Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “WING FLAPS, HINGED”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2016

Evaluation of the Hinge Moment and Normal Force Aerodynamic Loads from a Seamless Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge Flap in Flight

A seamless adaptive compliant trailing edge (ACTE) flap was demonstrated in flight on a Gulfstream III aircraft at the NASA Armstrong Flight Research Center. The trailing edge flap was deflected between minus 2 deg up and plus 30 deg down in flight. The safety-of-flight parameters for the ACTE flap experiment require that flap-to-wing interface loads be sensed and monitored in real time to ensure that the structural load limits of the wing are not exceeded. The attachment fittings connecting the flap to the aircraft wing rear spar were instrumented with strain gages and calibrated using known loads for measuring hinge moment and normal force loads in flight. The safety-of-flight parameters for the ACTE flap experiment require that flap-to-wing interface loads be sensed and monitored in real time to ensure that the structural load limits of the wing are not exceeded. The attachment fittings connecting the flap to the aircraft wing rear spar were instrumented with strain gages and calibrated using known loads for measuring hinge moment and normal force loads in flight. The interface hardware instrumentation layout and load calibration are discussed. Twenty-one applied calibration test load cases were developed for each individual fitting. The 2-sigma residual errors for the hinge moment was calculated to be 2.4 percent, and for normal force was calculated to be 7.3 percent. The hinge moment and normal force generated by the ACTE flap with a hinge point located at 26-percent wing chord were measured during steady state and symmetric pitch maneuvers. The loads predicted from analysis were compared to the loads observed in flight. The hinge moment loads showed good agreement with the flight loads while the normal force loads calculated from analysis were over-predicted by approximately 20 percent. Normal force and hinge moment loads calculated from the pressure sensors located on the ACTE showed good agreement with the loads calculated from the installed strain gages.

Hinge Moment Loads↗
NASA NTRS1951

Theoretical characteristics of two-dimensional supersonic control surfaces

The "Busemann second-order-approximation theory" for the pressure distribution over a two-dimensional airfoil in supersonic flow was used to determine some of the aerodynamic characteristics of uncambered symmetrical parabolic and double-wedge airfoils with leading-edge and trailing-edge flaps. The characteristics presented and discussed in this paper are: flap effectiveness factor, rate of change of hinge-moment coefficient with flap deflection, rate of change of the pitching-moment coefficient with flap deflection, rate of change of the pitching-moment coefficient about the mid chord with flap deflection, and the location of the center of pressure of the airfoil-flap combination.

MACH NUMBER EFFECTS - WING SECTIONS↗
NASA NTRS1983

An exploratory study of area-efficient vortex flap concepts

The potential of planform modification and hinge-line relocation to improve the thrust efficiency of vortex flaps was experimentally investigated on a 60-deg cropped delta wing model. Spanwise segmentation of the flap, together with chord-tailoring of the segments, allowed the vortex to be maintained on the outboard flap surfaces to higher angles of attack. In addition, location of the flap hinge aft of and underneath the wing leading edge generated substantial thrust from the vortex suction acting on the leading-edge lower surface. A combination of these beneficial effects allowed the flap/wing area to be reduced from 11.4 percent of the continuous flap to 6.3 percent of segmented flap, essentially without detriment to the incremental lift-to-drag ratio due to flap addition in the lift coefficient range 0.5-0.7 based on the basic wing area.

Rao, D. M.↗
NASA NTRS1959

Full-Scale Wind-Tunnel Investigation of a Jet Flap in Conjunction with a Plain Flap with Blowing Boundary-Layer Control on a 35 deg Sweptback-Wing Airplane

Previous investigations have shown that increased blowing at the hinge-line radius of a plain flap will give flap lift increases above that realized with boundary-layer control. Other experiments and theory have shown that blowing from a wing trailing edge, through the jet flap effect, produced lift increases. The present investigation was made to determine whether blowing simultaneously at the hinge-line radius and trailing edge would be more effective than blowing separately at either location. The tests were made at a Reynolds number of 4.5 x 10(exp 6) with a 35 deg sweptback-wing airplane. For this report, only the lift data are presented. Of the three flap blowing arrangements tested, blowing distributed between the trailing edge and the hinge-line radius of a plain flap was found to be superior to blowing at either location separately at the plain flap deflections of interest. Comparison of estimated and experimental jet flap effectiveness was fair.

Aoyagi, Kiyoshi↗
NASA NTRS1979

The effect of disturbance on a wing

Disturbances such as flap and aileron hinges and poorly faired spoilers were simulated in a computer wind tunnel. The total drag of a single roughness element does not depend only on the size of that element. Its position on the wing has a surprisingly strong effect. In particular, a roughness element on the convex side of a deflected flap or aileron causes a very substantial increase in drag. Very few experimental data are available for comparison. Good agreement with experiment can be achieved, however, by adapting a fictive step size. The correlation between the real roughness-element size and the drag increase remains to be determined. Simple, fundamental experiments are suggested which will allow a theoretical estimation of the drag increase due to roughness elements.

