1 ml of PBS each) were incubated at 25 .°CThe remaining plates were inoculated with 0.2ml ofPBS and incubated at 30 ̊C for seven days. Afterincubation bacterial and fungal isolates were countedand transferred to new plates for identification usingthe VITEK24 automated system or by sequencing aportion of the barcode gene (16S rRNA for bacteria,small subunit gene for fungi) on an ABI 3500 Sangersequencer. Negative controls consisted of swabs thatwere opened in the sampling environment andanalyzed alongside the experimental samples.Results: A 6 hour exposure to hydrogen peroxideresulted in visible pitting on un-anodized 6061 Al, butnot on anodized surfaces. No visible pitting occurredafter a 30 minute exposure. Therefore, we decided tolimit our experimental tests to 30 min. exposures. 17bacterial CFU (colony forming units) representing 4distinct organisms were isolated from the meteorite processing lab floor prior to hydrogen peroxidetreatment. We were unable culture any organisms afterperoxide treatment. In the glovebox we were able toculture three bacterial CFU representing three distinctspecies, including a spore forming bacterium prior todisinfection with peroxide. After the peroxidetreatment we were unable to culture any organisms.Routine monitoring of the meteorite processing lab andthe glovebox did not indicate any increase in unwantedinorganic contamination after these peroxidetreatments. Discussion: A 30 minute treatment with 7.5 wt%peroxide appears to be an effective method forreducing bioburden on typical cleanroom surfaces. Themethod does not introduce unwanted organic orinorganic contamination and is compatible withcommonly used curation materials like stainless steel,Teflon and anodized aluminum alloys. Special careshould be taken with un-anodized aluminum.Prolonged exposure to hydrogen peroxide can causepitting on this material. We recommend using thismethod to disinfect curation labs and equipment whenbiological alteration is a concern. This method iseffective at room temperature and cannot be used todisinfect labs and equipment where the ambienttemperature is < 0 ̊C. Astromaterials samples shouldbe removed from the area where disinfection is tooccur. Hydrogen peroxide is a powerful oxidizingagent and will react with any organic carbon present inthe sample. References: [1.] Mccubbin, F. M. et al.Sp. Sci Rev(2019) doi:10.1007/s11214-019-0615-9. [2.] Mogul, R.et al.Astrobiology 18, ast.2017.1814 (2018). [3.]Rutala, W. A. & Weber, D. J. Guideline for Disinfection and Sterilization in Healthcare Facilities, 2008. [4.] Pincus, D. H. in Encyclopedia of Rapid Microbiological Methods (2005).

A. B. Regberg↗

Insights From Routine Microbiological Monitoring of Air in Astromaterials Curation Cleanrooms

NASA maintains nine separate cleanrooms at the Johnson Space Center to curate and preserve astromaterials samples. Routine microbial monitoring of the surfaces in these cleanrooms began in 20181. Until recently, materials compatibility requirements prevented monitoring airborne biological particles in all but one of these cleanrooms. New astromaterials collections from carbon rich asteroids are more susceptible to biological degradation than previous collections. Therefore, it is important to monitor the bioburden in the air and on surfaces in these labs. Establishing a comprehensive microbial monitoring program will help inform the monitoring and curation plans for Mars sample return which will include samples that are extremely biologically sensitive. In April of 2022 we began routinely collecting air samples in seven of the nine curation cleanrooms (Meteorite ISO 7 equivalent, Lunar ISO 6 equivalent, Stardust, Hayabusa2, OSIRIS-REx ISO 5 equivalent, and Genesis ISO 4 equivalent) using a sampling device that collects airborne biological particles on an electret filter instead conventional sampler that collect cells in a liquid media or onto organic rich Petri dishes. Electret is a generic term for electrostatically charged media. The charge on these materials increases particle trapping when compared to non-charged filters of similar thickness. N95 respirators also use electret filters. This dry sample collection method allows us to meet materials requirements for all the curation labs and reduces the risk of inadvertently introducing contamination as part of our monitoring effort. This method also allows us to preserve a portion of each sample for DNA extraction and next generation sequencing. DNA sequencing helps us to characterize the portion of the cleanroom microbiome that we cannot culture. We will present the results of our first 8 months of monitoring, compare these results to particle counts in the labs and to measurements made directly onto Petri dishes when possible. We will also make recommendations for modifications to the sampling method to improve sampling efficiency and preserve diversity.

