Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Lunar Manufacturing”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS1992

NASA/USRA advanced design program activity, 1991-1992

The School of Textile and Fiber Engineering continued to pursue design projects with the Mechanical Engineering School giving the students an outstanding opportunity to interact with students from another discipline. Four problems were defined which had aspects which would be reasonably assigned to an interdisciplinary team. The design problems are described. The projects included lunar preform manufacturing, dust control for Enabler, an industrial sewing machine variable speed controllor, Enabler operation station, and design for producing fiberglass fabric in a lunar environment.

Dorrity, J. Lewis↗
NASA NTRS1985

Cost comparisons of solar power satellites versus lunar based power systems

A comparison is made between projected electricity costs of an optimized space solar power station (SPS) in GEO and a moon-based SPS (LPS). A single SPS would receive sunlight on an almost uninterruptible basis. The LPS would be illumined 50 percent of the time, thus requiring two stations on opposite sides of the moon as well as three terrestrial rectennas spaced 120 deg apart. The 5 percent efficient LPS cells would be manufactured from lunar materials and built into arrays mounted on tall mounds. The steerable GEO SPS would have 15 percent efficient cells. Construction costs would be significantly lower on the moon, but the total antenna area would need to be two orders of magnitude larger to produce the same output as the SPS. It is estimated that the LPS would therefore deliver 5 GW electricity to earth stations at a cost of 511.3 mills/kW, compared to 46.8 mills/kW from the SPS. It is concluded that lunar materials are suitable for building an SPS, not a LPS.

Kerwin, E. M.↗
NASA NTRS1989

Lunar production of solar cells

The feasibility of manufacturing of solar cells on the moon for spacecraft applications is examined. Because of the much lower escape velocity, there is a great advantage in lunar manufacture of solar cells compared to Earth manufacture. Silicon is abundant on the moon, and new refining methods allow it to be reduced and purified without extensive reliance on materials unavailable on the moon. Silicon and amorphous silicon solar cells could be manufactured on the moon for use in space. Concepts for the production of a baseline amorphous silicon cell are discussed, and specific power levels are calculated for cells designed for both lunar and Earth manufacture.

Landis, Geoffrey A.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Scaleup of Microwave Powder Bed Fusion for Lunar Infrastructure Construction

NASA and its partners are seeking to establish a sustainable and permanent presence on the Moon. Like explorers on Earth, making use of natural resources upon arrival at the destination will be paramount. In-situ resource utilization of the lunar regolith will enable efficient construction of lunar infrastructure. Transforming the granular regolith into a solid can be achieved in many ways. One method is to use microwave energy to sinter the regolith into various structures. The lunar regolith has a low thermal conductivity, but microwaves can volumetrically heat it to bind the granular particles together in an energy efficient manner. One concept that is being developed and evaluated to sinter the regolith into infrastructure uses the Moon’s surface as a powder bed. Regolith would be added to the sintered lunar structure to build up layers to create structures such as landing pads, blast shields, roads, etc. Microwave systems, concept of operations, and sintering protocols are being developed to create a sub-element structure targeted for a lunar demonstration mission.

microwave↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA’s Moon-to-Mars Planetary Autonomous Construction Technology Project: Overview and Status

NASA plans to land the first woman and next man on the Moon by 2025 through the initial Artemis missions. NASA and its international partners plan to establish a sustainable long-term presence on the lunar surface and build up infrastructure in the subsequent Artemis missions. The Lunar Surface Innovation Initiative (LSII), within NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate, aims to spur the creation of novel technologies needed for lunar surface exploration and accelerate the technology readiness of key systems and components. The primary thrust areas of LSII include sustainable power; dust mitigation; in-situ resource utilization; surface excavation, construction, and outfitting; and extreme access/extreme environments. The Moon-to-Mars Planetary Autonomous Construction Technology (MMPACT) projectwas initiated to address the lunar surface construction thrust area of LSII. The goal of the MMPACT project is to develop, deliver, and demonstrate on-demand capabilities to protect astronauts and create infrastructure on the lunar surface via construction of landing pads, habitats, shelters, roadways, berms and blast shields using lunar regolith-based materials. The MMPACT project is leveraging technology derived from NASA’s 3D Printed Mars Habitat Challenge along with contributions from other Government agencies, and multiple partners within industry and academia. The MMPACT project is comprised of three interrelated elements, construction hardware and process development; feedstock materials development; and microwave structure construction capabilities. These elements are working together to address the multiple challenges of infrastructure construction on the surface of the Moon including increased autonomy of operations, hardware operation and manufacturing under lunar environmental conditions, long-duration operation of mechanisms and parts, scale of construction activities, and material and construction requirements and standards. This presentation will summarize the status of development activities in each of the three elements, including testing of the various candidate materials, preliminary design concepts for future lunar infrastructure elements, and the vision for future technology demonstrations on the lunar surface. These demonstrations, targeting the mid-to-late 2020’s, are expected to enable landing pad construction and habitat construction resulting in commercial capabilities early in the next decade.

