SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Skylab”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3

All sources NASA NTRS DOE OSTI

NASA NTRS1979

Skylab is falling - Strategies for reentry

Planning for the Skylab reentry, options for influencing the reentry, and a discussion of the Penn State drag modulation scheme are presented. The history of and risks in connection with Skylab reentry, and the NASA and the Penn State schemes for extending Skylab life are discussed. Coordinate systems and equations of motions describing the Skylab attitude motion, aerodynamic damping, and six-degree-of-freedom simulation are considered to derive structural damping models for Skylab, and to determine if stabilization is possible, and if it is, if the TACS (attitude-control) system can retumble the vehicle. It is concluded that at least 12 hours are required to carry out the Penn State drag modulation, and natural stabilization after a period of tumbling is possible but cannot be confirmed due to limitations in the modeling of aerodynamic properties, internal damping, and atmospheric density.

Kaplan, M. H.↗

NASA NTRS1980

Skylab reactivation mission report

On July 11, 1979, Skylab impacted the Earth's surface. The debris dispersion area stretched from the South Eastern Indian Ocean across a sparsely populated section of Western Australia. The events leading to the reentry of Skylab are discussed and a final assessment of the Skylab debris impact footprint is presented. Also included are detailed evaluations of the various Skylab systems that were reactivated when control of Skylab was regained in mid-1978 after having been powered down since February 4, 1974.

Chubb, W. B.↗

NASA NTRS2009

The Skylab Medical Operations Project: Recommendations to Improve Crew Health and Performance for Future Exploration Missions

From May 1973 to February 1974, NASA conducted a series of three human missions to the Skylab space station, which was a voluminous vehicle largely descendant of Apollo hardware and the first U.S. space station. Crew members of these missions spent record-breaking durations of time in microgravity (28, 59, and 84 days, respectively) and gave the U.S. space program its first experiences with long-duration space flight. The program overcame a number of obstacles to conduct a lauded scientific program that encompassed life sciences, astronomy, solar physics, materials sciences, and Earth observation. Yet Skylab has more to offer than the results of these scientific efforts. The operations that were conducted by the crews and ground personnel represent a rich legacy of operational experience. As we plan a return to the moon and subsequent human exploration of Mars, it is essential to use the experiences and insights of those who were involved in previous programs. Skylab and Skylab Medical Experiments Altitude Test personnel possess unique insight into operations that are being planned for the Constellation Program, such as umbilical extravehicular activity and water landing/recovery of long-duration crew members. The Skylab Program was also well known for its habitability and extensive medical suite.

Scheuring, Richard A.↗

NASA NTRS1973

Skylab Student Project: Summary Description

In 1971 the NASA conceived the Skylab student project in an effort to involve the general public in the Skylab program. The primary aim of this project was to stimulate national interest in science and technology. NASA decided to direct the Skylab student project to those young people who have indicated an interest in science and technology and to foster this interest through direct participation in an ongoing program emphasizing as wide a spectrum of science and technology as possible. Skylab, with the opportunity it gives to provide experiments in areas of science and technology provided the ideal opportunity for such participation. In implementing this project, the National Science Teachers Association (NSTA), having an existing, closely associated contact with students, grades 9 through 12, in United States schools, was asked to sponsor, organize, and administer a national competition for high school students. This competition called for individual students (or groups of students) to develop meaningful experiments to be flown on Skylab. To facilitate the organization and administration of this program, the NSTA divided the participating students into their 12 geographical regions with a regional chairmen appointed to receive all proposals for his region. The regional chairmen then appointed a committee of eminent scientists, engineers, and science educators to evaluate each proposal. Some 80,000 applications were requested by teachers and 3409 proposals were submitted. Moreover, because of team proposals, over 4000 students participated and approximately 300 regional winners selected. Each participant received a certification of merit. The 300 winning regional proposals were transmitted to the NSTA headquarters where they were further screened. In March of 1972 twenty-five national winners and 22 special mentions were announced. The 25 winning students were then assigned science advisers at the George C. Marshall Space Flight center (MSFC), the center selected by NASA to be responsible for development of the student project. The Johnson Space Center (JSC) also provided science advisors and valuable support.

Floyd, Henry B.↗

NASA NTRS1972

Formulation of an effective safety design review for the Skylab Program.

The Skylab Program is presenting a unique set of requirements by extending the capabilities of both men and equipment to withstand extended periods of time in space. The progression of space programs which preceded Skylab have provided a set of building blocks of knowledge and experience coupled with an extensive ground test program which makes it possible to plan its flight program without earlier, unmanned test flights. This approach, however, makes it mandatory that to the maximum extent possible, we factor into the design review process all the 'lessons learned' which are applicable. It is this conscious review of the Skylab design, based on checklists prepared from design criteria, gleaned from a variety of sources and experiences, which is the subject of this paper. A brief description of the Skylab Program, its objectives, and the missions planned for it are presented briefly to better understand the degree of extrapolation of hardware development from previous programs.

Cohen, H.↗

NASA NTRS1972

Attitude control of a spinning Skylab.

