Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “technology maturity”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 541 records · Page 30

Computational Fluid Dynamics Simulations of the Transonic Dynamics Tunnel Airstream Oscillator System

This paper presents a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) model of the flow in the NASA Langley Research Center Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT) with the Airstream Oscillator System (AOS) in operation. The TDT is a continuous-flow, closed circuit wind tunnel with a 16- by 16-foot slotted test section with cropped corners. The tunnel was originally built as the 19-ft Pressure Tunnel in 1938, but it was converted to the current transonic tunnel in the 1950s, with capabilities to use either air or heavy gas (R-134a) as the test medium. The TDT was also fitted with an AOS which can be used to create a gust field in the test section. To date, no computational analyses of the TDT involving the AOS have been performed. In this study, experimental data acquired of an oscillating airstream in the tunnel will be used to calibrate the computational analyses. A significant motivation of this work is to attempt to compare computational gust velocities to those recorded in the TDT literature. In addition to a validation of this model with experimental data, it may also be possible to supplement the experimental data with computational data. The experimental data is rather sparse and at only a few Mach numbers. Computational results may be able to expand the AOS data set. Another motivation for this work is that the Integrated Adaptive Wing Technology Maturation (IAWTM) semi-span model of the high-aspect-ratio CRM with 10 trailing edge control surfaces is currently being fabricated and will be delivered to the NASA Langley Transonic Dynamics Tunnel (TDT) for testing in late 2020. Among tests to be conducted, gust load alleviation (GLA) will be demonstrated at transonic conditions using the AOS.

Computational Fluid Dynamics↗

HERMeS Thruster Magnetic Field Topology Optimization Study: Plasma Plume Results

NASA’s Hall Effect Rocket with Magnetic Shielding (HERMeS) 12.5-kW Technology Demonstration Unit-1 (TDU-1) has been the subject of extensive technology maturation in preparation for flight system development. The magnetic optimization study aims to explore and investigate alternate magnetic field topologies. Four candidate magnetic field topologies that reduce the effectiveness of the shielding along the discharge channel walls with the intent to also reduce the erosion rates along the front pole covers were designed. Three of the four candidate magnetic field topologies (B1, B2, and B4) have been manufactured and were subjected to an extensive test campaign that included laser induced fluorescence (LIF), performance, stability, wear, and plume characterization. In Phase I, LIF measurements along the discharge chamber centerline found that upstream retraction of the thruster’s peak magnetic field does result in an upstream shift of the acceleration zone, but the magnitude of the shift does not correspond one-to-one to the shift in the location of the peak radial magnetic field magnitude. Phase II test segment results found that at a normalized thruster magnetic field setting of 1, the thruster performance and discharge current oscillations were very similar for configurations B0-B2. Also in Phase II abbreviated wear tests found that average inner front pole cover erosion rates for configuration B1 were approximately 65% of those at B0, and the average erosion rates for configuration B2 were approximately 35% of those at B0. This paper reports on the detailed plasma plume mapping results for configurations B0-B4. Faraday probe results indicate that, at 600 V operation, the plume divergence increased slightly for the B4 configuration when compared to B0-B2. Wien filter spectrometer results found that at 600 V, lower multiply-charged species fractions were attained as the thruster transitioned from configurations B0 to B4. Finally, retarding potential analyzer results found that at 600 V operation and at angles above 60,˚ significantly lower high-energy ion content was found for configurations B2 and B4 when compared to B0 and B1.

Electric propulsion,.Hall thruster, laser diagnost↗

NASA’s Initial and Sustained Artemis Human Landing Systems

On March 26, 2019, in keeping with President Trump’s Space Policy Directive-1, Vice President Pence charged NASA with landing the first woman and the next man on the South Pole of the Moon by 2024, followed by a sustained presence on and around the Moon by 2028. NASA’s Human Landing System (HLS) Program is responsible for the final mode of transportation in deep space that will carry humans to and from the surface of the Moon, to be designed and developed by American companies for NASA’s Artemis lunar exploration program. This paper examines the approach for Artemis human landing systems for both the initial missions and future sustained missions. While achieving the 2024 goal requires a focus on speed and the use of mature technologies, planning toward sustained operations to and from the lunar surface requires a focus on reliability and reusability. The two approaches, however, are not mutually exclusive, as demonstrated by the HLS prime contractors’ integrated lander system proposals. On April 30, 2020, NASA announced that Blue Origin of Kent, Washington, Dynetics (a Leidos company) of Huntsville, Alabama, and SpaceX of Hawthorne, California, were the awardees for NASA’s Human Landing System contracts under Appendix H of the NextSTEP-2 Broad Agency Announcement. The companies began work in a 10-month base period during which NASA teams worked with the companies to streamline the review of required products and to share the agency’s expertise in human spaceflight systems development. Following the base period, NASA will determine which company or companies will develop the human landers for the initial missions, including the 2024 landing, and which companies will develop landers for future sustained missions toward the end of the decade.

