Results for “Common Research Model” — Page 3

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

A Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Perspective for the High Lift Common Research Model Using the LAVA Framework

An in-depth assessment of the High Lift-Common Research Model (HL-CRM) aerodynamic performance is made using a Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) methodology. Results presented here were produced in support of the 4th AIAA High Lift Prediction Workshop(HLPW-4), with additional simulation results and analysis used to support findings from the workshop. Mesh resolution, RANS closure models, and tunnel effects were among the sources of simulation sensitivity addressed, all in the pursuit of evaluating best-practice simulation methods for complex high-lift configurations. In general, free-air simulations using RANS yield accurate predictions of integrated loads in the pre-stall regime for the HL-CRM, while strong sensitivity to simulation method is observed near CLmax. Additionally, a study assessing changes in aerodynamic performance due to flap deflection angle indicated strong sensitivity to turbulence model closure and mesh resolution, particularly at the highest deflection setting. Several available corrections for the Spalart-Allmaras (SA) turbulence model were tested and generally introduced more error relative to the experiment in comparison to the baseline SA closure model. The Standard Menter Baseline Two-Equation (k-ωBSL) turbulence model was also explored, which arguably yielded results highly consistent with experiment, but at a substantially higher computational cost. Therefore, as a compromise between computational cost and accuracy, the baseline SA closure model was selected for additional HL-CRM studies that assess alternative solution methods. These strategies include “warm start” approaches, which initialize the simulation from a previously converged solution at a nearby angle of attack, unsteady calculations, and simulations that model the experimental wind tunnel. Results from these studies would reinforce the shortcomings of RANS in predicting aircraft performance at high-lift conditions, namely at high-αand highly loaded flap conditions, while also answering questions about appropriate modeling techniques to minimize the errors associated with RANS where possible

TTT↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Study of Trailing Edge Mini Flaps Interactions on a Wind Tunnel Scale Aspect Ratio 13.5 Common Research Model

This paper presents a computation study of an aspect ratio 13.5 wind tunnel scale Common Research Model (CRM) with trailing edge mini-flaps. A vortex-lattice model of the CRM is developed with transonic small disturbance and integral boundary-layer corrections coupled with NASTRAN equivalent beam model for the rapid CRM aeroelastic simulation. The simulations are performed with individual trailing edge mini-flap deflected and a series of groups of two adjacent trailing edge mini-flaps deflected at the same time. A surrogate model is developed to estimate the aerodynamic interactions between the flaps. To validate the surrogate model, static aeroelastic simulations are performed using FUN3D CFD solver.

Interaction↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA 5.2%-Scale Semispan High Lift Common Research Model Wind Tunnel Test at the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel

A wind tunnel test of the NASA 5.2%-scale Semispan High Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) was conducted at the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel (14x22) in the fall of 2022. The main purpose of the test was a model checkout before shipping it overseas. The model was shipped to Germany in the spring of 2023, and the team wanted to be sure that instrumentation in the model was working, all of the model parts fit together well, and model changes could be done smoothly, as designed while installed in a wind tunnel. Force and moment and pressure data were collected during the test, and while these data were a secondary objective, they can be used for for tunnel-to-tunnel verification of the model, and for database supplementation for the NASA CRM-HL ecosystem. The test was run from August 15, 2022 through September 8, 2022. Eight configurations were tested at Mach 0.2 and 0.26, over an alpha range from -4deg to +24deg. All of the configurations that were tested accomplished testing of all model parts. This test campaign was a unique opportunity to test a complicated model design in a wind tunnel that is less expensive to test in and has easier model access than the tunnel that it was designed to run in. The test was invaluable in providing lessons learned about building up and running the model, and the model was returned to the model manufacturer from December 2022 to February 2023 for updates to make model changes easier, to make design fixes on the model, and to do clean up work on the model.

