Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORAGE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 541 records · Page 30
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2017

Advanced Fuel Cycle Cost Basis – 2017 Edition

This report, commissioned by the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Nuclear Energy (NE), provides a comprehensive set of cost data supporting a cost analysis for the relative economic comparison of options for use in the DOE Nuclear Technology Research and Development (NTRD) Program (previously the Fuel Cycle Research and Development (FCRD) and the Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative (AFCI)). The report describes the NTRD cost basis development process, reference information on NTRD cost modules, a procedure for estimating fuel cycle costs, economic evaluation guidelines, and a discussion on the integration of cost data into economic computer models. This report contains reference cost data for numerous fuel cycle cost modules (modules A-O) as well as cost modules for a number of reactor types (R modules). The fuel cycle cost modules were developed in the areas of natural uranium mining and milling, thorium mining and milling, conversion, enrichment, depleted uranium disposition, fuel fabrication, interim spent fuel storage, reprocessing, waste conditioning, spent nuclear fuel (SNF) packaging, long-term monitored retrievable storage, managed decay storage, recycled product storage, near surface disposal of low-level waste (LLW), geologic repository and other disposal concepts, and transportation processes for nuclear fuel, LLW, SNF, transuranic, and high-level waste. Since its inception, this report has been periodically updated. The last such internal document was published in August 2015 while the last external edition was published in December of 2009 as INL/EXT-07-12107 and is available on the Web at URL: www.inl.gov/technicalpublications/Documents/4536700.pdf. This current report (Sept 2017) is planned to be reviewed for external release, at which time it will replace the 2009 report as an external publication. This information is used in the ongoing evaluation of nuclear fuel cycles by the NE NTRD program.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2025

FY25 Organic Evaporation Testing in Support of Hanford Sample-and-Send

The Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) is being built to treat and immobilize the approximately 56 million gallons of radioactive mixed waste stored in 156 underground storage tanks. The baseline method for immobilization of Low-Activity Waste (LAW) is vitrification, but additional immobilization capacity is needed to supplement the initial LAW melters. Additionally, efforts are being undertaken to accelerate the disposition of Pre-Treated Waste (PTW) in Hanford’s West Area. An alternative cementitious waste form is being investigated as an alternative immobilization method. However, one impediment to a cementitious waste form is the presence of Land Disposal Restricted (LDR) organic chemicals in tank waste, which are regulated on a concentration-based standard in the final waste form. Hence, if the quantity of organics in PTW and LAW is high enough, treatment may be needed to destroy or remove said organics to make a waste form compatible with disposal in a mixed low level waste landfill. This work evaluates evaporation as a potential avenue for treatment of LDR organics to eliminate the impediment and permit possible use of a cementitious waste form.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Disposition Options for Sodium Cooled Fast Reactor (A White Paper)

The sodium-cooled fast reactor (SFR) design concept is one of the six classes of nuclear reactors in the GenIV initiative. SFRs are uranium or plutonium-fueled reactors operating in the fast neutron spectrum using liquid sodium as the coolant. SFRs can be designed as a breeder reactor or actinide-burning reactor in addition to operating the thorium fuel cycle. While having different fuel designs, the anticipated waste streams, and the necessary management strategies for spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and radioactive wastes from SFRs are very similar. This includes the SNF, activated sodium coolant, in-core stainless-steel components, piping, resins and filters, solidified liquid waste, contaminated equipment, and other radioactive wastes. Modern SFR designs are based on a long and rich operating history of several liquid-metal-cooled fast reactors with sodium coolant. Several of these reactors have been shut down, the fuel has been placed in safe storage, and they have undergone some degree of decommissioning. As such, there is significant experience in the management of the SNF and radioactive wastes associated with operating these reactors. This white paper will identify the definitions and regulations that apply to the safe and secure management, storage, and disposal of radioactive waste and identify the key radioactive waste streams from SFRs. Idaho National Laboratory has significant experience in the management of the SNF from the SFR predecessors. This experience should form the basis for the management and disposition efforts of the radioactive waste from any new SFR-type small modular reactor or microreactor intended for deployment at the Idaho National Laboratory Site

