Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORAGE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2015

Implementing a Low-Activity Waste Direct Feed Capability in the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project - 15594

The current design of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) requires that all waste be processed through the Pretreatment (PT) Facility. The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has developed a strategic, phased approach to completing the WTP Project, beginning with feeding some liquid waste from the tank farms to the Low-Activity Waste (LAW) Facility, bypassing the PT Facility. To accomplish this, the DOE Office of River Protection (ORP) will construct a new capability outside WTP to remove cesium and solids from the liquid portion of the tank waste before transferring that waste to the LAW Facility. This new capability, referred to as the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System, is outside WTP and not included in the project's scope. The primary driver for the Direct-Feed LAW (DFLAW) approach is to enable commissioning of the LAW Facility for low-activity waste processing before the PT and High-Level Waste Facilities are complete and operational. As such, the functions intended to be provided to the LAW Facility by the PT Facility and the common functionality with the High-Level Waste Facility must be refined and modified. The DFLAW approach will provide necessary systems and facilities to replace these enabling PT Facility functions until the PT Facility is completed and commissioned. In February 2014, ORP requested the WTP contractor to develop separate contract modification proposals for completing: (1) the LAW Facility, Balance of Facilities, and Analytical Laboratory work scope in the current contract through hot commissioning in a manner to accommodate a phased start of the WTP mission; and (2) initial planning and design for incorporating a permanent capability to accommodate DFLAW in the WTP. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Direct Feed Low Activity Waste (DFLAW) Program: Development, Progression and Risk Management - 16476

This Direct Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) Program paper describes the key programmatic elements to enable the startup of treatment and disposal of Hanford tank waste through a phased startup of the Hanford Tank Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP). Specifically the DFLAW Program consists of the Low- Activity Waste (LAW) vitrification facility, and the direct feed to LAW of treated tank farm supernatant from the Low-Activity Waste Pretreatment System (LAWPS). This document identifies the overall strategy, objectives, and processes of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of River Protection (ORP) and all supporting DOE subcontractors, and describes the scope of the program elements. In addition gaps, risks, and opportunities to successful integration for commissioning of all needed systems and facilities to produce immobilized LAW product (ILAW) are described. The scope of the DFLAW Program extends up to the point that LAW Facility hot commissioning is complete and all DFLAW systems are fully operational. The DFLAW Program coordinates, integrates, and monitors all the activities necessary to successfully commission and start up the WTP LAW facility. This involves integrating the readiness of all the plant, personnel and program/procedures that support startup of hot commissioning of tank farms systems, WTP systems, waste treatment and disposal systems, and site utility, infrastructure and services. Multiple Hanford contractors have responsibilities to execute and perform scope under the umbrella of the DFLAW Program. The primary focus of the One System organization, comprised of WTP Project and Tank Operations Contract (TOC) personnel, is to manage the coordination and integration across the interfaces of the work scope described above. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Managing Hanford's Direct Feed Low Activity Waste Program - 20002

