Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “turbulence model”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2010

Description of a Website Resource for Turbulence Modeling Verification and Validation

The activities of the Turbulence Model Benchmarking Working Group - which is a subcommittee of the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) Fluid Dynamics Technical Committee - are described. The group s main purpose is to establish a web-based repository for Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes turbulence model documentation, including verification and validation cases. This turbulence modeling resource has been established based on feedback from a survey on what is needed to achieve consistency and repeatability in turbulence model implementation and usage, and to document and disseminate information on new turbulence models or improvements to existing models. The various components of the website are described in detail: description of turbulence models, turbulence model readiness rating system, verification cases, validation cases, validation databases, and turbulence manufactured solutions. An outline of future plans of the working group is also provided.

Rumsey, Christopher L.↗
NASA NTRS1983

A turbulence model for three dimensional turbulent shear flows over curved rotating bodies

There exists currently considerable interest in the development of numerical procedures for solving the equations governing three-dimensional fluid flows. In particular, improved calculations of viscous flows on rotating bodies such a turbomachinery rotors are of great importance. The present investigation is mainly concerned with the analysis of the effect of rotation on the dissipation rate equation and the Reynolds stress equations. Attention is given to governing equations and modelling, algebraic Reynolds stress equations, a procedure for implementing the turbulence closure scheme, results for a model representative of centrifugal turbomachinery, and results for axial turbomachinery. The proposed turbulence model is valid for three-dimensional, rotating, and curved flows. The model has all the essential physics of turbulence, mean flow, rotation, and the curvature.

Galmes, J. M.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Numerical investigation of separated transonic turbulent flows with a multiple-time-scale turbulence model

A numerical investigation of transonic turbulent flows separated by curvature and shock wave - boundary layer interaction is presented. The free stream Mach numbers considered are 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.825, 0.85, 0.875, 0.90, and 0.925. In the numerical method, the conservation of mass equation is replaced by a pressure correction equation for compressible flows and thus incremental pressure is solved for instead of density. The turbulence is described by a multiple-time-scale turbulence model supplemented with a near-wall turbulence model. The present numerical results show that there exists a reversed flow region at all free stream Mach numbers considered whereas various k-epsilon turbulence models fail to predict such a reversed flow region at low free stream Mach numbers. The numerical results also show that the size of the reversed flow region grows extensively due to the shock wave - turbulent boundary layer interaction as the free stream Mach number is increased. These numerical results show that the turbulence model can resolve the turbulence field subjected to extra strains caused by the curvature and the shock wave - turbulent boundary layer interaction and that the numerical method yields a significantly accurate solution for the complex compressible turbulent flow.

Kim, S.-W.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Turbulence modeling for high speed compressible flows

Turbulence models are necessary in numerical simulations because of the impracticality of computing all scales of turbulent motion. Approximate methods, or turbulence models, are introduced to simplify and make the computations practical. There are several approaches to turbulence modeling: subgrid scale modeling; modeling of all the scales of turbulent motion; eddy viscosity; and Reynolds stress turbulence closure models. In many instances, computations based on turbulence models are compared with available experimental data. The effort is directed at seeking models which have reasonable accuracy over a limited range of flow conditions. Future needs are briefly discussed. Work to date is outlined.

Chandra, Suresh↗
NASA NTRS1982

Assessment of turbulent models for scramjet flowfields

The behavior of several turbulence models applied to the prediction of scramjet combustor flows is described. These models include the basic two equation model, the multiple dissipation length scale variant of the two equation model, and the algebraic stress model (ASM). Predictions were made of planar backward facing step flows and axisymmetric sudden expansion flows using each of these approaches. The formulation of each of these models are discussed, and the application of the different approaches to supersonic flows is described. A modified version of the ASM is found to provide the best prediction of the planar backward facing step flow in the region near the recirculation zone, while the basic ASM provides the best results downstream of the recirculation. Aspects of the interaction of numerica modeling and turbulences modeling as they affect the assessment of turbulence models are discussed.