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Degradation of Saltstone Disposal Unit Cementitious Materials

The Saltstone facilities at the DOE Savannah River Site (SRS) are used to stabilize and dispose of low-level radioactive salt solution originating from liquid waste storage tanks at the site. The Saltstone Production Facility (SPF) receives treated salt solution and mixes the aqueous waste with dry cement, blast furnace slag, and fly ash to form a grout slurry which is mechanically pumped into concrete disposal cells that compose the Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF). The solidified grout is termed “saltstone”. Cementitious materials play a prominent role in the design and long-term performance of the SDF. The saltstone grout exhibits low permeability and diffusivity, and thus represents a physical barrier to waste release. The waste form is also reducing, which creates a chemical barrier to waste release for certain key radionuclides, notably Tc-99. Similarly, the concrete shell of a saltstone disposal unit (SDU) represents an additional physical and chemical barrier to radionuclide release to the environment. Together the waste form and the SDU compose a robust containment structure at the time of facility closure. However, the physical and chemical state of cementitious materials will evolve over time through a variety of phenomena, leading to degraded barrier performance over Performance Assessment timescales of thousands to tens of thousands of years. Previous studies of cementitious material degradation in the context of low-level waste disposal have identified sulfate attack, carbonation-influenced steel corrosion, and decalcification (primary constituent leaching) as the chemical degradation phenomena of most significance under SRS exposure conditions.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Chute Silo ILW Project Berkeley - 16649

Magnox, a Tier 1 Site Licensed Company (SLC), is the management and operations contractor responsible for the decommissioning of twelve of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority's (NDA) nuclear sites in the UK. Aquila Nuclear Engineering is a specialist Tier 3, turnkey engineering company based in the UK, delivering mission critical engineering solutions to Europe's nuclear and nuclear medicine industries. Berkeley Nuclear Power Station, Berkeley, England started generating electricity in 1962, ceasing operation 27 years later in 1989. The Chute Silo ILW Project at this Reactor Site had been set up to retrieve irradiated control rods and charge chutes disposed of within a subterranean vault (silo). The project involved in-silo size reduction of waste in to 30-35 waste baskets. The waste basket was then to be retrieved via a pintle grab and hoist mechanism in to a Transfer Flask (through a silo and a Transfer Flask gamma gate). The Transfer Flask was then to transit along existing crane rails, out of the silo building and over the top of an Import/Export Facility. A Ductile Cast Iron Container (DCIC) was to be imported into Import/Export Facility and inspected/prepared to receipt the waste basket from the Transfer Flask. Once filled, the DCIC was then to be sealed and exported to an on-site storage facility. Due to an issue with the Magnox Tier 2 Framework holder in delivering a cost effective and viable solution for their Chute Silo ILW Retrieval Project, Magnox took the ground breaking decision to 'self-perform'. This involved dividing the larger project into several smaller packages. Two of these packages - for the shielded Transfer Flask and the Import/Export facility - were put out for competitive tendering directly to the Tier 3 Supply Chain. The work completed by the Tier 2 Company was shared with the Tier 3's, but Magnox expressly requested the Tier 2 proposals were scrutinised and that far more cost effective, robust and simpler solutions were provided for within the Tier 3 Tenders. Aquila won both work packages and delivered them with significant and demonstrable cost savings, on time and under budget. This was achieved by the collaborative arrangements between Aquila and Magnox, the methodologies of both company's project teams and the innovation and 'fitness for purpose' of Aquila's design pragmatism. The original Tier 2 Framework holder's price to Magnox for the Chute Silo ILW Project was between UK Pounds 2-3 M. Aquila delivered the equivalent scope for under UK Pounds 1 M. Aquila's original programme was maintained despite the award of additional scope and (Magnox) delays on site. Aquila came under the original target price for each discrete phase of the project. The above was achieved because of: - the collaborative arrangements between Aquila and Magnox; - the methodologies of both company's project teams; - the design features put forward by Aquila (welcomed and adopted by Magnox). In 2014 Aquila Nuclear Engineering received formal recognition of its achievements on this project by winning an NDA Supply Chain Award for 'Best example of supplier 'going the extra mile''. Points highlighted in the award were: - improved customer focus, leading to stronger relationships - encouraging challenge and innovation - continuous suggestions for improvement - UK Pounds 1 million savings and three months programme reduction.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2014