The Office of River Protection (ORP) is responsible for the management and completion of the River Protection Project (RPP) mission, which comprises both the Hanford Site tank farms operations and the completion and operation of the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant Project. The RPP mission is to safely retrieve, treat, and immobilize Hanford's high-level and low-activity tank waste and close the tank farms to protect the Columbia River. The Direct-Feed Low-Activity Waste (DFLAW) Program is a major subset of the overall RPP mission, providing disposition of low-activity waste. The scope is to retrieve, treat, and immobilize the low-activity waste at the Low-Activity Waste Facility. DFLAW will begin operations no later than December 2023. The DFLAW Program overarches a suite of individual projects, activities, and infrastructure upgrades. The major projects and activities include multiple contractors under both ORP and the Richland Operations Office, underscoring the need for effective integration, coordination, and collaboration. The objectives of the DFLAW Program leadership team are to: - Effectively coordinate and integrate the projects that comprise the DFLAW Program - Manage the interfaces between the projects so that the integrated DFLAW Program is completed successfully - Ensure the DFLAW portfolio of projects operate as required without gaps or conflicts at the interfaces. DOE is accomplishing these objectives through a newly established leadership model that integrates the DOE and contractor work streams and promotes a teamwork model to enable collaborative success. Long considered one of the most formidable cleanup challenges at Hanford, the Department of Energy and its contractors are on the verge of achieving a cleanup commitment that has been decades in the making. DOE is preparing to vitrify (turn to glass) Hanford's chemical and radioactive tank waste using the DFLAW process. The Modified Consent Decree milestone for completing hot commissioning of the Hanford Site's Low- Activity Waste Facility is Dec. 31, 2023. While this milestone may seem distant under normal project management circumstances, it is a relatively short period of time for the operational and cultural transformation necessary to successfully begin treating tank waste at Hanford. Direct feed means separating the waste at a tank farm to remove the more radioactive portion (i.e., solids and cesium) so that the resulting low-activity (less radioactive) waste can be fed directly to the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant's Low-Activity Waste Facility. Starting DFLAW will require a singular, intensive leadership focus, along with a sustained, collective commitment to excellence and teamwork by the Department and its contractors. Major upgrades to Hanford's infrastructure will occur prior to startup. Supporting DFLAW operations requires significant integration between the DFLAW facilities - the Waste Treatment Plant, Hanford's tank farms, effluent treatment facilities, disposal facilities - and between all of the site contractors to achieve success. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Application of On-Line Monitoring and Real-Time Characterization of Low Level Waste Samples from Hanford Tanks - 20380

Waste and treatment stream characterization is an essential part of safe, efficient, and cost-effective processing of Hanford materials. The demand for materials characterization, including chemical, radionuclide, and physical attributes during waste management, transfer, and staging operations in the Hanford tank farms, is expected to significantly increase as the U.S. Department of Energy Office of River Protection (ORP) progresses toward Hanford waste treatment and immobilization. The application of on-line monitoring can greatly improve operation time frames and reduce costs by providing real-time data and supporting the reduction of necessary grab sample collection. Recently, our team applied Raman online monitoring and chemometric modeling to the supernate of Hanford tank 241-AP-105, and demonstrated the quantitative measurement of nine analytes within this waste. Application of this method has been expanded to additional Hanford tank wastes, AW-102 and AP-107. The performance of the process monitoring instruments and the accuracy of the chemometric models will be assessed. On-line monitoring results will be compared to anion results determined from the current standard, ion-chromatographic and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry methods. Comparisons of both determined values and uncertainties of results will be presented. Results will be shared with personnel working on flowsheet interfaces for the Direct-Feed Low Activity Waste mission at Hanford. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Removal of Metal Oxides from Reactor Metals/Alloys by Laser Ablation

Storage of low and intermediate level radioactive waste in a deep geological repository (L and ILW DGR): - Large volumes of metallic waste = increased production of hydrogen gas. - Large fraction of the metallic wastes are out-of-core reactor components. - Carbon steel feeder pipes. - Radioactive contamination is concentrated within the surface oxides. - Removal of surface contaminants would lead to volume reduction of metallic waste that is stored in L and ILW DGR. - Current decontamination techniques generate large volumes of secondary waste. Objectives: Oxide removal from carbon steel using a ytterbium fiber laser (1064 nm) with a particular focus on identifying the key laser parameters that affect the removal efficiency. Advantages of laser ablation: Generate low volumes of waste, Flexibility of deployment, Remote operation. Grow an oxide film on carbon steel with the incorporation of cobalt. Optimize laser cleaning technology for the removal of surface oxides. Incorporate an oxide collection system for the ablated particles. Conclusions: Objective 1 - Simulated inactive oxides on carbon steel, using Co{sup 2+} as a surrogate for Co radionuclide. Objective 2 - Optimized laser parameters (200 MW/cm{sup 2}, 3 scans, 15 μm overlap); Complete removal of cobalt from surface and bulk metal with optimized cleaning settings. Objective 3 - Glass fiber media H14 HEPA filters had highest collection yield; High oxide collection yields (∼100%). Future Work: Further testing of the liquid trap will verify the efficacy of the HEPA filter and determine the amount of ablated oxides that pass through. Testing of the laser ablation system needs to be done on other reactor materials along with the incorporation of different transition metal cations. Improvements to the oxide collection system are required to improve collection yields.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2020