CRM-HL↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA 5.2%-Scale Semispan High Lift Common Research Model Wind Tunnel Test at the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel

A wind tunnel test of the NASA 5.2%-scale Semispan High Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) was conducted at the 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel (14x22) in the fall of 2022. The main purpose of the test was a model checkout before shipping it overseas. The model was shipped to Germany in the spring of 2023, and the team wanted to be sure that instrumentation in the model was working, all of the model parts fit together well, and model changes could be done smoothly, as designed while installed in a wind tunnel. Force and moment and pressure data were collected during the test, and while these data were a secondary objective, they can be used for for tunnel-to-tunnel verification of the model, and for database supplementation for the NASA CRM-HL ecosystem. The test was run from August 15, 2022 through September 8, 2022. Eight configurations were tested at Mach 0.2 and 0.26, over an alpha range from -4deg to +24deg. All of the configurations that were tested accomplished testing of all model parts. This test campaign was a unique opportunity to test a complicated model design in a wind tunnel that is less expensive to test in and has easier model access than the tunnel that it was designed to run in. The test was invaluable in providing lessons learned about building up and running the model, and the model was returned to the model manufacturer from December 2022 to February 2023 for updates to make model changes easier, to make design fixes on the model, and to do clean up work on the model.

Semispan↗

NASA NTRS2024

Aeroelastic Stability Assessment Methodology and Application to Slat Noise Treatments on the High-Lift Common Research Model

This work supports a larger effort at NASA to reduce airframe noise and, thus, environmental noise around airports. The leading-edge slat of conventional high-lift systems is a prominent source of airframe noise, and two technologies were previously identified as promising for noise reduction without significant aerodynamic or weight penalty: the slat cove filler (SCF) and the slat gap filler (SGF). NASA fabricated a 10%-scale semispan aircraft model for wind tunnel testing based upon the High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL). NASA embarked on a test campaign with the 10% CRM-HL to determine the noise reduction effectiveness and other performance metrics of 3D SCF and SGF treatments in flow conditions representative of flight. The highly flexible SCF and SGF treatments posed a risk to the model and aeroelastic instability would compromise research integrity, so aeroelastic stability assessment was required. This work briefly describes the 10% CRM-HL, design of the SCF and SGF treatments to the model, and supporting fluid structure interaction (FSI) research. Relations for static and dynamic aeroelastic similitude are then developed for convenience of reference, and simplifications are introduced of particular utility to the cases considered in this study. The similitude relations are employed to assess the stability of the treatments under wind tunnel flow conditions based upon known behaviors from the supporting research. It is shown that the treatments are safe for test under the anticipated wind tunnel flow conditions with significant margins/factors of safety. It is furthermore demonstrated that the SCF is more susceptible to aeroelastic instability than the SGF, which has implications for flight feasibility.

Similitude↗

NASA NTRS2015

Comparison of the NASA Common Research Model European Transonic Wind Tunnel Test Data to NASA Test Data

Experimental aerodynamic investigations of the NASA Common Research Model have been conducted in the NASA Langley National Transonic Facility, the NASA Ames 11-ft wind tunnel, and the European Transonic Wind Tunnel. In the NASA Ames 11-ft wind tunnel, data have been obtained at only a chord Reynolds number of 5 million for a wing/body/tail = 0 degree incidence configuration. Data have been obtained at chord Reynolds numbers of 5, 19.8 and 30 million for the same configuration in the National Transonic Facility and in the European Transonic Facility. Force and moment, surface pressure, wing bending and twist, and surface flow visualization data were obtained in all three facilities but only the force and moment, surface pressure and wing bending and twist data are presented herein.

Rivers, Melissa B.↗

NASA NTRS2015

Comparison of the NASA Common Research Model European Transonic Wind Tunnel Test Data to NASA Test Data

Experimental aerodynamic investigations of the NASA Common Research Model have been conducted in the NASA Langley National Transonic Facility, the NASA Ames 11-ft wind tunnel, and the European Transonic Wind Tunnel. In the NASA Ames 11-ft wind tunnel, data have been obtained at only a chord Reynolds number of 5 million for a wing/body/tail = 0 degree incidence configuration. Data have been obtained at chord Reynolds numbers of 5, 19.8 and 30 million for the same configuration in the National Transonic Facility and in the European Transonic Facility. Force and moment, surface pressure, wing bending and twist, and surface flow visualization data were obtained in all three facilities but only the force and moment and surface pressure data are presented herein.