A. B. Regberg↗

Micrometer to Atomic Scale Characterisation of Primitive Astromaterials Using A Novel Method, Metis-Fa: A Coordinated Atom Probe Tomography, Transmission Electron Microscopy and NanoSIMS Approach

Introduction: Presolar grains preserve isotopic, chemical and microstructural records of physical and chemical processing, and formation mechanisms within a vast range of evolved stellar systems, the interstellar medium, solar nebula and their parent bodies. These evolutionary records are preserved at the micrometric to atomic scale, requiring coordinated studies to expand our understanding of evolutionary processes occurringthroughout ours and external stellar systems [1]. NanoSIMS enabled rapid in situ identification and isotopic characterisation of presolar grains and their stellar origins using 17O/16O and 18O/16O, and 13C/12C isotopic ratios [1]. Coordination with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed crystallographic and localised contextual relationships and quantitively constrained their major and minor compositions [1]. However, trace elements cannot be quantified, the most sensitive geochemical tracers of environmental conditions, essential to unravelling the chemical record of their evolutionary pathway and parent stellar systems [2-3] . Furthermore, owing to the combination of technical limitations (only 5 – 7 isotopes can be measured per NanoSIMS run) and their small grain sizes of 100 nm < 3 μm (with rare exceptions in nanodiamonds (2 nm ≤) and SiC (< 40 μm)), the number of measurable isotopes per grain volume is limited [1,3] . Through more comprehensive isotopic studies of presolar grains, NanoSIMS studies have shown the importance of the latter, identifying Fe and Mg as important indicators of nuclear synthetic processing and their stellar origins, respectively [4- 5]. Coordination of NanoSIMS and Atom Probe Tomography (APT) revealed morphological signatures, and isotopic and chemical signatures at major to trace levels without requirements for preselection of elements [6]. However, crystallographic signatures in localized contextual relationships cannot be measured. Consequently, coordination of NanoSIMS, TEM and APT is essential to gain access to almost all contextual, structural and geochemical signatures within each presolar grain.Transmission electron microscopy requires a 100 nm thin lamella which is unstable in APT and would not produce any viable data. Atom probe tomography requires a needle-shaped specimen which when measured in TEM removes the local context, impacts the quality of the TEM diffraction images due to the shank angle of the needle, and can alter the chemistry of beam sensitive materials from the higher degree of surface exposure at the tip. To address these issues, we developed METIS-Fa (Multi-technical measurements of Electron Transparent materials using an Indium Sandwich - a FIB approach). A novel method which enables coordination of NanoSIMS, TEM and APT for generalized and targeted studies of individual grains, including beam sensitive materials, without compromising sample preparation requirements for TEM and APT. This method requires only indium and a Focus Ion Beam (FIB), minimizing the movement of fragile materials while still enabling preparation of TEM lamella into APT needles. Samples: Initial experimental development and testing of the method occurred at Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science (ARES), Johnson Space Centre (JSC), NASA and APT measurements and needle preparation occurred at JdLC, Curtin University. Synthetic silicate samples were used as analogs for presolar silicates when performing a trial run of the method. Samples were extracted from a polished thin section created at JSC, NASA, comprised of 38 wt.% Si, 17 wt.% FeO, 13 wt.% MgO, 12 wt.% Al, 11 wt.