Technology Development for Under Tank Inspection of Double-Shell Tanks - 20045

The Department of Energy (DOE) Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP) is responsible for management and cleanup of the tank farms located at the Hanford Site. Nuclear waste at Hanford is stored in 149 single-shell tanks (SSTs) and 27 double-shell tanks (DSTs). The vast majority of the liquid radioactive waste is stored in the DSTs. The 27 DSTs, located in six tank farms, were constructed from 1967 to 1986 and, compared to the SSTs, provide greatly improved protection from leakage and better accessibility for inspection. The DSTs and ancillary equipment are expected to exceed their design life before their waste is removed and sent to the Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant. The DST Integrity Project (DSTIP) must ensure that the DST system can meet the River Protection Project mission goals. This paper provides a programmatic overview of the DSTIP with a focus on development of under-tank inspection technologies. Currently, two categories of nondestructive examination (NDE) techniques for DSTs are implemented on the Hanford site: (1) surface (SNDE) and (2) volumetric (VNDE). Further discussion on current inspection techniques is provided in this paper. The technology development approach for advanced VNDE techniques will also be generally discussed as a precursor for another more detailed WM2020 paper and presentation by PNNL. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Use of an Alternative Conceptual Model of Vadose Zone Heterogeneity to Evaluate Past Tank Leaks and Other Unplanned Releases within a Tank Farm at the Hanford Site - 20061

Washington State Department of Ecology (Ecology) requested that U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)-Office of River Protection (ORP) consider an evaluation of effects of fine-grained thin sediment layers on transport with a separate alternative conceptual model in its evaluation of the potential impact of tank leaks and other unplanned releases within the tank farm at the Hanford Site. For this alternative model, Ecology recommended that the model be developed based on the general framework of fine-grained units identified by a stakeholder group in their interpretations of variability in moisture content data collected in the vicinity of Waste Management Area (WMA) C. In discussions with DOE-ORP, Ecology acknowledged that the underlying data and interpretations of the occurrence and lateral continuity of the fine-grained thin layers identified by a stakeholder group are uncertain. However, DOE-ORP agreed to Ecology's recommendation and has provided support for the requested evaluation that involved development of an alternative model based on the general framework of the unpublished report by the stakeholder. DOE-ORP considered this evaluation to be a hypothetical evaluation of vadose zone heterogeneities at WMA C. General observations from the range of simulation cases examined in the evaluation of the effects of hypothetical vadose zone heterogeneities at WMA C are as follows. - The movement of the center of mass of the simulated plumes was generally vertically downward below the source for all simulations, including those that incorporated the hypothetical fine-grained units. - All simulations that incorporated hypothetical heterogeneity produced additional plume spreading over what was produced in simulations using Equivalent Homogeneous Media (EHM) model(s)a. The spreading resulted in a broadening of the fringes of the plume, resulting in a wider region of low concentration, but lower peak concentrations associated with the center of mass of the plume. - Simulations that used the silty-sand hydraulic properties, suggested by Ecology for the hypothetical fine-grained units, generally produced similar spreading and slightly lower peak mass flux at the water table when compared to the EHM modeling results. a The EHM-based models used at WMA C do not explicitly include small-scale fine-grained heterogeneities used in the model advocated by Ecology. - Simulations that used the silty-sand hydraulic properties, suggested by Ecology for the hypothetical fine-grained units, generally produced less spreading and an earlier arrival of mass flux at the water table when compared to the use of another set of hydraulic properties from a silty-sand sample collected at a nearby disposal facility. - The EHM representation of the vadose zone generally produced higher peak mass flux and an earlier occurrence of peak fluxes at the water table compared to all analyses incorporating additional hypothetical heterogeneity. Results of this alternative model evaluation of past leaks provided some insight into the transport effects of vadose zone heterogeneities at WMA C that helped resolve Ecology's comments and issues related to the effects of vadose zone heterogeneities on past leaks and losses from the WMA C tank farms area. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Supplemental Immobilization of Hanford Low-Activity Waste: Cast Stone Augmented Formulation Matrix Tests

