Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Solid electrolyte interface”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3

TiO 2 Microboxes with Controlled Internal Porosity for High‐Performance Lithium Storage

Abstract Titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) is considered a promising anode material for high‐power lithium ion batteries (LIBs) because of its low cost, high thermal/chemical stability, and good safety performance without solid electrolyte interface formation. However, the poor electronic conductivity and low lithium ion diffusivity of TiO 2 result in poor cyclability and lithium ion depletion at high current rates, which hinder them from practical applications. Herein we demonstrate that hierarchically structured TiO 2 microboxes with controlled internal porosity can address the aforementioned problems for high‐power, long‐life LIB anodes. A self‐templating method for the synthesis of mesoporous microboxes was developed through Na 2 EDTA‐assisted ion exchange of CaTiO 3 microcubes. The resulting TiO 2 nanorods were organized into microboxes that resemble the microcube precursors. This nanostructured TiO 2 material has superior lithium storage properties with a capacity of 187 mAh g −1 after 300 cycles at 1 C and good rate capabilities up to 20 C.

Gao, Xuehui↗

Direct Prelithiation of Silicon-Based Composite Electrodes via Island-like Thermal Evaporation

Irreversible losses of Li during solid electrolyte interface (SEI) conditioning is a key contributor to the lower specific capacities observed in silicon-containing Li-ion batteries. Herein, thermal evaporation of between 1 and 20 µm of Li onto Si-based composite anodes has been investigated as a prelithiation method to account for such losses. To account for mechanical strain caused by Li-Si alloying during the deposition, a stainless-steel mesh is applied to the electrodes before prelithiation to form “island-like” deposition on the electrode surface. The open circuit potential was also found to decrease as a function of increased Li evaporation, consistent with the potentials of electrochemically prepared LixSi alloys. Prelithiating to account for irreversible Li losses to SEI formation resulted in full cells with a 15.8% increase in initial coulombic efficiency and a 47.8% reduction in irreversible capacity loss after SEI formation cycling. Subsequent C/3 cycling showed up to a 62.9% increase in specific capacity in prelithiated cells. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) revealed differences in the SEI composition that was formed by electrochemical cycling and reactively formed in prelithiated cells upon exposure to Gen2 + 3% FEC electrolyte. The reactively formed SEI from the spontaneous reaction with lithiated silicon was carbonate-rich while the electrochemical SEI formation showed significantly more LiPFx species, which could play a role in overall cycling performance.

Musgrove, Amanda↗

Recent progress and future prospects of atomic layer deposition to prepare/modify solid-state electrolytes and interfaces between electrodes for next-generation lithium batteries

Lithium ion batteries (LIBs) are encouraging electrochemical devices with remarkable properties including a high energy/power density, fast charging capability, and low self-discharge rate. Further increase in energy density as well as safe usage is needed for next-generation LIBs in electric transportation vehicles. Solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) are very promising for high-performance LIBs since they enable improved safety along with increased energy density compared to flammable liquid organic electrolytes. However, utilizing SSEs with a Li metal anode is very challenging due to the possibility of undesired side reactions and the formation of an unstable solid-electrolyte interphase. Therefore, it is critical to enhance the stability of SSEs against the Li anode. One feasible approach is to form a thin and conductive interlayer between the Li anode and solid-state electrolyte. Atomic layer deposition (ALD) is a unique technique for conformal coating of complex 3D structures with finely controlled film thickness (at the atomic scale). ALD coating on the surface of SSEs can be adopted for engineering solid-electrolyte interfaces with desired attributes and improved stability. In this review paper, we have discussed recent progress in implementing the ALD technique for depositing thin layers on various SSE configurations including lithium phosphorus oxynitride (LiPON), garnets, oxides, perovskites, sulphides, Li 3 BO 3 –Li 2 CO 3 (LBCO), and sodium super ionic conductors (NASICON). We have also highlighted the major areas for future research and development in the field. We believe that this review will be very helpful for directing future research on implementing ALD for synthesizing stable and high-performance SSEs with an engineered solid-electrolyte interface for next-generation electrochemical devices (e.g., Li-ion batteries, supercapacitors, and flow batteries).