lunar infrastructure↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

NASA’s Moon-to-Mars Planetary Autonomous Construction Technology Project: Overview and Status

NASA plans to land the first woman and next man on the Moon by 2025 through the initial Artemis missions. NASA and its international partners plan to establish a sustainable long-term presence on the lunar surface and build up infrastructure in the subsequent Artemis missions. The Lunar Surface Innovation Initiative (LSII), within NASA’s Space Technology Mission Directorate, aims to spur the creation of novel technologies needed for lunar surface exploration and accelerate the technology readiness of key systems and components. The primary thrust areas of LSII include sustainable power; dust mitigation; in-situ resource utilization; surface excavation, construction, and outfitting; and extreme access/extreme environments. The Moon-to-Mars Planetary Autonomous Construction Technology (MMPACT) project was initiated to address the lunar surface construction thrust area of LSII. The goal of the MMPACT project is to develop, deliver, and demonstrate on-demand capabilities to protect astronauts and create infrastructure on the lunar surface via construction of landing pads, habitats, shelters, roadways, berms and blast shields using lunar regolith-based materials. The MMPACT project is leveraging technology derived from NASA’s 3D Printed Mars Habitat Challenge along with contributions from other Government agencies, and multiple partners within industry and academia. The MMPACT project is comprised of three interrelated elements, construction hardware and process development; feedstock materials development; and microwave structure construction capabilities. These elements are working together to address the multiple challenges of infrastructure construction on the surface of the Moon including increased autonomy of operations, hardware operation and manufacturing under lunar environmental conditions, long-duration operation of mechanisms and parts, scale of construction activities, and material and construction requirements and standards. This presentation will summarize the status of development activities in each of the three elements, including testing of the various candidate materials, preliminary design concepts for future lunar infrastructure elements, and the vision for future technology demonstrations on the lunar surface. These demonstrations, targeting the mid-to-late 2020’s, are expected to enable landing pad construction and habitat construction resulting in commercial capabilities early in the next decade.

Additive construction, regolith processing, lunar ↗
NASA NTRS2004

Teleoperated Modular Robots for Lunar Operations

Solar system exploration is currently carried out by special purpose robots exquisitely designed for the anticipated tasks. However, all contingencies for in situ resource utilization (ISRU), human habitat preparation, and exploration will be difficult to anticipate. Furthermore, developing the necessary special purpose mechanisms for deployment and other capabilities is difficult and error prone. For example, the Galileo high gain antenna never opened, severely restricting the quantity of data returned by the spacecraft. Also, deployment hardware is used only once. To address these problems, we are developing teleoperated modular robots for lunar missions, including operations in transit from Earth. Teleoperation of lunar systems from Earth involves a three second speed-of-light delay, but experiment suggests that interactive operations are feasible.' Modular robots typically consist of many identical modules that pass power and data between them and can be reconfigured for different tasks providing great flexibility, inherent redundancy and graceful degradation as modules fail. Our design features a number of different hub, link, and joint modules to simplify the individual modules, lower structure cost, and provide specialized capabilities. Modular robots are well suited for space applications because of their extreme flexibility, inherent redundancy, high-density packing, and opportunities for mass production. Simple structural modules can be manufactured from lunar regolith in situ using molds or directed solar sintering. Software to direct and control modular robots is difficult to develop. We have used genetic algorithms to evolve both the morphology and control system for walking modular robots3 We are currently using evolvable system technology to evolve controllers for modular robots in the ISS glove box. Development of lunar modular robots will require software and physical simulators, including regolith simulation, to enable design and test of robot software and hardware, particularly automation software. Ready access to these simulators could provide opportunities for contest-driven development ala RoboCup (http://www.robocup.org/). Licensing of module designs could provide opportunities in the toy market and for spin-off applications.

Globus, Al↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Overview of NASA's Break the Ice Lunar Challenge

This paper provides the background, status and ongoing plans by NASA’s CentennialChallenges Program (CCP) in developing “Break the Ice Lunar Challenge”. This challenge will enable the development of excavation technologies that can operate in the extreme conditions on the Moon. As a direct result of NASA’s Space Policy Directive 1 (To the Moon, then Mars”), CCP organized a kickoff meeting in October 2019 where Subject Matter Experts (SME) from various NASA centers got together and identified the technology gaps in the areas of Lunar Excavation, Manufacturing, and Construction. Following the kickoff meeting, CCP in partnership with external challenge consultants conducted in-depth interviews with experts from academia, industry, and NASA over a period of two months to further identify any technology gaps and the status of the current state of the art technologies in these areas. Through these activities, we determined that there is sufficient need and opportunity to move forward and develop this into a robust challenge. As a nextstep, CCP organized a workshop in February 2020 where experts from academia, industry, NASA, and other government agencies met to validate the specific technology need and prioritize those needs in such a way that the potential challenge can address the high priority needs. Since the completion of this workshop, a core challenge development team has been working on the challenge scenarios, rules, and requirements with the goal to open the challenge in Nov 2020.

Centennnial Challenges↗
NASA NTRS1998

High Performance Materials Applications to Moon/Mars Missions and Bases

Two classes of material processing scenarios will feature prominently in future interplanetary exploration: in situ production using locally available materials in lunar or planetary landings and high performance structural materials which carve out a set of properties for uniquely hostile space environments. To be competitive, high performance materials must typically offer orders of magnitude improvements in thermal conductivity or insulation, deliver high strength-to-weight ratios, or provide superior durability (low corrosion and/or ablative character, e.g., in heat shields). The space-related environmental parameters of high radiation flux, low weight, and superior reliability limits many typical aerospace materials to a short list comprising high performance alloys, nanocomposites and thin-layer metal laminates (Al-Cu, Al-Ag) with typical dimensions less than the Frank-Reed-type dislocation source. Extremely light weight carbon-carbon composites and carbon aerogels will be presented as novel examples which define broadened material parameters, particularly owing to their extreme thermal insulation (R-32-64) and low densities (<0.01 g/cu cm) approaching that of air itself. Even with these low-weight payload additions, rocket thrust limits and transport costs will always place a premium on assembling as much structural and life support resources upon interplanetary, lunar, or asteroid arrival. As an example, for in situ lunar glass manufacture, solar furnaces reaching 1700 C for pure silica glass manufacture in situ are compared with sol-gel technology and acid-leached ultrapure (<0.1% FeO) silica aerogel precursors.

Noever, David A.↗
NASA NTRS1998

High Performance Materials Applications to Moon/Mars Missions and Bases

Two classes of material processing scenarios will feature prominently in future interplanetary exploration- in situ production using locally available materials in lunar or planetary landings and high performance structural materials which carve out a set of properties for uniquely hostile space environments. To be competitive, high performance materials must typically offer orders of magnitude improvements in thermal conductivity or insulation, deliver high strength-to-weight ratios, or provide superior durability (low corrosion and/or ablative character, e.g. in heat shields). The space-related environmental parameters of high radiation flux, low weight and superior reliability limits many typical aerospace materials to a short list comprising high performance alloys, nanocomposites and thin-layer metal laminates (Al-Cu, Al-Ag) with typical dimensions less than the Frank-Reed-type dislocation source. Extremely light weight carbon-carbon composites and car on aerogels will be presented as novel examples which define broadened material parameters, particularly owing to their extreme thermal insulation (R-32-64) and low densities (less than 0.01 g/cc) approaching that of air itself. Even with these low weight payload additions, rocket thrust limits and transport costs will always place a premium on assembling as much structural and life support resources upon interplanetary, lunar or asteroid arrival. As an example for in situ lunar glass manufacture, solar furnaces reaching 1700 C for pure silica glass manufacture in situ are compared with sol-gel technology and acid-leached ultrapure (less than 0.1% FeO) silica aerogel precursors.

