Relap-7: Advanced Nuclear Reactor Systems Analysis Software Package
Advanced Nuclear Reactor Systems Analysis Software Package
SEARCH · Search NASA
Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Advanced Nuclear Reactor Systems Analysis Software Package
The Utah State University (USU) Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) National Scientific User Facility experiment is a materials test consisting of specimens of hafnium aluminide intermetallic and composite. Specimens were contained in sealed, drop-in capsule pairs that were irradiated in the ATR B2 position for up to four reactor cycles (149A, 149B, 150 B and 151A). The experiment configuration was modeled using ABAQUS CAE Version 6.14-2 for construction of the finite element model and ABAQUS Standard to calculate specimen temperatures under as-run irradiation conditions. This ECAR report was formalized as requested by the NSUF project manager (Attachment A). A thermal analysis was performed to determine the irradiation temperatures of each test specimen for up to four irradiation cycles (149A, 149B, 150 B and 151A) that comprised the irradiation campaign. Computed minimum, average and maximum specimen temperatures are given for each of the 132 specimens for an average set of heat rates provided by the physics analysis. In addition, bounding temperatures are given for each specimen using the maximum heat rates from the physics analysis. Specimens in Capsules C 1, D 1 and B 2 experienced the lowest temperatures, followed by those in Capsules B 1, C 2 and D-2, and the highest temperatures were in specimens located in Capsules A-1 and A-2. Temperatures of the specimens for all cycles were between 325.2K and 424.7K. The highest average specimen temperature of 422.9K occurred in the intermetallic rod specimens in Capsule A-1 during Cycle 149B. The highest bounding temperature in the specimens was 424.7K. This information will be used in conjunction with PIE measurements to elucidate the thermophysical mechanisms occurring during, and as a result of, irradiation in the ATR.
In this work, an innovative energy storage concept based on the purposeful creation of defects in crystalline material by neutron irradiation is presented. Lattice defects are generated when heavy particles collide with the atoms in a crystal structure, i.e., if the incoming particles have enough energy, recoil atoms are displaced from their initial lattice sites. Most of the displaced atoms will eventually combine with nearby vacancies, but some of them will come to rest in non-ideal locations. The energy held by displaced atoms is called Wigner energy. Lattice defects can migrate and form clusters, and the Wigner energy can be released from these groupings if sufficient activation energy is provided. In the nuclear industry, this effect is well-known since it represented an issue for graphite-moderated reactors. This work presents the conceptual design of an engineering system that exploits this physical process to store the energy of neutrons in advanced reactor concepts. In the first part of the paper, the theoretical performance of an energy storage system based on the Wigner effect is described. Given the lattice properties and the compatibility with the harsh reactor environment, graphite was selected as the candidate material for the irradiation targets. Both experimental data and molecular dynamics simulations confirmed that this system can achieve performance comparable with state-of-the-art batteries in terms of stored energy density. In the second part of the paper, the engineering challenges of this innovative technology and the proposed solutions are described. After defining the optimal irradiation conditions, the different steps of the operation of the proposed energy system (from energy storing to energy harvesting) were defined. Finally, the integration of this concept with advanced reactor designs, i.e., a Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor and a Molten Salt-cooled Reactor, was investigated and the corresponding performance was evaluated.
