NASA NTRS1994
Historically, large-eddy simulations (LES) have been restricted to simple geometries where spectral or finite difference methods have dominated due to their efficient use of structured grids. Structured grids, however, not only difficulty representing complex domains and adapting to complicated flow features, but also are rather inefficient for simulating flows at high Reynolds numbers. The lack of efficiency stems from the need to resolve the viscous sublayer, which requires very fine resolution in all three directions near the wall. Structured grids make use of a stretching to reduce the normal grid spacing but must carry the fine resolution in the streamwise and spanwise directions throughout the domain. The unnecessarily fine grid for much of the domain leads to disturbingly high grid estimates. Chapman (1979), and later Moin & Jimenez (1993), pointed out that, in order to advance the technology to airfoils at flight Reynolds numbers, structured grids must be abandoned in lieu of what are known as nested or unstructured grids. The finite element method can efficiently solve the Navier-Stokes equations on unstructured grids. Although the CPU cost per time step per element is somewhat higher than structured grid methods, this effect is more than offset by the reduction in the number of elements. The use of unstructured grids, coupled with the advances in dynamic subgrid-scale modeling such as those made by Germano et al. (1991) and Ghosal et al. (1994), make LES of an airfoil tractable. We have chosen the NACA 4412 airfoil at maximum lift as the first simulation since this flow has not been successfully simulated with the Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations.