Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Classification”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2011

Best Merge Region Growing with Integrated Probabilistic Classification for Hyperspectral Imagery

A new method for spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral images is proposed. The method is based on the integration of probabilistic classification within the hierarchical best merge region growing algorithm. For this purpose, preliminary probabilistic support vector machines classification is performed. Then, hierarchical step-wise optimization algorithm is applied, by iteratively merging regions with the smallest Dissimilarity Criterion (DC). The main novelty of this method consists in defining a DC between regions as a function of region statistical and geometrical features along with classification probabilities. Experimental results are presented on a 200-band AVIRIS image of the Northwestern Indiana s vegetation area and compared with those obtained by recently proposed spectral-spatial classification techniques. The proposed method improves classification accuracies when compared to other classification approaches.

Tarabalka, Yuliya↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Satellite-Derived Imagery and Transfer Learning: A Novel Technique for Land Cover Classification

Land cover classification is a continuing research topic due to its relevance to land use and land cover changes from impacts such as climate change, agriculture, urbanization, and hazardous weather. Simple access to frequently changing land cover classifications could provide knowledge and decision support to various researchers and agencies across the globe for each of above-mentioned and related influences. This research aims to provide a novel technique for land cover classification of remote sensing imagery; harnessing Artificial Neural Networks and transfer learning (TL). Knowledge sharing techniques within machine learning are typically utilized when training datasets are sparse or transitions between data modalities is required. In this case, two data modalities, multi and hyperspectral data, are considered for knowledge transfer. The large number of continuous spectral bands available from hyperspectral sensors typically provide increased sophisticated land classification capability compared to more traditional multispectral imagery with limited discrete spectral bands. However, large-scale, frequent access to hyperspectral imagery is relatively limited. The proposed classification technique would therefore prove useful in regions in which hyperspectral data are not readily available for classification but multispectral data are. Image segmentation models are trained on each multi and hyperspectral datasets. Knowledge sharing techniques are then applied to each model to understand what knowledge, if any, is gained when moving between the data modalities. The datasets utilized for training and testing a U-Net model include the European Space Agency’s multispectral imager Sentinel-2 and the hyperspectral German Aerospace Center’s Earth Sensing Imaging Spectrometer (DESIS). Initially, only two classes, land and water, are classified for simplicity. However, more complex classes can be added if knowledge sharing is successful. The workflow for image classification through supervised image segmentation with a U-Net model will be discussed along with metrics calculated before and after TL for both Sentinel-2 and DESIS data are applied. Additionally, future steps to advance the sophistication of this technique as well as other applicable methodologies will be explored.

Emily Foshee↗
NASA NTRS2012

Improved Hierarchical Optimization-Based Classification of Hyperspectral Images Using Shape Analysis

A new spectral-spatial method for classification of hyperspectral images is proposed. The HSegClas method is based on the integration of probabilistic classification and shape analysis within the hierarchical step-wise optimization algorithm. First, probabilistic support vector machines classification is applied. Then, at each iteration two neighboring regions with the smallest Dissimilarity Criterion (DC) are merged, and classification probabilities are recomputed. The important contribution of this work consists in estimating a DC between regions as a function of statistical, classification and geometrical (area and rectangularity) features. Experimental results are presented on a 102-band ROSIS image of the Center of Pavia, Italy. The developed approach yields more accurate classification results when compared to previously proposed methods.

Classification↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Hierarchical Mixture of Experts for Advanced Air Mobility Flight Phase Classification

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) and Urban Air Mobility (UAM) operations will have numerous vehicles and aircraft flying in the airspace, which poses safety and security concerns. Commercial airlines utilize Air Traffic Management (ATM) and Air Traffic Control (ATC) for real-time monitoring, surveillance, traffic coordination, and rerouting to maintain safe and efficient flight patterns. Transferring ATM and ATC architectures to AAM/UAM will be challenging to implement since AAM/UAM aircraft fly at lower altitudes, have more static and dynamic obstacles, operate in highly dense environments, and have several more aircraft to monitor for a given volume of the national airspace (NAS). Aircraft typically have the following flight phases: takeoff, climb, cruise, descent, and landing. Classifying these flight phases provides insight into ensuring safe operations, providing situational awareness of the NAS, and monitoring flights in emergencies. Automatic flight phase classification will enhance the efficiencies of ATM/ATC-like architectures for AAM/UAM, especially since numerous aircraft will be flying in highly dense urban environments. Typical flight phase classification methods are all-or-nothing, which will not capture or accurately classify the transitions between flight phases. Utilizing hierarchical mixture of experts (HME) provides a flight phase classification solution that includes transitions between the flight phases by assigning weights based on ground-based distributed sensor readings from cameras and radar. Adding the transitions between flight phases increases the fidelity of flight phase classification and provides deeper insight into flight phase classification by leveraging distributed sensing concepts. Simulation results and post-processed flight test results demonstrate the utility of HME for automatic and robust flight phase classification for real-time AAM operations.

distributed sensing↗
NASA NTRS1981

The effect of finite field size on classification and atmospheric correction

The atmospheric effect on the upward radiance of sunlight scattered from the Earth-atmosphere system is strongly influenced by the contrasts between fields and their sizes. For a given atmospheric turbidity, the atmospheric effect on classification of surface features is much stronger for nonuniform surfaces than for uniform surfaces. Therefore, the classification accuracy of agricultural fields and urban areas is dependent not only on the optical characteristics of the atmosphere, but also on the size of the surface do not account for the nonuniformity of the surface have only a slight effect on the classification accuracy; in other cases the classification accuracy descreases. The radiances above finite fields were computed to simulate radiances measured by a satellite. A simulation case including 11 agricultural fields and four natural fields (water, soil, savanah, and forest) was used to test the effect of the size of the background reflectance and the optical thickness of the atmosphere on classification accuracy. It is concluded that new atmospheric correction methods, which take into account the finite size of the fields, have to be developed to improve significantly the classification accuracy.

Kaufman, Y. J.↗
NASA NTRS1981

Comparison of wheat classification accuracy using different classifiers of the image-100 system

Classification results using single-cell and multi-cell signature acquisition options, a point-by-point Gaussian maximum-likelihood classifier, and K-means clustering of the Image-100 system are presented. Conclusions reached are that: a better indication of correct classification can be provided by using a test area which contains various cover types of the study area; classification accuracy should be evaluated considering both the percentages of correct classification and error of commission; supervised classification approaches are better than K-means clustering; Gaussian distribution maximum likelihood classifier is better than Single-cell and Multi-cell Signature Acquisition Options of the Image-100 system; and in order to obtain a high classification accuracy in a large and heterogeneous crop area, using Gaussian maximum-likelihood classifier, homogeneous spectral subclasses of the study crop should be created to derive training statistics.

Dejesusparada, N.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Suggested UV spectral classification criteria for A stars

Criteria for determining effective temperature and electron density independently of abundances, for A, late B, and F stars are given. Comparison of IUE data with standard classification techniques, shows that for late B and A stars, temperature classification by UV spectra is more sensitive than classification using visual spectra. The long wavelength wing of the Lyman is recommended for these stars. For A and F stars, the ratio of the Mg (2580 A) and Mg+ (2800A) resonance lines gives a good temperature/electron density (ne) criterion which is nearly independent of metal abundance (Z). The SiI discontinuities give an excellent temperature classification for A and F stars, but it is dependent on Z and ne. If the absolute intensities of either of the Mg lines are added to the criteria, three classification criteria for a three dimensional classification, according to temperature, ne and Z, are obtained.

Boehm-Vitense, E.↗
NASA NTRS1988

Multisensor classification of sedimentary rocks

A comparison is made between linear discriminant analysis and supervised classification results based on signatures from the Landsat TM, the Thermal Infrared Multispectral Scanner (TIMS), and airborne SAR, alone and combined into extended spectral signatures for seven sedimentary rock units exposed on the margin of the Wind River Basin, Wyoming. Results from a linear discriminant analysis showed that training-area classification accuracies based on the multisensor data were improved an average of 15 percent over TM alone, 24 percent over TIMS alone, and 46 percent over SAR alone, with similar improvement resulting when supervised multisensor classification maps were compared to supervised, individual sensor classification maps. When training area signatures were used to map spectrally similar materials in an adjacent area, the average classification accuracy improved 19 percent using the multisensor data over TM alone, 2 percent over TIMS alone, and 11 percent over SAR alone. It is concluded that certain sedimentary lithologies may be accurately mapped using a single sensor, but classification of a variety of rock types can be improved using multisensor data sets that are sensitive to different characteristics such as mineralogy and surface roughness.

Evans, Diane↗
NASA NTRS1990

Neural network approaches versus statistical methods in classification of multisource remote sensing data

Neural network learning procedures and statistical classificaiton methods are applied and compared empirically in classification of multisource remote sensing and geographic data. Statistical multisource classification by means of a method based on Bayesian classification theory is also investigated and modified. The modifications permit control of the influence of the data sources involved in the classification process. Reliability measures are introduced to rank the quality of the data sources. The data sources are then weighted according to these rankings in the statistical multisource classification. Four data sources are used in experiments: Landsat MSS data and three forms of topographic data (elevation, slope, and aspect). Experimental results show that two different approaches have unique advantages and disadvantages in this classification application.

Benediktsson, Jon A.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Statistical methods and neural network approaches for classification of data from multiple sources

Statistical methods for classification of data from multiple data sources are investigated and compared to neural network models. A problem with using conventional multivariate statistical approaches for classification of data of multiple types is in general that a multivariate distribution cannot be assumed for the classes in the data sources. Another common problem with statistical classification methods is that the data sources are not equally reliable. This means that the data sources need to be weighted according to their reliability but most statistical classification methods do not have a mechanism for this. This research focuses on statistical methods which can overcome these problems: a method of statistical multisource analysis and consensus theory. Reliability measures for weighting the data sources in these methods are suggested and investigated. Secondly, this research focuses on neural network models. The neural networks are distribution free since no prior knowledge of the statistical distribution of the data is needed. This is an obvious advantage over most statistical classification methods. The neural networks also automatically take care of the problem involving how much weight each data source should have. On the other hand, their training process is iterative and can take a very long time. Methods to speed up the training procedure are introduced and investigated. Experimental results of classification using both neural network models and statistical methods are given, and the approaches are compared based on these results.

Benediktsson, Jon Atli↗
NASA NTRS1994

Comparisons of neural networks to standard techniques for image classification and correlation

Neural network techniques for multispectral image classification and spatial pattern detection are compared to the standard techniques of maximum-likelihood classification and spatial correlation. The neural network produced a more accurate classification than maximum-likelihood of a Landsat scene of Tucson, Arizona. Some of the errors in the maximum-likelihood classification are illustrated using decision region and class probability density plots. As expected, the main drawback to the neural network method is the long time required for the training stage. The network was trained using several different hidden layer sizes to optimize both the classification accuracy and training speed, and it was found that one node per class was optimal. The performance improved when 3x3 local windows of image data were entered into the net. This modification introduces texture into the classification without explicit calculation of a texture measure. Larger windows were successfully used for the detection of spatial features in Landsat and Magellan synthetic aperture radar imagery.

Paola, Justin D.↗
NASA NTRS2005

Sunspot Pattern Classification using PCA and Neural Networks (Poster)

The sunspot classification scheme presented in this paper is considered as a 2-D classification problem on archived datasets, and is not a real-time system. As a first step, it mirrors the Zuerich/McIntosh historical classification system and reproduces classification of sunspot patterns based on preprocessing and neural net training datasets. Ultimately, the project intends to move from more rudimentary schemes, to develop spatial-temporal-spectral classes derived by correlating spatial and temporal variations in various wavelengths to the brightness fluctuation spectrum of the sun in those wavelengths. Once the approach is generalized, then the focus will naturally move from a 2-D to an n-D classification, where "n" includes time and frequency. Here, the 2-D perspective refers both to the actual SOH0 Michelson Doppler Imager (MDI) images that are processed, but also refers to the fact that a 2-D matrix is created from each image during preprocessing. The 2-D matrix is the result of running Principal Component Analysis (PCA) over the selected dataset images, and the resulting matrices and their eigenvalues are the objects that are stored in a database, classified, and compared. These matrices are indexed according to the standard McIntosh classification scheme.