HLS↗

NASA's Initial and Sustained Artemis Human Landing Systems

On March 26, 2019, in keeping with President Trump’s Space Policy Directive-1, Vice President Pence charged NASA with landing the first woman and the next man on the South Pole of the Moon by 2024, followed by a sustained presence on and around the Moon by2028. NASA’s Human Landing System (HLS) Program is responsible for the final mode of transportation in deep space that will carry humans to and from the surface of the Moon, to be designed and developed by American companies for NASA’s Artemis lunar exploration program. This paper examines the approach for Artemis human landing systems for both the initial missions and future sustained missions. While achieving the 2024 goal requires a focus on speed and the use of mature technologies, planning toward sustained operations to and from the lunar surface requires a focus on reliability and reusability. The two approaches, however, are not mutually exclusive, as demonstrated by the HLS prime contractors’ integrated lander system proposals. On April 30, 2020, NASA announced that Blue Origin of Kent, Washington, Dynetics (a Leidos company) of Huntsville, Alabama, and SpaceX of Hawthorne, California, were the awardees for NASA’s Human Landing System contracts under Appendix H of the NextSTEP-2 Broad Agency Announcement. The companies began work in a 10-month base period during which NASA teams worked with the companies to streamline the review of required products and to share the agency’s expertise in human spaceflight systems development. Following the base period, NASA will determine which companies will develop the human landers for the initial missions, including the 2024 landing, and which companies will develop landers for future sustained missions toward the end of the decade.

Lisa Watson-Morgan↗

Method for Real-Time State Estimation of Structural Modes for an Aeroelastic Wind Tunnel Model

A method for estimating displacements, velocities, and accelerations of structural modes in generalized coordinates from measured sensor data in real time is developed and demonstrated. Data from conventional strain gauges and fiber optic strain sensors (FOSS) were combined with strain mode shapes to produce least-squares estimates of the structural mode displacements. Similarly, accelerometer data were combined with displacement mode shapes to estimate structural mode accelerations. Estimates were then combined using a Kalman filter to refine the displacement estimates and produce structural mode velocity estimates. The approach was demonstrated using simulation data for the NASA-Boeing collaboration called the Integrated Adaptive Wing Technology Maturation (IAWTM) project in both a stable open-loop condition and an unstable condition where estimated displacement and velocity states were used for feedback control. Results supported the feasibility of using this approach for feedback control and system identification applications for wind tunnel tests.

Aeroservoelasticity↗

Reduced-Order Aerodynamic Modeling Based on CFD Frequency Responses from Multisine Inputs

A system identification analysis was performed to determine a reduced-order model (ROM) of a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) solver in support of linear aeroservoelastic model development and feedback control design. The approach was applied to the FUN3D code for the half-span wind tunnel test article used in the NASA-Boeing collaboration called the Integrated Adaptive Wing Technology Maturation (IAWTM) project. In a transonic flow condition, multiple inputs (11 structural mode displacements and 3 control surface deflections) were simultaneously excited with orthogonal phase-optimized multisines while multiple outputs (the corresponding 14 generalized aerodynamic forces) were recorded. From these recorded times series, the matrix of frequency responses was computed and subsequently fit using rational function approximations (RFAs). It was found that the entire (14 x 14) matrix of frequency responses could be determined from a single CFD run and that results generally followed trends predicted using other methods. Differences were attributed to the modeling fidelity and nonlinearities from structural mode and control surface interactions at higher reduced frequencies. More accurate fits of the RFAs to the frequency response data were obtained by making two CFD runs, one with only structural mode excitations and one with only control surface excitations, which reduced the degree of nonlinearity in the modeling data.

