Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “workshop summary”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 55 records · Page 3

CEERP SM3 Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation Workshop: Summary Report

The Columbia Estuary Ecosystem Restoration Program (CEERP) workshop, “CEERP Synthesis Memorandum (SM3): Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation,” was held in Portland, Oregon on June 24–25 2024. A diverse group of 26 domain experts with demonstrated knowledge and experience working in the Lower Columbia River Estuary (LCRE) participated. The workshop supported development of the forthcoming third Synthesis Memorandum for CEERP. The workshop furthered the collaborative understanding of the state of the science regarding the LCRE, helped to identify remaining knowledge gaps and uncertainties, and assisted in the prioritization of future restoration research and monitoring.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

Sensors Workshop summary report

A review of the efforts of three workshops is presented. The presentation describes those technological developments that would contribute most to sensor subsystem optimization and improvement of NASA's data acquisition capabilities, and summarizes the recommendations of the sensor technology panels from the most recent workshops.

Source record↗

March 2011 Physical Indicators Workshop Summary Report

The National Climate Assessment (NCA) convened a workshop on Physical Climate Indicators from 29-30 March 2011, as part of a series on Monitoring Climate Change and its Impacts . The overarching goal of this workshop was to identify a few broad categories of potential physical climate indicators using a set of priorities developed by the NCA, and to provide a clear justification for how they would inform the Nation about climate change. Additional goals included providing input on the overall NCA framework for selecting the indicators and suggesting methodologies to construct indicators. Although one of the workshop goals was to address the status of current observational networks to support indicators, this was not a main focus of any single discussion. However, participants agreed with the NCA indicator vision that high quality data were needed to develop indicators, and generally focused on identifying indicator categories that current observation systems could support. The nearly 60 participants, primarily from Federal agencies, received a white paper in advance of the workshop that detailed the NCA vision for a coordinated suite of climate-related physical, ecological, and societal indicators. The intent of these national indicators of change is to develop a way to evaluate and communicate over time both the rate of change in impacts and the capacity to respond to climate drivers. These indicators will be tracked as a part of ongoing, long-term assessment activities, with adjustments as necessary to adapt to changing conditions and understanding. An initial framework was provided to workshop participants to ensure that everyone understood the audience, scope, and purpose of the indicators. A common lexicon was defined since indicator terminology varies widely. In addition, several potential approaches to grouping or categorizing the indicators were presented. Participants spent most of their time in small breakout groups with facilitators, working to address a common set of questions. The workshop was structured to start with the broadest issue and then focus down as the workshop progressed. The first breakout therefore solicited comments on the NCA indicator framework, followed by discussion of the potential approaches to organizing the physical climate indicators. Once several approaches were identified, the groups then worked to define specific measurements, or types of measurements, that could be used to create the indicators.

Roberts, Brent↗

Biopower Technical Strategy Workshop Summary Report

Biopower is electricity produced from a wide range of biomass (organic materials found in wood, plants, agricultural waste and other materials). Biomass is a base load renewable energy source with high availability for electricity production. To explore opportunities for biopower in the United States, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Biomass Program conducted the Biopower Technical Strategy Workshop in Denver, Colorado, on December 2–3, 2009. This report summarizes the results of the workshop, which focused on challenges to the expanded use of biopower and the possible solutions, including technology research, development, and demonstration (RD&D) as well as policies and other market transformation mechanisms.

biomass↗

Bioproducts to Enable Biofuels Workshop Summary Report

This report summarizes the results of a public workshop sponsored by DOE/EERE in Westminster, Colorado, on July 16, 2015. The views and opinions of the workshop attendees, as summarized in this document, do not necessarily reflect those of the United States government or any agency thereof, nor do their employees make any warranty, expressed or implied, or assume any liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represent that its use would not infringe upon privately owned rights.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Plastics for a Circular Economy Workshop: Summary Report

This report summarizes the results of a public workshop sponsored by the Bioenergy Technologies Office, the Advanced Manufacturing Office, and Mars held on December 11–12, 2019 in Golden, Colorado. The Plastics for a Circular Economy Workshop brought together experts from industry, academia, and national laboratories to discuss opportunities and challenges facing the development of new technologies to address plastic waste.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗

Predictive Models and High-Performance Computing as Tools to Accelerate the Scaling-Up of New Bio-Based Fuels Workshop: Summary Report

This report summarizes the results of a virtual workshop sponsored by the Bioenergy Technologies Office held on June 9–11, 2020. The workshop discussed best practices for utilizing mathematical modeling tools across multiple scales to reduce technology uncertainty and accelerate scaling-up of biorefinery/chemical production equipment and optimize operations.