More than 56 million gallons of radioactive and hazardous waste are stored in 177 underground storage tanks at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Hanford Site in Washington State. The HLW will be vitrified in the HLW facility for ultimate disposal at an offsite federal repository. A portion (~35%) of the LAW will be vitrified in the LAW vitrification facility for disposal onsite at the Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF). The pretreatment and HLW vitrification facilities will have the capacity to treat and immobilize all of the wastes destined for those facilities. However, a second facility will be needed for the expected volume of LAW requiring immobilization. Cast Stone, a cementitious waste form, is being considered to provide the required additional LAW immobilization capacity. The Cast Stone waste form must be acceptable for disposal in the IDF. The Cast Stone waste form and immobilization process must be tested to demonstrate that the final Cast Stone waste form can comply with the waste acceptance criteria for the disposal facility and that the immobilization processes can be controlled to consistently provide an acceptable waste form product. A testing program was developed in fiscal year (FY) 2012 describing in detail the work needed to develop and qualify Cast Stone as a waste form for the solidification of Hanford LAW. A statistically designed test matrix was used to evaluate the effects of key parameters on the properties of the Cast Stone as it is initially prepared and after curing. For the processing properties, the water-to-dry-blend mix ratio was the most significant parameter in affecting the range of values observed for each property. The single shell tank (SST) Blend simulant also showed differences in measured properties compared to the other three simulants tested. A review of the testing matrix and results indicated that an additional set of tests would be beneficial to improve the understanding of the impacts noted in the Screening Matrix tests. A set of Cast Stone formulations were devised to augment the original screening test matrix and focus on the range of the test conditions. Fly ash and blast furnace slag were limited to either northwest or southeast and the salt solutions were narrowed to the Average and the SST Blend at the 7.8M Na concentration. To fill in the matrix, a mix ratio of 0.5 was added. In addition, two admixtures, Xypex Admix C-500 and Rheomac SF100 (silica fume), were added as an additional dry material binder in select compositions. As in the Screening Matrix, both fresh and cured properties were evaluated for the formulations. In this study, properties that were influenced by the W/DM ratio in the Screening Matrix; flow diameter, plastic viscosity, density, and compressive strength, showed consistent behavior with respect to W/DM. The leach index for highly soluble components, sodium and nitrate, were not influenced by changes in formulation or the admixtures. The leach index for both iodine and Tc-99 show an influence from the addition of the admixture, Xypex Admix C-500. Additional testing should be performed to further evaluate the influence of Xypex Admix C-500 on the leach index over a range of admixture concentrations, Cast Stone formulations, and curing and storage conditions.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

RCRA Refresher Self-Study, Course 28582

Federal and state regulations require hazardous and mixed waste facility workers at treatment and storage facilities (TSFs) and <90-day accumulation areas to be trained in hazardous and mixed waste management. This course will refamiliarize and update <90-day accumulation area workers, TSF workers, and supervisors of TSF workers regarding waste identification, pollution prevention, storage area requirements, emergency response procedures, and record-keeping requirements.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2017

Does the Perfect Waste Package Exist? Development of a Decisional Tool Addressing this Challenge - 17053

