Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “Solar Modulation”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 559 records · Page 31

Spring 2024 Solar Industry Update

Each quarter, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) conducts the Quarterly Solar Industry Update, a presentation of technical trends within the solar industry Each presentation focuses on global and U.S. supply and demand, module and system price, investment trends and business models, and updates on U.S. government programs supporting the solar industry.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Fall 2024 Solar Industry Update [Slides]

Each quarter, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) conducts the Quarterly Solar Industry Update, a presentation of technical trends within the solar industry. Each presentation focuses on global and U.S. supply and demand, module and system price, investment trends and business models, and updates on U.S. government programs supporting the solar industry.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Model for Characterization and Optimization of Spectrally Selective Structures to Reduce the Operating Temperature and Improve the Energy Yield of Photovoltaic Modules

Many existing commercially manufactured photovoltaic modules include a cover layer of glass, commonly coated with a single layer antireflection coating (ARC) to reduce reflection losses. As many common photovoltaic cells, including c-Si, CdTe, and CIGS, decrease in efficiency with increasing temperature, a more effective coating would increase reflection of sub-bandgap light while still acting as an antireflection coating for higher energy photons. The sub-bandgap reflection would reduce parasitic sub-bandgap absorption and therefore reduce operating temperature. This reduction under realistic outdoor conditions would lead to an increase in annual energy yield of a photovoltaic module beyond what is achieved by a single layer ARC. However, calculating the actual increase in energy yield provided by this approach is difficult without using time-consuming simulation. Here, we present a time-independent matrix model which can quickly determine the percentage change in annual energy yield of a module with a spectrally selective mirror by comparison to a baseline module with no mirror. The energy benefit is decomposed into a thermal component from temperature reduction and an optical component from increased transmission of light above the bandgap and therefore increased current generation. Time-independent matrix model calculations are based on real irradiance conditions that vary with geographic location and module tilt angle. The absolute predicted values of energy yield improvement from the model are within 0.1% of those obtained from combined ray-tracing and time-dependent finite-element simulations and compute 1000x faster. Uncertainty in the model result is primarily due to effects of wind speed on module temperature. Optimization of the model result produces a 13-layer and a 20-layer mirror, which increase annual module energy yield by up to 4.0% compared to a module without the mirror, varying depending on the module location and tilt angle. Finally, we analyze how spectrally selective mirrors affect the loss pathways of the photovoltaic module.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Life-cycle costing assessment of back contact doping and encapsulation alternatives for increasing the life expectancy of CdTe PV modules (Final Report)

Contribution of Research to the State-of-Knowledge This research produced comparative sustainability evaluations of back contact doping and encapsulation alternatives considered by First Solar for decreasing degradation and increasing the life of the cadmium telluride (CdTe) photovoltaic (PV) modules. Technical Effectiveness and Economic Feasibility of Methods Investigated A holistic life-cycle-assessment of the alternatives considered for longer module operational lives, showed that they add between 0.2% and 2% to environmental impact indicators at the cradle-to-gate module level, but at the cradle-to-grave system level, alternative materials offer only benefits (i.e., environmental impact indicator decreases) to the public and the environment. Parallel experimental studies at First Solar showed that the use of the considered alternative materials did not impact the effectiveness of the current module recycling separations and material recovery processes. Furthermore, the increment on the module manufacturing cost due to using alternative materials was estimated to be negligible (i.e., >1%) and longer module lives more than compensate cost increases. Specifically, increase of the current warranted module life of 30 years to 50 years, would decrease the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) from $40/MWh to $24/MWh for utility-scale installations in the US-SW, the economic feasibility of the considered alternatives is assured. Benefit to the Public With decreasing degradation from the current ~0.3%/year of Series 6 modules to less than 0.2%/year, the public will be benefited by longer photovoltaic operational lives, and therefore. In addition, the requirement for end-of-life management is shifted from 30 years to 40 or 50 years, with profound benefits to the public and the environment.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Features of load current–voltage characteristics of a monocrystalline silicon solar cell at various levels of solar illumination