Aeroservoelasticity↗

Mission Concept for a Europa Lander

A NASA HQ-directed study team led by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) with partners including Applied Physics Lab, Marshall Space Flight Center, Goddard Space Flight Center, Langley Research Center and Sandia National Laboratory has recently presented a mission concept for a Europa Lander that would search for bio-signatures and signs of life in the near-subsurface of the Jovian moon. The mission would follow the Europa Clipper multiple-flyby mission, planned for launch in June of 2022, which would provide reconnaissance imagery and other data to the Lander for use in selecting a scientifically compelling site and certifying it for engineering safety. The Europa Lander concept accommodates the Model Payload identified by the Europa Lander Science Definition Team (SDT) and documented in the Europa Lander Study 2016 Report released in February of 2017. The currently envisioned Europa Lander would launch on an SLS Block 1B as early as October of 2025 into a VEGA trajectory, arriving in the Jovian system as early as July of 2030. The baseline design of the integrated flight system includes a dedicated Carrier and Relay Stage, a Deorbit Vehicle composed of a Deorbit Stage consisting of a solid rocket motor (SRM), an MSL-like sky-crane Descent Stage, and a Lander which accommodates the instrument suite. The Lander would be powered by primary batteries over a 20-day surface mission. The science goals envisioned by the SDT require five samples taken from a depth of 10cm, a depth chosen to ensure minimal radiation processing of the potential biomarkers. Mission challenges include the large launch mass, unknown terrain topography, surface composition and materials properties, the high radiation environment, and complying with stringent planetary protection requirements. The mission concept uses a strategy of early risk reduction and overlapping requirements to provide robustness to harsh and uncertain environments. Early risk reduction efforts are aimed at maturing technologies associated with the sampling system, the intelligent landing system, high specific energy batteries, low mass and power motor controllers, and a thermal sterilization system.

Dooley, Jennifer↗

Technology needs to discover Earth 2.0

Dr. Nick Siegler of the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) began his talk by stating that the main goal of the Exoplanet Exploration Program technology effort is to enable future space missions to observe a planetary spectrum of a rocky planet in the habitable zone of its star and understand it in the context of potential life. He went on to say that the main exoplanet discovery tools, the radial velocity and transit techniques, which have discovered more than 95% of the more than 3,400 exoplanets, will not be the techniques to directly image exoplanets, which is needed to get a reflected light spectrum. Spectroscopy will be hard though because there simply aren’t many photons available to use, but it will not be the biggest problem. The biggest problem will be suppressing the light from the stars which can be 10 billion times brighter than a rocky planet in the habitable zone of a Sun analog. Starlight suppression could be done in one of three ways: internal occulters (i.e., coronagraphs), external occulters (i.e., starshades), and nulling interferometers. The latter option is the least technologically mature of the options and one that NASA is not currently pursuing.

Schmitt, Joseph↗

A status update on the eMMTG project

This paper provides an update on recent SKD technology maturation efforts and the results of several systems engineering tasks that continue to pave the way for successful system development.

Pinkowski, Stanley↗

NASA’s Artemis Human Landing Systems: Enabling Lunar Exploration

On March 26, 2019, in keeping with Space Policy Directive-1, NASA was charged with landing the first woman and the next man on the South Pole of the Moon by 2024, followed by a sustained presence on and around the Moon by 2028. NASA’s Human Landing System (HLS) Program is responsible for the transportation in deep space to carry humans to and from the surface of the Moon, to be designed and developed by American companies for NASA’s Artemis lunar exploration program. On April 30, 2020, NASA announced the awardees for NASA’s Human Landing System contracts under Appendix H of the NextSTEP-2 Broad Agency Announcement: A Blue Origin-led team including Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, and Draper; Dynetics (a Leidos company); and SpaceX. The companies began work in a multi-month base period during which NASA teams will work with the companies to streamline requirements, to establish standards and methods, to review required products and to share the NASA’s expertise in human spaceflight systems development. Following the base period, which ends in the spring of 2021, NASA will determine which company or companies will develop Artemis human landing systems for the initial demonstration missions, including the goal of landing on the Moon in 2024.This paper examines how the Human Landing System program is at the center of NASA’s Artemis lunar exploration program, designed to yield groundbreaking science, develop and utilize lunar surface resources and leverage the Moon as a proving ground for future Mars missions. While achieving the 2024 goal requires a focus on speed and the use of mature technologies, planning toward sustained operations to and from the lunar surface requires a focus on reliability and reusability.

Lisa Watson-Morgan↗

Balloon Data Readout via Free-Space Optical Communications

Free-space optical communications is a mature technology, using eye-safe beams and small-terminals, that has the potential to increase balloon data readout rates by orders of magnitude. Large commercial memory buffers paired with incredibly high-rate bursted communications – 100 Gbps has already been demonstrated with higher rates possible with existing commercial technologies – could revolutionize how science missions are designed and run. We will give an overview of the technology, show some examples of how it could already be useful to missions, and propose next steps to make affordable and robust systems be available to the balloon community.

