Direct comparison of microstructure-sensitive fatigue crack initiation via crystal plasticity simulations and in situ high-energy X-ray experiments
Not Available
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Not Available
Not Available
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Abstract not provided.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
X-Ray Tomography. Porosity is commonly measured using mercury injection (MI) or water immersion porosimeter (WIP). Both MI and WIP utilize pressure to fill open voids with mercury or water respectively. A measure of the volume change of the sample is then used to estimate the percentage of open voids. However, for the purpose of rheological study it is important to get an accurate measure of open and closed voids. X-ray tomography has been selected as it offers a three-dimensional view into the sample that can quantify all pores limited only by the voxel size which is in the micron range for this study. Radiographs for tomography were collected at the Material Science and Technology Division at Los Alamos National Lab using the Carl Zeiss Xradio 520 instrument and Scout-and-Scan version 16.1 operating software. Two samples were imaged, the starting material and the deformed sample SiO2_65. 3001 radiographs were taken of the starting material with a 6 second exposure time using a 4x objective lens. The x-ray beam was set to 60 kilovoltage peak (kVp) and 5 watts. 1901 radiographs were taken of SiO2_65 with a 25 second exposure time using a 10x objective lens. The x-ray beam was set to 80 kVp and 7 watts. Radiograph files were analyzed by Brian Patterson using Avizo. Void and inclusion volumes were output by voxel sized (1.03 μm) slices, used to calculate a total percentage volume for the starting material.
Proposal Objectives: 1. Utilize depolymerization/fractionation techniques to recover highly processable and reactive feedstocks for polymer synthesis from lignin. 2. Synthesize lignin‐derived non‐isocyanate polyurethane, epoxy, and polyamide using non‐ toxic, biobased route designed for chemical recycling. Characterize resulting materials. 3. Design a high‐yielding chemical recycling process for as‐synthesized materials yielding usable building blocks for many generations of polymer synthesis. 4. Optimize chemical recycling of PET waste for the synthesis of lignin‐based polymers. Compare properties to commercial materials. 5. Optimize reaction conditions and recycling steps to facilitate enhanced sustainability of the synthetic steps and final properties of materials. 6. Complete a lifecycle assessment of lignin utilization and chemical recycling to compare their environmental performance to that of materials produced from virgin material. Identify hot spots and benefits using the chemical recycling process.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.