Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “end of year report”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2017

Tiltrotor Conceptual Design

This year end progress report summarizes our engineering study of a large, VTOL civil transport that we began in August 2015. The task has been to follow up on work reported in Reference 1, which described a NASA, 2005 design study showing that a 120 passenger, tiltrotor aircraft capable of cruising at 350 knots at 30,000 feet was quite feasible. The objective of our task this year has been to investigate the feasibility of a 120 passenger, tiltrotor aircraft capable of cruising at 425 to 450 knots at altitude and having VSTOL capability at Denver (i.e., 5,000 feet) with an outside air temperature (OAT) of 95°F. A corollary to our work has been to examine the suitability of the engineering tools available to conduct the concept design study we have begun. We have relegated two key pieces of corollary work to an appendix and used the body of this report to transmit progress in our preliminary performance trend studies. By way of background, in January of 2016, Mr. Harris presented a paper titled The VSTOL Performance Gap at the AHS Technical Meeting on Aeromechanics Design for Vertical Lift. This presentation is included in this year end report as Appendix A. A key concluding chart in that presentation is repeated here as Fig. 1. The Rotorcraft Branch at NASA Ames was already studying a tiltrotor suited for the regional carrier routes, but no effort beyond the 2005 results reported in Ref. 1 was going on. Therefore, we took on the task of extending the 350 knot, 120 passenger tiltrotor studies up to speeds associated with major airline routes.

Conceptual Design↗
DOE OSTI2021

Analysis of Organoiodide Adsorption Mechanisms

If the United States were to engage in the reprocessing of used nuclear fuel, radioactive iodine must be removed from multiple plant off-gas streams to comply with governing regulations. One of these streams is the vessel off-gas (VOG), which arises from the separations process and is expected to contain iodine in primarily organic iodine forms and at parts-per-billion concentrations. The relative lack of knowledge surrounding organic iodine removal from the VOG prompted the US Department of Energy’s Office of Nuclear Energy to initiate experimental efforts targeted at understanding organic iodide removal from prototypic VOG streams. At Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), this effort has focused on developing a comprehensive understanding of iodine removal from VOG streams by using silver-based sorbents. An important aspect of this testing is developing an understanding of how the sorption of methyl iodide (CH 3 I), the most studied organic iodide species to date, compares with the sorption of other volatile organic iodide species potentially present in the VOG. The work presented here reflects initial testing that will continue to be developed, and final results will be incorporated into an end-of-year report that details a multiyear testing campaign designed to understand iodine mitigation from VOG streams. The goal of these experiments was to determine whether similar reaction pathways govern both CH 3 I and iodobutane (C 4 H 9 I) sorption onto silver mordenite (AgZ), a common silver-based iodine sorbent. More specifically, the authors hypothesized that the sorption of C 4 H 9 I by AgZ will result in the formation of butanol (C 4 H9OH). Effluent monitoring of CH 3 I sorption testing has confirmed methanol production, but analogous monitoring of effluents from C 4 H 9 I sorption studies has not been performed. A series of tests was completed to test this hypothesis with the aim of detecting C 4 H 9 OH downstream of the AgZ bed. Test conditions varied the bed depth, gas stream humidity, and bed temperature post sorption. The effluent gas stream downstream of the AgZ bed was sampled by using gas-tight syringes, and these samples were analyzed by a gas chromatograph coupled to a mass spectrometer. Thin bed C 4 H 9 I tests conducted at -65 and 0°C dew points did not result in C 4 H 9 OH detection in the effluent. This suggests that the sorption mechanism and subsequent reactions could be different from those observed for CH 3 I. The sorption testing continues; additional results will be included in final end-of-year report and will increase the fundamental understanding of organic iodide sorption by AgZ from VOG streams.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
NASA NTRS2000

Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch End of Fiscal Year 1999 Report

This report summarizes the major activities and accomplishments carried out by the Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch (FDAB), Code 572, in support of flight projects and technology development initiatives in Fiscal Year (FY) 1999. The report is intended to serve as a summary of the type of support carried out by the FDAB, as well as a concise reference of key analysis results and mission experience derived from the various mission support roles. The primary focus of the FDAB is to provide expertise in the discipline of flight dynamics, which involves spacecraft trajectory (orbit) and attitude analysis, as well as orbit and attitude determination and control. The FDAB currently provides support for missions involving NASA, government, university, and commercial space missions, at various stages in the mission life cycle.

Stengle, T.↗
NASA NTRS1999

Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch End of Fiscal Year 1999 Report

This document summarizes the major activities and accomplishments carried out by the Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC)'s Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch (FDAB), Code 572, in support of flight projects and technology development initiatives in Fiscal Year (FY) 1999. The document is intended to serve as both an introduction to the type of support carried out by the FDAB (Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch), as well as a concise reference summarizing key analysis results and mission experience derived from the various mission support roles assumed over the past year. The major accomplishments in the FDAB in FY99 were: 1) Provided flight dynamics support to the Lunar Prospector and TRIANA missions among a variety of spacecraft missions; 2) Sponsored the Flight Mechanics Symposium; 3) Supported the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) workshops; 4) Performed numerous analyses and studies for future missions; 5) Started the Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch Lab for in-house mission analysis and support; and 6) Complied with all requirements in support of GSFC IS09000 certification.

Stengle, Thomas↗
NASA NTRS2001

Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch: End of Fiscal Year 2001 Report

This report summarizes the major activities and accomplishments carried out by the Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch (FDAB), Code 572, in support of flight projects and technology development initiatives in Fiscal Year (FY) 2001. The report is intended to serve as a summary of the type of support carried out by the FDAB, as well as a concise reference of key accomplishments and mission experience derived from the various mission support roles. The primary focus of the FDAB is to provide expertise in the disciplines of flight dynamics, spacecraft trajectory, attitude analysis, and attitude determination and control. The FDAB currently provides support for missions and technology development projects involving NASA, government, university, and private industry.

Barnes, Alex↗
NASA NTRS2002

Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch End of Fiscal Year 2002 Report

This report summarizes the major activities and accomplishments carried out by the Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch (FDAB), Code 572, in support of flight projects and technology development initiatives in Fiscal Year (FY) 2002. The report is intended to serve as a summary of the type of support carried out by the FDAB, as well as a concise reference of key accomplishments and mission experience derived from the various mission support roles. The primary focus of the FDAB is to provide expertise in the disciplines of flight dynamics including navigation, spacecraft trajectory design, attitude analysis, attitude determination and attitude control. The FDAB currently provides support for missions and technology development projects involving NASA, government, university, and private industry.

Mangus, David↗
NASA NTRS2005

Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch End of Fiscal Year 2004 Report

This report summarizes the major activities and accomplishments carried out by the Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch (FDAB), Code 595, in support of flight projects and technology development initiatives in Fiscal Year (FY) 2004. The report is intended to serve as a summary of the type of support carried out by the FDAB, as well as a concise reference of key accomplishments and mission experience derived from the various mission support roles. The primary focus of the FDAB is to provide expertise in the disciplines of flight dynamics including spacecraft navigation (autonomous and ground based); spacecraft trajectory design and maneuver planning; attitude analysis; attitude determination and sensor calibration; and attitude control subsystem (ACS) analysis and design. The FDAB currently provides support for missions and technology development projects involving NASA, other government agencies, academia, and private industry.

DeLion, Anne↗
NASA NTRS2006

Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch End of Fiscal Year 2005 Report

This report summarizes the major activities and accomplishments carried out by the Flight Dynamics Analysis Branch (FDAB), Code 595, in support of flight projects and technology development initiatives in Fiscal Year (FY) 2005. The report is intended to serve as a summary of the type of support carried out by the FDAB, as well as a concise reference of key accomplishments and mission experience derived from the various mission support roles. The primary focus of the FDAB is to provide expertise in the disciplines of flight dynamics including spacecraft navigation (autonomous and ground based), spacecraft trajectory design and maneuver planning, attitude analysis, attitude determination and sensor calibration, and attitude control subsystem (ACS) analysis and design. The FDAB currently provides support for missions and technology development projects involving NASA, other government agencies, academia, and private industry.

Source record↗
DOE OSTI2020

Mixed Material Scintillator Systems Quarterly Report FY20Q4

This project aims to invent, model, and prototype architected multimaterial scintillator systems (AMSSs), a new class of radiation detectors that use heterogenous internal structures of different scintillating materials to detect additional properties of radiation. These internal structures can be produced using additive manufacture (AM, i.e. 3D printing) of scintillator, a currently emerging application of additive manufacture technology. AMSSs combine the low cost and complexity of conventional scintillation detectors with capabilities currently only available in more expensive and complex detectors. By identifying promising AMSS designs, this project will enable a new class of detectors to meet DNN’s mission needs for SNM detection. In past reporting, we have described this detector concept as “mixed material scintillator systems” (MMSS), but as part of preparing papers for publication we have concluded the term “architected multimaterial scintillator systems” (AMSS) better reflects the importance of structure in these detectors. We plan to use the AMSS acronym going forward. This quarter, we participated in an Independent Assessment of the work so far. The panelists on the review concluded that the AMSS concept has great potential and our work so far was effective at bringing that potential to light. They highly encouraged further work on this topic. The panelists also had several useful suggestions, which we took to heart. This review is described in more detail below. This quarter saw a resumption of work on the final task of this project, prototyping. In the first half of the quarter, this work focused on solving specific technical barriers to achieve 1x1x1 cm prints. In the second half, we focused on producing high-quality samples and making characterization measurements of those samples, with an eye on our deliverable report on the prototyping task. This report can be expected along with the end-of-year report on October 30. This project successfully spent the entirety of its remaining funds this quarter, except for $13k refunded to this project in the last days of the fiscal year due to LLNL cost adjustments. This project has captured the interest of many LLNL experts, and so we have been able to effectively use our budget to harness the available effort.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗
DOE OSTI2020

An Approach to DevOps and Microservices

This report presents work performed in 2017 and is a reissue of the end-of-year report SAND2018-0240, A Proof-of-Concept Approach to DevOps and Microservices, January 2018, modified for unlimited release. This report describes the approach, investigation, and prototyping efforts to create an API management solution and automated deployment pipeline for REST-based microservices. Additionally, it reviews: the microservices created for testing purposes; our experiences and results in using an open-source API management tool; and future plans.

97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING↗
DOE OSTI2023

Advanced Reactor Regulatory Framework Development Activities for Fiscal Year 2023

This report provides an end-of-year summary that reflects the progress and status of Idaho National Laboratory’s (INL) activities concerning the development of advanced reactor (AR) regulatory framework and its implementation in the United States (U.S.). The report also summarizes some general updates on important topics in regulatory development. This work was completed in Fiscal Year 2023 (FY-23) and was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Regulatory Development sub-program. These activities are managed by INL on behalf of DOE.

29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY↗
DOE OSTI2025

Non-LWR Regulatory Framework Modernization- Fiscal Year 2024

This report provides an end-of-year summary that reflects the progress and status of Idaho National Laboratory’s (INL’s) activities concerning the development of an advanced-reactor regulatory framework and its implementation in the United States (U.S.). The report also provides recommendations for work to be performed in Fiscal Year (FY)-25 and beyond. This work was completed in FY-24 and was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Regulatory Development sub-program. These activities are managed by INL on behalf of DOE.

22 - GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS↗
NASA NTRS2004

TOPEX Radar Altimeter Engineering Assessment Report Update: Side B Turn-On to January 1, 2004

This is the eleventh in a series of TOPEX Radar Engineering Assessment Reports, The initial TOPEX Radar Altimeter Engineering Assessment Report, in February 1994, presented performance results for the NASA Radar Altimeter on the TOPEX/POSEIDON spacecraft, from the time of its launch in August 1992 to February 1994. Since the time of that initial report and prior to this report, there have been nine interim supplemental Engineering Assessment Reports, issued in March 1995, May 1996, March 1997, June 1998, August 1999, September 2000, June 2001, March 2002 and again in May 2003.The sixth supplement in September 2000 was the first assessment report that addressed Side B performance, and presented the altimeter performance from the turn-on of Side B until the end of calendar year 1999. This report extends the performance assessment of Side B to the end of calendar year 2003 and includes the performance assessment of Jason-1, the TOPEX follow-on mission, launched on December 7, 2001.

Hancock, David W., III↗
NASA NTRS1975

Studies on the toxic elements and organic degradation products in aquatic bodies and sediments around Kennedy Space Center (KSC) Haulover Canal and Mosquito Lagoon

The work during the first year ending September, 1975, is reported. Indian River, Haulover Canal, Mosquito Lagoon, and other aquatic areas of discharge around Kennedy Space Center (KSC) were studied. The presentation and interpretation of data on water and sediment samples collected from Haulover Canal and Mosquito Lagoon are included. The field and laboratory data are presented and tentative conclusions were drawn in the various aspects of the study. An attempt was made to correlate the physical, chemical, and biological parameters.

Ghuman, G. S.↗
DOE OSTI2020

FY-20 GIF-RSWG and WGSAR Status Report

This report provides an end of year summary that reflects the progress and status of United States (U.S.) activities supporting the Global International Forum’s (GIF) Risk & Safety Working Group (RSWG) and the international regulators associated with the Working Group on the Safety of Advanced Reactors (WGSAR). This effort has commenced the development of a technology neutral, risk-informed approach for the selection of licensing basis events (LBE) and the assessment of defense in depth for Gen IV reactor technologies. These U.S. activities are being managed by Idaho National Laboratory on behalf of the U.S. Department of Energy.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