Don Boroson↗

Blue Origin De-orbit Descent and Landing Tipping Point: Program Final Report

The purpose of this document is to provide a final report on the Deorbit, Descent, and Landing (DDL) Tipping Point program, a public-private partnership between Blue Origin and NASA that is partially funded by NASA contract 80LARC19C0005. In this report we summarize the results of the entire contract, including recommendations and conclusions based on the experience and results obtained. Only the portions funded by the government with associated unlimited rights are documented in detail in this report. For the work funded by Blue Origin, summaries with unlimited rights are provided for context and completeness. The Blue Origin funded work exceeded 25% of the originally proposed total program cost and included a mixture of hardware procurement and critical technology maturation. The scope of this document is a discussion of all the major tasks performed under the contract including the sensor flight demonstrations on New Shepard, the hardware in the loop lunar landing navigator demonstration, and the ground testing of the Flash LiDAR hazard sensor. The contributions from the multiple NASA teams – Johnson Space Center, Langley Research Center, Goddard Space Flight Center, and Jet Propulsion Laboratory – are described along with the contributions from Blue Origin. This document is the Final Report for statement of work item 4.1.2.10 as Deliverable 5.8.

Stefan Bieniawski↗

Overview of High Temperature Material Needs for Space Nuclear Propulsion Reactors

Space nuclear propulsion systems are capable of enabling future crewed missions to Mars. Two primary options of these systems exist: nuclear thermal propulsion (NTP) and nuclear electric propulsion (NEP). NTP systems use a reactor as a heat exchanger to heat a hydrogen propellant to produce high specific impulse (≥ 900 s) and thrust (10 - 100 klbf). A NTP materials challenge is development of nuclear fuel capable of operating for short durations (hours) under high power densities (≥ 5 MW/L) and temperatures (> 2700 K) in a corrosive hydrogen environment. In NEP systems, the reactor heats a working fluid which transfers heat to a power conversion system to power electric thrusters. NEP is capable of higher specific impulse (≥ 2000 s) but limited to low thrust (10s lbf). Light weight vessel and in-core structural materials that are radiation-resistant, creep-resistant, and dimensionally stable while operating at ~1500 K over mission times up to several years are needed for NEP. Both systems can benefit from high temperature neutron moderators. Through the Space Nuclear Propulsion project, NASA, supported by the DOE, is developing NTP and NEP systems. Technology maturation planning and risk reduction activities related to fabrication and testing of reactor material candidates is ongoing. This presentation overviews NTP and NEP materials needs and current ceramic and composite development activities.

nuclear thermal propulsion↗

Radiometric Performance Characterization of the CubeSat Infrared Atmospheric Sounder (CIRAS) High Operating Temperature-Barrier Infrared Detectors (HOT-BIRD))

The CubeSat Infrared Atmospheric Sounder (CIRAS) is a remote sensing instrument under development for thedemonstration and technology maturation of hyperspectral infrared sounding in a 6U CubeSat. The CIRASinstrument utilizes a 2D Focal Plane Array (FPA) of High Operating Temperature-Barrier Infrared Detectors(HOT-BIRD). The HOT-BIRD material provides improved uniformity, higher allowable operating temperatures,and lower 1/f noise. The performance of the HOT-BIRD FPA was tested inside a Integrated Dewarand Cryocooler Assembly (IDCA), allowing the operating temperature of the FPA to reach low temperatures.Experimentation involved using an external Blackbody Calibrator Target (BCT) to generate numerous imagesof the BCT object at varying scene temperatures. The data acquired was compared to a radiometric model tocharacterize the responsivity of the detectors. In addition, a solid angle correction was developed to improve theaccuracy of the modeling. Real and synthetic images are presented in the comparative analysis to validate theexpected responsivity of the detectors through calculation of the quantum efficency.

Rafol, Sir B.↗

Health Management Considerations for Electrified Aircraft Propulsion Systems

Electrified aircraft propulsion (EAP) systems hold great potential for reducing aircraft fuel burn, emissions, and noise. Currently, NASA and other organizations are actively working to identify and mature technologies necessary to bring EAP designs to reality. This includes health management technology to monitor and assess the health of EAP systems. This presentation will review the typical components of an EAP architecture along with their potential fault modes and health management needs.

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion↗

Health Management Considerations for Electrified Aircraft Propulsion Systems

Electrified aircraft propulsion (EAP) systems hold great potential for reducing aircraft fuel burn, emissions, and noise. Currently, NASA and other organizations are actively working to identify and mature technologies necessary to bring EAP designs to reality. This includes health management technology to monitor and assess the health of EAP systems. This presentation will review the typical components of an EAP architecture along with their potential fault modes and health management needs.

Electrified Aircraft Propulsion↗