The definition of a safe, technically, economically and societally acceptable waste management strategy is highly dependent on the Waste Acceptance Criteria in each country and on the already available disposal routes. It is the reason why there is not a single solution but a combination of optimized solutions depending on the type of waste and on each country's considerations. In fact, when operating a nuclear plant or performing its decommissioning or legacy waste management, one has to consider a large waste diversity in term of natures, types, volumes and radioactivity spectra. All nuclear operators have to take-up the challenge of implementing solutions for conditioning its waste in packages suitable for transport short to long term interim storage and final disposal of it (or prepare for final disposal if the repository is not yet available). Operators have then to answer the following dilemma: either define a complete strategy packaging the waste for final disposal, or 'containerising' it temporarily, pending final disposal. The strategy is highly country dependent; in the first case, one has to take into account the available information and future orientations relative to acceptability of the packages in order to define a robust solution. The approach implemented in France requires a close dialogue between the Operators, the Safety Authority, the Administration and the stakeholders. Moreover it pushes forward whenever possible standardization, contributing to cost minimization. If the second approach has the advantage of leaving the options open, and reducing the initial investments, it inevitably requires future retrieval and re-packaging with potential evolutions/degradation of the initial waste form. It also induces the potential risk to produce additional secondary waste. As an additional drawback, it introduces uncertainties and unknowns related to the future waste management criteria and to the costs. The general idea is that, depending on context, a given route (i.e., treatment, conditioning, and transport), could be considered as efficient or not. Assessing a waste package is certainly highly context dependent. However it should be possible to recognize and to lead an evaluation based on a number of fixed criteria, whatever the context, to be addressed when assessing the development of a final waste package in connection to the overall management route. A waste package is always a combination of a waste container and a waste form and will have to be transported one day from the production site to the final repository or to off-site interim storage facilities. AREVA's approach consists in defining an evaluation grid based on a set of criteria which aim (i) to evaluate whether the different waste treatments, conditionings, transport and packages deserve to be considered within different national contexts, and (ii) to evaluate R and D actions to be performed for improving existing solutions or developing new ones. One of the key lessons to be drawn from AREVA's experience in developing waste packages is that the perfect waste doesn't exist even though the vitrified canister is probably the most efficient one. The performance of a package resulting from a compromise depends on context and is a strength combination between the waste container and the waste form. The approach is to evaluate a waste package development against different set of criteria and to draw optimization diagrams. In such diagram, a given waste package is assessed with respect to selected criteria such as waste form and waste container, stability, level of waste incorporation, integrity lifetime, secondary waste generation, transport, long term behavior, and economical effectiveness, etc. Addressing a waste form is a very key point. This evaluation grid and comparative approach will be presented through examples and comparison providing from AREVA feedback on waste package development related to complex waste management such as problematic waste or legacy waste. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Validation of the Modelling of Corrosion Driven Expansion in Grouted Waste-forms - 16125

One of the current preferred solutions for the disposal of Intermediate Level radioactive waste in the UK is grout encapsulation inside steel boxes for long term storage. These boxes are then to be entombed in a Geological Disposal Facility once one is available. However, both prior to and during geological disposal, waste contents can react with the water present in the encapsulant grout and begin to corrode. This corrosion product occupies a larger volume (by several hundred percent) than the original material and the corrosion occurs over the course of decades and centuries, long after the encapsulant grout has set and hardened. The expanding waste then creates stresses in the encapsulant causing both it and the surrounding box to deform and, in extreme circumstances, and after long times, for the structural integrity of the box to fail. This behaviour needs to be quantified before the box can be approved for use as any excessive deformation could lead to a loss of containment or, since the boxes are stacked on top of each other, to a significant accident in the stores. Due to the long timescales involved, physical testing of the phenomenon in full scale is impossible. Instead, a combination of chemical modelling and finite element analysis is used to predict the extent of the corrosion in the waste and its effect of the integrity of the box. There are a number of difficulties in modelling the corrosion-driven expansion and subsequent deformation of the boxes. Although the corrosion occurs over a very long time scale, the event is highly non-linear and dynamic. All of the material models, including the steel and grout are non-linear. The deformation is in the order of 10s of centimetres, well beyond the static elastic range. Finally, the components must be allowed to move relative to each other which involve a lot of part to part contacts. This means that simple static modelling, which would solve quite quickly, cannot be used. Instead a dynamic analysis code, LS-DYNA, has been used to expand the product over time to simulate the corrosion-driven expansion. This software is generally used for modelling car crashes or scenarios where waste containers have been dropped. The analyses therefore include a significant inertial component. This paper will detail the NNL's approach to modelling this long-term, quasi-static phenomenon in the dynamic, impact oriented software code LS-DYNA. It will cover the problems inherent in this approach, the errors that it creates as well as the tests and solutions that NNL worked on in order to overcome them and be confident that the solution could be validated. This work will ultimately be used to determine the maximum inventory which can be stored in each box based on the waste content and the potential extent of expansion as well as any modification that could be made to the box design or the processing streams that may improve the storage solution. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Gas retention and release from Hanford Site sludge waste tanks - 15491