09 BIOMASS FUELS↗

Workshop Summary Report on Using AI Tools to Improve the Efficiency and Outcomes of the NEPA Process: AI for Permitting Workshop at the 2025 National Association of Environmental Professionals (NAEP) Annual Conference

On April 29, 2025, the U.S. Department of Energy and Pacific Northwest National Laboratory hosted a workshop at the National Association of Environmental Professionals 2025 Conference and Training Symposium in Charleston, South Carolina, titled, “Effective and Responsible Use of Customized AI Tools to Improve the Efficiency and Outcomes of the NEPA Process.” The objectives of this workshop were to make environmental practitioners aware of the potential for using artificial intelligence in the National Environmental Policy Act process, demonstrate examples of how artificial intelligence can be integrated effectively to improve efficiency and outcomes and solicit questions and feedback from practitioners. This report summarizes the key points from all talks and case studies, as well as audience questions and feedback on the presentation topics and the broader topic of "AI in permitting". The report concludes by highlighting the key barriers and opportunities for the implementation of AI in permitting, as discussed during the workshop.

54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES↗

U.S.-Russian Nuclear Arms Control: Crisis and Collapse or Crossroads? Workshop Summary August 2018

In this context, the first day of the workshop was dedicated to assessing the incentives and disincentives the United States and Russia face in pursuing further arms control agreements as well as the role of arms control in the two countries’ foreign policies and security strategies.On the second day, the workshop participants explored four pathways for a renewal of U.S.-Russian arms control, including:New START extension or a New START follow-on agreement; an agreement which meets Russia at least half way in the strategic space; an agreement addressing challenges to European nuclear stability; and unusual mix-and-match approaches that might be taken. The discussions and their results are summarized here.

98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL P↗

Off-Road Vehicles Research Workshop (Summary Report)

This report summarizes the off-road vehicles stakeholder workshop that was focused on research, technical challenges, and future direction related to off-road vehicles and held at Argonne National Laboratory in October 2018. The views expressed in this report are those of the workshop participants. Topics discussed and included in this report are engine efficiency and emissions; efficient fluid power; and system integration, control, and new technologies. The purposes of this workshop were to: 1) Discuss and exchange information on the current state of technology for off-road vehicles; 2) Work collectively to address the technical challenges; and 3) Help shape the future direction for off-road vehicles research and development (R&D). The report highlights some key points, takeaways, and technical challenges and ideas to inform DOE R&D programs for the off-road sector. The workshop objectives were to: • Identify the barriers to cost-effective, high-efficiency, off-road vehicles; • Identify pre-competitive research topics that could have the biggest impact in overcoming barriers; and • Identify metrics that should be applied to program progress and ambitious but realistic goals. Customer acceptance, reliability, and system durability are some of the market barriers to new technology that were discussed during the workshop. Participants agreed that a comprehensive strategy is required to explore ways to improve engine efficiency while lowering emissions (i.e., NO x , GHG, etc.) and at the same time, meet customer needs and expectations. A full system optimization was recommended for off-road vehicles. It was noted that off-road vehicles are very diverse with a wide range of engine size and vehicle applications. A need for R&D for transient operations and other operating conditions was identified, as off-road vehicles are currently optimized for steady state. Fuel type for these vehicles has an important role. Fuel cost and fuel delivery to the work-site are challenging for any new fuel. Increased vehicle electrification is one of the new technologies discussed during the workshop. Electric propulsion for off-road vehicles has limited applications in the near term, but hybridization seems more promising. Furthermore, electrification requires better batteries and, possibly, the use of higher-voltage systems. Developing more efficient component technologies, including pumps, motors, and valves, is important for more efficient fluid power systems. New work-circuit architectures that can decrease throttling losses and better integrate the work circuit and engine can offer significant efficiency gains. Autonomous vehicles for off-road sectors were also discussed. Autonomous vehicles for off-road space are very appealing for some markets due to shortage in skilled labor and its significant impact on productivity, vehicle weight, and therefore, energy use and emissions. Autonomous driving for mining and farming applications is more feasible because the routes are predefined, but for other applications, such as forestry and construction vehicles, autonomous driving would be very challenging.