Sindir, M. M.↗
NASA NTRS1990

Turbulence modeling: Near-wall turbulence and effects of rotation on turbulence

Many Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes solvers use closure models in conjunction with 'the law of the wall', rather than deal with a thin, viscous sublayer near the wall. This work is motivated by the need for better models to compute near wall turbulent flow. The authors use direct numerical simulation of fully developed channel flow and one of three dimensional turbulent boundary layer flow to develop new models. These direct numerical simulations provide detailed data that experimentalists have not been able to measure directly. Another objective of the work is to examine analytically the effects of rotation on turbulence, using Rapid Distortion Theory (RDT). This work was motivated by the observation that the pressure strain models in all current second order closure models are unable to predict the effects of rotation on turbulence.

Shih, T.-H.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Multigrid acceleration and turbulence models for computations of 3D turbulent jets in crossflow

A multigrid method is presented for the calculation of three-dimensional turbulent jets in crossflow. Turbulence closure is achieved with either the standard k-epsilon model or a Reynolds stress model (RSM). Multigrid acceleration enables convergence rates which are far superior to that for a single grid method to be obtained with both turbulence models. With the k-epsilon model the rate approaches that for laminar flow, but with RSM it is somewhat slower. The increased stiffness of the system of equation in the latter may be responsible. Computed results with both turbulence models are compared to experimental data for a pair of opposed jets in crossflow. Both models yield reasonable agreement for the mean flow velocity, but RSM yields better predictions of the Reynolds stresses.

Demuren, A. O.↗
NASA NTRS1991

Examination of various turbulence models for application in liquid rocket thrust chambers

There is a large variety of turbulence models available. These models include direct numerical simulation, large eddy simulation, Reynolds stress/flux model, zero equation model, one equation model, two equation k-epsilon model, multiple-scale model, etc. Each turbulence model contains different physical assumptions and requirements. The natures of turbulence are randomness, irregularity, diffusivity and dissipation. The capabilities of the turbulence models, including physical strength, weakness, limitations, as well as numerical and computational considerations, are reviewed. Recommendations are made for the potential application of a turbulence model in thrust chamber and performance prediction programs. The full Reynolds stress model is recommended. In a workshop, specifically called for the assessment of turbulence models for applications in liquid rocket thrust chambers, most of the experts present were also in favor of the recommendation of the Reynolds stress model.

Hung, R. J.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of Turbulence Models for a Single-Injector Cooling Flow

This work assesses the ability of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes turbulence models to predict a fundamental thermal cooling flow configuration. This geometry consists of a plate with a single cooling hole positioned downstream of a heated exhaust nozzle. The linear Shear Stress Transport (SST), non-linear Quadratic Constitutive Relation (QCR), and differential SSG/LRR Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) turbulence models were investigated for flow conditions with a blowing ratio of 1.0 and 2.0. Despite significant differences in turbulence model complexity, the results miss important details observed in the data and large eddy simulation (LES). Injection penetration is over-predicted. Mixing and centerline wake recovery is too slow. Temperature predictions are worse than velocity, suggesting that perhaps the simple gradient diffusion approximation used to model the turbulent heat flux may be to blame. These observations are put into context using other studies to identify shortcomings in the modeling of both the turbulent stress and turbulent heat flux.

Film Cooling↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Assessment of Turbulence Models for a Single-Injector Cooling Flow

This work assesses the ability of Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes turbulence models to predict a fundamental thermal cooling flow configuration. This geometry consists of a plate with a single cooling hole positioned downstream of a heated exhaust nozzle. The linear Shear Stress Transport (SST), non-linear Quadratic Constitutive Relation (QCR), and differential SSG/LRR Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) turbulence models were investigated for flow conditions with a blowing ratio of 1.0 and 2.0. Despite significant differences in turbulence model complexity, the results miss important details observed in the data and large eddy simulation (LES). Injection penetration is over-predicted. Mixing and centerline wake recovery is too slow. Temperature predictions are worse than velocity, suggesting that perhaps the simple gradient diffusion approximation used to model the turbulent heat flux may be to blame. These observations are put into context using other studies to identify shortcomings in the modeling of both the turbulent stress and turbulent heat flux.

