Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Science Operations”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
NASA NTRS2013

Approach and Entry, Descent, and Landing Operations for the Mars Science Laboratory Mission

On August 5th, 2012, at 10:31 PM PDT, the Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) rover Curiosity landed safely within Gale Crater. Her successful landing de-pended not only upon the flawless execution of the numerous critical activities during the seven minute entry, descent, and landing (EDL), but also upon the operational preparations and decisions made by the flight team during approach, the final weeks, days, and hours prior to landing. During this period, decisions made by the flight team balanced operational risk to the spacecraft in flight with any resulting risks incurred during EDL as a result of those decisions. This pa-per summarizes the operations plans made in preparation for Approach and EDL and the as flown decisions and actions executed that balanced the operational and EDL risks and prepared the vehicle for a successful landing.

Mars Science Laboratory (MSL)↗
NASA NTRS2010

James Webb Space Telescope Project Overview and Status for the SPIE

Often described as the successor to the Hubble Space Telescope, the JWST will serve astronomers world-wide in much the same way: Science & mission operations managed by the Space Telescope Science Institute The science investigations performed by the JWST will be determined by the General Observer community. Observing time allocated through annual peer-reviewed proposal cycles Four science themes have been defined by a succession of international community working groups to guide engineering development of the JWST: a) Identify the first bright objects that formed in the early Universe, and follow the ionization history. b) Determine how galaxies and dark matter, including gas, stars, metals, overall morphology and active nuclei evolved to the present day. c) Observe the birth and early development of stars and the formation of planets. d) Study the physical and chemical properties of solar systems (including our own) and where the building blocks of life may be present.

Sabelhaus, Phillip A.↗
NASA NTRS2017

Cell Science 2 (CS-02) Payload Overview

This payload overview presentation will be presented at the POIWG on October 17th, 2017. It provides a high-level overview of Cell Science-02 operations.

Cell Scienc↗
NASA NTRS1991

Operational perspectives for performing microgravity science in orbit

The combination of automation and operator-based technologies is discussed with respect to orbital microgravity experiments in order to optimize the performance and results. A list of five design objectives is presented, and each item is examined in terms of on-orbit flight history to identify relevant examples. It is suggested that human factors be considered in hardware design and that in-flight maintenance operations be considered an integral part of a program. The operational design can produce more effective results when it is established for 'failures' and mission success operations. The design must also be approached in terms of both the limitations and advantages of microgravity. The overarching theme of the investigation is that the mix of automation and operator interaction should be optimized by automating routine tasks and using the operator for critical assessments.

Dunbar, Bonnie J.↗
NASA NTRS2007

Integrating Automation into a Multi-Mission Operations Center

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center's Space Science Mission Operations (SSMO) Project is currently tackling the challenge of minimizing ground operations costs for multiple satellites that have surpassed their prime mission phase and are well into extended mission. These missions are being reengineered into a multi-mission operations center built around modern information technologies and a common ground system infrastructure. The effort began with the integration of four SMEX missions into a similar architecture that provides command and control capabilities and demonstrates fleet automation and control concepts as a pathfinder for additional mission integrations. The reengineered ground system, called the Multi-Mission Operations Center (MMOC), is now undergoing a transformation to support other SSMO missions, which include SOHO, Wind, and ACE. This paper presents the automation principles and lessons learned to date for integrating automation into an existing operations environment for multiple satellites.