% Ca based on electron microprobe analysis (EMPA) [8] . Experimental details, pressure and temperature conditions were presented in [8] and references therein. Testing of the capability to target individual grains in mineral matrices using this method for acquisition in APT, measured matrix regions in meteoritic thin sections of primitive meteorites. These meteorites and their identified presolar grains for future targeted studies are detailed in [9]. Techniques: The TEM-FIB lamella were prepared using a FIB. An e-beam assisted pt deposition was used as a protective coating for the synthetic and meteoritic samples. When targeting individual grains, a secondary e-beam assisted pt deposition button is placed over the desired grain before the protective coating to denote its location. A JEOL 2500SE field-emission TEM was used for high-resolution imaging, energy-dispersive X-ray (EDX) and electron diffraction data.TheMETIS-Fa method was experimentally designed, tested and executed using a FIB at ARES, JSCNASA. Needles for APT were prepared using the Tescan Lyra3 GM Dual Beam Focus Ion Beam (FIB) Field Emission SEM (FE-SEM) at the JdLC, Curtin University. Atom probe tomography measurements were conducted using a CAMECA Local Electrode Atom Probe, LEAP 4000X HR. Two pure indium needles were analyzed initially to constraining acquisition parameters and stability under the beam. Manual acquisition was required to maintain evaporation of specimen’s at the apex and monitor interactions with measurement parameters. Experimental Design: Indium foil is pressed onto an Al stub with a pneumatic press and mounted into the FIB adjacent to the TEM-FIB lamella of interest. Using a FIB, two indium slices (5 μm x ~300 nm x 3 μm) are extracted from indium foil and aligned with the TEM-FIB lamella before touching the TEM-FIB lamella. Each slice is then attached through cold welding to the FIB-TEM lamella. This approach eliminates the need for chemical treatments and proved effective for aligning the Indium within the region of interest for APT, holding it in place for up to 4 days during testing.Once both indium slices are attached within their pre-determined region per grain targeting requirements, they are gradually melted onto the FIB-TEM lamella.When targeting a specific grain, measurements should be taken of the pt button and its distance from edge to edge of the lamella before and after sandwiching. A secondary button should be placed over the same region after the Indium slices have been attached to improve precision when preparing APT needles. Results: Figure 1 shows two indium slices melted onto a FIB-TEM lamella, adding additional bulk for preparation into APT needles as shown in Figure 2 [7] . The latter was essential so samples could be measured in TEM and APT without compromising sample preparation requirements and consequently data quality and acquisition stability. METIS-Fa proved effective forimproving geometry. Figure 3 shows a successful APTrun of the synthetic silicate. EMPA, TEM and APTshowed no chemical alterations. During targetingtesting, a solar silicate grain was successfully identifiedand measured in TEM, and prepared into an APTneedle. However, the indium was melted too long during sample preparation, causing expansion andformation of internal porosity leading to sample loss.Conclusion: METIS-Fa greatly expands the number of isotopic and chemical signatures measured per grain volume, and enables measurements of contextual, structural, crystallographic, isotopic and geochemical signatures within individual grains. Gaining access to such a vast range of evolutionary signatures required for expanding our understanding of external stellar and planetary systems and the evolution of our solar system. This method was designed for application to a vast range of phases including being sensitive materials and thus provides a way for coordination of NanoSIMS, TEM and APT not just for the study of presolar grains and by extension primitive astromaterials, but studies in a vast range of other fields including the geosciences and material sciences.Acknowledgments: Thankyou to ARES, JSC, NASA; JdLC Curtin University and Space Science Technology Centre for the use of laboratory facilities and funding [confirm].

Nicole D Nevill↗

Polarized Resonant Soft X-ray Scattering (P-RSoXS) as a New Technique for Characterizing Amorphous Astromaterials

In the coming years, samples will be returned from several asteroids, the lunar surface, and the first material returned directly from the Martian surface. Previous in-situ and remote studies indicate these samples will contain abundant amorphous or weakly crystalline materials. However, detailed characterization and quantification of these amorphous materials remains challenging. Conventional techniques, including electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction, provide important information on material structure, but are generally limited to crystalline materials. Polarized resonant soft X-ray scattering (P-RSoXS) is a synchrotron-based X-ray scattering technique that has been used to characterize and quantify weakly crystalline systems, including soft materials. This research aims to translate this technique to geologic and extraterrestrial materials, building off the knowledge of using P-RSoXS to interrogate soft materials. P-RSoXS is well-suited to interrogate geologic materials, which are often multiphase, heterogeneous systems with crystalline and amorphous components, and domain sizes on the order of tens of nanometers. It is anticipated that future work will help reveal new chemical and structural information in geologic materials. Maturation of this preliminary work to develop P-RSoXS to characterize astromaterial-relevant samples will provide new understanding of the secondary processes responsible for the development of amorphous astromaterials and further elucidate our knowledge of the geologic history and past alteration processes.

Joshua H Litofsky↗

Development towards stable chlorine isotope measurements of astromaterials using the modified Middleton source of an accelerator mass spectrometer

The volatile element Cl can be lost during the formation and evolution of planetary bodies, leading to fractionation of its two stable isotopes 35 Cl and 37 Cl. Chlorine isotope variations (reported as δ 37 Cl in parts per thousand (‰) relative to Standard Mean Ocean Chloride, SMOC) are documented to exceed 80‰ between different lunar rock samples and have been variably interpreted as the fingerprint of degassing during accretion, magma ocean, or volcanic portions of lunar history. The large intersample and intrasample variations observed by both bulk isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) and in-situ secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) methods are difficult to interpret in part because of a paucity of bulk Cl isotope measurements. This lack of high-precision bulk data is due to the relative rarity of IRMS laboratories capable of making these high precision measurements on small samples of precious planetary materials such as those returned by human or robotic exploration. Here we present a new method for performing high precision δ 37 Cl measurements using the modified Middleton ion source of an existing accelerator mass spectrometer. For samples with as little as 1 μg Cl–the equivalent of 2–4 mm 3 of a typical lunar rock sample–the average cathode accuracy is ~1‰. Finally, cathode reproducibility is typically ~1‰ (2σ) for samples with at least 10 μg of Cl, increasing to ~3–6‰ for aliquots with ~1–2 μg Cl, similar to published SIMS results and sufficient to study astromaterials from the Moon, Mars, or 4 Vesta, which have tens of ‰ observed variations.

07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES↗

Ultra Pure Water Cleaning Baseline Study on NASA JSC Astromaterial Curation Gloveboxes

Future sample return missions will require strict protocols and procedures for reducing inorganic and organic contamination in isolation containment systems. In 2012, a baseline study was orchestrated to establish the current state of organic cleanliness in gloveboxes used by NASA JSC astromaterials curation labs [1, 2]. As part of this in-depth organic study, the current curatorial technical support procedure (TSP) 23 was used for cleaning the gloveboxes with ultra pure water (UPW) [3-5]. Particle counts and identification were obtained that could be used as a benchmark for future mission designs that require glovebox decontamination. The UPW baseline study demonstrates that TSP 23 works well for gloveboxes that have been thoroughly degreased. However, TSP 23 could be augmented to provide even better glovebox decontamination. JSC 03243 could be used as a starting point for further investigating optimal cleaning techniques and procedures. DuPont Vertrel XF or other chemical substitutes to replace Freon- 113, mechanical scrubbing, and newer technology could be used to enhance glovebox cleanliness in addition to high purity UPW final rinsing. Future sample return missions will significantly benefit from further cleaning studies to reduce inorganic and organic contamination.

