Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Solid electrolyte”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2020

Encapsulated sulfide glass solid electrolytes and solid-state laminate electrode assemblies

Nanofilm-encapsulated sulfide glass solid electrolyte structures and methods for making the encapsulated glass structures involve a lithium ion conducting sulfide glass sheet encapsulated on its opposing major surfaces by a continuous and conformal nanofilm made by atomic layer deposition (ALD). During manufacture, the reactive surfaces of the sulfide glass sheet are protected from deleterious reaction with ambient moisture, and the nanofilm can be configured to provide additional performance advantages, including enhanced mechanical strength and improved chemical resistance.

Visco, Steven J.↗
DOE OSTI2022

Encapsulated sulfide glass solid electrolytes and solid-state laminate electrode assemblies

Nanofilm-encapsulated sulfide glass solid electrolyte structures and methods for making the encapsulated glass structures involve a lithium ion conducting sulfide glass sheet encapsulated on its opposing major surfaces by a continuous and conformal nanofilm made by atomic layer deposition (ALD). During manufacture, the reactive surfaces of the sulfide glass sheet are protected from deleterious reaction with ambient moisture, and the nanofilm can be configured to provide additional performance advantages, including enhanced mechanical strength and improved chemical resistance.

Visco, Steven J.↗
DOE OSTI2023

Boosting the interfacial superionic conduction of halide solid electrolytes for all-solid-state batteries

Designing highly conductive and (electro)chemical stable inorganic solid electrolytes using cost-effective materials is crucial for developing all-solid-state batteries. Here, we report halide nanocomposite solid electrolytes (HNSEs) ZrO 2 (-ACl)-A 2 ZrCl 6 (A = Li or Na) that demonstrate improved ionic conductivities at 30 °C, from 0.40 to 1.3 mS cm -1 and from 0.011 to 0.11 mS cm -1 for Li + and Na + , respectively, compared to A 2 ZrCl 6 , and improved compatibility with sulfide solid electrolytes. The mechanochemical method employing Li 2 O for the HNSEs synthesis enables the formation of nanostructured networks that promote interfacial superionic conduction. Via density functional theory calculations combined with synchrotron X-ray and 6 Li nuclear magnetic resonance measurements and analyses, we demonstrate that interfacial oxygen-substituted compounds are responsible for the boosted interfacial conduction mechanism. Compared to state-of-the-art Li 2 ZrCl 6 , the fluorinated ZrO 2 -2Li 2 ZrCl 5 F HNSE shows improved high-voltage stability and interfacial compatibility with Li 6 PS 5 Cl and layered lithium transition metal oxide-based positive electrodes without detrimentally affecting Li + conductivity. We also report the assembly and testing of a Li-In||LiNi 0.88 Co 0.11 Mn 0.01 O 2 all-solid-state lab-scale cell operating at 30 °C and 70 MPa and capable of delivering a specific discharge of 115 mAh g -1 after almost 2000 cycles at 400 mA g -1 .

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2020

NASICON Li 1.2 Mg 0.1 Zr 1.9 (PO 4 ) 3 Solid Electrolyte for an All‐Solid‐State Li‐Metal Battery

Abstract A thin solid electrolyte with a high Li + conductivity is used to separate the metallic lithium anode and the cathode in an all‐solid‐state Li‐metal battery. However, most solid Li‐ion electrolytes have a small electrochemical stability window, large interfacial resistance, and cannot block lithium‐dendrite growth when lithium is plated on charging of the cell. Mg 2+ stabilizes a rhombohedral NASICON‐structured solid electrolyte of the formula Li 1.2 Mg 0.1 Zr 1.9 (PO 4 ) 3 (LMZP). This solid electrolyte has Li‐ion conductivity two orders of magnitude higher at 25 °C than that of the triclinic LiZr 2 (PO 4 ) 3 . 7 Li and 6 Li NMR confirm the Li‐ions in two different crystallographic sites of the NASICON framework with 85% of the Li‐ions having a relatively higher mobility than the other 15%. The anode–electrolyte interface is further investigated with symmetric Li/LMZP/Li cell testing, while the cathode–electrolyte interface is explored with an all‐solid‐state Li/LMZP/LiFePO 4 cell. The enhanced performance of these cells enabled by the Li 1.2 Mg 0.1 Zr 1.9 (PO 4 ) 3 solid electrolyte is stable upon repeated charge/discharge cycling.