Active attitude control of a spinning Skylab is analyzed to determine a simple control law that will provide a satisfactory response, considering the dynamics of attached flexible appendages. A simplified model of the complex Skylab vehicle is selected to make it analytically tractable. The vehicle is modeled as a single rigid-core body with two attached flexible massless booms having masses on their tips. The equations of motion describing the attitude dynamics of the model are presented as a linear matrix-differential equation. The states of the vehicle are small perturbations about its steady-state spin. An analysis is performed to determine the domain of stability. Next, attitude dynamics are analyzed; both frequency domain (parameter plane) and time domain (an optimal linear quadratic loss program) techniques are compared. An analysis of the nonlinear effect of control torque saturation of Skylab's control moment gyroscopes is discussed. The results of the analysis compare favorably with a large-scale digital simulation of the Skylab.

Seltzer, S. M.↗

NASA NTRS1972

Skylab

The Skylab program is presented to show the construction of the space vehicle and the facilities provided. The projects to be conducted during Skylab missions are described. The cost of the program is discussed and plans for future Skylab vehicles and missions are analyzed. Photographs of the interior of Skylab simulators are included to clarify the report.

Butler, G. V.↗

NASA NTRS1973

Photointerpretation of Skylab 2 multispectral camera (S-190A) data: Advance report of significant results

The author has identified the following significant results. A significant and possible major economic example of the practical value of Skylab photographs was provided by locating on Skylab Camera Station Number 4, frame 010, SL-2, an area of exposures of limestone rocks which were thought to be completely covered by volcanic rocks based upon prior mapping. The area is located less than 12 miles north of the Ruth porphyry copper deposit, White Pine County, Nevada. This is a major copper producing open pit mine owned by Kennecott Copper Corporation. Geophysical maps consisting of gravity and aeromagnetic studies have been published indicating three large positive magnetic anomalies located at the Ruth ore deposits, the Ward Mountain, not a mineralized area, and in the area previously thought to be completely covered by post-ore volcanics. Skylab photos indicate, however, that erosion has removed volcanic cover in specific sites sufficient to expose the underlying older rocks suggesting, therefore, that the volcanic rocks may not be the cause of the aeromagnetic anomaly. Field studies have verified the initial interpretations made from the Skylab photos. The potential significance of this study is that the large positive aeromagnetic anomaly suggests the presence of cooled and solidified magma below the anomalies, in which ore-bearing solutions may have been derived forming possible large ore deposits.

Jensen, M. L.↗

NASA NTRS1973

Skylab and the Sun

Articles pertaining to the solar studies and the Skylab program are presented, with emphasis on the usefulness of the Apollo Telescope Mount (ATM) program. A description of Skylab objectives and key mission events is included along with articles about the sun. Skylab solar studies which are reported include these topics: ATM solar observatory, scientific instruments, crew operations and crew training, and the joint observing program. The Skylab associated solar programs are also reported.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS1973

Skylab Medical Experiments Altitude Test (SMEAT)

The Skylab Medical Experiments Altitude Test (SMEAT) was an integral part of the Skylab Program. SMEAT served both to gather vital baseline biomedical data and to resolve many of the requirement and procedural problems which otherwise might have impaired Skylab. To all persons and organizations who worked on the SMEAT program, I would like to extend my sincere thanks. The preparation for and completion of SMEAT required individual dedication, a desire to get the job done, and a willingness to go that “second mile.” Without such outstanding performance, it would not have been possible to complete this difficult and complex test program. Everyone should be proud of the contributions which have been made to the Skylab Program.

Richard S Johnston↗

NASA NTRS1973

Mission requirements: Skylab rescue mission SL-R

The Skylab Program includes three low earth orbit missions. These missions are designated SL-1/SL-2,SL-3 and SL-4. In addition to the three nominal Skylab missions, the program includes the Skylab Rescue Mission (SL-R). The SL-R mission is designed to provide a safe return of the Skylab crew in the event the Command Service Module (CSM) becomes disabled while docked to the Saturn Workshop (SWS). Mission requirements for the SL-R mission only are presented. SL-R mission configuration will be a CSM (modified with a field installed kit) manned by two crewmen launched on a Saturn IB Launch Vechicle. The SL-R CSM will rendezvous and dock with the SWS (or Orbital Assembly (OA), consisting of the SWS and disabled CSM, if the disabled CSM has not previously been jettisoned). The SWS configuration includes a Multiple Docking Adapter (MDA), Apollo Telescope Mount (ATM), Airlock Module (AM), and an S-IVB stage (modified as an Orbital Workshop (OWS), previously launched and inserted into orbit on a two-stage Saturn V Launch Vehicle for the SL-1/SL-2 mission.

Source record↗

NASA NTRS1974

Skylab short-lived event alert program

During the three manned Skylab missions, the Center for Short-Lived Phenomena (CSLP) reported a total of 39 significant events to the Johnson Space Center (JSC) as part of the Skylab Short-Lived Event Alert Program. The telegraphed daily status reports included the names and locations of the events, the track number and revolution number during which the event could be observed, the time (GMT) to within plus or minus 2 sec when Skylab was closest to the event area, and the light condition (daylight or darkness) at that time and place. The messages sent to JSC during the Skylab 4 mission also included information pertaining to ground-truth studies and observations being conducted on the events. Photographic priorities were assigned for each event.

