Reply to “Comment on ‘Reexamining the relation between the binding energy of finite nuclei and the equation of state of infinite nuclear matter' ”
In their comment to our paper [1], Bertsch and Stroberg [2] provide three criticisms. Two of these concern the interpretation of our dispersive optical model (DOM) results and their relation to the liquid drop model (LDM) parameters. The third criticism focuses on the potential systematic uncertainties on our DOM results associated with missing three-body contributions. Before addressing these critiques, we want to state that the key message of our paper remains whether or not the DOM results agree with the LDM predictions in the nuclear interior. Here, the key point is that the standard determination of the saturation energy from the LDM is not ideal since the total binding energy has a minimal contribution from the core of the nucleus as pointed out in Figs. 1–3 of our paper.