Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Lithium Anode”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3

Imaging the Phase Transformation in Single Particles of Lithium Titanate Anode for Lithium-ion Batteries

Lithium uptake and release in lithium titanate (LTO) anode materials during a discharge and charge cycle is one of the fundamental processes of a Lithium-ion battery (LIB), still not fully understood at the microscopic level.During discharge cycle, LTO undergoes a phase transformation between Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 and Li 7 Ti 5 O 12 states within a cubic crystal lattice. To reveal the details of the microscopic mechanism,it is necessary to track the sequence of phase transformation sat different discharge/charge states under operating conditions.Here we use in-situ Bragg Coherent Diffraction Imaging (BCDI) and in-situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) experiments to examine the lithium insertion-induced materials phase transformation within a single LTO particle anda bulk battery analogue,respectively. BCDI analysis from (111) Bragg peak, shows the two-phase transformation manifesting as a distinct image phase modulation within a single LTO nanoparticle occurring in the middle of the discharge region then subsiding towards the end of the discharge cycle. We observe the biggest phase variation at the two-phase stage,indicating the formation of phase domains of 200 nm in size during the discharge process. Additionally, we also observe a lattice contraction of >0.2% in a single LTO nanoparticle at the (400) Bragg peak measurement, larger than that in the corresponding bulk material. Our observation of this phase transformation at a single particle level has implications for the understanding of the microscopic/mesoscale picture of the phase transformation in anode and cathode LIBs materials.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

High-efficiency, anode-free lithium–metal batteries with a close-packed homogeneous lithium morphology

Anode-free lithium–metal batteries (LMBs) are ideal candidates for high-capacity energy storage as they eliminate the need for a conventional graphite electrode or excess lithium–metal anode. Current anode-free LMBs suffer from low Coulombic efficiency (CE) due to poor lithium stripping efficiency. Advanced electrolyte development is a promising route to maximize lithium plating and stripping CE and minimize capacity fade. However, a poor understanding of the mechanisms by which advanced electrolytes improve performance hampers progress in the practical development of anode-free LMBs. Here, we use synchrotron techniques and other tools to analyze the influence of three commercially available electrolytes on the composition, heterogeneity, kinetics, morphology, and electrochemistry of anode-free LMBs. Advanced electrolytes improve the electrochemical performance of anode-free LMBs by forming much denser and better-packed Li morphologies on a Cu current collector than on the conventional electrolyte. Li plates uniformly over the electrode area with the advanced electrolytes rather than in a few active sites. Inactive crystalline Li with heterogeneous distribution dominates the capacity degradation of anode-free cells, especially with the conventional electrolyte, indicating that reducing the amount of “dead” crystalline Li will significantly improve the cycling stability of anode-free cells. Finally, the understanding of the Li plating and stripping process obtained from this work will accelerate the development of anode-free LMBs with high efficiency.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Covalent Organic Framework as an Efficient Protection Layer for a Stable Lithium‐Metal Anode

Abstract Lithium (Li) metal shows great potential for achieving high‐energy‐density rechargeable batteries. However, the practical applications of Li‐metal batteries are still challenged by the formation of Li dendrites and unstable solid‐electrolyte interphase (SEI) on metallic Li. Herein, a thin covalent organic framework layer is in situ fabricated on Li (COF‐Li) to suppress Li dendrite growth and mitigate the side reaction on the Li anode. The COF has a periodic and uniform porosity, allowing for selectively sieving Li ions and guiding a uniform Li deposition. As a result, the COF‐Li exhibits a non‐dendrite morphology during repeated Li plating/stripping and demonstrates a remarkable cycle life over 13 200 h with an extremely low overpotential of only 16 mV at a high current density of 10 mA cm −2 and a high areal capacity of 10 mAh cm −2 .