A Low-Tech, Low-Budget Storage Solution for High Level Radioactive Sources

The need for safe, secure, and economical storage of radioactive material becomes increasingly important as beneficial uses of radioactive material expand (increases inventory), as political instability rises (increases threat), and as final disposal and treatment facilities are delayed (increases inventory and storage duration). Several vendor-produced storage casks are available for this purpose but are often costly — due to the required design, analyses, and licensing costs. Thus the relatively high costs of currently accepted storage solutions may inhibit substantial improvements in safety and security that might otherwise be achieved. This is particularly true in areas of the world where the economic and/or the regulatory infrastructure may not provide the means and/or the justification for such an expense. This paper considers a relatively low-cost, low-technology radioactive material storage solution. The basic concept consists of a simple shielded storage container that can be fabricated locally using a steel pipe and a corrugated steel culvert as forms enclosing a concrete annulus. Benefits of such a system include 1) a low-tech solution that utilizes materials and skills available virtually anywhere in the world, 2) a readily scalable design that easily adapts to specific needs such as the geometry and radioactivity of the source term material), 3) flexible placement allows for free-standing above-ground or in-ground (i.e., below grade or bermed) installation, 4) the ability for future relocation without direct handling of sources, and 5) a long operational lifetime . ‘Le mieux est l’ennemi du bien’ (translated: The best is the enemy of good) applies to the management of radioactive materials – particularly where the economic and/or regulatory justification for additional investment is lacking. Development of a low-cost alternative that considerably enhances safety and security may lead to a greater overall risk reduction than insisting on solutions that remain economically and/or politically ‘out of reach’.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Integrated Systems Analysis for a Regional Deep Borehole Repository for Commercial Spent Nuclear Fuel - 16291

Some nuclear waste stakeholders have suggested private interim storage facilities (ISF), but little work has been done to consider the cost or logistics for nuclear waste management or disposal facilities smaller than the national scale. This paper performs an integrated system analysis for a deep borehole repository system which would accept waste from a regional subset of the national commercial reactor fleet. The regional subset is comprised of a centrally-located host state with a large SNF inventory surrounded by states with small SNF inventories. The chosen region will contain between one-fifth and one-quarter of the national commercial SNF inventory. Using best estimates of past and future SNF discharges in the sample region, the SNF inventory in the chosen region is characterized by reactor of origin. Basic parameters are then chosen for the regional repository, such as the annual rate of waste emplacement and the time necessary to process borehole-specific waste canisters. Scenarios chosen for analysis test the sensitivity of a variety of system parameters, including the annual rate of waste acceptance, the division of annual waste acceptance among sites, the use of bare fuel transportation canisters, and the size of the regional subset of reactors. Estimated costs for the facility are $13 billion for around 27,000 MT of SNF and $16 billion for around 35,000 MT. This translates to $490,000 per MT and $466,000 per MT, respectively. These unit costs are comparable to the $370,000 per MT estimate for the full 140,000 MT national inventory. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2014

