Ruthenium Volatilisation in Nuclear Waste Systems -Comparison of Ru(III)Cl{sub 3} and Ru(III)NO(NO{sub 3}){sub 3} - 17113
Ruthenium is a fission product possessed of two relatively long lived isotopes; {sup 103}Ru and {sup 106}Ru, both of which form part of the Highly Active (HA) waste raffinate during spent nuclear fuel reprocessing. During reprocessing, ruthenium, which may be in the form of the RuNO{sub 3}+ complex, encounters temperatures conducive to volatilisation. Due to ruthenium's high specific radioactivity it is important to understand the mechanism by which volatilisation occurs. Here we use combined cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical micro-gravimetry experiments in a study of both NO free Ru (III), in the form of a RuCl{sub 3} solution and NO complexed Ru (III), in the form of RuNO{sub 3}+ solutions. We do this in order to establish baseline behaviour of NO free Ru (III) and compare it to NO complexed Ru (III) to determine the effect of complexation on the system. We have observed discrete oxidations in both systems from solution phase Ru (III) to solid phase RuO{sub 2} and volatile RuO{sub 4}. Two key differences emerged between the two systems, the first being the mass changes associated with deposition and stripping of RuO{sub 2} are significantly smaller in the RuNO{sub 3}+ solutions than those for solutions of RuCl{sub 3}. The second difference is the difference in onset of volatile RuO{sub 4} generation, in the RuNO{sub 3}+ solution, RuO{sub 4} generation is 100 mV positive than that for the RuCl{sub 3} solution. This suggests NO complexation protects Ru (III) against oxidation and, to a certain extent, volatilisation as RuO{sub 4}. (authors)