Results for “Scale-Resolving” — Page 3

NASA NTRS2022

Finite Difference Methods for Turbulence Simulations

The optimal finite difference discretization used in simulations of turbulent flows is influenced by both, the type of the scale resolving simulation (DNS or LES), as well as the flow-physics (hydrodynamic instabilities, shocks, acoustics, etc.) one expects to resolve. Insight into dispersion and dissipation error requirements for some common scale-resolving simulation scenarios help to highlight the issues faced in selecting a scheme.

Finite Difference Methods↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Flow Fields of Internally Mixed Exhaust Systems With External Plug For Supersonic Transport Applications

Commercial supersonic vehicles of the future will likely use engines with lower bypass ratios, where the design of the internal mixer will have a strong impact on the noise produced by the jet plume. Their exhaust systems may also feature external plugs to improve boattail angle for cruise performance at supersonic speeds. Currently there are no publicly available empirical noise models for such nozzle systems, and insight into their flow fields will help in creating these models. For those attempting to make large eddy simulations and other higher fidelity methods be their main prediction tool, the internally mixed exhaust system is also a good test case when going beyond simple single-stream jets. The turbulent flow statistics of several configurations previously tested for noise and shocks have been measured for flow conditions that can be used in development of empirical models and validating scale-resolving prediction tools. These measurements are presented and briefly analyzed for insights into the noise impacts from the flow impacts observed.

Turbulence, Jets, Particle Image velocimetry↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Exploring the Accuracy of RANS Simulations for Mars Entry Vehicles

Accurate yet inexpensive predictions of aerodynamic coefficients for Mars entry vehicles have remained a consistent challenge over the past five decades. Below Mach 6, drag on the backshell becomes significant and must be accurately predicted. Steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models are commonly used, despite their poor predictions of backshell pressure. While scale-resolving simulations have shown promise in the past decade, there is still a need for cheap, accurate RANS predictions for large aerodynamic databases. The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) is used as a case study to examine predictive accuracy and known shortcomings for RANS predictions of Mars entry vehicles. Several different grid generation techniques are compared, including a comparison between prismatic boundary layer grids and fully unstructured, tetrahedral grids. Comparisons are made to experimental data for Mach 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5. The accuracy of predicted aerodynamic coefficients is examined. Overpredictions in axial force and drag are explained by a closer examination of the surface pressure. These findings document sensitivities and best practices for future RANS database development of Mars entry vehicles.

RANS↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Flow Fields of Internally Mixed Exhaust Systems With External Plug For Supersonic Transport Applications

Commercial supersonic vehicles of the future will likely use engines with lower bypass ratios, where the design of the internal mixer will have a strong impact on the noise produced by the jet plume. Their exhaust systems may also feature external plugs to improve boattail angle for cruise performance at supersonic speeds. Currently there are no publicly available empirical noise models for such nozzle systems, and insight into their flow fields will help in creating these models. For those attempting to make large eddy simulations and other higher fidelity methods be their main prediction tool, the internally mixed exhaust system is also a good test case when going beyond simple single-stream jets. The turbulent flow statistics of several configurations previously tested for noise and shocks have been measured for flow conditions that can be used in development of empirical models and validating scale-resolving prediction tools. These measurements are presented and briefly analyzed for insights into the noise impacts from the flow impacts observed.

Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Exploring the Accuracy of RANS Simulations for Mars Entry Vehicles

Accurate yet inexpensive predictions of aerodynamic coefficients for Mars entry vehicles have remained a consistent challenge over the past five decades. Below Mach 6, drag on the backshell becomes significant and must be accurately predicted. Steady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models are commonly used, despite their poor predictions of backshell pressure. While scale-resolving simulations have shown promise in the past decade, there is still a need for cheap, accurate RANS predictions for large aerodynamic databases. The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) is used as a case study to examine predictive accuracy and known shortcomings for RANS predictions of Mars entry vehicles. Several different grid generation techniques are compared, including a comparison between prismatic boundary layer grids and fully unstructured, tetrahedral grids. Comparisons are made to experimental data for Mach 2.5, 3.5, and 4.5. The accuracy of predicted aerodynamic coefficients is examined. Overpredictions in axial force and drag are explained by a closer examination of the surface pressure. These findings document sensitivities and best practices for future RANS database development of Mars entry vehicles.

