Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “GN&C”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1981

Verification of the Space Shuttle entry GN&C system

The certification procedures for the initial Shuttle flight are discussed. Particular attention is paid to the entry guidance, navigation, and control (GNC) verification, comprising tests, analysis, demonstration, inspection, and simulation. Flow diagrams for the verification and operational flight sequences are provided, along with a block diagram of the GNC circuitry interfaces. The development of the test matrix software for the GNC is outlined, noting the constant interplay between software verification and spacecraft reconfiguration to meet simulated performance requirements. Comparison of GNC performance predictions with actual entry flight data showed a good match in all performance areas except for sideslip excursions, bank overshoots, an area of transonic buffet, and an increased lift/drag ratio in the preflare to landing flight phase.

Van Hoften, J. D. A.↗
NASA NTRS1982

Shuttle entry GN&C performance during STS-1 and STS-2

Data obtained during the entry segment of the descent phase of the flights are analyzed. The nominal entry profile is defined and a description is given of the guidance, navigation, and control subsystem. Emphasis is placed on the stability and control problems encountered during STS-1 and to the changes made in response to these anomalies. These are: (1) the first roll maneuver was done manually at a reduced roll rate; (2) the nominal elevator position was changed from one degree up to one degree down for Mach numbers greater than 12 to reduce the heat load on the body flap; (3) the pilot was directed to execute small roll maneuvers at dynamic pressures of 4, 8, and 18 psf to help determine the roll moment from the aft yaw jets; (4) the planned test inputs in the transonic region were reduced in magnitude; and (5) the targeted touchdown point was moved 500 feet closer to the runway threshold.

Mcwhorter, L. B.↗
NASA NTRS1994

Advanced Mico-Gn&C Technology for Low-Cost Planetary

The new NASA paradigm calls for more frequent, low-cost, small spacecraft missions capable of returning high-value planetary science. This challenge also extends to the rapid insertion of advanced technologies across all spacecraft subsystems as an enabling tool for building these highly capable miniaturized science platforms in the spirit of.

planetary spacecraft tracking gravity-field mappin↗
NASA NTRS2005

International Space Station US. GN&C Momentum Manager Controller Design for Shuttle Thermal Protection System Repair

This paper describes the design of the ISS Momentum Manager controllers for the Orbiter Repair Maneuver (ORM) and Orbiter Tile Repair operations. Momentum Manager Controllers provide non-propulsive attitude control via CMGs. Non-propulsive control is required at the beginning and the middle of the ORM and at the tile repair position. This paper first reviews the design issues and requirements, then presents the design methodology, and concludes with analysis results that verify the design.

Sims, Christopher R.↗
NASA NTRS2005

Small Body GN&C Research Report: A Robust Model Predictive Control Algorithm with Guaranteed Resolvability

A robustly stabilizing MPC (model predictive control) algorithm for uncertain nonlinear systems is developed that guarantees the resolvability of the associated finite-horizon optimal control problem in a receding-horizon implementation. The control consists of two components; (i) feedforward, and (ii) feedback part. Feed-forward control is obtained by online solution of a finite-horizon optimal control problem for the nominal system dynamics. The feedback control policy is designed off-line based on a bound on the uncertainty in the system model. The entire controller is shown to be robustly stabilizing with a region of attraction composed of initial states for which the finite-horizon optimal control problem is feasible. The controller design for this algorithm is demonstrated on a class of systems with uncertain nonlinear terms that have norm-bounded derivatives, and derivatives in polytopes. An illustrative numerical example is also provided.

model predictive control algorithm (MPC)↗
NASA NTRS2005

Small Body GN&C Research Report: A Guidance and Control Technique for Small-Body Proximity Operations with Guaranteed Guidance Resolvability and Required Thruster Silent Time