Surka, Derek M.↗
NASA NTRS2019

New Features in the SPOC Pipeline Release 4.0

The Science Processing Operations Center is in the process of testing and deploying Release 4.0 of the codebase in the March 2019 timeframe. This paper describes the new features of the software and their likely impact on the quality of the TESS science data products. The major goals of Release 4.0 are to improve the extraction of photometry from the pixels in light of the non-uniform pointing performance and the identification of instrumental signatures from the light curves. We also describe modifications to the FFI pipeline to allow the generation of FFI light curves, correction of the instrumental systematics therein, and planet searches, primarily for the purpose of validating the 2-min pipeline against the FFI pipeline, but also to be able to provide cotrending basis vectors (CBVs) derived directly from the FFIs to the public to aid them in their extraction and correction of photometry. We also discuss the improvements in photometric performance of the pipeline and its various components.The lapse in funding experienced between 22 December 2018 and 27 January 2019 significantly delayed our ability to conduct integration testing as planned for late December/early January, delaying the start of V&V by one month to the end of February 2019.The TESS Mission is funded by NASA's Science Mission Directorate as an Astrophysics Explorer Mission.The Science Processing Operations Center is in the process of testing and deplo!"ing Release 4.0 of thecodebase In the March 2019 tlmeframe. This paper describes the new features or the software and theirlikely impact on the quality of the TESS science data products. The major goals or Release 4.0 are to Imtheidentification of instrumental signatures from the light cuNes. We also describe modifications tothe FFI pipeline to allow the generation of FFI light curves, correction of the instrumental systematicstherein, and planet searches, primarily for the purpose of validating the 2-min pipelineagainst the FFI pipeline, but also to be able to provide cotrending basis vectors (C3Vs) ,,.~,.;.derived directly from the FFls to the public to aid them in their extractbn and correction , :-; ~'-'\'.'.of photometry. We also discuss the Improvements In photometric performance• of ~~\":;:•the pipeline and its various components. :,;.-.;The lapse In funding experienced between 22 December 2018 and 27January 2019 significantly delayed our ability to conduct Integrationtesting as planned for late December/early January, delaying thestart of V&V by one month to the end of February 2019.The TESS Mission is funded by NASA's Science Mission Directorateas an Astrophysics Explorer Mission.o.iu.c...,.....~~New Features in SPOC 4.01. Use of quatemions In photometry and centroiding.2. Use of quaternions to Identify high-motion cadences and exclude same.3. Use of the TPS detections to deemphasize pathological cadences ("skyline flattenlng"I.4. Improved CAL calculations for black and smear correction.5. PA brightness metric calculation improvements (induo'e crowding in calrulation)./ • 6. Improved POC spike goodness metric.•~• 7. Improved handling of gaps and momentum duni:>S in POC.8. Improved tuning of POC., 9. Improved attitude tweak correction in PDC.10. Improvements in PDC introduced noise and correlation goodness metrics11. Using the improved spike goodness metric to minimize overlitting in the spikeremover ' • :,''l./ 12. Enable FFI processing through planet search.,,. ,• • "« ,;,,,•.~'A , 13.1 D4.V S mtreinaim-relipnoinrgts d aartcah irveetrdie tvoa Ml aAnSdT p ersistence to database 15. Improved management of jobs on the NAS Pleiadss supercomputer

Jenkins, Jon M.↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

SAGE III on ISS: Mission Update and Science Milestone Results and Future Plans

The Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment III on the International Space Station (SAGE III/ISS) has been collecting data on the stratosphere almost continuously for 4 years since the first light milestone was achieved on March 17, 2017. In that time, the SAGE III/ISS data products have withstood robust assessments both internal and external, using comparisons to data sets both in-situ and spaceborne, and incorporated improvements into the retrieval algorithm and the science data products themselves. With the new v5.2 release of the SAGE III/ISS science data product algorithm, improvements made to the aerosol and water vapor products have produced better correlations with both MLS and balloonsonde data. At this 4-year milestone, we will look back on the last 4 years of data collection highlighting SAGE III/ISS ozone and aerosol data from 2017-2020 in a 6-minute video highlighting the SAGE III mission. An overview of mission operations and the challenges of operating a science mission on the ISS will highlight lessons learned and the mission science objectives completed during the first three years of the mission. The future goals for the SAGE III/ISS mission, as we continue operations and science collection, will round out the presentation.

Marilee M Roell↗
NASA NTRS2015

Constellation Mission Operation Working Group: ESMO Maneuver Planning Process Review

The Earth Science Mission Operation (ESMO) Project created an Independent Review Board to review our Conjunction Risk evaluation process and Maneuver Planning Process to identify improvements that safely manages mission conjunction risks, maintains ground track science requirements, and minimizes overall hours expended on High Interest Events (HIE). The Review Board is evaluating the current maneuver process which requires support by multiple groups. In the past year, there have been several changes to the processes although many prior and new concerns exist. This presentation will discuss maneuver process reviews and Board comments, ESMO assessment and path foward, ESMO future plans, recent changes and concerns.

maneuver↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Artemis Internal Science Team Update: Deployed Payloads