Calaway, Michael J.↗

Curation of Microscopic Astromaterials by NASA: "Gathering Dust Since 1981"

Employing the philosophy that "Small is Beautiful", NASA has been collecting and curating microscopic astromaterials since 1981. These active collections now include interplanetary dust collected in Earth's stratosphere by U-2, ER-2 and WB-57F aircraft (the Cosmic Dust Program - our motto is "Gathering dust since 1981"), comet Wild-2 coma dust (the Stardust Mission), modern interstellar dust (also the Stardust Mission), asteroid Itokawa regolith dust (the Hayabusa Mission - joint curation with JAXA-ISAS), and interplanetary dust impact features on recovered portions of the following spacecraft: Skylab, the Solar Maximum Satellite, the Palapa Satellite, the Long Duration Exposure Facility (LDEF), the MIR Space Station, the International Space Station, and the Hubble Space Telescope (all in the Space Exposed Hardware Laboratory).

Frank, D. R.↗

ECTFE (HALAR) as a New Material for Primary Sample Containment of Astromaterials

Fluoropolymers, such as Teflon® (PTFE, PFA, FEP) and Viton® (FKM), have been used for over 40 years in curating astromaterials at NASA JSC. In general, fluoropolymers have low outgassing and particle shedding properties that reduce cross-contamination to curated samples. Ethylene - Chlorotrifluoroethylene (ECTFE), commonly called Halar® (trademark of Solvay Solexis), is a partially fluorinated semi-crystalline copolymer in the same class of fluoropolymers with superior abrasion resistance and extremely low permeability to liquids, gases, and vapors than any other fluoropolymer (fig. 1). ECTFE coatings are becoming more popular in the nuclear, semiconductor, and biomedical industry for lining isolation containment gloveboxes and critical piping as well as other clean room applications. A study was conducted at NASA JSC to evaluate the potential use of Halar on future sample return missions as a material for primary sample containment.

Calaway, Michael J.↗

Astromaterials Acquisition and Curation Office (KT) Overview

The Astromaterials Acquisition and Curation Office has the unique responsibility to curate NASA's extraterrestrial samples - from past and forthcoming missions - into the indefinite future. Currently, curation includes documentation, preservation, physical security, preparation, and distribution of samples from the Moon, asteroids, comets, the solar wind, and the planet Mars. Each of these sample sets has a unique history and comes from a unique environment. The curation laboratories and procedures developed over 40 years have proven both necessary and sufficient to serve the evolving needs of a worldwide research community. A new generation of sample return missions to destinations across the solar system is being planned and proposed. The curators are developing the tools and techniques to meet the challenges of these new samples. Extraterrestrial samples pose unique curation requirements. These samples were formed and exist under conditions strikingly different from those on the Earth's surface. Terrestrial contamination would destroy much of the scientific significance of extraterrestrial materials. To preserve the research value of these precious samples, contamination must be minimized, understood, and documented. In addition, the samples must be preserved - as far as possible - from physical and chemical alteration. The elaborate curation facilities at JSC were designed and constructed, and have been operated for many years, to keep sample contamination and alteration to a minimum. Currently, JSC curates seven collections of extraterrestrial samples: (a)) Lunar rocks and soils collected by the Apollo astronauts, (b) Meteorites collected on dedicated expeditions to Antarctica, (c) Cosmic dust collected by high-altitude NASA aircraft,t (d) Solar wind atoms collected by the Genesis spacecraft, (e) Comet particles collected by the Stardust spacecraft, (f) Interstellar dust particles collected by the Stardust spacecraft, and (g) Asteroid soil particles collected by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) Hayabusa spacecraft Each of these sample sets has a unique history and comes from a unique environment. We have developed specialized laboratories and practices over many years to preserve and protect the samples, not only for current research but for studies that may be carried out in the indefinite future.

