Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “CRM-HL”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA Contributions to the High Lift Common Research Model Ecosystem

As part of the High Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) ecosystem, NASA has designed and built two CRM-HL models. The first model is a 5.2% scale semispan model that has been tested in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Wind Tunnel (14x22), the low-speed wind tunnel DNW-NWB in Germany and in the National Transonic Facility (NTF) at NASA Langley Research Center. Information on the NASA tests that will include model details, test methods and some test data will be presented in the final document. The second model is a 2.7% scale model that will also be tested in the NTF in both full span and semispan configurations. Information on the design and fabrication of this model will be included in the final document.

Melissa Rivers↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

USM3D-ME Contributions to the 5th AIAA High Lift Prediction Workshop

This paper presents the results of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations conducted by NASA’s flow solver, mixed-element USM3D (USM3D-ME), for the 5th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop. As part of the Fixed-Grid RANS Technology Focus Group (TFG), these simulations were performed to assess the accuracy and efficiency of the USM3D-ME solutions in predicting high-lift flows. The High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) served as the primary geometry. Several CRM-HL configurations were used for three case studies: a verification study (Case 1), a configuration buildup study (Case 2), and a Reynolds-number variation study (Case 3). Overall, USM3D-ME RANS results aligned with the solutions selected by the Fixed-Grid RANS TFG and available wind tunnel data Simulations for Cases 1 and Configuration 2.1 achieved machine-zero residual convergence, with aerodynamic coefficients converging to steady-state values. However, Configurations 2.2-2.4 and Case 3 encountered iterative- and grid-convergence challenges, particularly at high angles of attack. Compared with the experimental data available for Configurations 2.2-2.4, close agreement was demonstrated at low angles of attack. However, for angles of attack approaching the maximum lift conditions, the predicted lift coefficient and pitching moment deviated from experimental values. The drag-coefficient predictions were in a relatively good agreement, however, slight overpredictions were observed at the highest angle of attack corresponding to the maximum-lift condition. Although iterative convergence for Configurations 2.2-2.4 at high angles of attack remains a persistent challenge, averaging aerodynamic coefficients over the last 5000 iterations yielded satisfactory agreement with the available wind tunnel experimental data. During the workshop, the lack of iterative convergence was attributed to the vortex structures emanating from the slat brackets. To investigate this issue further, post-workshop simulations were conducted on Configuration 2.2. In one study, RANS simulations were performed on a simplified geometry with the slat brackets removed. The second study focused on performing URANS simulations on the original Configuration 2.2 geometry. Preliminary results from both studies are presented and compared with wind tunnel data for Configuration 2.2. Consistent with the findings of other participants in the Fixed-Grid RANS TFG, this study emphasizes the necessity for further exploration and advancement in RANS technology for predicting high-lift flows.

CFD↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

USM3D-ME Contributions to the 5th AIAA High Lift Prediction Workshop

This paper presents the results of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) simulations conducted by the NASA flow solver, mixed-element USM3D (USM3D-ME), for the 5th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop. As part of the Fixed-Grid RANS Technology Focus Group (TFG), these simulations were performed to assess the accuracy and efficiency of the USM3D-ME solutions in predicting high-lift flows. The High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) served as the primary geometry. Several CRM-HL configurations were used for three case studies: a verification study (Case 1), a configuration buildup study (Case 2), and a Reynolds-number variation study (Case 3). Overall, USM3D-ME RANS results aligned with the solutions selected by the Fixed-Grid RANS TFG and available wind tunnel data. Simulations for Case 1 and Configuration 2.1 achieved machine-zero residual convergence, with aerodynamic coefficients converging to steady-state values. However, Configurations 2.2-2.4 and Case 3 encountered iterative- and grid-convergence challenges, particularly at high angles of attack. Compared with the experimental data available for Configurations 2.2-2.4, close agreement was demonstrated at low angles of attack. However, for angles of attack approaching the maximum lift conditions, the predicted lift coefficient and pitching moment deviated from experimental values. The drag-coefficient predictions were in relatively good agreement, however, slight overpredictions were observed at the highest angle of attack corresponding to the maximum-lift condition. Although iterative convergence for Configurations 2.2-2.4 at high angles of attack remains a persistent challenge, averaging aerodynamic coefficients over the last 5000 iterations yielded satisfactory agreement with the available wind tunnel experimental data. During the workshop, the lack of iterative convergence was attributed to the vortex structures emanating from the slat brackets. To investigate this issue further, post-workshop simulations were conducted on Configuration 2.2. In one study, RANS simulations were performed on a simplified geometry with the slat brackets removed. The second study focused on performing unsteady RANS (URANS) simulations on the original Configuration 2.2 geometry. Preliminary results from both studies are presented and compared with wind tunnel data for Configuration 2.2. Consistent with the findings of other participants in the Fixed-Grid RANS TFG, this study emphasizes the necessity for further exploration and advancement in RANS technology for predicting high-lift flows.