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Stabilizing the Garnet Solid-Electrolyte/Polysulfide Interface in Li–S Batteries

Chemical and physical short circuits are the main challenges faced by lithium batteries which compromise battery performance and safety. At the cathode, solvation of active cathode materials and shuttling of unwanted chemical species in the liquid electrolyte result in “chemical short circuits”, which deteriorate the Li metal electrode and limit the deployment of new cathode materials, such as high voltage cathodes, sulfur, and air/O 2 . In Li–S batteries, the repeated shuttling of polysulfides between electrodes constantly corrodes the Li metal anode and the loss of active material will result in low Coulombic efficiency. At the anode, Li dendrite penetration through the separator causes internal electronic, or “physical”, short circuits. Finally, several strategies have been reported to prevent chemical and physical short circuits by using a cathode host, small sulfur molecules, modified separators, or electrolyte additives to alleviate sulfur materials diffusion and shuttling, and finding ways to delay, confine, or block Li dendrites to extend the cycling lifetime and avoid thermal runaway in lithium metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Li 2 OHCl crystalline electrolyte for stable metallic lithium anodes

In a classic example of stability from instability, we show that Li 2 OHCl solid electrolyte forms a stable solid electrolyte interface (SEI) with metallic lithium anode. The Li 2 OHCl solid electrolyte can be readily achieved through simple mixing of air-stable LiOH and LiCl precursors with a mild processing temperature under 400 °C. Additionally, we show that continuous, dense Li 2 OHCl membranes can be fabricated at temperatures less than 400 °C, standing in great contrast to current processing temperatures of over 1600 °C for most oxide-based solid electrolytes. The ionic conductivity and Arrhenius activation energy were explored for the LiOH-LiCl system of crystalline solid electrolytes where Li 2 OHCl with increased crystal defects was found to have the highest ionic conductivity and reasonable Arrhenius activation energy. The Li 2 OHCl solid electrolyte displays stability against metallic lithium, even in extreme conditions past the melting point of lithium metal. Furthermore, to understand this excellent stability, we show that SEI formation is critical in stabilizing the interface between metallic lithium and the Li 2 OHCl solid electrolyte.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Cathode electrolyte interface enabling stable Li–S batteries

A high-concentration, ether-based electrolyte with LiTFSI and LiNO 3 as the co-salts is proposed, which enables stable cycling of a lithium metal battery using sulfurized polyacrylonitrile (SPAN) as the cathode material. In addition to providing excellent protection for lithium metal anodes by forming the solid electrolyte interface (SEI), the electrolyte promotes the formation of a crystalline cathode electrolyte interface (CEI) on the SPAN surface composed of LiF and LiNO 2 . The CEI effectively prevents the formation of soluble polysulfide species and enables stable cycling of the Li-SPAN battery. The benefit of having effective CEI and SEI layers is also demonstrated in Li-SPAN cells with limited lithium supply, which exhibit lithium cycling efficiency values consistent with or exceeding Li/Cu test results, reaching 99.5%. In conclusion, the development of electrolyte chemistries to enable the formation of effective CEI layers is a promising approach to long-life lithium metal batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Electroanalytical Exploration of Li Loss at the Solid Electrolyte-Anode Interface in Anode-Free Batteries with Polymer Electrolytes

Li loss during cycling at the solid electrolyte|anode interface strongly determines the cycle life of anode-free solid-state batteries (SSBs). Here, this loss is probed electroanalytically for polymer electrolyte (PE)-based SSBs in anode-free coin cells with practical pressures. A wide range of parameters expected to impact the measured average coulombic efficiency (CE) were explored to estimate the expected range of performance. These factors include PE type, cycling profiles, current collector type, and the presence of a thin Li seed layer. Further, low CE values in the ~50%–85% range are observed for all electrolytes and test conditions. Other than the electrolyte type, a strong dependence of the CE on the electrochemical cycling profile and the type of metallic current collector is observed. Compared to the anode-free setup, the presence of a thin (5 μ m) Li seed layer did not improve the average CE for two out of three PEs, suggesting its presence to be a weak contributor in minimizing the Li loss. This work provides baseline data on the Li losses in low-pressure anode-free configuration cells with PEs.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Garnet-Type Solid-State Electrolytes: Materials, Interfaces, and Batteries