Artemis will reestablish human presence on the Moon and lead to a new era of scientific discovery and exploration. Led by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Artemis effort includes a collaboration of space agencies and companies from around the world. In support of Artemis, a cross-disciplinary effort of science, engineering, operations, and human factors personnel is currently developing the best methods, facilities, and field locations to test hardware, train astronauts, and evaluate concepts of operations. This poster, as part of the Artemis Internal Science Team (AIST), provides an update to NASA’s plans for the solicitation, development, and operations of deployed surface payloads. In calendar year 2023, NASA’s Science Mission Directorate will solicit proposals for instruments to be deployed by crew on the surface of the Moon (Fig. 1), beginning with Artemis III. The Artemis III mission will land in the south polar region of the Moon, within 6º of latitude from the south pole, in the vicinity of both persistently illuminated and permanently shadowed areas of the Moon, with potential access to surface-accessible volatile deposits. Several of the proposed landing regions are located among some of the oldest parts of the Moon, and together with the permanently shadowed regions, provide the opportunity to learn about the history of the Moon through previously unexplored lunar regions. Deployed payloads will be a critical part of a notional program that captures the highest-priority science for Artemis III and provides the greatest feed-forward to follow-on missions and the build-up to the Artemis Base Camp.

R. C. Weber↗
NASA NTRSDate not supplied

Artemis Internal Science Team Update: Deployed Payloads

Artemis will reestablish human presence on the Moon and lead to a new era of scientific discovery and exploration. Led by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the Artemis effort includes a collaboration of space agencies and companies from around the world [1]. In support of Artemis, a cross-disciplinary effort of science, engineering, operations, and human factors personnel is currently developing the best methods, facilities, and field locations to test hardware, train astronauts, and evaluate concepts of operations. This abstract, as part of the Artemis Internal Science Team (AIST) [2], provides an update to NASA’s plans for the solicitation, development, and operations of deployed surface payloads. In calendar year 2023, NASA’s Science Mission Directorate will solicit proposals for instruments to be deployed by crew on the surface of the Moon (Fig. 1), beginning with Artemis III [3]. The Artemis III mission will land in the south polar region of the Moon, within 6º of latitude from the south pole, in the vicinity of both persistently illuminated and permanently shadowed areas of the Moon, with potential access to surface-accessible volatile deposits [4]. Several of the proposed landing regions are located among some of the oldest parts of the Moon, and together with the permanently shadowed regions, provide the opportunity to learn about the history of the Moon through previously unexplored lunar regions [5]. Deployed payloads will be a critical part of a notional program that captures the highest-priority science for Artemis III and provides the greatest feedforward to follow-on missions and the build-up to the Artemis Base Camp

R. C. Weber↗
NASA NTRS2011

Cassini Attitude Control Operations - Guidelines Levied on Science to Extend Reaction Wheel Life

The Cassini spacecraft was launched on October 15, 1997 and arrived at Saturn on June 30, 2004. It has performed detailed observations and remote sensing of Saturn, its rings, and its satellites since that time. Cassini deployed the European-built Huygens probe, which descended through the Titan atmosphere (Saturn's largest moon) and landed on its surface on January 14, 2005. The Cassini mission has recently been approved by NASA to continue through September of 2017. This 7-year extension is called the Solstice mission and it presents challenges to the spacecraft operations team and its ability to maintain the health of the spacecraft. To keep the spacecraft healthy for 7 more years, the spacecraft team must carefully manage hydrazine use (about 48% of the 132 kg launch load remains as of January 2011). A vital part of conserving hydrazine is to use the reaction wheel assembly (RWA) control system for precise pointing and slews wherever possible. In any given week, the Cassini spacecraft is commanded to use RWA control about 99% of the time, with about 1% of the time requiring reaction control system (RCS) thruster control (to perform Delta V course corrections or to bias the RWA momentum). Such extensive use of the RWA hardware throughout the mission requires that the RWAs be operated in a way that minimizes degradation in the RWA electronics, DC motor, and spin bearing for each reaction wheel. Three consumables in particular have been identified for the RWAs: (1) Total number of revolutions for each RWA. (2) Time spent at very low wheel speeds. At these low speeds, good elasto-hydrodynamic (EHD) film lubrication may be compromised. (3) Total number of on/off power cycles. The second of these consumables, minimizing the time spent at very low wheel speeds, is especially important to keep the spin bearing healthy and well-lubricated. These consumables are actively managed by the attitude control operations team throughout the mission. One vital management technique is to predict individual RWA momentum (given the pointing and slews that are needed to collect the best science) and to bias the RWA momentum in a way that reduces both the total number of revolutions as well as the time spent below EHD wheel speed. Another strategy to protect RWA health is to alter the planned pointing of the spacecraft (which can affect science collection) so that the RWA consumables are conserved. This paper focuses on why this second technique is needed, and discusses how guidelines have been developed by the attitude control team which affects the planned science pointing, so that science data can be most optimally collected while still minimizing RWA consumable usage.