Degradation of cementitious materials associated with salstone disposal units

The Saltstone facilities at the DOE Savannah River Site (SRS) stabilize and dispose of low-level radioactive salt solution originating from liquid waste storage tanks at the site. The Saltstone Production Facility (SPF) receives treated salt solution and mixes the aqueous waste with dry cement, blast furnace slag, and fly ash to form a grout slurry which is mechanically pumped into concrete disposal cells that compose the Saltstone Disposal Facility (SDF). The solidified grout is termed “saltstone”. Cementitious materials play a prominent role in the design and long-term performance of the SDF. The saltstone grout exhibits low permeability and diffusivity, and thus represents a physical barrier to waste release. The waste form is also reducing, which creates a chemical barrier to waste release for certain key radionuclides, notably Tc-99. Similarly, the concrete shell of a saltstone disposal unit (SDU) represents an additional physical and chemical barrier to radionuclide release to the environment. Together the waste form and the SDU compose a robust containment structure at the time of facility closure. However, the physical and chemical state of cementitious materials will evolve over time through a variety of phenomena, leading to degraded barrier performance over Performance Assessment (PA) timescales of thousands to tens of thousands of years. Previous studies of cementitious material degradation in the context of low-level waste disposal have identified sulfate attack, carbonation influenced steel corrosion, and decalcification (primary constituent leaching) as the primary chemical degradation phenomena of most relevance to SRS exposure conditions. In this study, degradation time scales for each of these three degradation phenomena are estimated for saltstone and concrete associated with each SDU type under conservative, nominal, and best estimate assumptions.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2022

Organic Evaporation and Oxidation Testing in Support of Hanford Sample-and-Send

The Hanford site has approximately 56 million gallons of radioactive mixed waste stored in 177 underground storage tanks. The Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) is being built to treat and immobilize the tank waste. The baseline method for immobilization of Low Activity Waste (LAW) through the WTP is vitrification, but additional immobilization capacity is needed to supplement the initial LAW melters. An alternative cementitious waste form is being investigated for that future immobilization method to supplement vitrification. However, one impediment to a cementitious waste form is the presence of Land Disposal Restricted (LDR) organic chemicals in tank waste. This work evaluates potential avenues to eliminate that impediment to permit possible use of a cementitious waste form and work towards a decision whether additional LDR organic pretreatment would be required. Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL) performed testing using simulants to examine evaporation as a method to remove some prevalent organics from LAW. Spiking the caustic LAW simulant with selected regulated organic chemicals found one that clearly decomposes because of caustic instability. Oxidation testing of other organic chemicals found some LDR organics degrade as desired and others are stable in the presence of peroxide and permanganate. In addition to studies with simulants, a literature review was performed to evaluate radiological stability of LDR organics. Descriptions of the experimental details, equipment, and results are included in this report. Evaporation testing consisted of preparing the LAW simulant, spiking that simulant with organic chemicals, and evaporating the mixture via differential distillation. The apparatus was a laboratory-scale vacuum evaporator operated at 60 ±5 torr absolute (vacuum evaporation) and also at atmospheric pressure. The LAW simulant represented the liquid expected to be retrieved from the Hanford tank farms at approximately 4.0 M [Na + ] total sodium ion concentration. The concentration of the organic chemicals added was significantly higher than typically found in the tank waste samples since the higher levels were necessary to assist in analytical measurement and tracking of the spiked species. Organic chemicals were chosen for the work with a consideration of how their volatility compares with that of methanol. This was done by comparing the ratio of the pure water Henry’s law coefficient (K h ) of methanol to that of the compound in question (hereafter termed the K h ratio), where ratios above unity indicated less volatility than methanol. Methanol was chosen because it is a common regulated chemical with relatively low volatility but which has been removed by evaporation in previous laboratory work. While organic separation results depend on evaporator design, laboratory experiments verified that organic partitioning to the overhead condensate stream by evaporation is a practical process. The work reported here found difficulties in quantitative analysis of the organic chemicals in aqueous samples. Most of the time there was insufficient analysis to close a mass balance for evaporator runs, but qualitative evidence of carryover was obtained. The methods were also able to show whether organic chemicals were susceptible or resistant to solution oxidation in permanganate or hydrogen peroxide tests.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