Solid-state batteries with desirable advantages, including high-energy density, wide temperature tolerance, and fewer safety-concerns, have been considered as a promising energy storage technology to replace organic liquid electrolyte-dominated Li-ion batteries. Solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) as the most vital component in solid-state batteries largely lead the future battery development. Among different types of solid-state electrolytes, garnet-type Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) solid-state electrolytes have particularly high ionic conductivity (10 –3 to 10 –4 S/cm) and good chemical stability against Li metal, offering a great opportunity for solid-state Li-metal batteries. Since the discovery of garnet-type LLZO in 2007, there has been an increasing interest in the development of garnet-type solid-state electrolytes and all solid-state batteries. Garnet-type electrolyte has been considered one of the most promising and important solid-state electrolytes for batteries with potential benefits in energy density, electrochemical stability, high temperature stability, and safety. In this Review, we will survey recent development of garnet-type LLZO electrolytes with discussions of experimental studies and theoretical results in parallel, LLZO electrolyte synthesis strategies and modifications, stability of garnet solid electrolytes/electrodes, emerging nanostructure designs, degradation mechanisms and mitigations, and battery architectures and integrations. We will also provide a target-oriented research overview of garnet-type LLZO electrolyte and its application in various types of solid-state battery concepts (e.g., Li-ion, Li–S, and Li–air), and we will demonstrate opportunities and perspectives as guides for future development of solid electrolytes and solid-state batteries.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

In Situ Formation of Li 3 P Layer Enables Fast Li + Conduction across Li/Solid Polymer Electrolyte Interface

Abstract Solid‐state polymer electrolytes provide better flexibility and electrode contact than their ceramic counterparts, making them a worthwhile pursuit for all‐solid‐state lithium‐metal batteries. However, their large Li/solid state electrolyte interfacial resistance, small critical current density, and rapid lithium dendrite growth during cycling still limit their viability. Owing to these restrictions, all‐solid‐state cells with solid polymer electrolytes must be cycled above room‐temperature and with a small current density. These problems can be mitigated with an in situ formed artificial solid electrolyte interphase that rapidly conducts Li + ions. Herein, a Li 3 P layer formed in situ at the Li‐metal/solid polymer electrolyte interphase is reported that significantly reduces the electrode/electrolyte interfacial resistance. Additionally, this layer increases the wettability of the solid polymer by the metallic lithium anode, allowing for the critical current density of lithium symmetric cells to be doubled by homogenizing the current density at the interface. All‐solid‐state Li/Li symmetric cells and Li/LiFePO 4 cells with the Li 3 P layer show improved cycling performance with a high current density.

Wu, Nan↗

Improved electrochemical and thermal performances of layered Li[Li 0.2 Ni 0.17 Co 0.07 Mn 0.56 ]O 2 via Li 2 ZrO 3 surface modification

We successfully coated a conductive Li 2 ZrO 3 layer on the surface of Li-rich layered cathode Li[Li 0.2 Ni 0.17 Co 0.07 Mn 0.56 ]O 2 in order to enhance its electrochemical performances. For the crystal structures, electrochemical properties and thermal stabilities of the bare and coated materials are studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD), field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM), high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), electron diffraction spectroscopy (EDS), inductively coupled plasma (ICP), galvanostatic cycling, cyclic voltammetry (CV), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). We found that the electrochemical performances of Li-rich cathode material are obviously improved by Li 2 ZrO 3 surface modification. Especially, the 1 wt.% Li 2 ZrO 3 -coated material demonstrates the best cycling performance, with capacity retention of 89% after 50 cycles, much better than that of the pristine one, 64%. Intensive explorations indicate that the improved electrochemical properties can be attributed to the Li 2 ZrO 3 surface layer, which not only stabilizes the cathode structure by decreasing the loss of oxygen, but also protects the Li-rich cathode material from side reaction(s) with the electrolyte and thus suppressing the fast growth of solid electrolyte interface (SEI) film on the surface of oxide particles.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Design principles for self-forming interfaces enabling stable lithium-metal anodes

Significance It is possible to nearly double the energy density of existing lithium-ion batteries by using lithium metal anodes. However, it has been known for decades that the lithium dendrites and mossy lithium formed during charging (electrodeposition) limit the cycle life of the batteries. It is important to change the growth behavior of lithium metal, which is closely related to the properties of the solid–electrolyte interface (SEI) formed via spontaneous reactions between the lithium metal and the electrolyte. In this experimental-modeling integrated study, we reveal the design principles of the SEI that facilitates the dendrite-free and dense deposition of lithium and demonstrate one of the best cycling performances of lithium metal anode to date under practically relevant conditions.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Superoxide (Electro)Chemistry on Well-Defined Surfaces in Organic Environments

Efficient chemical transformations in energy conversion and storage systems depend on understanding superoxide anion (O 2 – ) electrochemistry at atomic and molecular levels. Here, in this work, a combination of experimental and theoretical techniques are used for rationalizing, and ultimately understanding, the complexity of superoxide anion (electro)chemistry in organic environments. By exploring the O 2 + e – ↔ O 2 – reaction on well-characterized metal single crystals (Au, Pt, Ir), Pt single crystal modified with a single layer of graphene (Graphene@Pt(111)), and glassy carbon (GC) in 1,2 dimethoxyethane (DME) electrolytes, we demonstrate that (i) the reaction is an outer-sphere process; (ii) the reaction product O 2 – can “attack” any part of the DME molecule, i.e., the C–O bond via nucleophilic reaction and the C–H bond via radical hydrogen abstraction; (iii) the adsorption of carbon-based decomposition products and the extent of formation of a “solid electrolyte interface” (“SEI”) increases in the same order as the reactivity of the substrate, i.e., Pt(hkl)/Ir(hkl) » Au(hkl)/GC > Gaphene@Pt(111); and (iv) the formation of the “SEI” layer leads to irreversible superoxide electrochemistry on Pt(hkl) and Ir(hkl) surfaces. In conclusion, we believe this fundamental insight provides a pathway for the rational design of stable organic solvents that are urgently needed for the development of a new generation of reliable and affordable battery systems.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Understanding the Role of SEI Layer in Low-Temperature Performance of Lithium-Ion Batteries

Low-temperature electrolytes (LTEs) have been considered as one of the most challenging aspects for the wide adoption of lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) since the SOA electrolytes cannot sufficiently support the redox reactions at LT resulting in dramatic performance degradation. Although many attempts have been taken by employing various noncarbonate solvent electrolytes, there was a lack of fundamental understanding of the limiting factors for low-temperature operations (e.g., -20 to -40 degrees C). Here, the crucial role of the solid-electrolyte-interface (SEI) in LIB performance at low temperature using a butyronitrile (BN)-based electrolyte was demonstrated. These results suggested that an additive formed SEI with low resistance and low charge transfer dictates the LT performance in terms of capacity and cycle life, presenting a useful guideline in designing new electrolytes to address the LT issue.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Understanding the Origin of the Ultrahigh Rate Performance of a SiO 2 -Modified LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 Cathode for Lithium-Ion Batteries

LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 (LNMO) is one of the most promising cathode materials for next-generation lithium-ion batteries for rapid charging-discharge applications. The surfaces of LNMO samples are coated with different amounts (0.5-2.0 wt. %) of silica (SiO 2 ) using a cost-effective and scalable ball milling process, and the surface-modified samples showing excellent electrochemical stability with conventional liquid electrolyte. The advantage of this coating is clearly demonstrated by the improved electrochemical performance at ambient and elevated temperatures (25 °C and 55 °C) using half- and full-cell configurations. The solid electrolyte interface (SEI) and coating properties have been highlighted by Ex situ TEM analysis, which indicates the close attachment and good wetting of the SiO 2 layer with the LNMO active particles. Importantly, the 1 wt. % SiO 2 -coated material cycled at 10 C, 40 C and 80 C rates for 400 cycles and excellent cycling stability with capacity retentions of 96.7, 87.9 and 82.4 %, respectively. The 1 wt. % SiO 2 -coated material also shows excellent cycling stability when charged at 6C (10 min.) and discharged at C /3 for 500 cycles. Here, the interfacial resistances of the SiO 2 -coated LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 is found to be much lower compared to bare material and does not considerably increase with the amount of coating. Overall, the scalable and cost-effective strategy of SiO 2 coating applied to LiNi 0.5 Mn 1.5 O 4 lowers the interfacial charge transfer resistance and enables the materials to be suitable for extremely fast-charging electric vehicle battery applications.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Delineating the Roles of Mn, Al, and Co by Comparing Three Layered Oxide Cathodes with the Same Nickel Content of 70% for Lithium-Ion Batteries