interplanetary trajectory↗
NASA NTRS2022

In Situ Measurements of Surface Texture with Virtual Environments Support Science-Driven Human Surface Operations on the Moon and Beyond

Visualization tools enabling real-time scientific analysis are important for supporting future astronaut operations on the lunar surface. Such tools can be built into virtual environments to support scientific investigations, as well as situational awareness, real-time decision making, and efficient communication between astronauts and ground and support systems. Understanding how these tools can be optimized for science is essential for upcoming Artemis missions. In this contribution, we discuss how measurements of surface texture at multiple length scales can greatly enhance in situ science on/of the Moon, and eventually Mars, asteroids, and beyond. Roughness measurements at various wavelengths directly support objectives defined in the Artemis Science Plan, including (O1) “understanding planetary processes,” (O2) “understanding volatile cycles,” and (O3) “interpreting the impact history of the Earth-Moon system” . Key scientific analyses enabled by texture measurements at different length scales include: ● Sub-centimeter scales: Texture measurements can help constrain lava flow crystallinity, lava rheology, emplacement flow dynamics, and cooling histories (O1). Measurements of lacunarity (voids in fractal fill space) can shed light on eruptive volatile content, residence time of migrating volatiles, and near-surface volume available for micro-cold trapping of volatiles (O1, O2). ● Centimeter–meter scales: Texture measurements can be used for the differentiation of individual lava flows, the reconstruction of local stratigraphies and emplacement sequences, characterization of post-emplacement surface modification processes (O1, O3). Derived roughness (polarization) metrics can be used in the detection of water ice and characterization of ice properties (e.g., purity, grade, depth, abundance). ● Hectometer–Kilometer scales: Texture measurements can be used to differentiate major geologic surface units and surface structures (O1), constrain the presence of abundant ground ices (O2), and analyze surface modification and estimate surface age (O3). Real-time measurements of surface texture across these multiple length scales will enable efficient sample identification and scientific investigations by future astronauts. To support these investigations and the objective classification of surface texture, virtual environments employed by astronauts should be able to instantaneously convert raw data into processed data (e.g., digital terrain and elevation models) and derived metrics (e.g., RMS, std, Hurst, CPR) and perform statistical analyses (e.g., PCA, outliers, correlation matrices). Such tools are being developed and tested by the Resource Exploration and Science of our Cosmic Environment (RESOURCE) team, a node of NASA’s Solar System Exploration Research Virtual Institute (SSERVI), and are an excellent example of the powerful synergies of human and robotic ground assets critical in the return of humans to the Moon.

Ariel N. Deutsch↗
NASA NTRS2012

Launch Pad Closeout Operations for the Mars Science Laboratory's Heat Rejection System

The Mars Science Laboratory (MSL) rover was launched on an Atlas V on November 26, 2011. Preparations were carried out prior to launch in order to closeout the spacecraft's complex heat rejection system (HRS), which consists of two mechanically pumped CFC-11 fluid loops. The first HRS loop, onboard the Curiosity rover, was fully integrated, filled with CFC-11, and successfully operated prior to launch pad operations; however, the second thermal loop, called the cruise HRS loop, required final mechanical and thermal integration activities to occur while on the launch pad in order to accommodate the last minute installation of the rover's Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG) power source. In order to prevent overheating of propellant tanks and critical avionics equipment buried deep within the spacecraft's aeroshell, the MMRTG needed to be pre-cooled using a separate non-flight mechanically pumped fluid loop prior to and during the final closeout and subsequent startup of the flight loop. This paper outlines the various steps that took place to safely install the MMRTG while carefully transitioning from the pre-cooling operation to the final startup and operation of the flight cruise HRS loop. Temperature data of the launch pad thermal transition from the ground support loop activity to the final flight loop operation is presented. Some background development of the ground support loop and lessons learned are also discussed. This successful launch pad integration activity required a close-knit coordination between NASA KSC, JPL, the Department of Energy, Idaho National Labs, Pratt and Whitney Rocketdyne Inc., Teledyne Technologies Inc., ULA, and Advanced Thermal Sciences Corp.

thermal↗
NASA NTRS2014

Maiden Voyage of the Rodent Habitat on ISS: Opportunities for Investigating Molecular Mechanisms and Biomedical Consequences of Long Duration Spaceflight

