Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Reaction center”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3

Stabilization of Charge-Transfer Excited States in Biological Systems: A Computational Focus on the Special Pair in Photosystem II Reaction Centers

Charge-transfer (CT) excited states play an important role in many biological processes. However, many computational approaches often inadequately address the equilibration effects of nuclear and environmental degrees of freedom on these states. One prominent example of systems in which CT states are of utmost importance is reaction centers (RC) in photosystems. Here we use a multiscale approach combined with time-dependent density functional theory to explore the lowest CT excited state of the special pair P D1 –P D2 in the Photosystem II-RC of a cyanobacterium. We find that the nonequilibrium CT excited state resides near the Soret band, making an exciton the lowest-energy excited state. However, accounting for nuclear and state-specific dielectric equilibration along the CT potential energy surface (PES), the CT state P D1 – –P D2 + stabilizes energetically below the excitonic state. Importantly, this underscores the crucial role of state-specific solvation in mapping the PES of CT states, as demonstrated in a simplified dimer model.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Inference of photosynthetic capacity parameters from chlorophyll a fluorescence is affected by redox state of PSII reaction centers

Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) has been used to infer photosynthetic capacity parameters (e.g., the maximum carboxylation rate V cmax , and the maximum electron transport rate J max ). However, the precise mechanism and practical utility of such approach under dynamic environments remain unclear. In this study, we used the balance between the light and carbon reactions to derive theoretical equations relating chlorophyll a fluorescence (ChlF) emission and photosynthetic capacity parameters, and formulated testable hypotheses regarding the dynamic relationships between the true total ChlF emitted from PSII (SIF PSII ) and V cmax and J max . We employed concurrent measurements of gas exchanges and ChlF parameters for 15 species from six biomes to test the formulated hypotheses across species, temperatures, and limitation state of carboxylation. Our results revealed that SIF PSII alone is incapable of informing the variations in V cmax and J max across species, even when SIF PSII is determined under the same environmental conditions. In contrast, the product of SIF PSII and the fraction of open PSII reactions q L , which indicates the redox state of PSII, is a strong predictor of both V cmax and J max , although their precise relationships vary somewhat with environmental conditions. Our findings suggest the redox state of PSII strongly influences the relationship between SIF PSII and V cmax and J max .

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

Single-Molecule Detection of the Encounter and Productive Electron Transfer Complexes of a Photosynthetic Reaction Center

Small, diffusible redox proteins play an essential role in electron transfer (ET) in respiration and photosynthesis, sustaining life on Earth by shuttling electrons between membrane-bound complexes via finely tuned and reversible interactions. Ensemble kinetic studies show transient ET complexes form in two distinct stages: an “encounter” complex largely mediated by electrostatic interactions, which subsequently, through subtle reorganization of the binding interface, forms a “productive” ET complex stabilized by additional hydrophobic interactions around the redox-active cofactors. Here, using single-molecule force spectroscopy (SMFS) we dissected the transient ET complexes formed between the photosynthetic reaction center-light harvesting complex 1 (RC-LH1) of Rhodobacter sphaeroides and its native electron donor cytochrome c 2 (cyt c 2 ). Importantly, SMFS resolves the distribution of interaction forces into low (~150 pN) and high (~330 pN) components, with the former more susceptible to salt concentration and to alteration of key charged residues on the RC. Thus, the low force component is suggested to reflect the contribution of electrostatic interactions in forming the initial encounter complex, whereas the high force component reflects the additional stabilization provided by hydrophobic interactions to the productive ET complex. Employing molecular dynamics simulations, we resolve five intermediate states that comprise the encounter, productive ET and leaving complexes, predicting a weak interaction between cyt c 2 and the LH1 ring near the RC-L subunit that could lie along the exit path for oxidized cyt c 2 . The multimodal nature of the interactions of ET complexes captured here may have wider implications for ET in all domains of life.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗

Two pathways to understanding electron transfer in reaction centers from photosynthetic bacteria: A comparison of Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Rhodobacter capsulatus mutants

The rates, yields, mechanisms and directionality of electron transfer (ET) are explored in twelve pairs of Rhodobacter (R.) sphaeroides and R. capsulatus mutant RCs designed to defeat ET from the excited primary donor (P*) to the A-side cofactors and re-direct ET to the normally inactive mirror-image B-side cofactors. In general, the R. sphaeroides variants have larger P + H B - yields (up to similar to ~90%) than their R. capsulatus analogs (up to similar to ~60%), where H B is the B-side bacteriopheophytin. Substitution of Tyr for Phe at L-polypeptide position L181 near B B primarily increases the contribution of fast P* → P + B B - → P + H B - two-step ET, where B-B is the "bridging" B-side bacteriochlorophyll. The second step (similar to ~6-8 ps) is slower than the first (similar to ~3-4 ps), unlike A-side two-step ET (P* → P + B A - → P + H A - ) where the second step (similar to ~1 ps) is faster than the first (similar to ~3-4 ps) in the native RC. Substitutions near H B , at L185 (Leu, Trp or Arg) and at M-polypeptide site M133/131 (Thr, Val or Glu), strongly affect the contribution of slower (20-50 ps) P* → P + H B - one-step superexchange ET. Here, both ET mechanisms are effective in directing electrons "the wrong way" to H B and both compete with internal conversion of P* to the ground state (similar to ~200 ps) and ET to the A-side cofactors. Collectively, the work demonstrates cooperative amino-acid control of rates, yields and mechanisms of ET in bacterial RCs and how A- vs. B-side charge separation can be tuned in both species.