Film Cooling↗
NASA NTRS1992

Analysis of an RNG based turbulence model for separated flows

A two-equation turbulence model of the K-epsilon type was recently derived by using Renormalization Group (RNG) methods. It was later reported that this RNG based model yields substantially better predictions than the standard K-epsilon model for turbulent flow over a backward facing step - a standard test case used to benchmark the performance of turbulence models in separated flows. The improvements obtained from the RNG K-epsilon model were attributed to the better treatment of near wall turbulence effects. In contrast to these earlier claims, it is shown in this paper that the original version of the RNG K-epsilon model substantially underpredicts the reattachment point in the backstep problem. This is a deficiency that is traced to the modeling of the production of dissipation term. However, with the most recent improvements in the RNG K-epsilon model, excellent results for the backstep problem are now obtained.

Speziale, C. G.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Development of an algebraic turbulence model for analysis of propulsion flows

A simple turbulence model that will be applicable to propulsion flows having both wall bounded and unbounded regions was developed and installed within the PARC Navier-Stokes code by linking two existing algebraic turbulence models. The first is the Modified Mixing Length (MML) model which is optimized for wall bounded flows. The second is the Thomas model, the standard algebraic turbulence model in PARC which has been used to calculate both bounded and unbounded turbulent flows but was optimized for the latter. This paper discusses both models and the method employed to link them into one model (referred to as the MMLT model). The PARC code with the MMLT model was applied to two dimensional turbulent flows over a flat plate and over a backward facing step to validate and optimize the model and to compare its predictions to those obtained with the three turbulence models already available in PARC.

Georgiadis, N. J.↗
NASA NTRS1992

Development of an algebraic turbulence model for analysis of propulsion flows

A simple turbulence model that will be applicable to propulsion flows having both wall bounded and unbounded regions was developed and installed within the PARC Navier-Stokes code by linking two existing algebraic turbulence models. The first is the Modified Mixing Length (MML) model which is optimized for wall bounded flows. The second is the Thomas model, the standard algebraic turbulence model in PARC which has been used to calculate both bounded and unbounded turbulent flows but was optimized for the latter. This paper discusses both models and the method employed to link them into one model (referred to as the MMLT model). The PARC code with the MMLT model was applied to two dimensional turbulent flows over a flat plate and over a backward facing step to validate and optimize the model and to compare its predictions to those obtained with the three turbulence models already available in PARC.

Georgiadis, N. J.↗
NASA NTRS1989

More accurate predictions with transonic Navier-Stokes methods through improved turbulence modeling

Significant improvements in predictive accuracies for off-design conditions are achievable through better turbulence modeling; and, without necessarily adding any significant complication to the numerics. One well established fact about turbulence is it is slow to respond to changes in the mean strain field. With the 'equilibrium' algebraic turbulence models no attempt is made to model this characteristic and as a consequence these turbulence models exaggerate the turbulent boundary layer's ability to produce turbulent Reynolds shear stresses in regions of adverse pressure gradient. As a consequence, too little momentum loss within the boundary layer is predicted in the region of the shock wave and along the aft part of the airfoil where the surface pressure undergoes further increases. Recently, a 'nonequilibrium' algebraic turbulence model was formulated which attempts to capture this important characteristic of turbulence. This 'nonequilibrium' algebraic model employs an ordinary differential equation to model the slow response of the turbulence to changes in local flow conditions. In its original form, there was some question as to whether this 'nonequilibrium' model performed as well as the 'equilibrium' models for weak interaction cases. However, this turbulence model has since been further improved wherein it now appears that this turbulence model performs at least as well as the 'equilibrium' models for weak interaction cases and for strong interaction cases represents a very significant improvement. The performance of this turbulence model relative to popular 'equilibrium' models is illustrated for three airfoil test cases of the 1987 AIAA Viscous Transonic Airfoil Workshop, Reno, Nevada. A form of this 'nonequilibrium' turbulence model is currently being applied to wing flows for which similar improvements in predictive accuracy are being realized.