Allen, Carlton↗

Evolution of the Lunar Receiving Laboratory to the Astromaterial Sample Curation Facility: Technical Tensions Between Containment and Cleanliness, Between Particulate and Organic Cleanliness

The Lunar Receiving Laboratory (LRL) was planned and constructed in the 1960s to support the Apollo program in the context of landing on the Moon and safely returning humans. The enduring science return from that effort is a result of careful curation of planetary materials. Technical decisions for the first facility included sample handling environment (vacuum vs inert gas), and instruments for making basic sample assessment, but the most difficult decision, and most visible, was stringent biosafety vs ultra-clean sample handling. Biosafety required handling of samples in negative pressure gloveboxes and rooms for containment and use of sterilizing protocols and animal/plant models for hazard assessment. Ultra-clean sample handling worked best in positive pressure nitrogen environment gloveboxes in positive pressure rooms, using cleanable tools of tightly controlled composition. The requirements for these two objectives were so different, that the solution was to design and build a new facility for specific purpose of preserving the scientific integrity of the samples. The resulting Lunar Curatorial Facility was designed and constructed, from 1972-1979, with advice and oversight by a very active committee comprised of lunar sample scientists. The high precision analyses required for planetary science are enabled by stringent contamination control of trace elements in the materials and protocols of construction (e.g., trace element screening for paint and flooring materials) and the equipment used in sample handling and storage. As other astromaterials, especially small particles and atoms, were added to the collections curated, the technical tension between particulate cleanliness and organic cleanliness was addressed in more detail. Techniques for minimizing particulate contamination in sample handling environments use high efficiency air filtering techniques typically requiring organic sealants which offgas. Protocols for reducing adventitious carbon on sample handling surfaces often generate particles. Further work is needed to achieve both minimal particulate and adventitious carbon contamination. This paper will discuss these facility topics and others in the historical context of nearly 50 years' curation experience for lunar rocks and regolith, meteorites, cosmic dust, comet particles, solar wind atoms, and asteroid particles at Johnson Space Center.

Allton, J. H.↗

Fluid Inclusions in Astromaterials: Direct Samples of Early Solar System Aqueous Fluids

We have become increasingly aware of the fundamental importance of water, and aqueous alteration, on primitive solar-system bodies. All classes of astromaterials studied show some degree of interaction with aqueous fluids. We have direct observations of cryovolcanism of several small solar system bodies (e.g. Saturnian and Jovian moons), and indirect evidence for this process on the moons Europa, Titan, Ganymede, and Miranda, and the Kuiper Belt object Charon, and so are certain of the continuing and widespread importance of aqueous processes across the solar system. Nevertheless, we are still lacking fundamental information such as the location and timing of the aqueous alteration and the detailed nature of the aqueous fluid itself.

Zolensky, Michael↗

Nasa's Astromaterials Collections: Housed at the NASA Johnson Space Center (JSC) in Houston, TX

The Astromaterials Research and Exploration Science Division at JSC is responsible for the curation of extraterrestrial samples from NASA's past, present and future sample return missions. These samples provide data that help scientists better understand the history and evolution of our Solar System. Our mission is to preserve, protect, and distribute samples for research by the present and future scientific community.

Graff, Paige V.↗

Microbial Monitoring of Astromaterials Curation Labs Reveals Inter-Lab Diversity

The Astromaterials Curation Division at NASA’s Johnson Space Center houses seven sample collections stored in separate clean rooms to avoid cross-contamination. Prior to receiving new sample collections from carbon rich asteroids, we instituted a monitoring program to characterize the microbial ecology of these labs and to understand how organisms could interact with and potentially contaminate current and future collections. Methods: Beginning in Oct. 2017 we sampled the Meteorite (ISO 7 equivalent) and Pristine Lunar (ISO 5 equivalent) labs on a monthly basis. Surface samples were collected using dry swabs. Air samples were collected using an impactor style air sampler. Cultivable organisms were identified and characterized. Aliquots of each sample were also preserved for DNA sequencing. For each sampling event recovery rate was calculated as the percentage of samples showing microbial growth1. Fungal colonies were selected for amino acid extraction and analysis via Ultra- Performance Liquid Chromatography with Fluorescence Detection and Mass Spectrometry.

Regberg, A. B.↗

ANALYSIS OF FLUID INCLUSIONS IN ASTROMATERIALS

Aqueous fluid inclusions in meteorites and other astromaterials can provide fundamental information related to the location and timing of aqueous alteration in the solar system, and the detailed nature of the aqueous fluids themselves. Microanalytical techniques are finally at the level where such studies are possible.