An Evaluation of the Impact of Glycolate and Glycolate Mitigation on the Defense Waste Processing Facility Recycle Diversion Project Flowsheet

The Savannah River Site (SRS) Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) processes radioactive High Level Waste (HLW) sludge solids from the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facilities (CSTF); which includes the SRS Tank Farm and Evaporator facilities, and a concentrated Cs-137 laden stream and a Monosodium Titanate (MST) and sludge solids stream from the SRS Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). The waste is chemically adjusted with acids and reductant (currently with 50 wt.% nitric acid and ~90 wt.% formic acid, but eventually formic acid will be substituted with ~70 wt.% glycolic acid), and frit is added so that a durable, borosilicate glass waste form can be produced when the material is vitrified in the melter. As a result of the evaporation of water during both the melter feed preparation and the melter feed vitrification steps in DWPF, a recycle waste stream is generated, neutralized, and sent back to the CSTF. The recycle waste is a dilute aqueous stream originating from the collection of condensate liquids containing some minor sludge, MST, and frit solids and other waste components resulting from melter feed entrainment during foamover events and transfer of volatile species into the condensate. The recycle stream volume is significant and is expected to approach 3 million gallons per year once SWPF reaches full operation, requiring the use of multiple large CSTF tanks for storage. The recycle waste is currently collected in the SRS Tank Farm and periodically evaporated in the 242-16H (2H) Evaporator to conserve storage space.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Coupling compositional liquid gas Darcy and free gas flows at porous and free-flow domains interface

This paper proposes an efficient splitting algorithm to solve coupled liquid gas Darcy and free gas flows at the interface between a porous medium and a free-flow domain. This model is compared to the reduced model introduced in [6] using a 1D approximation of the gas free flow. For that purpose, the gas molar fraction diffusive flux at the interface in the free-flow domain is approximated by a two point flux approximation based on a low-frequency diagonal approximation of a Steklov–Poincaré type operator. The splitting algorithm and the reduced model are applied in particular to the modelling of the mass exchanges at the interface between the storage and the ventilation galleries in radioactive waste deposits.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

US nuclear waste may have temporary home

Combined developments could break the logjam over disposition of spent nuclear fuel and defense high-level radioactive waste.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