Radioactive wastes from nuclear fuel processing are stored in large underground storage tanks at the Hanford Site. Solid wastes can be divided into salt-cake (mostly precipitated soluble sodium nitrate and nitrite salts with some interstitial liquid consisting of concentrated salt solutions) and sludge (mostly low solubility aluminum and iron compounds with relatively dilute interstitial liquid). Waste generates hydrogen through the radiolysis of water and organic compounds, radio-thermolytic decomposition of organic compounds, and corrosion of a tank's carbon steel walls. Nonflammable gases, such as nitrous oxide and nitrogen, are also produced. Additional flammable gases (e.g., ammonia and methane) are generated by chemical reactions between various degradation products of organic chemicals present in the tanks. Six double-shell tanks (DSTs) containing salt-cake wastes began showing signs of gas accumulation and buoyant instability in the form of periodic waste level drops in the 1980's. Studies in the 1990's indicated that gas would accumulate in the settled solids layer until its bulk density was lower than the supernatant liquid. The resultant gas release caused by this instability was termed a Buoyant Displacement Gas Release Event (BDGRE). Criteria were developed to prevent forming additional waste tanks that exhibited BDGREs. Significant gas accumulation and BDGREs were never observed in tanks containing predominantly sludge wastes. Literature reviews, data from Hanford Site waste tanks, and experiments with waste simulants have led to new conclusions on gas retention and release in sludge waste. The data show similar overall behavior where initially the settled solids volume increases as gas bubbles form. Gas fraction in the settled solids increases to a peak concentration after which additional generated gas escapes through connected cracks and there is a balance between gas generation and gas release with little change in gas fraction. Experiments showed that this behavior does not change as sludge waste depth increases. Sufficient data now exist to differentiate between gas retention and release behavior in Hanford Site sludge waste tanks and salt-cake waste tanks. The salt-cake criteria do not need to be applied to sludge waste tanks that exhibit certain gas retention and release behavior. Criteria for waste characteristics and process behavior have been defined that identify specific wastes and tanks that, based on previous operating experience, will have low gas retention and will not exhibit large, spontaneous releases. The first criterion defines what waste is considered sludge and what waste is considered salt-cake. If the mass ratio of soluble to insoluble constituents is below 2.5, then the waste is sludge. The second criterion is a density difference criterion that prevents tanks being operated in a region where sludge buoyancy might occur. For large gas releases to occur, the settled solids must accumulate sufficient gas to become less dense than the overlying supernatant (i.e., the settled solids would become buoyant). Based on previous operating experience, the ratio of liquid density to degassed settled solids bulk density (ρl/ρB) should be maintained at ≤ 0.84. This ensures that retained gas content in the sludge would need to exceed 16% by volume for the settled solids to become buoyant in the overlying supernatant. Tank waste that satisfies the mass ratio criterion, the liquid to bulk solids density criterion, and has process data supporting typical Hanford waste sludge behavior does not pose a significant risk for a large spontaneous gas release event. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Overcoming challenges in delivering 5 Avantech water treatment systems at Fukushima - 15544

The Great East Japan Earthquake has left the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Station with many challenges related to water treatment. This paper will provide information on three systems provided for the treatment of [1] accumulated water associated with the Circulated Water Cooling System, [2] sub-drain water removed from wells adjacent to the Unit 1-4 Reactor and Turbine Buildings, and [3] wash water from decontamination of vehicles and equipment. Specific information will be presented on work that was completed to overcome process, installation and logistical challenges associated with these water streams including the following: - Selection of technology and equipment for removal of specific radionuclides - Performance results of highly selective adsorbents used for removing radionuclides in the presence of varying concentrations of chlorides and other natural constituents - Description of process flowsheets and equipment configuration - Discussion of the post-accident work environment and the related work site restrictions Results show that the customized solutions will enable the utility to clean-up the wastewater for cooling, reuse and potential discharge. The technologies used for the three water treatment systems are directly applicable to the treatment of similarly challenging water streams at commercial nuclear power plants, fuel reprocessing plants and governmental nuclear facilities worldwide. The use of these technologies will aid in the lowering of radioactivity released to the environment, worker radiation exposure and the amount of secondary waste requiring long term storage and/ or disposal. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2015