Rajkumar, T.↗
NASA NTRS2009

Progressive Classification Using Support Vector Machines

An algorithm for progressive classification of data, analogous to progressive rendering of images, makes it possible to compromise between speed and accuracy. This algorithm uses support vector machines (SVMs) to classify data. An SVM is a machine learning algorithm that builds a mathematical model of the desired classification concept by identifying the critical data points, called support vectors. Coarse approximations to the concept require only a few support vectors, while precise, highly accurate models require far more support vectors. Once the model has been constructed, the SVM can be applied to new observations. The cost of classifying a new observation is proportional to the number of support vectors in the model. When computational resources are limited, an SVM of the appropriate complexity can be produced. However, if the constraints are not known when the model is constructed, or if they can change over time, a method for adaptively responding to the current resource constraints is required. This capability is particularly relevant for spacecraft (or any other real-time systems) that perform onboard data analysis. The new algorithm enables the fast, interactive application of an SVM classifier to a new set of data. The classification process achieved by this algorithm is characterized as progressive because a coarse approximation to the true classification is generated rapidly and thereafter iteratively refined. The algorithm uses two SVMs: (1) a fast, approximate one and (2) slow, highly accurate one. New data are initially classified by the fast SVM, producing a baseline approximate classification. For each classified data point, the algorithm calculates a confidence index that indicates the likelihood that it was classified correctly in the first pass. Next, the data points are sorted by their confidence indices and progressively reclassified by the slower, more accurate SVM, starting with the items most likely to be incorrectly classified. The user can halt this reclassification process at any point, thereby obtaining the best possible result for a given amount of computation time. Alternatively, the results can be displayed as they are generated, providing the user with real-time feedback about the current accuracy of classification.

Wagstaff, Kiri↗
NASA NTRS2016

Empirical Analysis and Automated Classification of Security Bug Reports

With the ever expanding amount of sensitive data being placed into computer systems, the need for effective cybersecurity is of utmost importance. However, there is a shortage of detailed empirical studies of security vulnerabilities from which cybersecurity metrics and best practices could be determined. This thesis has two main research goals: (1) to explore the distribution and characteristics of security vulnerabilities based on the information provided in bug tracking systems and (2) to develop data analytics approaches for automatic classification of bug reports as security or non-security related. This work is based on using three NASA datasets as case studies. The empirical analysis showed that the majority of software vulnerabilities belong only to a small number of types. Addressing these types of vulnerabilities will consequently lead to cost efficient improvement of software security. Since this analysis requires labeling of each bug report in the bug tracking system, we explored using machine learning to automate the classification of each bug report as a security or non-security related (two-class classification), as well as each security related bug report as specific security type (multiclass classification). In addition to using supervised machine learning algorithms, a novel unsupervised machine learning approach is proposed. An ac- curacy of 92%, recall of 96%, precision of 92%, probability of false alarm of 4%, F-Score of 81% and G-Score of 90% were the best results achieved during two-class classification. Furthermore, an accuracy of 80%, recall of 80%, precision of 94%, and F-score of 85% were the best results achieved during multiclass classification.

Cybersecurity↗
NASA NTRS1992

On the nature of global classification

Molecular sequencing technology has brought biology into the era of global (universal) classification. Methodologically and philosophically, global classification differs significantly from traditional, local classification. The need for uniformity requires that higher level taxa be defined on the molecular level in terms of universally homologous functions. A global classification should reflect both principal dimensions of the evolutionary process: genealogical relationship and quality and extent of divergence within a group. The ultimate purpose of a global classification is not simply information storage and retrieval; such a system should also function as an heuristic representation of the evolutionary paradigm that exerts a directing influence on the course of biology. The global system envisioned allows paraphyletic taxa. To retain maximal phylogenetic information in these cases, minor notational amendments in existing taxonomic conventions should be adopted.