Eppler, R.↗
NASA NTRS1959

Force-Test Investigation of the Stability and Control Characteristics of a 1/4-Scale Model of a Tilt-Wing Vertical-Take-Off-and-Landing Aircraft

A wind-tunnel investigation has been made to determine the aerodynamic characteristics of a 1/4-scale model of a tilt-wing vertical-take-off-and-landing aircraft. The model had two 3-blade single-rotation propellers with hinged (flapping) blades mounted on the wing, which could be tilted from an incidence of 4 deg for forward flight to 86 deg for hovering flight. The investigation included measurements of both the longitudinal and lateral stability and control characteristics in both the normal forward flight and the transition ranges. Tests in the forward-flight condition were made for several values of thrust coefficient, and tests in the transition condition were made at several values of wing incidence with the power varied to cover a range of flight conditions from forward-acceleration (or climb) conditions to deceleration (or descent) conditions The control effectiveness of the all-movable horizontal tail, the ailerons and the differential propeller pitch control was also determined. The data are presented without analysis.

Newsom, William A., Jr.↗
NASA NTRS1977

Aerodynamic characteristics of an F-8 aircraft configuration with a variable camber wing at Mach numbers from 0.70 to 1.15

A 0.1-scale model of an F-8 aircraft was tested in the Ames 14-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel at Mach numbers from 0.7 to 1.15. Angle of attack was varied from -2 deg. to 22 deg. at sideslip angles of 0 deg and -5 deg. Reynolds number, dictated by the atmospheric stagnation pressure, varied with Mach number from 3.4 to 4.0 million based on mean aerodynamic chord. The model was configured with a wing designed to simulate the downward deflection of the leading and trailing edges of an advanced-technology-conformal-variable camber wing. This wing was also equipped with conventional (simple hinge) flaps. In addition, the model was tested with the basic F-8 wing to provide a reference for extrapolating to flight data. In general, at all Mach numbers the use of conformal flap deflections at both the leading edge and trailing edge resulted in slightly higher maximum lift coefficients and lower drag coefficients than with the use of simple hinge flaps. There were also found to be small improvements in the pitching-moment characteristics with the use of conformal flaps.

Boltz, F. W.↗
NASA NTRS1957

Ground Effects on the Longitudinal Characteristics of Two Models with Wings Having Low Aspect Ratio and Pointed Tips

Wind-tunnel tests were conducted to determine the ground effects on a tailless model with a wing of aspect ratio 2 and infinite taper, and on a tailed model with a triangular wing of aspect ratio 3, with flaps. Control-surface hinge moments were measured on the tailless model. The results are compared with the predictions of the theory of Tani, et al.

CONTROLS, FLAP-TYPE - COMPLETE WINGS↗
NASA NTRS1959

Flight Investigation of the Stability and Control Characteristics of a 1/4-Scale Model of a Tilt-Wing Vertical-Take-Off-and-Landing Aircraft

An experimental investigation has been conducted to determine the dynamic stability and control characteristics of a tilt-wing vertical-take-off-and-landing aircraft with the use of a remotely controlled 1/4-scale free-flight model. The model had two propellers with hinged (flapping) blades mounted on the wing which could be tilted up to an incidence angle of nearly 90 deg for vertical take-off and landing. The investigation consisted of hovering flights in still air, vertical take-offs and landings, and slow constant-altitude transitions from hovering to forward flight. The stability and control characteristics of the model were generally satisfactory except for the following characteristics. In hovering flight, the model had an unstable pitching oscillation of relatively long period which the pilots were able to control without artificial stabilization but which could not be considered entirely satisfactory. At very low speeds and angles of wing incidence on the order of 70 deg, the model experienced large nose-up pitching moments which severely limited the allowable center-of-gravity range.