We have studied the electric current characteristics of a monocrystalline silicon solar cell (SC) at various solar radiation power levels from 0.05 kW/m{sup 2} to 1 kW/m{sup 2} (АМ1). It has been found that the energy efficiency of the SC increases from 9.5 to 15% with an increase in the power of radiation. The series resistance and shunt resistance of the SC decrease, which is associated with the modulation of the photoactive layers of SC.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Development of coring procedures applied to Si, CdTe, and CIGS solar panels

Most of the research on the performance and degradation of photovoltaic modules is based on macroscale measurements of device parameters such as efficiency, fill factor, open-circuit voltage, and short-circuit current. Our goal is to develop the capabilities to allow us to study the degradation of these parameters in the micro- and nanometer scale and to relate our results to performance parameters. To achieve this objective, the first step is to be able to access small samples from specific areas of the solar panels without changing the properties of the material. In this paper, we describe two coring procedures that we developed and applied to Si, CIGS, and CdTe solar panels. In the first procedure, we cored full samples, whereas in the second we performed a partial coring that keeps the tempered glass intact. The cored samples were analyzed by different analytical techniques before and after coring, at the same locations, and no damage during the coring procedure was observed.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Development of Tools Training and Outreach to Address Solar Glare and Flux-Related Avian Impacts

Millions of dollars and significant resources are being spent by developers of utility-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) and concentrating solar power (CSP) plants to address federal and local requirements regarding glare and avian hazards. Solar glare can occur from the glass surfaces of PV modules and from mirrors in CSP systems, which can produce safety and health risks for pilots, motorists, and residents located near these systems. In addition, concentrated solar flux at CSP plants has the potential to singe birds as they fly through regions of high solar flux. This work will develop tools to characterize and mitigate these potential hazards, which will address regulatory policies and reduce costs and efforts associated with the proposed deployment of gigawatts of solar energy systems throughout the nation. The development of standardized and publicly available tools to address these regulatory policies and ensure public and environmental safety is an appropriate role for the government.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Transmission Electron Microscopy Study on Microstructure of Degraded CdTe Mini-Modules

In this paper, we employ transmission electron microscopy coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS) to study the structure and chemistry of cadmium telluride (CdTe) thin-film solar cells with different extents of degradation. The studied regions originate from the same photovoltaic mini-module, which was subjected to one-sun light exposure at a temperature of 100 degrees C for 400 h to induce light and heat degradation. EDS maps reveal a discontinuous CdS layer and particles rich in O and S but Te-depleted within the CdTe absorber layer after the light and heat stress. These features could act as enhanced recombination centers, resulting in decreased photovoltaic conversion efficiency. Additionally, the most degraded CdTe sample shows a strong accumulation of Na precisely localized in the discontinuous part of the CdS layer. The local Na concentration is determined to be ~16 at.%. In addition, appreciable Na accumulation is observed at the soda-lime glass/transparent conductive oxide interface in both degraded CdTe solar cells. The microstructure of the baseline CdTe mini-module with no stress was also investigated to demonstrate that the structure difference was caused by the light- and heat-induced degradation, instead of module fabrication. These results highlight the need to control the distribution of Na in fielded CdTe modules to sustain long-term high-power output.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Thermally Conductive Backsheets (TCB) for Reduced Operating Temperatures