Zhou, Qiongyu↗
DOE OSTI2016

Computational Exploration of the Li-Electrode|Electrolyte Interface in the Presence of a Nanometer Thick Solid-Electrolyte Interphase Layer [Computational exploration of the Li-electrode|electrolyte interface complicated by a nanometer thin solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer]

A nanometer thick passivation layer will spontaneously form on Li-metal in battery applications due to electrolyte reduction reactions. This passivation layer in rechargeable batteries must have “selective” transport properties: blocking electrons from attacking the electrolytes, while allowing Li + ion to pass through so the electrochemical reactions can continue. The classical description of the electrochemical reaction, Li + + e → Li 0 , occurring at the Li-metal|electrolyte interface is now complicated by the passivation layer and will reply on the coupling of electronic and ionic degrees of freedom in the layer. We consider the passivation layer, called “solid electrolyte interphase (SEI)”, as “the most important but the least understood in rechargeable Li-ion batteries,” partly due to the lack of understanding of its structure–property relationship. In predictive modeling, starting from the ab initio level, we find that it is an important tool to understand the nanoscale processes and materials properties governing the interfacial charge transfer reaction at the Li-metal|SEI|electrolyte interface. Here, we demonstrate pristine Li-metal surfaces indeed dissolve in organic carbonate electrolytes without the SEI layer. Based on joint modeling and experimental results, we point out that the well-known two-layer structure of SEI also exhibits two different Li + ion transport mechanisms. The SEI has a porous (organic) outer layer permeable to both Li + and anions (dissolved in electrolyte), and a dense (inorganic) inner layer facilitate only Li + transport. This two-layer/two-mechanism diffusion model suggests only the dense inorganic layer is effective at protecting Li-metal in electrolytes. This model suggests a strategy to deconvolute the structure–property relationships of the SEI by analyzing an idealized SEI composed of major components, such as Li 2 CO 3 , LiF, Li 2 O, and their mixtures. After sorting out the Li+ ion diffusion carriers and their diffusion pathways, we design methods to accelerate the Li + ion conductivity by doping and by using heterogonous structure designs. We will predict the electron tunneling barriers and connect them with measurable first cycle irreversible capacity loss. We note that the SEI not only affects Li + and e – transport, but it can also impose a potential drop near the Li-metal|SEI interface. Our challenge is to fully describe the electrochemical reactions at the Li - metal|SEI|electrolyte interface. This will be the subject of ongoing efforts.

30 DIRECT ENERGY CONVERSION↗
DOE OSTI2021

Recent progress in understanding solid electrolyte interphase on lithium metal anode

Lithium (Li) metal batteries (LMBs) are among the most promising candidates of next-generation high-energy-density rechargeable batteries. Solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) on Li metal anode plays a significant role which influences the Li deposition morphology and the cycle life of LMBs. Although SEI is the most important part, a thorough understanding of SEI is inadequate. In this review, we focus on the progresses of understanding on structures, properties and influencing factors of SEI as well as efficient strategies of tailoring SEI. First, the compositions, models and recent progresses on characterizing atomic structure of SEI are summarized. Second, the properties of SEI, including electronic conduction, ionic conduction, stability and mechanical properties are elucidated. Structures and properties of SEI are greatly influenced by multiple factors such as solvent, salt, additive, solvation structure, impurity, current density, temperature, pressure and capacity utilization. Thus, interactions between these factors and SEI are comprehensively discussed. Correlations of SEI with Li deposition morphology, rate capability and cycle life are further summarized. Moreover, efficient strategies of tailoring SEI with desired properties, including in-situ SEI and ex-situ SEI are also reviewed. Despite the significant progresses that have been achieved in the researches of SEI, better understanding of SEI is still highly demand. Finally, future directions especially in-operando techniques, multi-modality approaches for characterization of SEI and artificial intelligence assisted understanding of correlation between electrolyte components and SEI properties are proposed.

Wu, Haiping↗
DOE OSTI2020

Excellent cycling stability of sodium anode enabled by a stable solid electrolyte interphase formed in ether-based electrolytes

Sodium (Na)-ion batteries have been considered as one of the most promising power sources beyond Li-ion batteries. Although Na metal anode exhibits a high theoretical capacity of 1165 mAh g-1, its application on Na batteries is largely hindered by dendrite growth and low Coulombic efficiency. Herein, we demonstrate that an electrolyte consists of 1 M sodium tetrafluoroborate in Tetraglyme can enable excellent cycling efficiency (99.9 %) of Na metal anode for more than 1000 cycles. This high reversibility of Na anode can be attributed to a stable solid electrolyte interphase formed on Na surface as revealed by cryogenic transmission electron microscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. These electrolytes also enabled excellent cycling stability of Na||hard carbon cells and Na||Na2/3Co1/3Mn2/3O2 cells at high rate with very high coulombic efficiencies.