He, Jiarui↗

Crossover Effects in Batteries with High–Nickel Cathodes and Lithium–Metal Anodes

It is well understood that cathode-to-anode crossover, especially of transition-metal ions, can significantly impact the long-term cycling of lithium-ion batteries. The dissolved transition-metal ions in lithium-ion cells deposit on the graphite anode, disrupt the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI), and catalyze further side reactions. Meanwhile, crossover effects in lithium-metal batteries have rarely been studied. This study is the first to investigate crossover effects in lithium-metal batteries with high-nickel layered-oxide cathodes. It is shown that the crossover of transition-metal ions from LiNi 0.9 Mn 0.05 Co 0.05 O 2 has minimal effect on the lithium-metal anode (LMA) due to the following reasons. The catalytic transition metals 1) have less effect on an inherently reactive LMA, 2) are diluted in a thicker SEI, and 3) are produced in overall lower quantity due to the limited cycle life of the LMA. Conversely, the LMA generates soluble decomposition products that cross over to the cathode even during early cycling. This crossover accelerates impedance growth and capacity fade at the cathode and is partially responsible for the mismatch between the performance of half and full-cells with layered-oxide cathodes. Finally, this study highlights the need for better battery design with LMA, potentially including electrolyte or cell modifications.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Optimization of Magnesium-Doped Lithium Metal Anode for High Performance Lithium Metal Batteries through Modeling and Experiment

Lithium (Li)-magnesium (Mg) alloy with limited Mg amount, which can also be called Mg-doped Li (Li-Mg), has been considered as a potential alternative anode for high energy density rechargeable Li metal batteries. However, the optimum doping-content of Mg in Li-Mg anode and the mechanism of the improved performance are not well understood. In this study, density functional theory (DFT) calculations are used to investigate the effect of Mg amount in Li-Mg anode. The Li-Mg with about 5 wt. % Mg (abbreviated as Li-Mg5) has the lowest absorption energy of Li, thus all the surface area can be “controlled” by Mg atoms, leading to the smooth and continuous deposition of Li on the surface around the Mg center. A localized high concentration electrolyte enables Li-Mg5 to exhibit the best cycling stability in Li metal batteries with high-loading cathode and lean electrolyte under 4.4 V high-voltage, which is approaching the demand of practical application. This electrolyte also helps generate an inorganic-rich solid electrolyte interphase, which leads to smooth, compact and less corrosion layer on the Li-Mg5 surface. Both theoretical simulations and experimental results prove that Li-Mg5 has optimum Mg content and gives best battery cycling performance.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Optimization of Magnesium‐Doped Lithium Metal Anode for High Performance Lithium Metal Batteries through Modeling and Experiment

Abstract Lithium (Li)‐magnesium (Mg) alloy with limited Mg amount, which can also be called Mg‐doped Li (Li‐Mg), has been considered as a potential alternative anode for high energy density rechargeable Li metal batteries. However, the optimum doping‐content of Mg in Li‐Mg anode and the mechanism of the improved performance are not well understood. Herein, density functional theory (DFT) calculations are used to investigate the effect of Mg amount in Li‐Mg anode. The Li‐Mg with about 5 wt. % Mg (abbreviated as Li‐Mg5) has the lowest absorption energy of Li, thus all the surface area can be “controlled” by Mg atoms, leading to the smooth and continuous deposition of Li on the surface around the Mg center. A localized high concentration electrolyte enables Li‐Mg5 to exhibit the best cycling stability in Li metal batteries with high‐loading cathode and lean electrolyte under 4.4 V high‐voltage, which is approaching the demand of practical application. This electrolyte also helps generate an inorganic‐rich solid electrolyte interphase, which leads to smooth, compact and less corrosion layer on the Li‐Mg5 surface. Both theoretical simulations and experimental results prove that Li‐Mg5 has optimum Mg content and gives best battery cycling performance.