The performance of photovoltaic (PV) modules is primarily influenced by the plane of array (POA) irradiance and their operating temperature. The lower the module operating temperature, the higher is its performance. Increasing a module’s operating temperature reduces its power output due to an increase in the semiconductor’s intrinsic carrier density, leading to a reduction in the open-circuit voltage and, subsequently, reducing the maximum power point voltage. Reducing the operating temperature lowers the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) via increased energy production (i.e., more kilowatt hour over the life of the asset) and increased service lifetime (years in the field). The module operating temperature is dictated by the weather parameters and the thermal properties of module construction materials. The primary weather parameters influencing the PV module temperature are: the ambient temperature (directly related), irradiance (directly related), and wind speed (inversely related). The primary thermal properties of module construction materials influencing the PV module temperature are: the optical transmissivity and thermal conductivity of superstrate, the thermal conductivity of substrate, the thermal conductivity of encapsulant and the efficiency of the encapsulated solar cells. The primary goal of this study is to reduce the operating temperature of PV modules using thermally conductive backsheet (TCB) substrates developed by the industry. The temperature of PV modules installed in a large multi-MW plant can also be influenced by their physical locations in the plants due to the influence of wind direction. A thermal mapping of PV plants has also been investigated and presented in this study. The most commonly used PV backsheet material has been polyvinyl fluoride (DuPont trade name “Tedlar”)-based backsheet, which typically has three layers: Tedlar–polyethylene terephthalate (PET)–Tedlar (TPT). The primary goal of this project is to reduce the module operating temperature below the benchmark TPT backsheet temperature using newly developed TCBs by the industry. The overall approach of this project involves six focus areas: i) select and procure one TPT and thirteen promising TCBs available in the industry; ii) construct a large number of 1-cell and 9-cell modules using benchmark TPT and selected TCBs [all other construction materials are fixed and they are: glass superstrate, EVA encapsulant, mono-Si cell and junction box]; iii) to identify best performing TCBs, monitor the long-term field operating temperatures of the constructed modules which are installed in three climatic conditions (hot-low wind [Mesa, AZ], hot-high wind [Maricopa County, AZ] and temperate [Cumberland County, NC]; iv) to identify the most durable TCB, perform extended accelerated reliability testing of modules constructed with best three TCBs and benchmark TPT; v) to predict module temperature, develop physical and empirical thermal models with and without thermal properties of all construction materials in the modules, respectively; and vi) to determine the influence of wind speed and direction on the module operating temperature in a plant, and perform thermal mapping of PV modules in two large PV plants [Maricopa County, AZ and Cumberland County, NC]. The key achievements of this project are listed below: Backsheet selection: 14 backsheets were procured after an extensive literature and industry search. Finally, based on the thermal and other selection criteria, 1 TPT and 4 thermally conductive backsheets were selected for this project. Fabrication of mini modules: 50 one-cell modules were fabricated in year 1 for thermal performance evaluation. The module design was changed to nine-cell module at start of year 2 to mimic commercial design. 20 nine-cell modules were fabricated in year 2 for thermal performance evaluation. 28 four-cell modules were fabricated in year 3 for accelerated stress-testing. Thermal conductivity of backsheets: Year 1 TCBs showed at least 8% higher thermal conductivities than TPT. Year 2 and 3 TCBs showed at least 20% higher thermal conductivities than TPT. Installation of mini PV modules at three sites: 6 one-cell modules and 8 nine-cell modules were installed at AZ-1 site [Mesa, AZ]. 12 one-cell modules and 6 nine-cell modules were installed at each of two powerplants (AZ-2 [Maricopa County, AZ] and NC sites). Nominal operating cell temperatures (NOCT) of mini PV modules: NOCT of TCBs were observed to be lower than TPT with differences as high as 2°C. Comparison of thermal performance: The median operating temperature of one-cell modules was found to be reduced by 2°C by using TCB_A modules compared to TPT modules on several days in a month for few months in a year. The median temperature improvement of 4oC was achieved at several instances on a few days, but not all days, in a year using multiple TCBs compared to TPT. The final project milestone of achieving median temperature improvement of 5oC was achieved at several instances on a few days, but not all days, in a year using TCB_A compared to TPT. Empirical thermal model (without the need of construction material properties): Empirical thermal model for one-cell module was developed based on the input data of irradiance, wind speed and ambient temperatures. The primary input data differentiator for temperature differences between TPT and TCBs appears to be the irradiance level (solar gain). Accelerated durability testing: 20 four-cell modules using 4 backsheets (1 TPT and 3 TCBs) were exposed to Damp Heat 1000 hours (8 modules), UV/Thermal cycling (50 cycles)/Humidity freeze (10 cycles) test sequence (8 modules) and UV Weathering for qualification (8 modules). All the modules with four selected backsheets passed the stress tests per the retest guidelines of IEC 61215 standard for the backsheet change. Simplified comparative LCOE analysis: Using backsheet-specific power degradation levels in the accelerated tests (for TCB_A and TPT only), efficiency, service lifetime and assuming same cost for all backsheets, the LCOE of modules using TCB_A is determined to be lower than TPT. Due to lower operating temperature of TCB_A-based modules compared to TPT-based modules, the operating efficiency and service life of TCB_A-based modules are calculated to be higher than TPT-based modules. Temperature mapping of PV power plants: A distinct temperature difference (as high as 4°C) has been observed between the modules located in various parts of a single PV plant.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Solar Industry Update: (H2 2020) [Slides]