sodium metal, TEGDME, solid electrolyte interphase↗
DOE OSTI2015

Characterizing Solid Electrolyte Interphase on Sn Anode in Lithium Ion Battery

Tin (Sn) nanoparticle electrodes have been prepared and battery cycling performance has been investigated with 1.2 M LiPF6 in ethylene carbonate (EC) / diethyl carbonate (DEC) electrolyte (1:1, w/w) with and without added vinylene carbonate (VC) or fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC). Incorporation of either VC or FEC improves the capacity retention of Sn nanoparticle electrodes although incorporation of VC also results in a significant increase in cell impedance. The best electrochemical performance was observed with electrolyte containing 10% of added FEC. In order to develop a better understanding of the role of the electrolyte in capacity retention and solid electrolyte interface (SEI) structure, ex-situ surface analysis has been performed on cycled electrodes with infrared (IR) spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), and Hard XPS (HAXPES). The ex-situ analysis reveals a correlation between electrochemical performance, electrolyte composition, and SEI structure.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Paradigms of frustration in superionic solid electrolytes

Superionic solid electrolytes have widespread use in energy devices, but the fundamental motivations for fast ion conduction are often elusive. In this Perspective, we draw upon atomistic simulations of a wide range of superionic conductors to illustrate some ways frustration can lower diffusion cation barriers in solids. Based on our studies of halides, oxides, sulfides and hydroborates and a survey of published reports, we classify three types of frustration that create competition between different local atomic preferences, thereby flattening the diffusive energy landscape. These include chemical frustration, which derives from competing factors in the anion–cation interaction; structural frustration, which arises from lattice arrangements that induce site distortion or prevent cation ordering; and dynamical frustration, which is associated with temporary fluctuations in the energy landscape due to anion reorientation or cation reconfiguration. For each class of frustration, we provide detailed simulation analyses of various materials to show how ion mobility is facilitated, resulting in stabilizing factors that are both entropic and enthalpic in origin. We propose the use of these categories as a general construct for classifying frustration in superionic conductors and discuss implications for future development of suitable descriptors and improvement strategies.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2020

Solvent oligomerization pathways facilitated by electrolyte additives during solid-electrolyte interphase formation

The solid–electrolyte interphase (SEI) layer formation is known to play an important role in determining the lifetime of lithium-ion batteries. A thin, stable SEI layer is linked to overall improved battery performance and longevity, however, the factors and mechanisms that lead to optimal SEI morphology and composition are not well understood. Inclusion of electrolyte additives (fluoroethylene carbonate, FEC; and vinylene carbonate, VC) is often necessary for improving SEI characteristics. To understand how these electrolyte additives impact SEI formation, we employed molecular dynamics (MD) and density functional theory (DFT) simulations to study the reaction networks and oligomerization pathways, respectively, for three systems containing ethylene carbonate (EC), a lithium ion, and FEC or VC. MD simulations suggest radical oligomerization pathways analogous to traditional oligomerization with nucleophilic alkoxide species via SN1 reaction mechanisms. Both S N 1 and S N 2 mechanisms were studied for all three systems using DFT. Oligomerization reactions were studied with both a standard alkoxide species and a ring-opened EC radical as the nucleophiles and EC, FEC, and VC as the electrophiles. For all cases, FEC and VC exhibited lower free energy barriers and more stable adducts when compared with EC. We conclude that one of the role of additives is to modify the oligomerization process of EC by introducing branching points (FEC) or termination points (VC).

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗
DOE OSTI2017

In Situ Chemical Imaging of Solid-Electrolyte Interphase Layer Evolution in Li–S Batteries

Parasitic reactions of electrolyte and polysulfide with the Li-anode in lithium sulfur (Li-S) batteries lead to the for-mation of solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) layers, which are the major reason behind severe capacity fading in these systems. Despite numerous studies, the evolution mechanism of the SEI layer and specific roles of polysulfides and oth-er electrolyte components are still unclear. We report an in-situ X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and chemical imaging analysis combined with ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) computational modeling to gain fundamental understanding regarding the evolution of SEI layers on Li-anodes within Li-S batteries. A multi-modal approach in-volving AIMD modeling and in-situ XPS characterization uniquely reveals the chemical identity and distribution of active participants in parasitic reactions as well as the SEI layer evolution mechanism. The SEI layer evolution has three major stages: the formation of a primary composite mixture phase involving stable lithium compounds (Li2S, LiF, Li2O etc); and formation of a secondary matrix type phase due to cross interaction between reaction products and elec-trolyte components, which is followed by a highly dynamic mono-anionic polysulfide (i.e. LiS5) fouling process. These new molecular-level insights into the SEI layer evolution on Li- anodes are crucial for delineating effective strategies for the development of Li–S batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