NASA Program Exobiology↗
NASA NTRS2015

An Active Learning Framework for Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Hierarchical Segmentation

Augmenting spectral data with spatial information for image classification has recently gained significant attention, as classification accuracy can often be improved by extracting spatial information from neighboring pixels. In this paper, we propose a new framework in which active learning (AL) and hierarchical segmentation (HSeg) are combined for spectral-spatial classification of hyperspectral images. The spatial information is extracted from a best segmentation obtained by pruning the HSeg tree using a new supervised strategy. The best segmentation is updated at each iteration of the AL process, thus taking advantage of informative labeled samples provided by the user. The proposed strategy incorporates spatial information in two ways: 1) concatenating the extracted spatial features and the original spectral features into a stacked vector and 2) extending the training set using a self-learning-based semi-supervised learning (SSL) approach. Finally, the two strategies are combined within an AL framework. The proposed framework is validated with two benchmark hyperspectral datasets. Higher classification accuracies are obtained by the proposed framework with respect to five other state-of-the-art spectral-spatial classification approaches. Moreover, the effectiveness of the proposed pruning strategy is also demonstrated relative to the approaches based on a fixed segmentation.

classification↗
NASA NTRS2022

Modernizing NASA's Risk Classification System

NASA's risk classification system dates back to an era when every new NASA space mission was a one-of-a-kind build, and the only way to obtain reliability was as a by-product through a combination of reliability analyses, extensive and stringent quality requirements, and extensive testing. Originally, there were very limited commercial capabilities to develop systems to work reliably in space, so NASA considered its own homegrown approach the only recipe for success. This approach involved very detailed and prescriptive piece-part controls and no reliance on (and to some extent a rejection of) any type of commercial practices. Often risk was considered to be the lowest when NASA had the maximum amount of control and prescription, and the highest when commercial practices were largely employed, and these principles drove risk classification in the agency. Over time, however, commercial capabilities grew, and many products became standardized and commercialized, while the agency maintained its tried-and-true approach, paying little attention to the evolution of the commercial sector. In fact, the commercial sector was developing systems that have direct, proven reliability, established over time, while NASA still maintained the approach to ignore the reality of the commercialized aspects of standard products, label them as high risk, and attempt to change them to align with the agency's piece-part control practices. A table of mission classification vs lifetime for missions launched after 2000 indicates no correlation between lifetime and classification, with the few exceptions involving missions that have very limited objectives and no valid purpose to continue after they were met. This paper steps through some of the key historical elements in risk classification and NASA's overall approach to assurance, and presents some elements being brought forward to modernize the approach and take advantage of the growing capability in the commercial sector.

risk↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Hierarchical Mixture of Experts for Advanced Air Mobility Flight Phase Classification

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) and Urban Air Mobility (UAM) operations will have numerous vehicles and aircraft flying in the airspace, which poses safety and security concerns. Commercial airlines utilize Air Traffic Management (ATM) and Air Traffic Control (ATC) for real-time monitoring, surveillance, traffic coordination, and rerouting to maintain safe and efficient flight patterns. Transferring ATM and ATC architectures to AAM/UAM will be difficult to implement since AAM/UAM aircraft fly at lower altitudes, have more static and dynamic obstacles, operate in highly dense environments, and have several more aircraft to monitor for a given volume of the national airspace (NAS). Automatic flight phase classification will enhance efficiencies of ATM/ATC-like architectures for AAM/UAM. Classifying the main flight phases (takeoff, climb, cruise, descent, and landing) provides insight to ensure safe operations, provide situational awareness of the NAS, and monitor flights in case there are any emergencies. Typical flight phase classification methods are all-or-nothing, which will not capture or accurately classify the transitions between flight phases. Utilizing hierarchical mixture of experts (HME) provides a flight phase classification solution that includes transitions between the flight phases by assigning weights based on ground-based distributed sensor readings from cameras and radar. Adding the transitions between flight phases increases the fidelity of flight phase classification and provides deeper insight for flight phase classification by leveraging distributed sensing concepts.

distributed sensing↗