Submersible ROVs pioneer decommissioning of a legacy nuclear fuel storage pond - 15368

Submersible Remote Handling Vehicles (ROVs) are being used in innovative ways at the Sellafield decommissioning, reprocessing and nuclear waste management facility in the UK in a legacy fuel storage pond in support of pond decommissioning. A wide range of sensors and tooling attached to submersible ROVs are being used to characterise the contents of the pond and perform a wide range of maintenance and material retrieval tasks. Visual surveys, sludge and liquor sampling and radiological surveys are just some of the characterisation projects undertaken with the help of the ROVs. The ROVs have also been deployed with tooling including manipulators which can retrieve debris from the pond floor. A variety of mini and work class ROVs are used in the ponds and these can access areas of the pond that the traditional technologies such as long reach tooling and manipulators from overhead cranes cannot reach safely, efficiently and cost effectively. The ROVs are controlled at a distance from the pond to minimise operator exposure to radiation and avoid potential radiological contamination. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

ENRESA's Spent Nuclear Fuel and Special Waste Database - 18115

Empresa Nacional de Residuos Radiactivos S.A. (ENRESA, by its initials in Spanish) Spent Nuclear Fuel (SNF) and Special Waste (SW) database development was initiated in a common effort between ENRESA and UNESA (the Spanish Association of the Electricity Industry) as a consequence of new regulatory requirements in the frame of radioactive waste management plans. Although these requirements were only mandatory for operators of nuclear power plants, ENRESA deemed necessary to have a centralized database which collected the data from the plant operators. The most relevant features of this database are: - The information collected covers not only the general characteristics of the SNF and SW but also the operation details needed for their characterization. - An application, named Gestion de Elementos Combustibles y Residuos Especiales (GECYRE, by its initials in Spanish) has been implemented for easing the queries and the generation of predefined reports. - An agile data transfer scheme, based on XML files, is used for an effective communication between ENRESA and the operators. The database is currently in production phase since 2014. During this phase it has demonstrated its effectiveness as an information repository to address the SNF and SW interim storage projects in Spain foreseen in the near future. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Used fuel transportation considerations to support centralized interim storage

The deployment of a used fuel centralized interim storage facility (CISF) can offer a renewed opportunity for the U.S. to make real progress towards integrating of the back end of the fuel cycle. One of the key elements of success, and perhaps as important as the CISF project itself, is transportation-program readiness for large-scale rail shipments of spent fuel to a centralized storage facility. This paper offers an overview of the status of spent fuel transportation readiness in the U.S. The authors identify a number of technical and institutional challenges to be resolved before rail shipments of used fuel to a centralized storage facility can begin. Furthermore, 'NAC International', a transportation company, recommends a key action to ensure a safe, secure and efficient transportation system that meets stakeholder expectations is ready to meet milestone dates. NAC will address the challenges of deploying such a system, focused on leveraging existing U.S. transportation experience, capabilities and infrastructure. This paper concludes with the assertion, that spent fuel transportation to a CISF by 2021 is possible if we seriously commit resources now to address the critical institutional, operational, and system requirements implicit in a consent based transportation and storage program.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2019

The Role of Indian Tribes in the Safe, Secure, and Routine Transportation of Spent Nuclear Fuel and High-Level Radioactive Waste - 19463