Noever, David A.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Design of a Manufacturing Demonstration Unit for a Composite Lunar Landing Gear Strut

The goal of the current work was to develop an analytical framework for design of composite struts using various levels of model fidelity. An additional goal of this work was to perform an initial assessment of using automated fiber placement (AFP) and other advanced manufacturing methods to explore their feasibility for the fabrication of struts for lunar landers, strut-braced wings, and other aerospace components. In particular, designs were considered for fabrication at the Integrated Structural Assembly of Advanced Composites (ISAAC) facility at Langley Research Center (LaRC). The designs presented in this paper do not represent the exact geometry and material systems currently in use by the Artemis landing system, but they are considered to be representative. The designs produced during this study will be used to develop manufacturing demonstration units (MDU) that can be fabricated at ISAAC and tested in lab facilities at LaRC

carbon-epoxy↗
NASA NTRS1977

Lunar materials for construction of space manufacturing facilities

Development of industrial operations in deep space would be prohibitively expensive if most of the construction and expendable masses had to be transported from earth. Use of lunar materials reduces the needed investments by a factor of 15 to 20. It is shown in this paper that judicious selection of lunar materials will allow one to obtain hydrogen, nitrogen, carbon, helium and other specific elements critical to the support of life in large space habitats at relatively low costs and lower total investment even further. Necessary selection techniques and extraction schemes are outlined. In addition, tables are presented of the oxide and elemental abundances characteristic of the mare and highland regions of the moon which should be useful in evaluating what can be extracted from the lunar soils.

Criswell, D. R.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Design of a Manufacturing Demonstration Unit for a Composite Lunar Landing Gear Strut

The goal of the current work was to develop an analytical framework for design of composite struts using various levels of model fidelity. Rapid optimization trade studies were performed using low fidelity two-dimensional (2D) axisymmetric models with smeared composite properties. The optimum 2D model was compared with three-dimensional (3D) models with higher levels of fidelity in material property representation. Good agreement was found with all models. The buckling performance of the highest fidelity 3D model was found to be satisfactory for the intended loading conditions. An additional goal of this work was to perform an initial assessment of using automated fiber placement (AFP) and other advanced manufacturing methods to explore their feasibility for the fabrication of struts for lunar landers, strut-braced wings, and other aerospace components. The designs produced during this study are intended to be used to develop manufacturing demonstration units (MDU) that can be fabricated at the Integrated Structural Assembly of Advanced Composites (ISAAC) facility at Langley Research Center (LaRC) and tested in lab facilities at LaRC.

carbon-epoxy↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Design of a Manufacturing Demonstration Unit for a Composite Lunar Landing Gear Strut

The goal of the current work was to develop an analytical framework for design of composite struts using various levels of model fidelity. Rapid optimization trade studies were performed using low fidelity two-dimensional (2D) axisymmetric models with smeared composite properties. The optimum 2D model was compared with three-dimensional (3D) models with higher levels of fidelity in material property representation. Good agreement was found with all models. The buckling performance of the highest fidelity 3D model was found to be satisfactory for the intended loading conditions. An additional goal of this work was to perform an initial assessment of using automated fiber placement (AFP) and other advanced manufacturing methods to explore their feasibility for the fabrication of struts for lunar landers, strut-braced wings, and other aerospace components. The designs produced during this study are intended to be used to develop manufacturing demonstration units (MDU) that can be fabricated at the Integrated Structural Assembly of Advanced Composites (ISAAC) facility at Langley Research Center (LaRC) and tested in lab facilities at LaRC.

carbon-epoxy↗
NASA NTRS1979

Nonterrestrial material processing and manufacturing of large space systems

Nonterrestrial processing of materials and manufacturing of large space system components from preprocessed lunar materials at a manufacturing site in space is described. Lunar materials mined and preprocessed at the lunar resource complex will be flown to the space manufacturing facility (SMF), where together with supplementary terrestrial materials, they will be final processed and fabricated into space communication systems, solar cell blankets, radio frequency generators, and electrical equipment. Satellite Power System (SPS) material requirements and lunar material availability and utilization are detailed, and the SMF processing, refining, fabricating facilities, material flow and manpower requirements are described.

Von Tiesenhausen, G.↗
NASA NTRS1986

Mission analysis and phased development of a lunar base

Manned lunar base activities may support one or more of three basic objectives: scientific research, the exploitation of lunar resources to manufacture a space infrastructure, and the establishment of a self-sufficient lunar base that can serve as a springboard toward long term planetary exploration. The present analysis gives attention to the commonality that may exist among the operational requirements of the three stated goals, as well as the degree of dependency of later developmental phases on the technology and systems development efforts of earlier phases.

Roberts, B. B.↗
NASA NTRS1993

General overview of an integrated lunar oxygen production/brickmaking system

On the moon, various processing systems would compete for the same resources, most notably power, raw materials, and perhaps human attention. Therefore, it may be advantageous for two or more processes to be combined such that the integrated system would require fewer resources than separate systems working independently. The synergistic marriage of two such processes--lunar oxygen production and the manufacture of bricks from sintered lunar regolith--is considered.

Altemir, D. A.↗