Charge Separation↗

Light Energy Transduction in Green Sulfur Bacteria

Green sulfur bacteria (GSB) are exquisitely adapted for growth at extraordinarily low light intensities. They are important primary producers of biomass in many anoxic environments, and they contribute significantly to the biogeochemical cycling of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur on Earth. Green bacteria more generally share the property of using chlorosomes for light-harvesting, and these unusual organelles have many unique features. These include the presence of a monolayer lipid-protein envelope, self-assembling bacteriochlorophylls (BChl) in which pigment-pigment interactions predominate, and the presence of redox components ([2Fe-2S] ferredoxins and quinones) that play a role in regulating excitation energy transfer to the type-1 homodimeric reaction centers. The reaction centers of GSB are related to Photosystem I of cyanobacteria and higher plants but also exhibit several unique structural and functional features. The long-term objectives of this research program are to understand the structure, functions, and biogenesis of the chlorosomes, reaction centers, and electron transport chains that carry out the photochemical transduction of light energy into chemical energy in the model green sulfur bacterium, Chlorobaculum (formerly Chlorobium) tepidum. Over a period of 26 years, we characterized chlorosomes in detail. We identified the proteins in the chlorosome envelopes of diverse organisms, identified the nearest neighbors of those proteins, and characterized the chlorosomes of mutant strains lacking one to five of these proteins. After the genome sequence of Cba. tepidum became available, we identified all genes encoding enzymes for BChl a , BChl c/d/e/ƒ , and Chl a biosynthesis Cba. tepidum . We additionally identified all genes encoding enzymes for carotenoid biosynthesis. By constructing a bchQRU mutant strain that produces [Et, Me]-BChl d , together with collaborators who are specialists in solid-state NMR and cryo-electron microscopy, we solved the structure of the BChls in chlorosomes. Using similar methods and chlorosomes containing [Et, Me]-BChl c , we then showed that alternative structures were possible using the same syn-anti BChl dimer. The structures were refined by introducing spectroscopic data from single-chlorosome measurements. Over the course of this project, we sequenced the genomes of approximately twenty GSB strains, which provided important information for comparative analyses. Through analyses of metagenomic data from Mushroom and Octopus Springs in Yellowstone National Park, we identified a novel chlorophototroph belonging to the phylum Acidobacteriota. We successfully isolated an axenic culture of this organism. We characterized the photosynthetic apparatus of this bacterium, named Chloracidobacterium thermophilum, in significant detail, in particular its type-1, homodimeric reaction centers. Surprisingly, these reaction centers contain three types of Chls, BChl a , Chl a , and Zn-BChl a' . We showed that a dimer of Zn-BChl a' is the primary donor and Chl a the primary acceptor of electrons in this reaction center by using advanced spectroscopic techniques. We isolated eight additional strains of Chloracidobacterium spp. from Mushroom Spring and Rupite hot springs in Bulgaria. Comparative genomes showed that these represent three species, Cab. thermophilum , Cab. aggregatum , and Cab. validum . By applying comparative genomics, genetic, biochemical biophysical and physiological approaches to study green bacteria, we produced a wealth of new information about the remarkable light-harvesting and energy transduction capabilities of these poorly characterized microorganisms.

59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES↗

Lifetimes of bacteriochlorophyll fluorescence in Rhodopseudomonas viridis and Heliobacterium chlorum at low temperatures

Fluorescence lifetimes of isolated membranes of Rhodopseudomonas viridis were measured in the temperature range of 77 K to 25 K. At room temperature, the main component of the fluorescence decay of bacteriochlorophyll (BChl) b had a time constant of 50 ps. In contrast to other purple bacteria, the emission at low temperature was spectrally homogeneous and showed essentially single lifetimes of 140 ps at 77 K and 180 ps at 25 K, with the primary electron donor in the oxidized state. Taking into account the relative fluorescence yields with open and closed reaction centers, we arrive at numbers of 125 ps and 215 ps, respectively, for open reaction centers. These numbers are significantly smaller than expected on the basis of measurements of the efficiency of charge separation, perhaps suggesting that the excitation decay in the absence of reaction centers is considerably faster at low temperature than at room temperature. At least four different spectral components with different lifetimes were observed at 25 K in the emission of Heliobacterium chlorum, a short-wavelength component of about 30 ps and three longer-wavelength components of about 100 ps, 300 ps, and 900 ps. This indicates a strong heterogeneity in the emitting pigment, BChl g-808. The component with the shortest lifetime does not appear to be affected by the redox state of the reaction center and might reflect energy transfer to BChl g species which are connected to the reaction center.

NASA Discipline Number 52-30↗