Each quarter, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) conducts the Quarterly Solar Industry Update, a presentation of technical trends within the solar industry, to the solar office staff. Each presentation focuses on global and U.S. supply and demand, module and system price, investment trends and business models, and updates on U.S. government programs supporting the solar industry.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

H1 2021 Solar Industry Update

Each quarter, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) conducts the Quarterly Solar Industry Update, a presentation of technical trends within the solar industry, to the solar office staff. Each presentation focuses on global and U.S. supply and demand, module and system price, investment trends and business models, and updates on U.S. government programs supporting the solar industry.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Solar Industry Update (Fall 2022) [Slides]

Each quarter, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) conducts the Quarterly Solar Industry Update, a presentation of technical trends within the solar industry, to the solar office staff. Each presentation focuses on global and U.S. supply and demand, module and system price, investment trends and business models, and updates on U.S. government programs supporting the solar industry.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Spring 2023 Solar Industry Update [Slides]

Each quarter, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) conducts the Quarterly Solar Industry Update, a presentation of technical trends within the solar industry, to the solar office staff. Each presentation focuses on global and U.S. supply and demand, module and system price, investment trends and business models, and updates on U.S. government programs supporting the solar industry.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Summer 2023 Solar Industry Update [Slides]

Each quarter, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) conducts the Quarterly Solar Industry Update, a presentation of technical trends within the solar industry, to the solar office staff. Each presentation focuses on global and U.S. supply and demand, module and system price, investment trends and business models, and updates on U.S. government programs supporting the solar industry.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗

Winter 2021/2022 Solar Industry Update

Each quarter, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) conducts the Quarterly Solar Industry Update, a presentation of technical trends within the solar industry, to the solar office staff. Each presentation focuses on global and U.S. supply and demand, module and system price, investment trends and business models, and updates on U.S. government programs supporting the solar industry.

cost trade↗

Spring 2022 Solar Industry Update

Each quarter, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) conducts the Quarterly Solar Industry Update, a presentation of technical trends within the solar industry, to the solar office staff. Each presentation focuses on global and U.S. supply and demand, module and system price, investment trends and business models, and updates on U.S. government programs supporting the solar industry.

cost↗

Summer 2022 Solar Industry Update

Each quarter, the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) conducts the Quarterly Solar Industry Update, a presentation of technical trends within the solar industry, to the solar office staff. Each presentation focuses on global and U.S. supply and demand, module and system price, investment trends and business models, and updates on U.S. government programs supporting the solar industry.

ASP↗

Thermal conductivity measurement using modulated photothermal radiometry for nitrate and chloride molten salts

Molten salts are being used or explored for thermal energy storage and conversion systems in concentrating solar power and nuclear power plants. Thermal conductivity of molten salts is an important thermophysical property dictating the performance and cost of these systems, but its accurate measurement has been challenging, as evidenced by wide scattering of existing data in literature. The corrosive and conducting nature of these fluids also leads to time consuming sample preparation processes of many contact-based measurements. Here, in this work, we report the measurement of thermal conductivity of molten salts using a modulated photothermal radiometry (MPR) technique, which is a laser-based, non-contact, frequency-domain method adopted for molten salts for the first time. By unitizing the advantages of front side sensing of frequency-domain measurements and the vertical holder orientation, the technique can minimize the natural convection and salt creeping effects, thus yielding accurate molten salt thermal conductivity . The MPR technique is first calibrated using standard molten materials including paraffin wax and sulfur. It is then applied on measuring pure nitrate salts (NaNO 3 and KNO 3 ), solar salt (NaNO 3 –KNO 3 mixture), and chloride salt (NaCl–KCl–MgCl 2 ). The measurement results are compared with data from literature, especially those obtained from laser flash analysis (LFA). Our results demonstrate that the MPR is a convenient and reliable technique of measuring thermal conductivity of molten salts. Accurate thermal conductivity data of molten salts will be valuable in developing the next-generation high-temperature thermal energy storage and conversion systems.

14 SOLAR ENERGY↗