CFD↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparisons of Mixing Efficiency for the Strut Fuel Injector Obtained from Large-Eddy and Reynolds-Averaged Simulations, and Experiments

Mixing efficiency is obtained for a strut fuel injector at hypervelocity flow conditions by using large-eddy simulations (LES), Reynolds-averaged simulations (RAS), and experiments. The injector and flow conditions have been previously investigated by using RAS and experiments as a part of the Enhanced Injection and Mixing Project (EIMP) at the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC). Because the fidelity of LES is a strong function of the grid, the mixing efficiency is obtained on two grids, the coarser of which is a factor of two coarser in each of the three dimensions with respect to the fine grid. The RAS uses the two-equation linear eddy viscosity and diffusivity modeling of Menter. In RAS, the species diffusivity model exhibits a strong dependence on the turbulent Schmidt number, which is often adjusted until some metric of engineering interest, such as the mixing efficiency, matches the experimental data. In the absence of experimental data, scale-resolving simulations, such as LES, have been proposed as surrogates for experiments that could provide the data needed to “calibrate” the turbulent Schmidt number in the RAS models. This approach is followed because LES requires significantly more computational resources (CPU, data storage, and time) than RAS, making it prohibitive for use in many engineering applications and specifically for parameter exploration or optimization. Here we examine the mixing efficiency obtained from several RAS with different values of the turbulent Schmidt number, and compare the results with those obtained from the LES and experiments. In addition, the least squares fitting approach was used to demonstrate how to obtain an estimate for the turbulent Schmidt number from LES analytically. These estimates were then used together with prior knowledge about RAS model sensitivity to select a turbulence model that was expected to best match the LES data.

LES↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Comparisons of Mixing Efficiency for the Strut Fuel Injector Obtained from Large-Eddy and Reynolds-Averaged Simulations, and Experiments

Mixing efficiency is obtained for a strut fuel injector at hypervelocity flow conditions by using large-eddy simulations (LES), Reynolds-averaged simulations (RAS), and experiments. The injector and flow conditions have been previously investigated by using RAS and experiments as a part of the Enhanced Injection and Mixing Project (EIMP) at the NASA Langley Research Center (LaRC). Because the fidelity of LES is a strong function of the grid, the mixing efficiency is obtained on two grids, the coarser of which is a factor of two coarser in each of the three dimensions with respect to the fine grid. The RAS uses the two-equation linear eddy viscosity and diffusivity modeling of Menter. In RAS, the species diffusivity model exhibits a strong dependence on the turbulent Schmidt number, which is often adjusted until some metric of engineering interest, such as the mixing efficiency, matches the experimental data. In the absence of experimental data, scale-resolving simulations, such as LES, have been proposed as surrogates for experiments that could provide the data needed to “calibrate” the turbulent Schmidt number in the RAS models. This approach is followed because LES requires significantly more computational resources (CPU, data storage, and time) than RAS, making it prohibitive for use in many engineering applications and specifically for parameter exploration or optimization. Here we examine the mixing efficiency obtained from several RAS with different values of the turbulent Schmidt number, and compare the results with those obtained from the LES and experiments. In addition, the least squares fitting approach was used to demonstrate how to obtain an estimate for the turbulent Schmidt number from LES analytically. These estimates were then used together with prior knowledge about RAS model sensitivity to select a turbulence model that was expected to best match the LES data.

LES↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Scale Resolving Simulations of Contra Rotating Open Rotor Noise Prediction

The development of breakthrough open-rotor propulsion systems that meet performance, fuel efficiency, and noise requirements for commercial viability relies heavily on the availability of reliable and computationally efficient aerodynamic performance and noise prediction tools.This investigation showcases the proficiency of the structured curvilinear overset grid Computational Fluid Dynamics solver implemented in the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics framework for predicting the aerodynamic and aeroacoustic characteristics of a Contra-RotatingOpen Rotor propulsion system. Additionally, the study includes comprehensive sensitivity analyses employing a Hybrid Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes/Large Eddy Simulation - based scale-resolving turbulence closure treatment. The computed results are validated through comparison with existing experimental measurements.