Synthesis and Single Crystals of Refractory Oxides of Lanthanides and Thorium

At the completion of this program, we can report that we developed a considerable degree of technical improvements in our ability to perform hydrothermal reactions at high temperatures and pressures. We can now routinely perform reactions at 700-750°C and 200 MPa. Currently we are in the process of exploiting this new technology synthesizing a range of exotic new materials investigating relatively poorly understood materials. Our initial efforts focused on the chemistry of rare earth oxides with tetravalent and pentavalent oxides. We recently published a study of the lanthanides with Nb 5+ and Ta 5+ ions, where we grew oxides such as RENdO 4 and RETaO 4 as high quality single crystals. These compounds were targeted as potential hosts for luminescent and scintillation materials, particularly given that they are among the densest oxide hosts and hence have good potential as absorbers for high energy radiation like X-rays and gamma rays. We also isolated a range of unusual new rare earth tantalates with very complex structures. indicating that the chemistry is very sensitive to conditions. We performed some fairly comprehensive examinations of the solid-state chemistry of rare earth ions with various tetravalent metal ions especially Si 4+ , Ge 4+ , Sn 4+ and Ti 4+ . Given the potential role of rare earth silicates in immobilizing radioactive waste elements in long-term storage, and the similarity of our hydrothermal fluids with known geological conditions, this chemistry continues to be relevant. We prepared an extensive series of new lanthanide germanates (e.g. RE 13 Ge 6 O 31 (OH), BaRE 10 (GeO 4 ) 4 O 8 ). and found that there is there is almost no overlap between the chemistry of the rare earth silicates. Stannic oxide (SnO 2 ) is much more refractory and requires higher temperatures and of mineralizer concentrations. One significant result is the growth of RE 2 Sn 2 O 7 pyrochlore single crystals. These are of interest because the rare earth stannate pyrochlores are known to display a wide range of magnetic frustration such as spin ice behavior. We grew high quality single crystals of rare earth germanate and stannate pyrochlores and this led to a collaboration with Professor Kate Ross at Colorado State. Preliminary measurements, indicate that the crystals contain no detectable defects or site disorder. Initial neutron diffraction on single crystals was performed at Oak Ridge, and more detailed experiments involving the Ross group are underway at both NIST and ORNL. This particular chemistry has turned out to be the most potentially significant work on this project and the collaborative effort with Prof. Ross is the topic of a DoE renewal project on quantum materials. Our initial foray into the hydrothermal chemistry of rare earth titanates has also been very promising and a range of cubic and polar ferroic phases of the light rare earths RE 2 Ti 2 O 7 (RE = La - Pr) in the P2 1 phase. We also discovered an interesting new phase Ce 2 Ti 4 O 11 that can have implications in heavy metal immobilization and storage. along with a series of new rare earth titanates (La 5 Ti 4 O 15 (OH) Sm 3 TiO 5 (OH) 3 and Lu 5 Ti 2 O 11 (OH) with exceptionally complex structures. One interesting sidelight has been high temperature hydrothermal chemistry terbium, including the growth of large crystals of TbO(OH). This is not a new compound but it is the first time it has been grown as large single crystals. The Tb atom density is almost as high as that in Tb 2 O 3 and has a very high Verdet constant (ca. 70), making it a very attractive candidate as a Faraday rotator. Unfortunately it is not in a cubic structure but he material is hard, stable, pure and inexpensive, so should still be an attractive Faraday oscillator. We recently received a patent on this material. We also synthesized K 2 Tb(Ge 2 O 7 ) containing stable octahedral Tb 4+ ions, which appears to be the first example of a well-characterized Tb 4+ complex. Given that Tb 4+ has been proposed as a benign surrogate for more treacherous tetravalent ions such as Cf 4+ and Bk 4+ , we think that Tb 4+ silicates can be a particularly useful study for actinide immobilization and related work. We also began reaction studies with rare earths and both ReO 2 and RuO 2 . These resulted in large single crystals of species like RE 5 Ru 2 O 12 , RE 4 Re 2 O 11 , REReO 4 and RE 2 ReO 5 . Several of these samples have already been sent to ORNL for magnetic and neutron diffraction studies.

36 MATERIALS SCIENCE↗
DOE OSTI2021

Integration of the Back End of the Nuclear Fuel Cycle

Management of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste consists of three main phases – storage, transportation, and disposal – commonly referred to as the back end of the nuclear fuel cycle. Current practice for commercial spent nuclear fuel management in the United States (US) includes temporary storage of spent fuel in both pools and dry storage systems at operating or shutdown nuclear power plants. Storage pools are filling to their operational capacity, and management of the approximately 2,200 metric tons of spent fuel newly discharged each year requires transferring older and cooler spent fuel from pools into dry storage. Unless a repository becomes available that can accept spent fuel for permanent disposal, projections indicate that the US will have approximately 136,000 metric tons of spent fuel in dry storage systems by mid-century, when the last plants in the current reactor fleet are decommissioned. Current designs for dry storage systems rely on large multi-assembly canisters, the most common of which are so-called “dual-purpose canisters” (DPCs). DPCs are certified for both storage and transportation, but are not designed or licensed for permanent disposal. The large capacity (greater number of spent fuel assemblies) of these canisters can lead to higher canister temperatures, which can delay transportation and/or complicate disposal. This current management practice, in which the utilities continue loading an ever-increasing inventory of larger DPCs, does not emphasize integration among storage, transportation, and disposal. This lack of integration does not cause safety issues, but it does lead to a suboptimal system that increases costs, complicates storage and transportation operations, and limits options for permanent disposal. This paper describes strategies for improving integration of management practices in the US across the entire back end of the nuclear fuel cycle. The complex interactions between storage, transportation, and disposal make a single optimal solution unlikely. However, efforts to integrate various phases of nuclear waste management can have the greatest impact if they begin promptly and continue to evolve throughout the remaining life of the current fuel cycle. A key factor that influences the path forward for integration of nuclear waste management practices is the identification of the timing and location for a repository. The most cost-effective path forward would be to open a repository by mid-century with the capability to directly dispose of DPCs without repackaging the spent fuel into disposalready canisters. Options that involve repackaging of spent fuel from DPCs into disposalready canisters or that delay the repository opening significantly beyond mid-century could add 10s of billions of dollars to the total system life cycle cost.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2017