Gao, Peiyuan↗

Anode‐Free Lithium–Sulfur Cells Enabled by Rationally Tuning Lithium Polysulfide Molecules

Abstract The two major barriers of practical lithium–sulfur batteries are the poor reversibility of lithium‐metal anode and sluggish kinetics of sulfur cathode. Here, we report a simple yet cogent, molecular tailoring approach for lithium polysulfides, enabling a synergistic enhancement of anode reversibility and cathode kinetics. We show that SnI 4 coordinates with lithium polysulfides to form soluble complexes, resulting in a Li 2 SnS 3 ‐rich anode interphase layer. As Li 2 SnS 3 is stable against parasitic reactions and has a lower ionic resistance over cycling, the Li plating/stripping efficiency is greatly improved. In addition, the formation of soluble complexes between SnI 4 and lithium polysulfides play a non‐negligible role in suppressing the clustering behavior of lithium polysulfide molecules, resulting in a significant enhancement in sulfur conversion kinetics under lean electrolyte conditions. The synergistic improvement is validated in anode‐free, lean‐electrolyte pouch cells with a Li 2 S cathode that displays capacity retention of 78 % after 100 cycles.

Ren, Yuxun↗

Anode-Free Lithium–Sulfur Cells Enabled by Rationally Tuning Lithium Polysulfide Molecules

The two major barriers of practical lithium–sulfur batteries are the poor reversibility of lithium-metal anode and sluggish kinetics of sulfur cathode. Here, we report a simple yet cogent, molecular tailoring approach for lithium polysulfides, enabling a synergistic enhancement of anode reversibility and cathode kinetics. In this study, we show that SnI 4 coordinates with lithium polysulfides to form soluble complexes, resulting in a Li 2 SnS 3 -rich anode interphase layer. As Li 2 SnS 3 is stable against parasitic reactions and has a lower ionic resistance over cycling, the Li plating/stripping efficiency is greatly improved. In addition, the formation of soluble complexes between SnI 4 and lithium polysulfides play a non-negligible role in suppressing the clustering behavior of lithium polysulfide molecules, resulting in a significant enhancement in sulfur conversion kinetics under lean electrolyte conditions. The synergistic improvement is validated in anode-free, lean-electrolyte pouch cells with a Li 2 S cathode that displays capacity retention of 78 % after 100 cycles.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

TiO2 Nanocrystal-Framed Li 2 TiSiO 5 Platelets for Low-Voltage Lithium Battery Anode

Titanium-based anode materials are attracting considerable attention for use in high-performance lithium-ion batteries, but the compromised energy density caused by high voltage plateaus and unsatisfactory capacities severely retards their practical applications. Herein, a molten-salt synthesis of Li 2 TiSiO 5 crystalline platelets and a subsequent selective facet modification by in situ growth of TiO 2 nanocrystal frames are facilely achieved. The discharge voltage plateau at around 0.5 V renders the Li 2 TiSiO 5 anode safe compared with graphite and confers a high energy density compared with zero-strain Li 4 Ti 5 O 12 anode. With the optimized size, structure, and content of modified TiO2 nanocrystals associated with the exposed (001) plane of Li 2 TiSiO 5 , the Li 2 TiSiO 5 -based anodes can deliver a capacity of above 300 mAh g -1 , enhanced rate performance, and a capacity retention of 66% after 10 000 cycles. In situ X-ray diffraction and ex situ transmission electron microscopy have demonstrated the structural stability of the anodes upon charge/discharge. Further theoretical calculation reveals 3D migration paths of Li + ions in Li 2 TiSiO 5 . The selective modification of in situ grown TiO2 nanocrystals on certain facets of crystallites opens a new door for the development of electrode materials possessing superior electrochemical properties.

anodes↗

Covalent Organic Framework as an Efficient Protection Layer for a Stable Lithium-Metal Anode

We report Lithium (Li) metal shows great potential for achieving high-energy-density rechargeable batteries. However, the practical applications of Li-metal batteries are still challenged by the formation of Li dendrites and unstable solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) on metallic Li. Herein, a thin covalent organic framework layer is in situ fabricated on Li (COF-Li) to suppress Li dendrite growth and mitigate the side reaction on the Li anode. The COF has a periodic and uniform porosity, allowing for selectively sieving Li ions and guiding a uniform Li deposition. As a result, the COF-Li exhibits a non-dendrite morphology during repeated Li plating/stripping and demonstrates a remarkable cycle life over 13 200 h with an extremely low overpotential of only 16 mV at a high current density of 10 mA cm -2 and a high areal capacity of 10 mAh cm -2 .