Aerodynamics↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wind Tunnel Testing of AFC over a Deflected Aileron on the High-Lift Common Research Model

Active flow control (AFC) using discrete fluidic actuators distributed along the span, just upstream of the deflected aileron of the 10% scale high-lift version of the Common Research Model (CRM-HL), was evaluated during a wind tunnel test in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel. For this set of experiments, a new outboard section was fabricated incorporating a deflectable aileron. Aileron deflection angles of 0, 7.5, 16, and 25 were investigated. This experimental investigation is in response to a recent study by Boeing potential to use AFC with a drooped aileron during takeoff to improve lift-to-drag ratio (L/D) by as much as 5%, depending on AFC mass flow rate. AFC is used at deflection angles above the nominal deflection of 7.5 to control the resulting flow separation that occurs and potentially improve L/D. Improvements in aircraft low-speed L/D can affect vehicle range and/or payload. Tuft flow visualization data, steady and unsteady surface pressure data, and force and moment data are used to compare the flowfields with and without AFC. Parameters varied include actuator momentum coefficient and aileron deflection angle. The surface pressure and tuft flow visualization results indicate that without AFC, the flow over a majority of the aileron upper surface is separated for aileron deflection angles larger than 7.5. When AFC is applied, the flow is reattached to the aileron. Force and moment results show that a local increase in lift leads to an increase in L/D of at least 3.5% using mass flow rates thought to be available from air sources onboard a commercial transport.

AFC↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wind Tunnel Testing of AFC over a Deflected Aileron on the High-Lift Common Research Model

Active flow control (AFC) using discrete fluidic actuators distributed along the span, just upstream of the deflected aileron of the 10% scale high-lift version of the Common Research Model (CRM-HL), was evaluated during a wind tunnel test in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel. For this set of experiments, a new outboard section was fabricated incorporating a deflectable aileron. Aileron deflection angles of 0, 7.5, 16, and 25 were investigated. This experimental investigation is in response to a recent study by Boeing potential to use AFC with a drooped aileron during takeoff to improve lift-to-drag ratio (L/D) by as much as 5%, depending on AFC mass flow rate. AFC is used at deflection angles above the nominal deflection of 7.5 to control the resulting flow separation that occurs and potentially improve L/D. Improvements in aircraft low-speed L/D can affect vehicle range and/or payload. Tuft flow visualization data, steady and unsteady surface pressure data, and force and moment data are used to compare the flowfields with and without AFC. Parameters varied include actuator momentum coefficient and aileron deflection angle. The surface pressure and tuft flow visualization results indicate that without AFC, the flow over a majority of the aileron upper surface is separated for aileron deflection angles larger than 7.5. When AFC is applied, the flow is reattached to the aileron. Force and moment results show that a local increase in lift leads to an increase in L/D of at least 3.5% using mass flow rates thought to be available from air sources onboard a commercial transport.

AFC↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Reynolds Number Effects on a 5.2%-Scale High Lift Common Research Model

A 5.2%-scale High Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) semispan wind tunnel model was tested at the National Transonic Facility (NTF) wind tunnel in Hampton, VA. One of the primary objectives of the NTF test was to determine the effect of varying Reynolds number on the configuration. The test used a combination of air and cryogenic nitrogen testing to obtain up to flight-like Reynolds numbers. The landing and takeoff configurations of the model were tested at speeds ranging from Mach 0.2 to 0.35. The Reynolds numbers based on the mean aerodynamic chord of the model ranged from 1.6 to 30 million. Overall, the lift increased and drag decreased with increasing Reynolds number for chord Reynolds numbers less than 16 million, following well-established trends. However, some anomalies in the force and moment data were observed in the linear region of the angle of attack range that did not follow expected trends. The force and moment results for both the landing and takeoff configurations are presented, along with surface pressure data for the landing configuration. Incremental effects from the landing gear, nacelle, and horizontal tail on the landing configuration are also presented.