ARMD↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Aeroacoustic Computations of a Transonic Truss-Braced Wing Aircraft: Part 1 – Aero-dynamic and Airframe Noise Simulations

Computational results are presented for an 8%-scale, full-span, transonic truss-braced wing (TTBW) model simulated as installed in the NASA Langley Research Center 14- by 22-Foot Subsonic Tunnel and in free-air conditions. The simulations were conducted with the lat-tice Boltzmann solver PowerFLOW® to capture the time-accurate characteristics of the flow. The aerodynamic behavior of the aircraft was investigated in the landing configuration, with high-lift devices and landing gear deployed, as well as in the clean (cruise) configuration, with these components stowed. Analyses were performed on local flow quantities, global forces, and time-averaged surface pressures. Aerodynamic quantities were shown to be sensitive to mesh resolution levels, driven by small geometric features inherent to the TTBW model. Flow features of the TTBW model were examined, with the wing/strut configuration of this model presenting unique behaviors generally not found in conventional transport aircraft. Near-field, time-dependent flow quantities obtained from the scale-resolving simulations were used in conjunction with a Ffowcs-Williams and Hawkings integral approach to predict the far-field airframe noise signature of this advanced concept. The effects of permeable data sur-face end caps on the far-field noise spectrum in the flyover direction were determined to be negligible.

Transonic Truss-Braced Wing↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Wall-Modeled Large Eddy Simulations of Transonic Buffet Over a Supercritical Airfoil

A series of scale-resolving simulations of flow over the ONERA OAT15A airfoil have been performed at an angle of attack of 3.5◦, just past the onset of buffet. The focus of this study is to document the sensitivity of the wall-modeled large eddy simulation (WMLES) methodology for curvilinear structured overset grids within the Launch, Ascent, and Vehicle Aerodynamics (LAVA) framework to mesh spacing, mesh distribution, and domain size. A secondary purpose of the study is to compare the results from WMLES to unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier Stokes (URANS) simulations and hybrid RANS-LES (HRLES) within the same LAVA solver framework. The study provides a unique perspective regarding comparisons between different turbulence modeling approaches, time-integration methods, and computational performance since many of the same numerical routines are used for all three types of simulations. The results are compared with experiments and previous numerical studies of the same geometry and flow conditions.

TTT↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

HLPW-5: Overview and Workshop Summary

The Fifth AIAA CFD High-Lift Prediction Workshop was held with the goal of assessing the numerical prediction capability of current-generation computational fluid dynamics (CFD) technology for swept, medium/high-aspect-ratio wings in high-lift configurations. A key aspect of this endeavor was the use of Technology Focus Groups (TFG), which included both mesh generation and flow-solver experts working together to accelerate advancements for their particular CFD methodology, by addressing key questions of importance prior to the workshop. The high-lift version of the NASA Common Research Model (CRM-HL) configuration was the focus of this workshop, and was used for three unique test cases. Wind-tunnel data were available for comparison for one of the test cases. Altogether, 365 datasets of CFD results were submitted by 47 teams, with 41 teams contributing to the multiple configurations of Case 1, 40 to Case 2, and 18 to Case 3. This paper provides a high-level summary of the results and conclusions from the workshop. As concluded from past workshops, fixed-grid Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes methods continued to be inaccurate and inconsistent for high-lift flows near maximum lift. However, application of mesh-adaptation technology helped to achieve improved consistency. Scale-resolving methods appeared most promising for predicting high-lift flow physics, particularly at maximum lift. Best practices for these methods were refined over the course of the workshop and new challenges were identified.