Research using rodents is an essential tool for advancing biomedical research on Earth and in space. The National Research Counsel’s Decadal survey (1) emphasized the importance of expanding NASAs life sciences research to perform long duration, rodent experiments on the International Space Station (ISS). To accomplish this objective, flight hardware, operations, and science capabilities were developed at NASA ARC to support both commercial and government-sponsored research. In preparation for the maiden voyage of the Rodent Habitat hardware and operations system (Rodent Research-1), and in close consultation with a Science Working Group comprised of veterinarians and experienced spaceflight investigators, we modified existing Animal Enclosure Module hardware, developed new hardware, operations, and science activities, and performed a series of ground-based verification tests. Preflight, ground based hardware tests included a simulation of SpaceX Dragon launch conditions (vibration and hypergravity) using the Transporter, and also two long-term biocompatibility tests (32 and 92 days) using the Habitat developed for long term housing on the ISS. The launch simulation test showed that adult mice housed in Transporter hardware adapted well, even if launch simulation was followed by a period of simulated weightlessness (via hind limb unloading). The biocompatibility tests demonstrated that the Habitat successfully supported animal health and also provided a useful video imaging system that enables frequent monitoring of animal health and behavior by veterinary and scientific experts on the ground, independent of ISS crew intervention. At the conclusion of all tests, mice were deemed healthy and suitable for conducting biological research. Additional preflight analyses of tissues preserved by freezing or fixation for gene expression analyses revealed that spleen and liver tissues recovered under conditions that simulated on-orbit activities yielded high quality RNA (RIN values 8-10) and liver enzyme activities and protein content (e.g. catalase). In addition, new methods were developed to optimize future science return by dissecting tissues post-euthanasia and storage. Various tissues were harvested from either intact or partially dissected, frozen carcasses after storage for ~2-6 months; most of the tissues (brain, heart, kidney, eye, adrenal glands and skeletal muscle) were of high RNA quality for science return, whereas some tissues (small intestine, bone marrow and bones) were not. These data demonstrated the protocols developed for future flight experiments supported science return despite delayed preservation post-euthanasia or prolonged storage, and furthermore, that high-quality RNA samples from many different tissues can be recovered by dissection following prolonged storage of the tissue in situ at -80˚C. The first flight experiments carrying 20 mice were launched on Sept 21, 2014 in an unmanned Dragon Capsule, SpaceX4; Rodent Research-1 is dedicated to achieving both NASA validation and CASIS science objectives. Ground based control groups (housed in flight hardware or standard cages) were maintained in environmental chambers at Kennedy Space Center. Crewmembers previously trained in animal handling transferred mice from the Transporter into Habitats under simultaneous veterinary supervision by video streaming and were deemed healthy. Health and behavior of all mice on the ISS was monitored by video feed on a daily basis. The 10 mice for validation (16wk old, female C57Bl6/J) ambulated freely and actively throughout the Habitat, relying heavily on their forelimbs for locomotion. The first on-orbit dissections of mice were performed successfully on Oct 12 and 13, 2014, and the validation mice will reside on ISS for up to 30 days. In conclusion, new capability for long duration rodent research is under development, including in-flight sample collection (which avoids the complication of reentry); results obtained to date will be described. This new Rodent Research system enables achievement of both basic science and translational research objectives to advance human exploration of space.

maiden voyage↗
NASA NTRS1992

OASIS-CC presentation

The Operations and Science Instrument Support (OASIS) project is a long-term effort to help produce operations capabilities that can support space science missions of the next century. Portions of the OASIS concept in software have been implemented under the general name OASIS-R/T. OASIS-CC is the OASIS Command and Control, for monitoring and controlling science instruments and spacecraft during test, integration, launch and on-orbit operations. Viewgraphs are presented on the OASIS-CC functionality description, OASIS-CC support, and OASIS-CC as a tool.