CRM-HL↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Reynolds Number Effects on a 5.2%-Scale High Lift Common Research Model

A 5.2%-scale High Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) semispan wind tunnel model was tested at the National Transonic Facility (NTF) wind tunnel in Hampton, VA. One of the primary objectives of the NTF test was to determine the effect of varying Reynolds number on the configuration. The test used a combination of air and cryogenic nitrogen testing to obtain up to flight-like Reynolds numbers. The landing and takeoff configurations of the model were tested at speeds ranging from Mach 0.2 to 0.35. The Reynolds numbers based on the mean aerodynamic chord of the model ranged from 1.6 to 30 million. Overall, the lift increased and drag decreased with increasing Reynolds number for chord Reynolds numbers less than 16 million, following well-established trends. However, some anomalies in the force and moment data were observed in the linear region of the angle of attack range that did not follow expected trends. The force and moment results for both the landing and takeoff configurations are presented, along with surface pressure data for the landing configuration. Incremental effects from the landing gear, nacelle, and horizontal tail on the landing configuration are also presented.

CRM-HL↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Unsteady Pressure Measurement on a Simplified High-Lift Configuration of the Common Research Model using Active Flow Control

The High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) is a product of the NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) Project intended to study various high-lift aerodynamic phenomena including enhanced lift, acoustic noise generation, and optimum placement of leading and trailing-edge devices. The current study was conducted in the NASA Langley 14-by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel (14x22) for the purpose of evaluating enhanced lift through the use of active flow control (AFC). The current paper documents the effect of sweeping-jet actuation combined with steady blowing on a simplified high-lift configuration using unsteady pressure measurements. The time-series parameters for the measurements are documented as well as the data acquisition system used to acquire the data. An uncertainty analysis will be presented in order to document the system performance and provide an estimate of the data quality. Repeatability of the data will be shown along with trends associated with model angle of attack, and those associated with changes in the nozzle pressure ratio (NPR) of the AFC system.

Common Research Model↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Unsteady Pressure Measurements on a Simplified High-Lift Configuration of the Common Research Model using Active Flow Control

The High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) is a product of the NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) Project intended to study various high-lift aerodynamic phenomena including enhanced lift, acoustic noise generation, and optimum placement of leading and trailing-edge devices. The current study was conducted in the NASA Langley 14-by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel (14x22) for the purpose of evaluating enhanced lift through the use of active flow control (AFC). The current paper documents the effect of sweeping-jet actuation combined with steady blowing on a simplified high-lift configuration using unsteady pressure measurements. The time-series parameters for the measurements are documented as well as the data acquisition system used to acquire the data. An uncertainty analysis will be presented in order to document the system performance and provide an estimate of the data quality. Repeatability of the data will be shown along with trends associated with model angle of attack, and also those associated with changes in the nozzle pressure ratio (NPR) of the AFC system.

Active Flow Control↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Angle-of-Attack Sweep with Mesh Adaptation for High-Lift Configurations

This paper reports an angle-of-attack (alpha) sweep study with mesh adaptation for the high-lift configuration - JAXA Standard Model (JSM) from the 3rd AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop. The method of angle-of-attack (alpha) continuation, where the flow-field at a certain angle of attack is initialized from the solution obtained at the previous angle of attack, is applied to adapted unstructured meshes. Since the meshes are continuously adapted, flow-field initialization on a particular mesh for a certain angle is done through linear interpolation of the solution from the previous mesh. Interpolated initial conditions usually prevent massively separated solutions that may otherwise occur with impulsive initial conditions. Alpha continuations are done in both forward (increasing alpha) and reverse (decreasing alpha) directions, resulting in the formation of hysteresis loops. Skin frictions are compared with the wind-tunnel oil flow images and pressure coefficients are compared with the wind-tunnel values, at selected angles of attack. Final paper will include results also for the high-lift version of the Common Research Model (CRM-HL) from the 4th AIAA High-Lift Prediction Workshop. A thorough comparison of the results will also be made with the available wind-tunnel data.