There are four completed tests among a series of Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) irradiation experiments that are being conducted within the Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) Fuel Development and Qualification Program. The main objectives of the fuel experimental campaigns are to provide the necessary data on fuel performance to support fuel process development, qualify a fuel design and fabrication process for normal operation and hypothetical accident conditions, and support development and validation of fuel performance and fission product transport models and codes.1 Since this tristructural isotropic fuel is qualified to be used in high temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs), it is essential that the testing conditions of fuel irradiations are designed to mimic those in the conceptual gas reactors. As a result, temperatures of the AGR test fuel have to be maintained within a specified range that is typical of the HTGRs. In each AGR capsule, the test fuel temperature is controlled independently using a variable fraction neon and helium gas mixture that fills the gap volume for each capsule. The temperature as measured by a thermocouple (TC) terminated in the graphite holder (which houses fuel compacts) is used as a feedback for the gas flow controllers. Direct temperature measurement for fuel compacts is not possible because contact between a TC head and fuel particle could lead to undesirable failures. Therefore, an ABAQUS based finite element thermal model was created to predict the daily average fuel temperatures during the entire irradiation period.2,3 It is well-known that extended exposure to neutron irradiation and high temperatures leads to changes in geometries of fuel compacts and graphite holder, which result in changes of the gas gap leading to a change in the relationship between TC and fuel temperatures. In addition, TCs are also expected to drift and sometimes fail under irradiation conditions. These facts make maintaining test fuel temperature within a specified range challenging. This paper describes how the regression analysis methods are used in conjunction of calculated fuel temperatures from early irradiation periods (when irradiation effect is relatively small) to effectively control fuel temperature for the remaining irradiation, when irradiation effect became profound. This is particularly important in the event of all TCs in a capsule fail.
The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL), is a large test reactor for providing the capability for studying the effects of intense neutron and gamma radiation on reactor materials and fuels. The ATR is a pressurized, light-water, high flux test reactor with a maximum operating power of 250 MWth. The INL also has several hot cells and other laboratories in which irradiated material can be examined to study material irradiation effects. In 2007 the US Department of Energy (DOE) designated the ATR as a National Scientific User Facility (NSUF) to facilitate greater access to the ATR and the associated INL laboratories for material testing research by a broader user community. This paper highlights the ATR NSUF research program and the associated educational initiatives.
Safety is central to the design, licensing, operation, and economics of Nuclear Power Plants (NPPs). Consequently, the ability to better characterize and quantify safety margin holds the key to improved decision making about LWR design, operation, and plant life extension. A systematic approach to characterization of safety margins and the subsequent margins management options represents a vital input to the licensee and regulatory analysis and decision making that will be involved. The purpose of the RISMC Pathway R&D is to support plant decisions for risk-informed margins management with the aim to improve economics, reliability, and sustain safety of current NPPs. Goals of the RISMC Pathway are twofold: (1) Develop and demonstrate a risk-assessment method coupled to safety margin quantification that can be used by NPP decision makers as part of their margin recovery strategies. (2) Create an advanced “RISMC toolkit” that enables more accurate representation of NPP safety margin. This report describes the RISMC methodology demonstration where the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) was used as a test-bed for purposes of determining safety margins. As part of the demonstration, we describe how both the thermal-hydraulics and probabilistic safety calculations are integrated and used to quantify margin management strategies.
The Advanced Test Reactor Fresh Fuel Shipping Container (ATR FFSC) is a rectangular stainless steel container used for shipping radioactive material. The container is described in the ATR FFSC Safety Analysis Report (SAR). Per the ATR FFSC SAR, the ATR FFSC is designated a Type AF-96 packaging per the definition of 10 CFR §71.4, and was originally designed to transport high enriched uranium (HEU) reactor fuel elements for the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR), the Advanced Test Reactor Critical (ATRC) facility, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Reactor (MITR), and the University of Missouri Research Reactor (MURR). The Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration’s (NNSA), Office of Material Management and Minimization (M3) is working with the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) to develop and qualify new low enriched uranium (LEU) fuels and technologies for use in the ATR, ATRC, MITR, and MURR reactors. The LEU fuel elements will weigh significantly more than the current HEU designs and, combined with their associated Fuel Handling Enclosures for