Implementing a Low Activity Waste Direct Feed Capability in the Hanford Waste Treatment Plant - 17277

The original design of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) requires that all waste be processed through the Pretreatment (PT) Facility in order to separate the low-activity waste and high-level waste streams. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has developed a sequenced approach to completing the WTP Project, beginning with feeding some liquid waste directly to the Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Facility, bypassing the PT Facility. Sending low-activity waste from the tank farms to the LAW Facility is referred to as direct-feed LAW (DFLAW). Using this approach, low-activity waste will be pretreated in a Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS) for cesium and solids separation to meet LAW Facility safety basis requirements and produce an acceptable low-activity waste product. The waste feed will then be transferred to the LAW Facility where it will be immobilized in glass, poured into stainless steel containers, and then transported by truck to the Integrated Disposal Facility, a mixed waste burial ground located in the Hanford 200-East Area. The primary driver for the DFLAW approach is to enable commissioning of the LAW Facility for low-activity waste processing prior to the completion and availability of the PT and High-Level Waste (HLW) facilities. As such, the functions intended to be provided to the LAW Facility by the PT Facility and the common functionality with the HLW Facility must be refined and modified to enable DFLAW operations. The DFLAW approach will provide necessary systems and facilities to replace these enabling PT Facility functions until the PT Facility is completed and commissioned. For example, liquid effluents from the LAW Facility, primarily melter offgas condensate, will be processed in a new effluent management facility (EMF) within the WTP footprint rather than sending the effluent back to the PT Facility for processing. During DFLAW operations approximately 3 785 m{sup 3} (1 million gallons) of double-shell tank (DST) waste will be delivered to WTP for treatment each year of operation, and nominally produce 21 metric tons of immobilized low-activity waste glass per day. The resultant freed space in the DSTs will support safe tank farm operation and staging of additional waste for treatment. In December 2016, DOE executed a contract modification and approved an incremental change to the project's performance baseline to complete the WTP facilities needed to allow direct feed of low-activity waste to the LAW Facility. The revised performance baseline supports completion and cold commissioning of the WTP facilities needed for DFLAW operations no later than August 2023. The design of modifications to WTP facilities needed to enable DFLAW operations is more that 60 percent complete. DOE approved the preliminary safety basis for DFLAW modifications to WTP based on the 30 percent design package in early 2016. Early construction work for DFLAW modifications to WTP began in mid-2015. Long-lead procurement actions for some of the more complex equipment needed for LAW Facility effluent treatment were initiated in early 2016. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Utilizing the Shift Technical Engineer Pipeline to Develop the Next Generation of Engineers - 17354