Mesh Adaptation↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Fully Coupled Aeroelastic Stability Analysis of Adaptive Shape Memory Alloy Structural Technologies for Airframe Noise Reduction

The objective of this work is the development of computational models and analysis of the coupled fluid-structure response of a slat gap filler (SGF) noise treatment applied to the leading-edge-slat component of a high-lift system typical of modern transport aircraft. The representative airframe chosen for this work is NASA’s High-lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) in a baseline high-lift configuration. Superelastic shape memory alloys (SMAs) have been identified as enabling materials for these structural treatments. Since the technology elements rely upon having a highly reconfigurable structure, designs must be assessed for static aeroelastic deflection as well as dynamic aeroelastic stability using coupled computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and nonlinear computational structural dynamics (NL CSD) tools. The technical approach consists of solving for the flow field around the entire vehicle using a global CFD model, followed by extraction of relevant local subdomain data for CFD and NL-CSD co-simulations. The SGF design is assessed using both 2D and 3D co-simulations to predict quasi-static aeroelastic deformations and to assess dynamic aeroelastic stability.

Fluid structure interaction↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

High-Lift Common Research Model: RANS, HRLES and WMLES Perspectives for CLmax Prediction Using LAVA

A unified assessment of three turbulence treatments: Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes(RANS), Hybrid RANS/LES (HRLES) and Equilibrium Wall-Modelled Large Eddy Simulation(WMLES) is presented for the High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL). For the free-air configuration, steady-state RANS simulations show very accurate drag polar predictions in the low-𝛼linear regime. However, strong grid sensitivity is reported near the maximum lift-state(𝐶𝐿max), with finer-grids showing larger errors and predicting erroneous flow topologies on the wing. Our RANS simulations show that several corrections for the Spalart-Allmaras (SA)turbulence model widely used in the community lead to more erroneous results compared to the baseline closure, without exception. Both scale-resolving methods (HRLES and WMLES)address these drawbacks and predict an outboard separation pattern on the main element that is in good agreement with the oil flow photographs taken from the QinetiQ wind tunnel experiments, when LES-appropriate grids and numerical discretizations are used. While RANS simulations with the baseline SA closure do not show any wing-root separation post𝐶𝐿max, both HRLES and WMLES show onset of corner flow separation with varying degrees of progression, along with a weak pitch break in the wing-contribution of the overall pitching moment. This post-𝐶𝐿max pitch break seen in the free-air simulations is weaker than the break observed in experiments, with a weaker break reported in WMLES for each iteration of grid-refinement. In-tunnel simulations using both SA-baseline RANS and WMLES show a much stronger post-𝐶𝐿max break with the WMLES predictions showing excellent agreement with the experiment in terms of both the flow-topology observed and the pressure-coefficients at various spanwise stations. Sensitivity to the tunnel wall boundary layer is characterized via comparisons between viscous and inviscid treatments for the tunnel walls. WMLES predictions show moderate sensitivity at the predicted inboard flow-state at 𝐶𝐿max along with the progression towards a post-𝐶𝐿max stall; however, this stalled state at 𝛼≈20◦(inside the tunnel) obtained with both tunnel wall treatments appears to be largely identical.

TTT↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Phased Array Characterization of Slat Noise Radiation from a High-Lift Common Research Model

A test campaign was conducted in the open-jet test section of the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel on a 10%-scale, semispan version of a High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) incorporating a leading-edge slat, trailing-edge flap and removable high-fidelity main landing gear. Far field acoustic measurements were obtained on baseline and acoustically treated model configurations using a traversing 97-microphone phased array that viewed the pressure side of the airframe. A modified version of the DAMAS deconvolution method incorporating corrections for shear layer acoustic wave decorrelation was employed to determine the locations and strengths of relevant noise sources along the span of the slat and in the vicinity of the flap edges and landing gear. The main goal of the test campaign was to use the array data to evaluate the effectiveness of various slat noise reduction concepts. It was found that slat-gap fillers produced significant broadband noise reduction for all Mach numbers and airfoil angles of attack that were investigated. Mach number scaling revealed an approximate velocity to the sixth power relationship for the slat noise at higher frequencies. Directivity measurements obtained from integration of DAMAS pressure-squared values over defined geometric zones around the model showed that baseline slat noise radiation approximated a dipole as a function of polar emission angle, becoming approximately omnidirectional with the introduction of the slat-gap filler. The test campaign clearly demonstrated the noise reduction benefits that can be obtained by applying appropriate treatments to leading edge slats on commercial transport-class aircraft.