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

A Facile Potential Hold Method for Fostering an Inorganic Solid‐Electrolyte Interphase for Anode‐Free Lithium‐Metal Batteries

Abstract Anode‐free lithium batteries are regarded as an ultimate form of high‐energy‐density lithium‐ion batteries. Unfortunately, irreversible lithium loss during cycling plays a major role in degrading the overall cell performance in the anode‐free configuration. To alleviate the deterioration, building a robust solid‐electrolyte interface on an anode current collector is an indispensable requirement. Here, we present a facile in‐situ electrochemical method of a potential hold during the first charge to guide more salt‐derived (less solvent‐derived) decomposition on the anode interface. We show the distinctive decomposition potential of lithium salts and ether/carbonate solvents, where the Li‐solvation structures with salt contact‐ion‐pairs preferentially decompose to form LiF‐rich and less organic components, leading to enhanced lithium Coulombic efficiency in Li||Cu cells as well as mitigating the capacity fade of Cu||LiFePO 4 and Cu||LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 cells.

Shin, Woochul↗

SEI formation mechanisms and Li + dissolution in lithium metal anodes: Impact of the electrolyte composition and the electrolyte-to-anode ratio

The lithium metal battery is one of today's most promising high-energy-density storage devices. Its full-scale implementation depends on solving operational and safety issues intrinsic to the Li metal high reactivity leading to uncontrolled electrolyte decomposition and uneven Li deposition. In this work, we study the spontaneous formation of the solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) upon contact of Li metal with the electrolyte and describe the heterogeneous SEI morphological features. Multiple electrolyte formulations based on lithium bis(fluorosulfonyl)imide (LiFSI), dimethoxyethane (DME), dimethyl carbonate (DMC), 1,2,2-tetrafluoroethyl-2,2,3,3-tetrafluoropropyl ether (TTE) and bis(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl) ether (BTFE) are used. Findings include the description of the SEI evolution from dispersed LiO, LiS, LiN, and LiF clusters to a continuous and compact inorganic phase in which the LiO and LiF content depend on the presence of fluorine diluents. Further, the role of the DME ether solvent helping the growth of a “wet-SEI” is compared to that of the highly unstable carbonate DMC, which decomposes into complex radical oligomers that might contribute to further electrolyte decomposition. The impact of the electrolyte-to-anode ratio on LiFSI decomposition is highlighted. Finally, we suggest the existence of a critical LiFSI concentration and electrolyte-to-anode ratio that could potentially balance the rate of electrolyte depletion and lithium consumption.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Alloying Interlayers for Anode‐Less Lithium‐Metal Polymer Batteries

Anode‐less lithium‐metal batteries potentially offer further increased energy densities. However, the Coulombic efficiency (CE) of lithium plating and stripping, as a classical measure of Li inventory reversibility, is commonly still insufficient for achieving long‐lasting rechargeable batteries. Herein, the potential benefits of employing thin (20 nm) metal interlayers of Ag, Pt, and Au on Cu to alloy with Li in Cu||Li half‐cells and induce homogeneous Li plating with poly(ethylene oxide)‐based electrolytes are investigated. Interestingly, not all alloying interlayers enable a higher CE compared to neat Cu foil with 84%—specifically Ag@Cu with only 81%, while the best performing one, Au@Cu, provides a substantially increased CE of 91%. While generally the formation of “dead lithium” is found to be the major source of CE, this appears to be less pronounced in the case of Au@Cu, indeed. Further improvement can be achieved by carefully adjusting the cell voltage to a region in which the continuous de‐/alloying is suppressed, yielding a further enhanced CE of 94%, thus highlighting the need for a comprehensive approach to design suitable electrode chemistries and designs beyond a “simple” material improvement.

anode-less battery↗