Adam M Clark↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Validation Experiments for Turbulent Separation over an Axisymmetric Body of Revolution

Historically, the flow physics involved with most turbulent separated flows have presented fundamental challenges to validating numerical approaches. As recognized by the CFD Vision 2030 study commissioned by NASA, validation of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models and other scale-resolving methods for turbulent separated flow requires data from advanced, high-fidelity experiments designed specifically for CFD implementation. In accordance with this effort, a new test platform, referred to as the NASA Axisymmetric Afterbody, was designed to obtain detailed measurements of the flow field undergoing a smooth, adverse pressure gradient induced separation for a fixed Reynolds number, Re = 180,000. The parametric body offers a range of flow states progressing from fully attached, to incipient separation, and finally to small-scale separated flow based on variable afterbody geometries. In an initial effort to evaluate RANS turbulence model capabilities, the present configurations of the axisymmetric model host a mild adverse pressure gradient over the contoured boattail section, inducing incipient turbulent separation, as well as a slightly larger adverse pressure gradient, inducing a small-scale region of turbulent separation. Experiments include steady pressure measurements and 2-D PIV to provide the preliminary dataset for simulation studies, which examine the effect of variable grid domains and RANS turbulence models. This is done in an effort to understand and evaluate the critical variability between solutions for the present model configurations. Results indicate potential discrepancies may be due to the effect of the square tunnel test section walls, relatively large blockage ratio, and slight variability in reference parameters. Ongoing work will focus on higher fidelity experimental campaigns to obtain surface flow visualizations and Stereo-Particle Image Velocimetry (SPIV) to deliver higher spatial resolution of the three-dimensional flow field to aid turbulence modelers.

Validation↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

New Capabilities and Improvements to the High-Order Glenn Flux Reconstruction Code

The Glenn Flux Reconstruction (GFR) code is a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code under development at NASA Glenn Research Center. GFR is based on the high-order flux reconstruction (FR) method and provides a large-eddy simulation (LES) capability that is both accurate and efficient for complex aeropropulsion flows. Three significant new capabilities have been added to the code that improve its performance and functionality. First, a variety of explicit Runge-Kutta methods, including some with adaptive time stepping, were added to GFR with two methods offering a 33% improvement in time-to-solution. Second, GFR can now utilize fully unstructured, mixed-element meshes to more easily facilitate the grid generation process for complex geometries. Finally, a rotating reference frame capability has been added to GFR for solving rotating turbomachinery problems. A selection of results demonstrating these new capabilities are presented in this work. The Taylor-Green vortex problem is used to verify the new unstructured capability by showing similar accuracy and resolution for all element types. LES of the Turbulent Heat Flux Phase III (THX3) experiment with comparison to another high-order LES code and a popular Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) code demonstrates the accuracy of the code for complex aeropropulsion flows. Finally, LES of a spacecraft cabin ventilation fan shows the ability of GFR to efficiently establish a fan performance map and identify operating points for further analysis at high orders of accuracy.

High-Order Methods↗

NASA NTRSDate not supplied

New Capabilities and Improvements to the High-Order Glenn Flux Reconstruction Code

The Glenn Flux Reconstruction (GFR) code is a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) code under development at NASA Glenn Research Center. GFR is based on the high-order flux reconstruction (FR) method and provides a large-eddy simulation (LES) capability that is both accurate and efficient for complex aeropropulsion flows. Three significant new capabilities have been added to the code that improve its performance and functionality. First, a variety of explicit Runge-Kutta methods, including some with adaptive time stepping, were added to GFR with two methods offering a 33% improvement in time-to-solution. Second, GFR can now utilize fully unstructured, mixed-element meshes to more easily facilitate the grid generation process for complex geometries. Finally, a rotating reference frame capability has been added to GFR for solving rotating turbomachinery problems. A selection of results demonstrating these new capabilities are presented in this work. The Taylor-Green vortex problem is used to verify the new unstructured capability by showing similar accuracy and resolution for all element types. LES of the Turbulent Heat Flux Phase III (THX3) experiment with comparison to another high-order LES code and a popular Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) code demonstrates the accuracy of the code for complex aeropropulsion flows. Finally, LES of a spacecraft cabin ventilation fan shows the ability of GFR to efficiently establish a fan performance map and identify operating points for further analysis at high orders of accuracy.

Direct Numerical Simulations↗