William M Humphreys, Jr.↗
NASA NTRS2023

Characterization of Slat Noise Radiation from a High-Lift Common Research Model

A test campaign was conducted in the open-jet test section of the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel on a 10%-scale, semispan version of a High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) incorporating a leading-edge slat, trailing-edge flap and removable high-fidelity main landing gear. Aerodynamic and far field acoustic measurements were obtained on baseline and acoustically treated model configurations using an ensemble of time-averaged and unsteady surface pressure sensors paired with a traversing 97-microphone phased array viewing the pressure side of the airframe. A modified version of the DAMAS deconvolution method incorporating corrections for shear layer acoustic wave decorrelation was employed to determine the locations and strengths of relevant noise sources along the span of the slat and in the vicinity of the flap edges and landing gear. The main goal of the test campaign was to use the surface pressure and array data to evaluate the effectiveness of various slat noise reduction concepts. It was found that slat-gap fillers produced significant broadband noise reduction with minimal aerodynamic performance penalties for all Mach numbers and airfoil angles of attack that were investigated. The test campaign clearly demonstrated the noise reduction benefits that can be obtained by applying appropriate treatments to leading-edge slats on commercial transport-class aircraft.

Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

HLPW-5: Overview and Workshop Summary

The Fifth AIAA CFD High-Lift Prediction Workshop was held with the goal of assessing the numerical prediction capability of current-generation computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technology for swept, medium/high-aspect-ratio wings in high-lift configurations. A key aspect of this endeavor was the use of Technology Focus Groups (TFG), which included both mesh generation and flow-solver experts working together to accelerate advancements for their particular CFD methodology, by addressing key questions of importance prior to the workshop. The high-lift version of the NASA Common Research Model (CRM-HL) configuration was the focus of this workshop, and was used for three unique test cases. Wind-tunnel data were available for comparison for one of the test cases. Altogether, 365 datasets of CFD results were submitted by 47 teams, with 41 teams contributing to the multiple configurations of Case 1, 40 to Case 2, and 18 to Case 3. This paper provides a high-level summary of the results and conclusions from the workshop. As concluded from past workshops, fixed-grid Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes methods continued to be inaccurate and inconsistent for high-lift flows near maximum lift. However, application of mesh-adaptation technology helped to achieve improved consistency. Scale-resolving methods appeared most promising for predicting high-lift flow physics, particularly at maximum lift. Best practices for these methods were refined over the course of the workshop and new challenges were identified.

Adam M Clark↗
NASA NTRS2022

Semispan Test Results of an Active Flow Control Enabled High-Lift Common Research Model in Landing Configuration

A 10%-scale semispan, Active Flow Control (AFC) enabled, simplified high-lift version of the Common Research Model (CRM-SHL-AFC) was tested in the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel at the NASA Langley Research Center. The main objective of the test was to develop an AFC system that can provide the necessary lift recovery on a simple-hinged flap high-lift system while minimizing its pneumatic power requirement. Three new types of AFC approaches were examined: Double-Row Sweeping Jets (DRSWJ), Alternating Pulsed Jets (APJ), and High Efficiency Low Power (HELP) actuators. The DRSWJ and the APJ actuators used two rows of unsteady jets, whereas the HELP actuators used an upstream row of sweeping jets combined with a downstream row of steady jets to overcome strong adverse pressure gradients. The test was conducted mostly at a freestream Mach number of 0.20. For exploration purposes, a limited number of runs were made at lower Mach numbers or using vortex generators (VGs). Minimal sensitivity to Mach number or VGs, for the cases evaluated, were observed. The AFC-induced lift coefficient increment was maintained over the AFC-off case for most flow-control cases examined. The CRM-SHL-AFC configuration equipped with HELP actuation was the only actuator configuration able to match or exceed the targeted lift performance of a reference conventional high-lift configuration. The presented aerodynamic data include lift, drag, and pitching moment coefficients as a function of angle of attack, with and without the Transonic Wall Interference Correction System (TWICS) method applied. Lift increments as a function of AFC pneumatic power usage (i.e., nozzle pressure ratio, mass flow, momentum coefficient, and power coefficient) are also presented at a lower angle of attack (α = 8.9°) and at maximum lift (α= 17.1°). At the two angles of attack, the surface pressure distributions and autospectral densities from the unsteady pressure transducers for the AFC-off case and the best HELP actuation case are compared.

high-lift↗