packaging, some configurations will exceed the 50 lbf used in the ATR FFSC qualifying drop tests. There are LEU versions of MITR, MURR, and ATR fuel elements. However, for this evaluation, drop analysis of the ATR FFSC with only the heavier ATR Low Enrichment (LOWE) fuel element is considered in this evaluation because the LOWE fuel element is the heaviest of the considered LEU fuel elements. The ATR HEU fuel element and the ATR LOWE fuel element are identical in every design aspect except for the fuel meat inside the 19 fuel plates. The LEU fuel meats are made using a U-10Mo high-density foil rather than uranium dispersed in aluminum in the HEU fuel elements. The high density of the uranium in the LEU fuel meat increases the LOWE fuel element weight to just under 44 lbf (versus the 22.1 lbf weight of the tested ATR HEU fuel element). ATR fuel elements are placed in a thin-gauge aluminum weldment called a "Fuel Handling Enclosure" during packaging. The Fuel Handling Enclosure is used to cover and protect the element during loading and unloading operations. The ATR Fuel Handling Enclosure weighs about 15 lbf per the drawings in the ATR FFSC SAR and the weight is accounted for in this evaluation. Transporting the heavier LEU fuel elements require evaluation of two issues. The first is the effect of the increased mass of the LEU fuel elements on the survivability of the ATR FFSC package following the requisite drop qualifications. The second is the effect of the increased mass of the fuel plates on the fuel element during the same drops. The ATR FFSC containing an ATR HEU fuel element in an ATR Fuel Handling Enclosure was physically dropped multiple times to qualify the container as a Type AF-96 package. The ATR FFSC SAR describes the drop tests performed with an actual ATR HEU fuel element weighing 22.1 lbf contained in a 14.3 lbf Fuel Handling Enclosure for a total payload of 36.4 lbf. Those drop tests showed that the ATR FFSC maintained containment of the ATR HEU fuel element and the fuel element was not significantly damaged. (Containment herein is not defined as a leak tight but is retention of the radioactive contents.) The purpose of the evaluation is to analytically show that, for a similar set of tests, the ATR FFSC maintains containment of the heavier ATR LOWE fuel element and to assess the damage to the fuel element during the drops. The approach was to create finite element analysis (FEA) models that produce the same results as the physical drops. Those models were then used as the benchmarks for the follow-on analyses using the heavier contents. FEA models of the drops of ATR FFSC using up to a 115 lbf fuel element were run and evaluated. Likewise, drops of a LOWE fuel element weighing 44 lbf in the ATR FFSC were run and evaluated. It is important to note that this report was done at the quality level necessary to be included in a nuclear facility safety basis. However, it is not the intent of this report to conclude the suitability of the ATR FFSC for transporting the heavier payloads. This report only describes the results of the FEA as related to the required drop scenarios. Incorporation of the FEA into the safety basis will be evaluated by the ATR FFSC design authority. The physical drop tests of the HEU fuel element and FEA drop analysis for the LOWE fuel element showed noteworthy damage to the fuel plates. An aluminum protective block was conceived to mitigate the damage. The concept requires the blocks to be placed in the fuel element between the end boxes and fuel plates. Additional FEA drop analyses were performed using the protective block. The addition of the blocks is primarily intended to mitigate the damage to the LOWE fuel element fuel plates. However, FEA drop analyses of the ATR HEU fuel element with the blocks were also performed and included for information.
The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR; TRA-670), which is located in the ATR Complex at Idaho National Laboratory, was constructed in the 1960s for the purpose of irradiating reactor fuels and materials. Other irradiation services, such as radioisotope production, are also performed at ATR. While ATR is safely fulfilling current mission requirements, assessments are continuing. These assessments intend to identify areas to provide defense–in-depth and improve safety for ATR. One of the assessments performed by an independent group of nuclear industry experts recommended that a remote accident management capability be provided. The report stated that: “contemporary practice in commercial power reactors is to provide a remote shutdown station or stations to allow shutdown of the reactor and management of long-term cooling of the reactor (i.e., management of reactivity, inventory, and cooling) should the main control room be disabled (e.g., due to a fire in the control room or affecting the control room).” This project will install remote reactor monitoring and management capabilities for ATR. Remote capabilities will allow for post scram reactor management and monitoring in the event the main Reactor Control Room (RCR) must be evacuated.
The Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) Complex located in Butte County, Idaho at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL) has an existing evaporative wastewater system to collect and treat sanitary wastewater from the facility. The existing system includes two cells, Cell #1 has a surface area of 2.9 acres and Cell #2 has a surface area of 13.8 acres. Cell #1 incorporates a soil liner system and Cell #2 includes both a PVC geomembrane and a soil liner. In 2010, both cells were tested in accordance with Idaho Department of Environmental Quality requirements and measured seepage was within acceptable limits.