Citron, R. A.↗

NASA NTRS1974

Skylab study of water quality

The author has identified the following significant results. Analysis of S-190A imagery from 1 EREP pass over 3 reservoirs in Kansas establishes a strong linear correlation between the red/green radiance ratio and suspended solids. This result compares quite favorably to ERTS MSS CCT results. The linear fits RMS for Skylab is 6 ppm as compared to 12 ppm for ERTS. All of the ERTS satellite passes yielded fairly linear results with typical RMS values of 12 ppm. However, a few of the individual passes did yield RMS values of 5 or 6 ppm which is comparable to the one Skylab pass analyzed. In view of the cloudy conditions in the Skylab photos, yet good results, the indications are that S-190A may do somewhat better than the ERTS MSS in determining suspended load. More S-190A data is needed to confirm this. As was the case with the ERTS MSS, the Skylab S-190A showed no strong correlation with other water quality parameters. S-190B photos because of their high resolution can provide much first look information regarding relative degrees of turbidity within various parts of large lakes and among smaller bodies of water.

Yarger, H. L.↗

NASA NTRS1974

Skylab contamination control

The optical contamination control systems of Skylab are reviewed, covering contamination sources, critical elements, flight hardware configuration, contamination monitoring sensors, mathematical contamination prediction models, contamination cloud and deposition models, and hardware implementation. Also considered are supportive contamination tests, contamination mission support activities, Skylab contamination evaluation, contamination measurement experiments, and the effectiveness of contamination control measures. Sources of contamination are identified, Skylab system susceptibility to contamination is determined, and predictions are made for surface contamination deposition and background brightness levels. Mission evaluation results indicate that, barring anomalous conditions, Skylab mission equipment and activities are adequate to reduce the general contamination level to the sensitivity threshold levels for experiments and affected subsystems.

Davis, C. M.↗

NASA NTRS1974

Management and control of Skylab missions

The flight operations task, as developed in support of the Skylab Program, was evolutionary in nature and, to a great extent, was an orderly extension of the flight control concepts used in the Apollo Program, tempered by the nature of the Skylab Program. During the terminal portion of the Apollo Program, many of the operating concepts proposed for Skylab were tested and used for Apollo support to obtain a realistic evaluation of these new techniques. The principal concept developed in the Apollo Program and augmented in support of the Skylab Program was one wherein a professional operations team would provide support to the scientists in the areas of mission integration, experiment, and experiment support systems, monitoring and control, and data retrieval.

Roach, J. W.↗

NASA NTRS1974

MSFC engineering support to Skylab operations

Major engineering support provided during the Skylab mission from the Marshall Space Flight Center and its contractors to the Mission Control Center at Houston was essential to Skylab success. The need for this type of support was anticipated during premission preparations due to the complexity and first-flight nature of the Skylab, but the requirements were greatly magnified by the problems encountered early in the mission. The MFSC engineering support organization and its interface to the Mission Control Center is described. The importance of close cooperation between the operating and engineering organizations in this type of mission is discussed. Illustrations are given from more than 1800 systems analysis actions worked out during the nine-month Skylab mission by more than 600 support engineers.

Kurtz, H. F., Jr.↗

NASA NTRS1974

Evaluation of Skylab data for land use mapping

The present work compares four multispectral data sets acquired within a 24-hour time period over an area in south-central Indiana in a land use analysis of the study area. Data sets were acquired by the 4-channel multispectral scanner (MSS) on the ERTS satellite, the Earth Resource Environmental Package (EREP) 13-channel MSS on Skylab, the color infrared photography from the EREP camera system, and the black and white multiband photography from the EREP camera system. Overall performance of MSS data sets was better than that of digitized photographic data sets. Digitized color IR data sets were better overall than digitized black and white sets. Also, overall performance of 'optimum' four channels in Skylab MSS data set was essentially the same as that for the ERTS MSS data sets. However, when the four channels in the Skylab MSS which most nearly correspond to those in the ERTS MSS were used, overall performance of Skylab MSS data set was significantly lower than that for the ERTS MSS.

Biehl, L. L.↗

NASA NTRS1974

Operational aspects of Skylab Student Project experiments

The activities associated with the operational aspects ot the Skylab Student Project experiments began with the participation of flight operations personnel on the National Science Teachers Association Selection Board and ended with the performance of the student experiments by the Skylab flightcrews. The operational criteria used during the compatibility analysis to determine which of the 25 national winners could be flown on board the Skylab vehicle are reviewed, the factors involved in the assignment of the experiments to Skylab missions are discussed, the activities associated with training the flightcrews in the operation of the student experiments are described, and the actual performance of the experiments during the mission and the associated ground operations in the Mission Control Center are detailed.

Macleod, J. B.↗