M.E. Zolensky↗

Generating Cryogenic Lunar Simulants Within the Planetary Exploration & Astromaterials Research Laboratory

The Planetary Exploration & Astromaterials Research Laboratory (PEARL) aims to provides capabilities for the creation of—and research on—cryogenic lunar regolith simulants (CRS) containing surface volatile analytes. CRS represent regolith samples that might be collected from lunar Permanently Shadowed Regions (PSRs) during future missions. Handling CRS requires procedural and engineering development due to extremely cold (i.e. ≤ - 196°C) working temperatures. However, there is an imperative to understand the physical and chemical alteration of samples during collection, transport, and curation processes throughout the Artemis missions. The chemistries that will be encountered within the PSRs need to be understood based upon prior mission data analysis. The ability to utilize these techniques provides future tests that could be relevant to planetary protection applications regarding future robotic sample return.

Lunar↗

Biogeochemistry, Planetary Protection, and Astromaterials Curation: A Story of Environmental Microbiology at NASA

The astromaterials curation office at the NASA Johnson Space Center is responsible for curating and allocating all of the extraterrestrial samples collected by NASA. This includes lunar samples, meteorites, cometary material, asteroid samples and individual atoms of the solar wind. Some of these collections are susceptible to biological alteration by terrestrial microbes. I will describe the microbial monitoring of the clean rooms used to store these samples and the ecology we find therein. This research is helping NASA design better cleanrooms for even more sensitive samples like those currently being collected on Mars. I will also discuss our group’s research on improved identification methods, biological alteration of meteorites, and efforts to sample microbes on the outside of the International Space Station.

Aaron B. Regberg↗

Comparing Analysis of Hydrogen Concentration in Astromaterials Nominally Anhydrous Minerals by Multiple SIMS

Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) is utilized to determine hydrogen (H) concentration in astromaterials nominally anhydrous minerals (NAMs) and their inclusions [e.g., 1]. This data is interpreted to refine the volatile history of planetary bodies. Four instruments are being used to compare H concentration analysis: a large geometry SIMS (The University of Hawaiʻi Cameca IMS 1280), a compact SIMS (Arizona State University (ASU) Cameca IMS 6f), and two Cameca NanoSIMS 50L at ASU and NASA-Johnson Space Center (JSC). Results on the first three instruments are available. Although fundamentally similar, SIMS instruments and their modifications [2] may produce different values or pose advantages for H analysis, especially for shocked samples that are susceptible to contamination filling their fractures. New data from the IMS 1280 is reported, using its microchannel plate (MCP) to image high H signals in grain fractures during pre-sputtering to avoid them as much as possible. Between fractures, 16 OH/ 30 Si was measured with a Cs + 4 nA primary beam, 30 micron spot size, and central ~5x5 micron collection area. First order comparison of H concentration (reported in ppm H 2 O) is achieved on a terrestrial gem quality clinopyroxene (SLP114, 162±12 ppm H 2 O [3]), with 157±7 and 215±40 ppm H 2 O by the IMS 1280 and 6f respectively. SIMS comparison is then extended to analysis of two Martian shergottites: RBT 04262 and NWA 5789. Due to a dense fracture network (< 20 micron) in RBT 04262, only one clinopyroxene hosted glassy inclusion was analyzed (n=6, ≤1 ppm H 2 O), while six olivine grains in NWA 5789 (n=12, ≤ 2 ppm H 2 O) (1s ±0.21) were analyzed. Higher concentrations were obtained for RBT 04262 olivine by the ASU NanoSIMS 50L (up to 350 ppm H 2 O [4]), and IMS 6f (300+ ppm H 2 O, [5]), for which contamination in fractures could not be avoided. Work on the JSC NanoSIMS 50L will further develop the SIMS comparison.

J.-M. Dudley↗