There are four completed tests among a series of Advanced Gas Reactor (AGR) irradiation experiments that are being conducted within the Advanced Reactor Technologies (ART) Fuel Development and Qualification Program. The main objectives of the fuel experimental campaigns are to provide the necessary data on fuel performance to support fuel process development, qualify a fuel design and fabrication process for normal operation and hypothetical accident conditions, and support development and validation of fuel performance and fission product transport models and codes. Since this tri-structural isotropic fuel is qualified to be used in high temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTGRs), it is essential that the testing conditions of fuel irradiations are designed to mimic those in the conceptual gas reactors. As a result, temperatures of the AGR test fuel have to be maintained within a specified range that is typical of the HTGRs. In each AGR capsule, the test fuel temperature is controlled independently using a variable fraction neon and helium gas mixture that fills the gap volume for each capsule. The temperature as measured by a thermocouple (TC) terminated in the graphite holder (which houses fuel compacts) is used as a feedback for the gas flow controllers. Direct temperature measurement for fuel compacts is not possible because contact between a TC head and fuel particle could lead to undesirable failures. Therefore, an ABAQUS-based finite element thermal model was created to predict the daily average fuel temperatures during the entire irradiation period. It is well-known that extended exposure to neutron irradiation and high temperatures leads to changes in geometries of fuel compacts and graphite holder, which results in changes of the gas gap, leading to a change in the relationship between TC and fuel temperatures. In addition, TCs are expected to drift and sometimes fail under irradiation conditions. These facts make maintaining test fuel temperature within a specified range challenging. This paper describes how the regression analysis methods are used in conjunction with calculated fuel temperatures from early irradiation periods (when the irradiation effect is relatively small) to effectively control fuel temperature for the remaining irradiation (when the irradiation effect became profound). This is particularly important in the event when all TCs in a capsule fail.
Advanced FeCrAl alloys are being considered as an enhanced accident tolerant fuel (ATF) cladding for light water reactor (LWR) applications as they can exhibit slower reaction kinetics with high temperature steam and have a reduced production of hydrogen during accident scenarios compared both to historic 304L cladding and Zircaloy. Both of these attributes are key towards producing a fuel-form with enhanced accident tolerance over the current Zr-based-UO{sub 2} fuel form in deployment. A multi-year, multi-laboratory effort has been established to rapidly advance FeCrAl alloys as an ATF concept. This effort has focused on optimizing the microstructure and composition of these alloys in an attempt to provide performance on-par with or better than the current Zr-based cladding in both normal operating conditions and under accident scenarios. To date, a significant database supporting key performance factors in both scenarios has been developed. Based on this database, a compositional and microstructural window has been identified providing the insight for an optimized, advanced nuclear-grade FeCrAl alloy for LWRs. This work will provide a comprehensive overview of the systematic effort to advance FeCrAl alloys as an enhanced ATF cladding in commercial LWRs. Efforts undertaken by this multi-year, multi-laboratory program have shown the viability of using FeCrAl alloys as an ATF cladding in LWRs. Most importantly, it has been shown the oxidation resistance, decreased hydrogen production, and reduced heat generation of FeCrAl alloys strongly contribute to its ATF capability. Furthermore, it has been shown that the normal operational performance of a FeCrAl cladding can rival that of Zr-based alloys. Finally, it was found that optimizing the performance of FeCrAl cladding materials requires balancing the starting composition and microstructure in order to satisfy key performance indicators such as oxidation resistance and radiation tolerance. (authors)
This report provides an overview of technical issues and design features relevant to advanced reactors and reviews MELCOR's current readiness for modeling accidents in such reactor types. This report describes advanced reactor physics models currently available or under development, and gauges the level of effort required to develop new models and capabilities applicable to assessing advanced reactor safety issues. Finally, this report reviews the available database that can be used in verification and validation of new models. Four general advanced reactor types are considered in this report: 1) High Temperature Gas-Cooled Reactor (HTGR); 2) Sodium Fast Reactor (SFR); 3) Molten Salt Reactor (MSR); 4) Fluoride Salt-Cooled High Temperature Reactor (FHR)
For each operating cycle of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory, a Core Safety Assurance Package (CSAP) is necessary to demonstrate compliance with the safety basis approved by the United State Department of Energy (DOE). Certain computer codes are used in CSAP development, most of them developed in-house. This work describes replacement of a large set of these codes and updates previous work. Replacement of legacy codes is necessary due to computer hardware failure but also has generally improved user-friendliness.