The guidance and control (G&C) algorithms for enabling small-body proximity operations are developed by using a model predictive control approach along with a convexification of the governing dynamics, control constraints, and trajectory/state constraints. The open-loop guidance is solved ahead of time or in a resolvable, real-time manner through the use of PWG (Pseudo Way-point Generation), a technique developed in this research. The PWG scheme ensures required thruster silent times during trajectory maneuvers. The feedback control is implemented to track the PWG trajectories in a manner that guarantees the resolvability for the open-loop problem, enabling the ability to update the G&C in a model-predictive manner. The schemes incorporate gravity models and thruster ring times into discrete dynamics that are solved as a optimal control problem to minimize fuel consumption or thruster energy expenditure. The optimal control problem is cast as an LMI (Linear Matrix Inequality) and then solved through Semi-Definite Programming techniques in a computationally efficient manner that provides convergence and constraint guarantees.

guidance and control (G&C)↗
NASA NTRS2017

Time Domain Stability Margin Assessment of the NS Space Launch System GN&C Design for Exploration Mission One

The baseline stability margins for NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) launch vehicle were generated via the classical approach of linearizing the system equations of motion and determining the gain and phase margins from the resulting frequency domain model. To improve the fidelity of the classical methods, the linear frequency domain approach can be extended by replacing static, memoryless nonlinearities with describing functions. This technique, however, does not address the time varying nature of the dynamics of a launch vehicle in flight. An alternative technique for the evaluation of the stability of the nonlinear launch vehicle dynamics along its trajectory is to incrementally adjust the gain and/or time delay in the time domain simulation until the system exhibits unstable behavior. This technique has the added benefit of providing a direct comparison between the time domain and frequency domain tools in support of simulation validation.

Clements, Keith↗
NASA NTRS2017

Time Domain Stability Margin Assessment of the NASA Space Launch System GN&C Design for Exploration Mission One

The baseline stability margins for NASA's Space Launch System (SLS) launch vehicle were generated via the classical approach of linearizing the system equations of motion and determining the gain and phase margins from the resulting frequency domain model. To improve the fidelity of the classical methods, the linear frequency domain approach can be extended by replacing static, memoryless nonlinearities with describing functions. This technique, however, does not address the time varying nature of the dynamics of a launch vehicle in flight. An alternative technique for the evaluation of the stability of the nonlinear launch vehicle dynamics along its trajectory is to incrementally adjust the gain and/or time delay in the time domain simulation until the system exhibits unstable behavior. This technique has the added benefit of providing a direct comparison between the time domain and frequency domain tools in support of simulation validation.

Clements, Keith↗
NASA NTRS2010

Flight Dynamics and GN&C for Spacecraft Servicing Missions

Future human exploration missions and commercial opportunities will be enabled through In-space assembly and satellite servicing. Several recent efforts have developed technologies and capabilities to support these exciting future missions, including advances in flight dynamics and Guidance, Navigation and Control. The Space Shuttle has demonstrated significant capabilities for crewed servicing of the Hubble Space Telescope (HST) and assembly of the International Space Station (ISS). Following the Columbia disaster NASA made significant progress in developing a robotic mission to service the HST. The DARPA Orbital Express mission demonstrated automated rendezvous and capture, In-space propellant transfer, and commodity replacement. This paper will provide a summary of the recent technology developments and lessons learned, and provide a focus for potential future missions.

Naasz, Bo↗
NASA NTRS2018

NASA SPLICE Project: Development and Testing of Precision Landing GN&C Technologies

This presentation shows NASA's progress in developing precision landing and hazard avoidance technologies during the last few years through its ALHAT, COBALT and now SPLICE projects. The talk shows how these projects intend to use active optical sensors to map landing surfaces and identify hazards for future lander missions. The talk will be given at an Entry Descent and Landing session at a NASA Technical Interchange Meeting on active optical sensor systems.

Restrepo, Carolina↗
NASA NTRS2019

Advanced Mathematics for Control System Design: Guidance, Navigation, and Control (GN&C) Studies

The study and control of inverted pendulum dynamics is of interest to NASA to better control the stability of a rocket. The different compartments of a rocket can move within a rocket during launch (i.e., rocket fuel slosh) and can affect its overall trajectory. Focusing on the inverted pendulum robot, PENNY, the dynamics are reduced to a simpler model which can prove to be more insightful for deriving more complex models and control laws. From the inverted pendulum bot, we can incorporate complexity into our physical model and approximate to the dynamics of a rocket (i.e., flexible inverted pendulum, multistage pendulum).

Autonomy↗