Collaborative Project: The problem of bias in defining uncertainty in computationally enabled strategies for data-driven climate model development
The objective of the project is to develop strategies for better representing scientific sensibilities within statistical measures of model skill that then can be used within a Bayesian statistical framework for data-driven climate model development and improved measures of model scientific uncertainty. One of the thorny issues in model evaluation is quantifying the effect of biases on climate projections. While any bias is not desirable, only those biases that affect feedbacks affect scatter in climate projections. The effort at the University of Texas is to analyze previously calculated ensembles of CAM3.1 with perturbed parameters to discover how biases affect projections of global warming. The hypothesis is that compensating errors in the control model can be identified by their effect on a combination of processes and that developing metrics that are sensitive to dependencies among state variables would provide a way to select version of climate models that may reduce scatter in climate projections. Gabriel Huerta was responsible for leading the effort to develop statistical methods for evaluating these field dependencies. The UT effort will incorporate these developments into MECS, which is a set of python scripts being developed at the University of Texas for managing the workflow associated with data-driven climate model development over HPC resources. We regularly consult with Peter Gleckler (LLNL), Mark Taylor (SNL), and Rich Neale (NCAR) to provide additional insight into issues concerning CAM5 model development and multi-model evaluation of the AR5 archive. This grant was originally assigned to Indiana University where both the PI (Huerta) and the Postdoc (Nosedal) worked on the project from March 1, 2012-March 31, 2013.