32 ENERGY CONSERVATION, CONSUMPTION, AND UTILIZATI↗

Power Technologies for Rail Decarbonization Workshop: Summary Report

Argonne National Laboratory organized the Power Technologies for Rail Decarbonization Workshop for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Vehicle Technologies Office. The workshop offered an inclusive venue for different stakeholders to convey their perspective on challenges and opportunities in decarbonizing the rail sector. The first day of the workshop focused on (1) rail decarbonization efforts in the DOE and collaboration opportunities, (2) technology pathways to decarbonize rail, and (3) prime mover and low-carbon options for rail. The second day was devoted to (1) prime mover and zero-carbon options for rail, and (2) rail logistics, infrastructure, and safety. Each day raised challenges and solutions through presentations from national leaders and discussions among panel members and the audience. Through this engagement with different stakeholders, we will produce a cross-disciplinary recommendation for the role of government agencies to contribute meaningful research to address current technology gaps. The workshop included up 139 active participants and featured keynote speakers and panelists from Association of American Railroads, Progress Rail Locomotive, Wabtec, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad, Amtrak, Caterpillar, Cummins, Renewable Energy Group-Chevron, DOE’s Bioenergy Technologies Office, California Air Resources Board, Federal Railroad Administration and multiple DOE national laboratories. This summary report presents highlights from participant discussions covering the topics of technology pathways to decarbonize rail, prime mover and low-carbon options, prime mover and zero-carbon options, as well as rail logistics, infrastructure, and safety. The variety of input gathered from the stakeholder attendees is vital, as it helps inform DOE on rail decarbonization challenges and opportunities. Stakeholder feedback is balanced against DOE strategic directions and priorities with consideration of the roles of government and industry.

33 ADVANCED PROPULSION SYSTEMS↗

2016 FACET-II Science Workshop Summary Report

The second in a series of FACET-II Science Workshops was held at SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory on October 17-19, 2016 [1]. The workshop drew thirty-five participants from eighteen different institutions including CERN, DESY, Ecole Polytechnique, FNAL, JAI, LBNL, LLNL, Radiabeam, Radiasoft, SLAC, Stony Brook, Strathclyde, Tech-X, Tsinghua, UC Boulder, UCLA and UT Austin. The 2015 workshop [2, 3] helped prioritize research directions for FACET-II. The 2016 workshop was focused on understanding what improvements are needed at the facility to support the next generation of experiments. All presentations are linked to the workshop website as a permanent record.

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗

The Grid of the Future Workshop Summary Report

The Grid of the Future was a one-day workshop to discuss a resilient grid for the 21st and 22nd century. The workshop gathered experts from various fields to explore concepts for the electric power grid of the future with an emphasis on improving resilience. The event was co-sponsored by Sandia National Laboratories, the Albuquerque IEEE Section, the University of New Mexico, New Mexico State University, and the Santa Fe Institute. The presenters identified radical changes to the grid that are expected to occur over the next 25-50 years and the role of resilience. The workshop was held at the University of New Mexico on Wednesday, August 22nd, 2018. This report summarizes presentations and discussions from the workshop.

24 POWER TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION↗

H2@Airports (Workshop Summary Report)

This report serves as the proceedings of the H2@Airports Workshop held virtually by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) in collaboration with the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and Department of Defense (DOD), November 4-6, 2020. Presentations from the workshop can be found at H2@Airports Workshop: https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/h2airports-workshop. The workshop was held to assess the state of the art for electric aircraft and airport applications specifically using hydrogen fuel cells, to discuss operational requirements and lessons learned on early fuel cell aviation and airport projects, to understand current technology gaps, to identify collaborative research and development (R&D) opportunities, to highlight codes, standards, safety, and regulatory challenges, and to identify potential actions that address them. Experts and stakeholders from industry, government, and academia met to discuss the current state of the art of hydrogen and fuel cell technologies and the requirements for using these technologies in aviation applications and land-based applications at airports. This report summarizes the discussions and diverse opinions expressed at the workshop.

08 HYDROGEN↗

Materials Innovation for Next-Generation T&D Grid Components. Workshop Summary Report

The Materials Innovations for Next-Generation T&D Grid Components Workshop was co-sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Electricity Delivery and Energy Reliability and the Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) and held on August 26 27, 2015, at the ORNL campus in Oak Ridge, Tennessee. The workshop was planned and executed under the direction of workshop co-chair Dr. Kerry Cheung (DOE) and co-chair Dr. Dominic Lee (ORNL). The information contained herein is based on the results of the workshop, which was attended by nearly 50 experts from government, industry, and academia. The research needs and pathways described in this report reflect the expert opinions of workshop participants, but they are not intended to represent the views of the entire electric power community.

Grid Components↗

TRANSP Workshop Summary - September 27-28, 2024, Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory, NJ

The TRANSP Code Workshop provided a platform for in-depth discussions on advancing the capabilities of the TRANSP code, focusing on key areas such as predictive capabilities, interpretive frameworks, core-edge coupling, and integration with engineering components. More than 25 scientists from PPPL and around the world contributed to the workshop by making presentations and participating in discussions. The workshop covered a range of topics including: (1) Current Status of TRANSP; (2) Code Infrastructure, Core-Edge Coupling, and Engineering Integration; (3) Enhancing Interpretive Capabilities, and (4) Predictive Capabilities for Discharge Optimization

70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY↗