Johnson, Dennis A.↗
NASA NTRS2015

Second-Moment RANS Model Verification and Validation Using the Turbulence Modeling Resource Website (Invited)

The implementation of the SSG/LRR-omega differential Reynolds stress model into the NASA flow solvers CFL3D and FUN3D and the DLR flow solver TAU is verified by studying the grid convergence of the solution of three different test cases from the Turbulence Modeling Resource Website. The model's predictive capabilities are assessed based on four basic and four extended validation cases also provided on this website, involving attached and separated boundary layer flows, effects of streamline curvature and secondary flow. Simulation results are compared against experimental data and predictions by the eddy-viscosity models of Spalart-Allmaras (SA) and Menter's Shear Stress Transport (SST).

Eisfeld, Bernhard↗
NASA NTRS1993

Some practical turbulence modeling options for Reynolds-averaged full Navier-Stokes calculations of three-dimensional flows

New turbulence modeling options recently implemented for the 3-D version of Proteus, a Reynolds-averaged compressible Navier-Stokes code, are described. The implemented turbulence models include: the Baldwin-Lomax algebraic model, the Baldwin-Barth one-equation model, the Chien k-epsilon model, and the Launder-Sharma k-epsilon model. Features of this turbulence modeling package include: well documented and easy to use turbulence modeling options, uniform integration of turbulence models from different classes, automatic initialization of turbulence variables for calculations using one- or two-equation turbulence models, multiple solid boundaries treatment, and fully vectorized L-U solver for one- and two-equation models. Validation test cases include the incompressible and compressible flat plate turbulent boundary layers, turbulent developing S-duct flow, and glancing shock wave/turbulent boundary layer interaction. Good agreement is obtained between the computational results and experimental data. Sensitivity of the compressible turbulent solutions with the method of y(sup +) computation, the turbulent length scale correction, and some compressibility corrections are examined in detail. The test cases show that the highly optimized one-and two-equation turbulence models can be used in routine 3-D Navier-Stokes computations with no significant increase in CPU time as compared with the Baldwin-Lomax algebraic model.

Bui, Trong T.↗
NASA NTRS1993

Some practical turbulence modeling options for Reynolds-averaged full Navier-Stokes calculations of three-dimensional flows

New turbulence modeling options recently implemented for the 3D version of Proteus, a Reynolds-averaged compressible Navier-Stokes code, are described. The implemented turbulence models include: the Baldwin-Lomax algebraic model, the Baldwin-Barth one-equation model, the Chien k-epsilon model, and the Launder-Sharma k-epsilon model. Features of this turbulence modeling package include: well documented and easy to use turbulence modeling options, uniform integration of turbulence models from different classes, automatic initialization of turbulence variables for calculations using one- or two-equation turbulence models, multiple solid boundaries treatment, and fully vectorized L-U solver for one- and two-equation models. Good agreements are obtained between the computational results and experimental data. Sensitivity of the compressible turbulent solutions with the method of y(+) computation, the turbulent length scale correction, and some compressibility corrections are examined in detail. Test cases show that the highly optimized one- and two-equation turbulence models can be used in routine 3D Navier-Stokes computations with no significant increase in CPU time as compared with the Baldwin-Lomax algebraic model.

Bui, Trong T.↗
NASA NTRS1988

An investigation of turbulence models

The accuracy to which a turbulent boundary layer or wake can be predicted numerically depends on the validity of the turbulence closure model used. The modeling of turbulence physics is one of the most difficult problems in computational fluid dynamics (CFD). In fact, it is one of the pacing factors in the development of CFD. In general, there are three main approaches to the description of trubulence physics. First is turbulence modeling in which the Reynolds averaged Navier-Stokes equations are used and some closure approximation is made for the Reynolds stresses. A second approach to turbulence is large eddy simulation (LES) in which the computational mesh is taken to be fine enough that the large scale structure of the turbulence can be calculated directly. An empirical assumption must be made for the small scale sub-grid turbulence. The third approach is direct simulation. In this technique the Navier-Strokes equations are solved directly on a mesh which if fine enough to resolve the smallest length scale of the turbulence. The Reynolds averaged equations are not used and no closure assumption is required. These last two approaches require extensive computer resources and as such are not engineering tools. The purpose of the work was to investigate the various engineering turbulence models for accuracy and ease of programming. This involved comparison of the models with each other and with experimental data.

Doria, Michael L.↗