Far too often federally recognized Indian Tribes are the last stakeholders invited to the table to discuss a particular issue with potentially wide-ranging impacts. Indian tribes were the first governments on this continent. With respect to the future transportation of spent nuclear fuel (SNF) or high-level radioactive waste (HLW), Indian tribes are potentially impacted in a myriad of ways: economics, cultural, environmental, health and safety. Yet few regulators fully understand and appreciate the legal and political standing of Indian tribes. This paper will examine the ways in which Indian tribes must be involved with the planning for safe, secure and routine SNF and HLW shipments and the ways in which the federal government is obligated to involve tribes. Indian tribes are similar to states in that they are responsible for the health and safety of its members (which they themselves define). Tribes, like states, make, implement, interpret, and enforce laws, and provide public services - healthcare, public education, social services, drug treatment, public safety and emergency management, transportation, managing natural resources, public housing, and environmental and cultural preservation. Many tribes also operate economic enterprises - manufacturing, farming, forestry, and gaming. The most basic principle of Indian law is the principle of 'sovereignty,' that is, an Indian tribe possesses all the powers of any sovereign state. Tribal governments are not subject to state or local jurisdiction but are subject to federal jurisdiction. The tribes enjoy a government-to-government relationship (and expectation) with the federal government (i.e., agencies, like the Department of Energy, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission). Of paramount concern to Indian tribes is the doctrine of Trust Responsibility, the general principle that the federal government's conduct 'in dealing with the Indians should therefore be judged by the most exacting fiduciary standards.' With respect to SNF/HLW this means that the federal government has an obligation (or a Trust Responsibility) to ensure that tribal people, lands and resources are protected. Equally important is the expectation that federal agencies will work with the Indian tribes on a government-to-government basis before undertaking any action with potential negative consequences on the tribe's people, land or resources. The concept of government-to-government consultation between Indian tribes and the United States is long standing and well recognized. As expressed in Executive Order 13175, 'Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments': 'Consultation - Each federal agency must have an accountable process to ensure meaningful and timely input by tribal officials in the development of regulatory policies that have tribal implications.' The purpose of consultation is to ensure that Indian tribes are consulted before government officials make decisions that may have an impact on their lives and territories. The three agencies involved with SNF and HLW transportation - the US Department of Transportation (DOT), the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), and the US Department of Energy (DOE) - have had various degrees of success with respect to direct consultation with Indian tribes. Given that there is plenty of lead-time before the first shipments commence, there should be ample time to develop a strategy for ensuring that tribes are equal partners when planning and preparing for shipments of SNF and HLW to the first interim storage facility. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Emergency response and solutions for damaged fuel assembly handling events - Lessons learned from a 2013 fuel positioning issue

In 2013, during the refueling of a French 1300 MWe reactor, a fuel assembly (FX3599) was damaged by a fuel assembly positioning tool in the reactor vessel. The upper part of a corner rod of the fuel assembly was twisted and the top end grid was torn off. Because of the protruding fuel rod, the assembly could not be easily transferred for repair to the fuel storage pool via the transfer tube. This unexpected and rarely encountered situation was assessed jointly by EDF and AREVA NP. The chosen option was to directly perform the field service inside the reactor building in cells generally used for intermediate storage during refueling. This operation, performed by EDF and AREVA, involved removing the twisted rod and positioning it in a special-purpose canister by means of a gripper-type tool for removal (KIPCI gripper) and a gripper for holding the rod in place. The special-purpose canister was designed, ordered and supplied by a sub-supplier within one week. The operation went through 3 phases. First a preparation step in the fuel building: The stripper was disassembled and technical checks carried out to ensure correct operation. The gripper tightening force was checked in real-life conditions with the gripper suspended from auxiliary crane. The fuel rod removal was simulated several times by trained operators. Second, the equipment was installed in the reactor building. And third, the operation took place in the reactor cavity: the special-purpose canister was opened, the radioactive waste canister placed in the special-purpose canister, the twisted fuel rod was then grasped by the KIPCI gripper and removed from the fuel assembly. The twisted fuel rod was positioned above the canister and dropped into it. Once the fuel rod had been removed, the canister and fuel assembly FX3599 were transferred to the fuel building and refueling resumed. The canister containing the fuel rod is currently in interim storage in the reactor pool until appropriate action is taken for it to be shipped and eventually reprocessed. EDF has performed improvement in its handling procedures and in its handling tools to avoid a similar new event.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