Tosti, Louis P.↗
NASA NTRS2015

Aerodynamic Load Analysis of a Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap System on a Flexible Wing Aircraft

This paper presents an investigative aerodynamic analysis conducted on the novel control surface known as a Variable Camber Continuous Trailing Edge Flap (VCCTEF). The VCCTEF is modeled as a control effector on the NASA Generic Transport Model (GTM) where wing flexibility is considered. Aerodynamic modeling of the aircraft is conducted using vortex-lattice method (VLM), and an aeroelastic model of the aircraft that utilizes a coupled finite-element analysis (FEA) vortex-lattice solution is employed. VLM solutions are used to determine quasi-steady aerodynamic loading over the aeroelastic wing structures with VCCTEF. The load data is used to calculate aerodynamic sensitivities to control surface deployment and is also integrated to determine overall hinge moments. This analysis is conducted for different flight conditions, where control sensitivities compare the VCCTEF effectiveness against conventional control surfaces. Hinge moment results provide insight into aeroelastic wing loads, and worst case hinge moments for the VCCTEF can be estimated. Results show that the VCCTEF offers greater control authority than conventional ailerons at cruise, and nominal flap settings are determined for a low-speed take-off condition where the VCCTEF maintains comparable control effectiveness. Worst case hinge moment values are presented, where for a possible VCCTEF configuration, the stiff wing model demonstrates up to a 5.90 percent increase in flap hinge moment relative to a rigid model, and a reduced stiffness model demonstrates up to an 11.42 percent increase.

Aeroelasticity↗
NASA NTRS1978

Computational wing optimization and comparisons with experiment for a semi-span wing model

A computational wing optimization procedure was developed and verified by an experimental investigation of a semi-span variable camber wing model in the NASA Ames Research Center 14 foot transonic wind tunnel. The Bailey-Ballhaus transonic potential flow analysis and Woodward-Carmichael linear theory codes were linked to Vanderplaats constrained minimization routine to optimize model configurations at several subsonic and transonic design points. The 35 deg swept wing is characterized by multi-segmented leading and trailing edge flaps whose hinge lines are swept relative to the leading and trailing edges of the wing. By varying deflection angles of the flap segments, camber and twist distribution can be optimized for different design conditions. Results indicate that numerical optimization can be both an effective and efficient design tool. The optimized configurations had as good or better lift to drag ratios at the design points as the best designs previously tested during an extensive parametric study.

Waggoner, E. G.↗
NASA NTRS2005

Loads Model Development and Analysis for the F/A-18 Active Aeroelastic Wing Airplane

The Active Aeroelastic Wing airplane was successfully flight-tested in March 2005. During phase 1 of the two-phase program, an onboard excitation system provided independent control surface movements that were used to develop a loads model for the wing structure and wing control surfaces. The resulting loads model, which was used to develop the control laws for phase 2, is described. The loads model was developed from flight data through the use of a multiple linear regression technique. The loads model input consisted of aircraft states and control surface positions, in addition to nonlinear inputs that were calculated from flight-measured parameters. The loads model output for each wing consisted of wing-root bending moment and torque, wing-fold bending moment and torque, inboard and outboard leading-edge flap hinge moment, trailing-edge flap hinge moment, and aileron hinge moment. The development of the Active Aeroelastic Wing loads model is described, and the ability of the model to predict loads during phase 2 research maneuvers is demonstrated. Results show a good match to phase 2 flight data for all loads except inboard and outboard leading-edge flap hinge moments at certain flight conditions. The average load prediction errors for all loads at all flight conditions are 9.1 percent for maximum stick-deflection rolls, 4.4 percent for 5-g windup turns, and 7.7 percent for 4-g rolling pullouts.

Allen, Michael J.↗
NASA NTRS2005

Loads Model Development and Analysis for the F/A-18 Active Aeroelastic Wing Airplane

The Active Aeroelastic Wing airplane was successfully flight-tested in March 2005. During phase 1 of the two-phase program, an onboard excitation system provided independent control surface movements that were used to develop a loads model for the wing structure and wing control surfaces. The resulting loads model, which was used to develop the control laws for phase 2, is described. The loads model was developed from flight data through the use of a multiple linear regression technique. The loads model input consisted of aircraft states and control surface positions, in addition to nonlinear inputs that were calculated from flight-measured parameters. The loads model output for each wing consisted of wing-root bending moment and torque, wing-fold bending moment and torque, inboard and outboard leading-edge flap hinge moment, trailing-edge flap hinge moment, and aileron hinge moment. The development of the Active Aeroelastic Wing loads model is described, and the ability of the model to predict loads during phase 2 research maneuvers is demonstrated. Results show a good match to phase 2 flight data for all loads except inboard and outboard leading-edge flap hinge moments at certain flight conditions. The average load prediction errors for all loads at all flight conditions are 9.1 percent for maximum stick-deflection rolls, 4.4 percent for 5-g windup turns, and 7.7 percent for 4-g rolling pullouts.