Rivers, Melissa↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Numerical Simulation of An Aspect Ratio 13.5 Common Research Model with Trailing Edge Mini-Flaps

This paper presents an aeroelastic modeling study of an aspect ratio 13.5 wind tunnel scale Common Research Model (CRM) with trailing edge mini-flaps. FUN3D is used for the aeroelastic steady and unsteady simulations at Mach 0.85 and dynamic pressure 230 psf. The aeroelastic simulation results are compared with the in-house developed VSPAERO aeroelastic model results. The incremental aerodynamic coefficients predicted by FUN3D and VSPAERO are close except when the mini-flap deflection angle is 10˚. The control reversal behavior is observed for the wing tip mini-flap. A series of dynamic pressure sweep simulations are performed to determine the control reversal onset point. Unsteady simulation results show that there is no buffet phenomenon observed at angle of attacks 0˚ and 2˚ when the mini-flap is deflected 10˚. The mini-flap oscillation simulations show the nonlinear behavior appears when the deflection angle is about 4˚.

Mini-flap↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Active Flow Control Enhanced Aileron of the High-Lift Common Research Model at Takeoff Condition

An experimental investigation was conducted in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel on the NASA 10% scale High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) to improve the high-lift aerodynamic performance of the takeoff configuration. Active flow control (AFC) was applied at the aileron hinge line to control flow separation at high aileron deflection angles ( δ a ) to increase lift-to-drag ratio (R/J). Improvements in low speed R/J can increase vehicle payload and/or range resulting in a more efficient vehicle. Aileron deflection angles of 0°, 7.5°, 16°, and 25° were investigated. Flow control was applied to the two largest aileron deflections, which are considered the high-lift (HL) improved takeoff configurations. A companion paper will discuss baseline flow characteristics of the CRM-HL at the three takeoff conditions: reference, nominal, and HL-improved. In this paper, we focus on the aerodynamic improvement obtained when AFC was applied to δ a = 16° relative to the nominal configuration, δ a = 7.5°. Multiple flow control parameters, including actuator type, spacing, and intensity, were investigated to evaluate the efficiency of the actuation system. The different AFC configurations tested were assessed with tuft visualization, steady surface pressure data, and force and moment data. The results indicated that all actuation types and spacings examined led to an increase in lift across the range of angles of attack investigated. Flow separation was mitigated with the injection of momentum at the aileron hinge line. The configurations with the smallest spacing produced the highest improvement in L/D . Steady jet actuation showed higher efficiency but similar aerodynamic performance when compared to the sweeping jet actuators. This work was performed in support of the NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) Project.

High-Lift Common Research Model↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Active Flow Control Enhanced Aileron of the High-Lift Common Research Model at Takeoff Condition

An experimental investigation was conducted in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel on the NASA 10% scale High-Lift Common Research Model (CRM-HL) to improve the high-lift aerodynamic performance of the takeoff configuration. Active flow control (AFC) was applied at the aileron hinge line to control flow separation at high aileron deflection angles to increase lift-to-drag ratio (L/D). Improvements in low speed L/D can increase vehicle payload and/or range resulting in a more efficient vehicle. Aileron deflection angles of 0°, 7.5°, 16°, and 25° were investigated. Flow control was applied to the two largest aileron deflections, which are considered the high-lift (HL) improved takeoff configurations. A companion paper will discuss baseline flow characteristics of the CRM-HL at the three takeoff conditions: reference, nominal, and HL-improved. In this paper, we focus on the aerodynamic improvement obtained when AFC was applied to an aileron deflected at 16° relative to the nominal configuration of 7.5° deflection. Multiple flow control parameters, including actuator type, spacing, and intensity, were investigated to evaluate the efficiency of the actuation system. The different AFC configurations tested were assessed with tuft visualization, steady surface pressure data, and force and moment data. The results indicated that all actuation types and spacings examined led to an increase in lift across the range of angles of attack investigated. Flow separation was mitigated with the injection of momentum at the aileron hinge line. The configurations with the smallest spacing produced the highest improvement in L/D. Steady jet actuation showed higher efficiency but similar aerodynamic performance when compared to the sweeping jet actuators. This work was performed in support of the NASA Advanced Air Transport Technology (AATT) Project.

CRM-HL↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroacoustic Simulations of the High-Lift Common Research Model and Validation with Experiment

Aerodynamic and acoustic data from unsteady numerical simulations of the High-Lift Common Research Model are compared with experimental measurements from an open-jet wind tunnel test of a 10\-scale model. Time-averaged surface pressure data is in good agreement for all of the configurations evaluated during the test. Unsteady surface pressure spectra from the leading-edge slat and the nose of the main element are presented, demonstrating that the highest levels are associated with the wakes of slat brackets. At these locations the simulations and experiment match reasonably well at low enough frequencies (f < 10 kHz based on the model scale) before excessive numerical dissipation leads to a rapid roll off in the predicted frequency spectra. The agreement is inconsistent at other locations on the slat and main-element surfaces, where the pressure fluctuation levels are lower. Noise predictions using a synthetic microphone array are compared with equivalent experimental results, and the changes in levels predicted between three configurations are similar to those measured. However, some details of the noise predictions are inconsistent with the experiment, and the use of solid- instead of porous-surface data for the acoustic processing of the simulations likely contributes to the discrepancies. All of the simulations were completed before the test, and, despite some shortcomings, they provided valuable insight into the aeroacoustic performance of the model that greatly aided test planning and execution. Hence, the post-test comparisons presented here allow an assessment of the predictive methodology in the context of a realistic high-lift configuration.

High-lift↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wind Tunnel Testing of AFC over a Deflected Aileron on the High-Lift Common Research Model

Active flow control (AFC) using discrete fluidic actuators distributed along the span, just upstream of the deflected aileron of the 10% scale high-lift version of the Common Research Model (CRM-HL), was evaluated during a wind tunnel test in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel. For this set of experiments, a new outboard section was fabricated incorporating a deflectable aileron. Aileron deflection angles of 0, 7.5, 16, and 25 were investigated. This experimental investigation is in response to a recent study by Boeing potential to use AFC with a drooped aileron during takeoff to improve lift-to-drag ratio (L/D) by as much as 5%, depending on AFC mass flow rate. AFC is used at deflection angles above the nominal deflection of 7.5 to control the resulting flow separation that occurs and potentially improve L/D. Improvements in aircraft low-speed L/D can affect vehicle range and/or payload. Tuft flow visualization data, steady and unsteady surface pressure data, and force and moment data are used to compare the flowfields with and without AFC. Parameters varied include actuator momentum coefficient and aileron deflection angle. The surface pressure and tuft flow visualization results indicate that without AFC, the flow over a majority of the aileron upper surface is separated for aileron deflection angles larger than 7.5. When AFC is applied, the flow is reattached to the aileron. Force and moment results show that a local increase in lift leads to an increase in L/D of at least 3.5% using mass flow rates thought to be available from air sources onboard a commercial transport.

AFC↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wind Tunnel Testing of AFC over a Deflected Aileron on the High-Lift Common Research Model

Active flow control (AFC) using discrete fluidic actuators distributed along the span, just upstream of the deflected aileron of the 10% scale high-lift version of the Common Research Model (CRM-HL), was evaluated during a wind tunnel test in the NASA Langley 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel. For this set of experiments, a new outboard section was fabricated incorporating a deflectable aileron. Aileron deflection angles of 0, 7.5, 16, and 25 were investigated. This experimental investigation is in response to a recent study by Boeing potential to use AFC with a drooped aileron during takeoff to improve lift-to-drag ratio (L/D) by as much as 5%, depending on AFC mass flow rate. AFC is used at deflection angles above the nominal deflection of 7.5 to control the resulting flow separation that occurs and potentially improve L/D. Improvements in aircraft low-speed L/D can affect vehicle range and/or payload. Tuft flow visualization data, steady and unsteady surface pressure data, and force and moment data are used to compare the flowfields with and without AFC. Parameters varied include actuator momentum coefficient and aileron deflection angle. The surface pressure and tuft flow visualization results indicate that without AFC, the flow over a majority of the aileron upper surface is separated for aileron deflection angles larger than 7.5. When AFC is applied, the flow is reattached to the aileron. Force and moment results show that a local increase in lift leads to an increase in L/D of at least 3.5% using mass flow rates thought to be available from air sources onboard a commercial transport.