Source record↗
NASA NTRS2016

Advances in Rodent Research Missions on the International Space Station

A research platform for rodent experiment on the ISS is a valuable tool for advancing biomedical research in space. Capabilities offered by the Rodent Research project developed at NASA Ames Research Center can support experiments of much longer duration on the ISS than previous experiments performed on the Space Shuttle. NASAs Rodent Research (RR)-1 mission was completed successfully and achieved a number of objectives, including validation of flight hardware, on-orbit operations, and science capabilities as well as support of a CASIS-sponsored experiment (Novartis) on muscle atrophy. Twenty C57BL6J adult female mice were launched on the Space-X (SpX) 4 Dragon vehicle, and thrived for up to 37 days in microgravity. Daily health checks of the mice were performed during the mission via downlinked video; all flight animals were healthy and displayed normal behavior, and higher levels of physical activity compared to ground controls. Behavioral analysis demonstrated that Flight and Ground Control mice exhibited the same range of behaviors, including eating, drinking, exploratory behavior, self- and allo-grooming, and social interactions indicative of healthy animals. The animals were euthanized on-orbit and select tissues were collected from some of the mice on orbit to assess the long-term sample storage capabilities of the ISS. In general, the data obtained from the flight mice were comparable to those from the three groups of control mice (baseline, vivarium and ground controls, which were housed in flight hardware), showing that the ISS has adequate capability to support long-duration rodent experiments. The team recovered 35 tissues from 40 RR-1 frozen carcasses, yielding 3300 aliquots of tissues to distribute to the scientific community in the U.S., including NASAs GeneLab project and scientists via Space Biology's Biospecimen Sharing Program Ames Life Science Data Archive. Tissues also were distributed to Russian research colleagues at the Institute for Biomedical Problems. The expression levels of select genes including albumin, catalase, GAPDH, HMGCoA Reductase, and IGF1 were determined using RNA isolated from the livers by qPCR and no significant differences by one factor ANOVA were found between flight and ground control groups. In addition, some of the liver samples were analyzed for transcriptomic, epigenomic and proteomic profiles; some of the data sets are now available to the scientific community through GeneLabs open science data website. A second long duration mission, Rodent Research-2 (RR-2) was completed on the ISS in 2015; 20 female C57BL6J mice were successfully maintained on the ISS for various durations, with the last group of 5 animals living on-orbit for 54 days. Furthermore, we continue to expand the ISSs capabilities by introducing new on-orbit technologies including blood collection and separation, bone densitometry scanning, muscle grip strength and anesthesia with recovery. In addition, series of ground-based verification testing to fly male mice and increase the total number of mice on-orbit from 20 to 40. Subsequent missions will provide the capability to return live mice from the ISS animals to evaluate recovery on Earth, further expanding operational and science capabilities of the RR project on the ISS.

Choi, S. Y.↗
NASA NTRS2021

NASA SpaceCube Edge TPU SmallSat Card for Autonomous Operations and Onboard Science-Data Analysis

Using state-of-the-art artificial intelligence (AI)frameworks onboard spacecraft is challenging because common spacecraft processors cannot provide comparable performance to datacenters with server-grade CPUs and GPUs available for terrestrial applications and advanced deep-learning networks. This limitation makes small, lo w-p o we r AI microchip architectures, such as the Google Coral Edge Tensor Processing Unit (TPU), attractive for space missions where the application-specific design enables both high-performance and power-efficient computing for AI applications. To address these challenging considerations for space deployment, this research introduces the design and capabilities of a CubeSat-sized Edge TPU-based co-processor card, known as the SpaceCube Low-power Ed g e Artificial Intelligence Resilient Node (SC-LEARN). This design conforms to NASA’s CubeSat Card Specification (CS2) for integration into next-generation SmallSat and CubeSat systems. This paper describes the overarching architecture and design of the SC-LEARN, as well as, the supporting test card designed for rapid prototyping and evaluation. The SC-LEARN was developed with three operational modes: (1) a high-performance parallel-processing mode,(2)a fault-tolerant mode for onboard resilience, and (3) a power-saving mode with cold spares. Importantly, this research also elaborates on both training and quantization of Tensor Flow models for the SC-LEARN for use onboard with representative, open-source datasets. Lastly, we describe future research plans, including radiation-beam testing and flight demonstration.

Advanced avionics↗
DOE OSTI2025

Automated Resonance Fitting for Nuclear Data Evaluation

Global and national efforts to deliver high-quality nuclear data to users have a wide-ranging impact, affecting applications in national security, reactor operations, basic science, medicine, and more. Cross section evaluation is a major part of this effort, combining theory and experimentation to produce recommended values and uncertainties for reaction probabilities. Resonance region evaluation is a specialized type of nuclear data evaluation that can require significant manual effort and months of time from expert scientists. In this article, non-convex non-linear optimization methods are combined with concepts of inferential statistics to infer a resonance model from experimental data in an automated manner that is not dependent on prior evaluation(s). This methodology aims to enhance the workflow of a resonance evaluator by minimizing time, effort, and the potential for bias from prior assumptions, while enhancing reproducibility and documentation, thereby addressing well-known challenges in the field.

73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS↗