Allen, Michael J.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Effects of forebody strakes and Mach number on overall aerodynamic characteristics of configuration with 55 deg cropped delta wing

A wind tunnel data base was established for the effects of chine-like forebody strakes and Mach number on the longitudinal and lateral-directional characteristics of a generalized 55 degree cropped delta wing-fuselage-centerline vertical tail configuration. The testing was conducted in the 7- by 10-Foot Transonic Tunnel at the David Taylor Research Center at free-stream Mach numbers of 0.40 to 1.10 and Reynolds numbers based on the wing mean aerodynamic chord of 1.60 x 10(exp 6) to 2.59 x 10(exp 6). The best matrix included angles of attack from 0 degree to a maximum of 28 degree, angles of sidesip of 0, +5, and -5 degrees, and wing leading-edge flat deflection angles of 0 and 30 degrees. Key flow phenomena at subsonic and transonic conditions were identified by measuring off-body flow visualization with a laser screen technique. These phenomena included coexisting and interacting vortex flows and shock waves, vortex breakdown, vortex flow interactions with the vertical tail, and vortices induced by flow separation from the hinge line of the deflected wing flap. The flow mechanisms were correlated with the longitudinal and lateral-directional aerodynamic data trends.

Erickson, Gary E.↗
NASA NTRS1958

Lift, Drag, and Pitching Moment of an Aspect-Ratio-2 Triangular Wing with Leading-Edge Flaps Designed to Simulate Conical Camber

An investigation was conducted to determine the effectiveness of leading-edge flaps in reducing the drag at lifting conditions of a triangular wing of aspect ratio 2.0. The flaps, deflected to simulate conically cambered wings having a wide range of design lift coefficients, were tested over a Mach number range of 0.70 to 2.22 through an angle-of-attack variation from -6 deg to +18 deg at a constant Reynolds number of 3.68 million based on the wing mean aerodynamic chord. A symmetrical wing of the same plan form and aspect ratio was also tested to provide a basis for comparison. The experimental results showed that with the flaps in the undeflected position, a small amount of fixed leading-edge droop incorporated over the outboard 5 percent of the wing semispan was as effective at high subsonic speeds as conical camber in improving the maximum lift-drag ratio above that of the symmetrical wing. At supersonic speeds, the penalty in minimum drag above that of the symmetrical wing was less than that incurred by conical camber. Deflecting the leading-edge flaps about the hinge line through 80 percent of the wing semispan resulted in further improvements of the drag characteristics at lift coefficients above 0.20 throughout the Mach number range investigated. The lift and pitching-moment characteristics were not significantly affected by the leading-edge flaps.

Menees, Gene P.↗
NASA NTRS2025

Subsonic Ultra Green Aircraft Research: Phase V – Buffet Test Report

This test report summarizes work performed by the Boeing Subsonic Ultra-Green Aircraft Research (SUGAR) team in the Phase V Transonic Truss-Braced Wing contract task. The task was awarded in September 2020, and ended at the end of September 2022. As a part of the SUGAR Phase V contract task, Boeing developed a wind tunnel test plan, model requirements, then fabricated and conducted a dedicated transonic buffet wind tunnel test. The test focused on the investigation of buffet onset, and the ability to accurately predict buffet onset for the TTBW configuration. This report summarizes the results and post-test analysis of the 9% scale, semispan, Transonic Truss-Braced Wing (TTBW) transonic buffet model tested at the NASA Ames Research Center Unitary Plan Wind Tunnel (UPWT) 11-Foot Transonic Wind Tunnel (11-Ft TWT) facility located at Moffett Field, CA. It was tested from January 24, 2022, through February 18, 2022. The wind tunnel test was successful in capturing buffet onset at the model design dynamic pressure. Multiple configurations were tested starting in the wing-body-strut configuration and ending with the full configuration including wing-body-strut-nacelle/pylon, and flap hinge. The test also measured the effect of control surface deflections (ailerons and spoilers), as well as the effect of an outboard strut flap. Steady data collected during the test included standard force and moment measurements, as well as wing, strut, nacelle, and body (fuselage) static pressures. These data were collected in a standard pitch-pause mode. Unsteady data captured in the test, collected in continuous pitch mode, included wing and strut dynamic pressures, accelerations, and strains. According to test data, previous concerns regarding critical buffet onset on the strut (at low vehicle lift coefficient) and in the wing-strut channel have been mitigated. Buffet onset on the TTBW appears to follow conventional wing-induced buffet onset mechanisms. However, the critical station where buffet onset first occurs has moved inboard to the wing-strut juncture span location (55-60% span) from the typical ~70% span location. Test data obtained by unsteady pressure transducers provided a good match to expected buffet onset modes. An assessment of different tools and methodologies for predicting buffet onset was conducted. Reasonable agreement was found for buffet boundary predictions between most of the methods examined when using a forward trip location, with the greatest discrepancies from the pitching moment break and trailing edge pressure divergence methods. When an aft trip location was used the buffet boundary predictions diverged more significantly from unsteady pressure measurements. In addition, good agreement between the buffet onset trends were found when the Reynolds number, configuration, or spanload was changed.

strut↗