As the liquid waste contractor for the U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Savannah River Site (SRS), Savannah River Remediation (SRR) is responsible for safely treating and dispositioning approximately 35 million gallons of liquid waste stored at SRS. To achieve this mission, SRR manages and operates several complex nuclear facilities. These nuclear facilities include the H and F Tank Farms, the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF), and the Saltstone Processing and Disposal Facility. To support the operations of these complex nuclear facilities, a Shift Technical Engineer (STE) is stationed for every shift. The STE is the sole Engineering Organization representative on-shift and serves as a direct technical resource for operations, including safety basis interpretation, process monitoring and prompt troubleshooting support. The training and qualification for an STE is more intensive than for typical technical staff personnel at SRR, involving additional classes, under-instruction watches, demonstration of practical factors, and culminating in an intense oral board examination. Like many other contractors in the DOE complex, SRR faces the challenge of preparing a significant number of new generation engineers to take the place of an aging workforce. Beyond the traditional training to establish minimum technical qualifications, SRR has established a number of initiatives aimed at accelerating the process of preparing early career engineers to replace experienced senior engineers. These initiatives include an internal rotational program, technical exchange activities with companies at other DOE sites, and an STE pipeline. The STE role provides a unique mechanism for select, early career engineers to gain in-depth knowledge and significant responsibility normally not achieved until much later in their careers. Once qualification is complete, the engineers perform the STE duties, providing technical support for nuclear facility operations. In addition, creating an STE pipeline, where promising young engineers are continually being qualified to replace the on-shift STEs, provides the company with a source of experienced engineers with in-depth technical knowledge as well as valuable experience interfacing with operations and other facility support groups. This paper will discuss the STE position, the qualification process, and how SRR is using the STE qualification pipeline to benefit both the company and the individual engineer. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Comparison of Exhibited Wear in Tefzel?, Kynar?, and UHMWPE Valve Seats Exposed to Cyclic Operations with Abrasive Slurry - 17519

Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) conducted abrasive-wear testing of ball valves used for double valve isolation in nuclear waste process lines. The valve seat materials consisted of Kynar{sup R}, Tefzel{sup R}, and ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE). Cycle testing was conducted for 1500 operating cycles for the Kynar{sup R} and Tefzel{sup R} valve seats and 5500 cycles for the UHMWPE valve seats. A valve operational cycle consisted of slurry flow, slurry gravity drain, flush water flow, and flush water gravity drain. Both two-way and three-way valves were evaluated, and valves were configured in simulated manifolds so the impact of serving various operational functions (e.g., slurry, flush, or drain control) could be evaluated as some valves are flushed prior to being cycled and others are not. Testing was conducted in PNNL's Multi-Phase Transport Evaluation Loop Facility using a performance-based simulant developed by PNNL specifically for this test program to emulate abrasive slurries for Hanford Tank Farms Waste Transfer System during single-shell tank retrieval and waste feed delivery to the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant. Pre- and post-test valve tear-down evaluations were conducted to observe changes in the condition of internal components for the various seat materials. The various forms of physical wear observed for the different seat materials are presented. The wear results can be used to assess seat materials and valve configurations for application to waste transfer operations, and the observed wear mechanisms can provide insight into assessing valve service life. This information will be used to identify and select additional valve designs that should be evaluated for certification for future use. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Advances in the glass formulations for the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant - 15053

The Department of Energy-Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) is constructing the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) to treat radioactive waste currently stored in underground tanks at the Hanford site in Washington. The WTP that is being designed and constructed by a team led by Bechtel National, Inc. (BNI) will separate the tank waste into High Level Waste (HLW) and Low Activity Waste (LAW) fractions with the majority of the mass (∼90%) directed to LAW and most of the activity (>95%) directed to HLW. The pretreatment process, envisioned in the baseline, involves the dissolution of aluminum-bearing solids so as to allow the aluminum salts to be processed through the cesium ion exchange and report to the LAW Facility. There is an oxidative leaching process to affect a similar outcome for chromium-bearing wastes. Both of these unit operations were advanced to accommodate shortcomings in glass formulation for HLW inventories. A by-product of this are a series of technical challenges placed upon materials selected for the processing vessels. The advances in glass formulation play a role in revisiting the flow sheet for the WTP and hence, the unit operations that were being imposed by minimal waste loading requirements set forth in the contract for the design and construction of the plant. Another significant consideration to the most recent revision of the glass models are the impacts on resolution of technical questions associated with current efforts for design completion. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