For each operating cycle of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at Idaho National Laboratory, a Core Safety Assurance Package (CSAP) is necessary to demonstrate compliance with the safety basis approved by the United State Department of Energy (DOE). Certain computer codes are used in CSAP development, most of them developed in-house. This work describes replacement of a large set of these codes and updates previous work. Replacement of legacy codes is necessary due to computer hardware failure but also has generally improved user-friendliness.
Passive reactor core cooling systems can mitigate the effects of station blackout conditions and avoid accidents similar to what occurred at the Fukushima Dai-ichi reactors. Advanced nuclear reactor designs such as the Advanced Heavy Water Reactor (AHWR) and others include passive cooling systems. The AHWR utilizes water storage tanks that can remove decay heat for more than 50 days after station blackout. While these systems do not rely on electricity, they do rely on passive valves to function during an emergency situation. The purpose of the present work is to determine the feasibility of a passive endothermic reaction cooling system (PERCS). The PERCS relies on an endothermic reaction that does not proceed until it reaches a threshold temperature. Thus, a vessel filled with chemicals that undergo an endothermic reaction can be directly connected to the reactor core without any valves and only react once accident conditions raise the temperature past the threshold temperature. (authors)
Many of the sensors deployed at materials and test reactors cannot withstand the high flux/high temperature test conditions often requested by users at U.S. test reactors, such as the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory. To address this issue, an instrumentation development effort was initiated as part of the ATR National Scientific User Facility in 2007 to support the development and deployment of enhanced in-pile sensors. This paper reports results from this effort. Specifically, this paper identifies the types of sensors currently available to support in-pile irradiations and those sensors currently available to ATR users. Accomplishments from new sensor technology deployment efforts are highlighted by describing new temperature and thermal conductivity sensors now available to ATR users. Efforts to deploy enhanced in-pile sensors for detecting elongation and realtime flux detectors are also reported, and recently-initiated research to evaluate the viability of advanced technologies to provide enhanced accuracy for measuring key parameters during irradiation testing are noted. (authors)
Many of the sensors deployed at materials and test reactors cannot withstand the high flux/high temperature test conditions often requested by users at U.S. test reactors, such as the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory (INL). To address this issue, an instrumentation development effort was initiated as part of the ATR National Scientific User Facility (NSUF) in 2007 to support the development and deployment of enhanced in-pile sensors. This paper reports results from this effort. Specifically, this paper identifies the types of sensors currently available to support in-pile irradiations and those sensors currently available to ATR users. Accomplishments from new sensor technology deployment efforts are highlighted by describing new temperature and thermal conductivity sensors now available to ATR users. Efforts to deploy enhanced in-pile sensors for detecting elongation and real-time flux detectors are also reported, and recently-initiated research to evaluate the viability of advanced technologies to provide enhanced accuracy for measuring key parameters during irradiation testing are noted.
Many of the sensors deployed at materials and test reactors cannot withstand the high flux/high temperature test conditions often requested by users at U.S. test reactors, such as the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Laboratory. To address this issue, an instrumentation development effort was initiated as part of the ATR National Scientific User Facility in 2007 to support the development and deployment of enhanced in-pile sensors. This paper provides an update on this effort. Specifically, this paper identifies the types of sensors currently available to support in-pile irradiations and those sensors currently available to ATR users. Accomplishments from new sensor technology deployment efforts are highlighted by describing new temperature and thermal conductivity sensors now available to ATR users. Efforts to deploy enhanced in-pile sensors for detecting elongation and real-time flux detectors are also reported, and recently-initiated research to evaluate the viability of advanced technologies to provide enhanced accuracy for measuring key parameters during irradiation testing are noted.