High-nickel layered oxides continue to prevail in the energy storage market as the frontmost cathode candidates for next-generation lithium-ion batteries. Demand and development of LiNi 1–x–y Mn x Co y O 2 (NMC) and LiNi 1–x–y Co x Al y O 2 (NCA) cathodes are rampantly increasing, particularly for the electric vehicle (EV) industry. However, the continued presence of cobalt in NMC and NCA cathodes raises global concerns due to geopolitical and ethical issues attributed to Co sourcing. We herein introduce a novel cobalt-free, high-nickel cathode LiNi 0.7 Mn 0.25 Al 0.05 O 2 (NMA70) and benchmark it against Co-containing LiNi 0.7 Mn 0.15 Co 0.15 O 2 (NMC70) as well as Co- and Al-free LiNi 0.7 Mn 0.3 O 2 (NM70) cathodes with equivalent 70% Ni contents that are all synthesized in-house. NMA70 displays a high initial C/10 capacity of 210 mA h g –1 , matching that of NMC70 in half cells with a cutoff voltage of 4.5 V. NMA70 also exhibits an impressive high-voltage full cell cycling performance with a cutoff voltage of 4.4 V with a nearly identical capacity retention of 83% compared to that of 82% for NMC70 after 300 cycles. Postmortem X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscopy (HAADF-STEM), and electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS) analyses indicate a thinner cathode–electrolyte interface (CEI) developed in NMA70 compared to that in NM70 and unveil a more robust solid-electrolyte interface (SEI) passivation on the graphite anode among all samples. The benefits of Al doping are additionally highlighted with enhanced high-voltage CEI and thermal stabilities in NMA70. Furthermore, this work assesses the roles of Mn, Al, and Co to demonstrate both the practicality and feasibility of synthesizing cobalt-free, high-nickel cathodes that are promising alternatives to current NMC- and NCA-based cathodes.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Interface potentials inside solid-state batteries: Origins and implications

Interface resistance has become a significant bottleneck for solid-state batteries (SSBs). Most studies of interface resistance have focused on extrinsic mechanisms such as interface reactions and imperfect contact between electrodes and solid electrolytes. Interface potentials are an important intrinsic mechanism that is often ignored. Here, we highlight Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) as a tool to image the local potential at interfaces inside SSBs, examining the existing literature and discussing challenges in interpretation. Drawing analogies with electron transport in metal/semiconductor interfaces, we showcase a formalism that predicts intrinsic ionic resistance based on the properties of the contacting phases, and we emphasize that future battery designs should start from material pairs with low intrinsic resistance. Here, we conclude by outlining future directions in the study of interface potentials through both theory and experiment.

25 ENERGY STORAGE↗

Thermally Driven Interfacial Degradation between Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 Electrolyte and LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 Cathode

Solid-state batteries offer higher energy density and enhanced safety compared to the present lithium-ion batteries using liquid electrolytes. A challenge to implement them is the high resistances, especially at the solid electrolyte interface with the cathode. Sintering at elevated temperature is needed in order to get good contact between the ceramic solid electrolyte and oxide cathodes and thus to reduce contact resistances. Many solid electrolyte and cathode materials react to form secondary phases. It is necessary to find out which phases arise as a result of interface sintering and evaluate their effect on electrochemical properties. Herein, we assessed the interfacial reactions between LiNi 0.6 Mn 0.2 Co 0.2 O 2 (NMC622) and Li 7 La 3 Zr 2 O 12 (LLZO) as a function of temperature in air. We prepared model systems by depositing thin-film NMC622 cathode layers on LLZO pellets. The thin-film cathode approach enabled us to use interface-sensitive techniques such as X-ray absorption spectroscopy in the near-edge as well as the extended regimes and identify the onset of detrimental reactions. We found that the Ni and Co chemical environments change already at moderate temperatures, on-setting from 500 °C and becoming especially prominent at 700 °C. By analyzing spectroscopy results along with X-ray diffraction, we identified Li 2 CO 3 , La 2 Zr 2 O 7 , and La(Ni,Co)O 3 as the secondary phases that formed at 700 °C. The interfacial resistance for Li transfer, measured by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy, increases significantly upon the onset and evolution of the detected interface chemistry. Our findings suggest that limiting the bonding temperature and avoiding CO 2 in the sintering environment can help to remedy the interfacial degradation.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