AFC↗

NASA NTRS2011

Results From a Pressure Sensitive Paint Test Conducted at the National Transonic Facility on Test 197: The Common Research Model

This report will serve to present results of a test of the pressure sensitive paint (PSP) technique on the Common Research Model (CRM). This test was conducted at the National Transonic Facility (NTF) at NASA Langley Research Center. PSP data was collected on several surfaces with the tunnel operating in both cryogenic mode and standard air mode. This report will also outline lessons learned from the test as well as possible approaches to challenges faced in the test that can be applied to later entries.

Watkins, A. Neal↗

NASA NTRS2017

Noise Simulations of the High-Lift Common Research Model

The PowerFLOW(TradeMark) code has been used to perform numerical simulations of the high-lift version of the Common Research Model (HL-CRM) that will be used for experimental testing of airframe noise. Time-averaged surface pressure results from PowerFLOW(TradeMark) are found to be in reasonable agreement with those from steady-state computations using FUN3D. Surface pressure fluctuations are highest around the slat break and nacelle/pylon region, and synthetic array beamforming results also indicate that this region is the dominant noise source on the model. The gap between the slat and pylon on the HL-CRM is not realistic for modern aircraft, and most nacelles include a chine that is absent in the baseline model. To account for those effects, additional simulations were completed with a chine and with the slat extended into the pylon. The case with the chine was nearly identical to the baseline, and the slat extension resulted in higher surface pressure fluctuations but slightly reduced radiated noise. The full-span slat geometry without the nacelle/pylon was also simulated and found to be around 10 dB quieter than the baseline over almost the entire frequency range. The current simulations are still considered preliminary as changes in the radiated acoustics are still being observed with grid refinement, and additional simulations with finer grids are planned.

Lockard, David P.↗

NASA NTRS2019

Experimental Investigation of the NASA Common Research Model with a Natural Laminar Flow Wing in the NASA Langley National Transonic Facility

A test of the new NASA Common Research Model with a Natural Laminar Flow (CRMNLF) semispan wing in the NASA Langley National Transonic Facility (NTF) was completed in October 2018. The main focus of this test was the evaluation of the extent of laminar flow on the CRM-NLF wing at various Reynolds numbers and test conditions. During this test, data were acquired at chord Reynolds numbers from 10 to 30 million and at Mach numbers ranging from 0.84 to 0.86. This investigation provided valuable insight into the necessary procedures for laminar flow testing in the NTF. It also significantly advanced the new carbonbased heating layer technique to improve the quality of transition visualization data from temperature sensitive paint (TSP) in a cryogenic wind tunnel.

Rivers, Melissa B.↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Real-Time Drag Optimization of Aspect Ratio 13.5 Common Research Model with Distributed Flap System

This paper presents a real-time drag optimization study of the aspect ratio 13.5 Common Research Model (CRM) with a distributed mini-plain flap system. A surrogate aerodynamic model of the aspect ratio 13.5 CRM is developed based on an aerodynamic database computed by a transonic panel method to capture the aerodynamic coefficients as functions of the angle of attack, flap deflections, and Mach number. A recursive least-squares parameter estimation algorithm is designed to estimate the aerodynamic parameters of the surrogate model. The estimated surrogate model is then used in an on-line drag optimization strategy based on an adjoint method. The results of the real-time drag optimization indicate a drag reduction of 2.46% for Mach 0.80, 3.37% for Mach 0.85, and 1.95% for Mach 0.88. The results show the convergence of all parameter estimates.

Drag Optimization↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroelastic Simulation of Wind Tunnel Scale Aspect Ratio 13.5 Common Research Model with Trailing Edge Mini-Flaps

This paper presents a computation study of an aspect ratio 13.5 wind tunnel scale Common Research Model (CRM) with trailing edge mini-flaps using FUN3D. The aeroelastic simulations are conducted under free-air and inside wind tunnel conditions. The NASA Langley Research Center Transonic Dynamic Tunnel (TDT) is a closed circuit and slotted-test-section with a 16 ft ×16 ft test section. The structure mode shapes are extracted from the latest updated NASTRAN Finite-Element Model (FEM) model. A dynamic pressure sweep is performed to determine the control reversal boundary of the trailing edge mini-flaps. The wind tunnel wall interference effects on the mini-flap control derivatives are analyzed based on the simulations.

Aeroelastic↗