Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “RADIOACTIVE WASTE STORAGE”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 577 records · Page 32
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2025

Demonstration Test Report: Vacuum Thermal Desorption (VTD) Testing to Support West Area Waste Feed Test 2

Approximately 54 million gallons of radioactive and hazardous waste are stored in underground storage tanks at the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Hanford Site in southeastern Washington State. The Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) is being constructed to immobilize the waste in glass waste forms. The baseline configuration of the WTP includes a Pretreatment Facility to separate the wastes into a small volume of high-level waste (HLW) containing most of the radioactivity and a larger volume of low-activity waste (LAW) containing most of the non-radioactive chemicals. The HLW will be converted to glass in the HLW vitrification facility for ultimate disposal at a federal repository.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Inventory and Characterization of Categories 3-5 Disused Sealed Radioactive Sources - 19284

Brazil has one of the biggest inventories of SRS in the world, not only because of the large industrial park, the well-developed health care infrastructure and the numerous mining operations, but also by the use of radioactive sources in consumer products, such as smoke detectors, lightning arresters, surge protectors and even cardiac pacemakers. Presently, the inventory of DSRS at the WML is of more than 10,000; if the sources from lightning arresters, smoke detectors and Ir-192 with activities above the clearance levels are included, the estimate is over 150,000. The Waste Management Laboratory (WML) of the Nuclear and Energy Research Institute (IPEN/CNEN-SP) is responsible for the management and treatment of these sources. An important aspect to consider is that Brazil does not have a defined strategy or a protocol for screening and inventorying these sources, whose management was limited only to storage. The WML started the development of methods and operational work, to characterize and reduce the total volume of this inventory for the borehole-type final disposal facility yet to be constructed, where the DSRS will be disposed of. The information available from these sources is in a database created in 1980, when the sources began to be received. Several records on the FRSD that were checked are incomplete or simply incorrect, since there is no correspondence between the dates of entry of these sources in the storage and their physical characteristics. Some reasons can be listed to try to understand the divergences: the inspection when receiving the sources was not possible, no inspection procedure was defined, there were technical difficulties to open the packages. The objective of this work is to organize the inventory in a standardized way, control access, traceability, reduction of the necessary time to locate and characterize the sources upon reception, and of the repetitive work in the operational routine, and finally release of space in the storage. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Spent Nuclear Fuel Disposition

One interdisciplinary field devoted to achieving the end-state of used nuclear fuel (UNF) through reuse and/or permanent disposal. The reuse option aims to make use of the remaining energy content in UNF and reduce the amount of long-lived radioactive materials that require permanent disposal. The planned approach in the U.S., as well as in many other countries worldwide, is direct permanent disposal in a deep geologic repository. Used nuclear fuel is fuel that has been irradiated in a nuclear reactor to the point where it is no longer capable of sustaining operational objectives. The vast majority (by mass) of UNF is from electricity generation in commercial nuclear power reactors. Furthermore, the other main source of UNF in the U.S. is the Department of Energy’s (DOE) and other federal agencies’ operation of reactors in support of federal government missions, such as materials production, nuclear propulsion, research, testing, and training. Upon discharge from a reactor, UNF emits considerable heat from radioactive decay. Some period of active on-site cooling (e.g., 2 or more years) is typically required to facilitate efficient packaging and transportation to a disposition facility. Hence, the field of UNF disposition broadly includes storage, transportation and ultimate disposition. See also: Nuclear Fission (content/nuclear-fission/458400), Nuclear Fuels (/content/nuclear-fuels/458600), Nuclear Fuel Cycle (/content/nuclear-fuel-cycle/458500), Nuclear Fuels Reprocessing (/content/nuclear-fuels-reprocessing/458700), Nuclear Power (/content/nuclear-power/459600), Nuclear Reactor (/content/nuclear-reactor/460100), Radiation (/content/radiation/566300), and Radioactive Waste Management (/content/radioactive-waste-management/568900).

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Summary of Industry Task Orders Completed by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy's Nuclear Fuel Storage and Transportation Planning Project

The Administration released its Strategy for the Management and Disposal of Used Nuclear Fuel and High- Level Radioactive Waste in January 2013. The Strategy includes a phased, adaptive, and consent-based approach to siting, and implementing a comprehensive management and disposal system. These plans include activities to establish one or more ISFs using consent-based siting and to prepare for large-scale transport of spent nuclear fuel (SNF). Nuclear Fuels Storage and Transportation Planning Project (NFST) completed the following three Task Orders, using industry Advisory and Assistance Contracts related interim storage and transportation. These design concepts provide important information to the waste management systems analysis regarding throughput capacities, operational considerations, and cost estimates. - Generic Design Alternatives for Dry Storage of Used Nuclear Fuel- Chicago Bridge and Iron (CBandI) developed and documented generic design alternatives for receipt and storage of SNF and greater-than-class-C (GTCC) waste contained in dual-purpose canisters. - Generic Design for Small Size Standard Transportation, Aging, and Disposal Canister System- EnergySolutions developed a generic design of a small capacity (4 PWR/9 BWR) Standard Transportation, Aging, and Disposal (STAD) canister. - Operational Requirements for Standardized Dry Fuel Canister Systems- EnergySolutions developed solutions to address operational impacts of using a standardized canister at utility sites with a smaller capacity than conventional, dual-purpose canisters (DPC). (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2018

Host-guest prospects of neodymium and gadolinium ultraphosphate frameworks for nuclear waste storage: Multi-temperature topological analysis of nanoporous cages in RP{sub 5}O{sub 14}

Highlights: • The temperature-dependent cage topologies of RP{sub 5}O{sub 14} (R = Nd or Gd) were examined. • A topological analysis revealed similar cage structure for RP{sub 5}O{sub 14} (R = Nd or Gd). • One exception: the 8/4 cage topology of NdP{sub 5}O{sub 14} lacks structural cross-linking. • Volume (UO{sub 2} or PuO{sub 2}) ≫ 8/4 topology in RP{sub 5}O{sub 14} (R = Nd or Gd). • RP{sub 5}O{sub 14} (R = Nd or Gd) are good prospective host media for nuclear waste storage. - Abstract: Rare-earth ultraphosphate (RP{sub 5}O{sub 14}) framework materials are potential host media for nuclear waste storage, since cages within their nanoporous structures have volumes that match well those of prospective guests such as uranium or plutonium ions. Good volume matches of host cages and guest compounds are nonetheless not the only structural requirement for ensuring viable nuclear waste storage. Host structures also need to be stable enough to withstand the typical environmental conditions of long-term storage of spent nuclear fuel. To this end, the nanoporous cage topologies of neodymium and gadolinium ultraphosphate, NdP{sub 5}O{sub 14} and GdP{sub 5}O{sub 14}, are investigated as a function of temperature. Topological analysis shows that, while both compounds are essentially isostructural, thus displaying the same type of cage structures, the cage volumes of NdP{sub 5}O{sub 14} are significantly larger than those of GdP{sub 5}O{sub 14}, with one stark exception. This exception concerns the cage of NdP{sub 5}O{sub 14} whose 8/4 topology lacks structural cross-linking that would otherwise give it much more strength. This 'squashed' cage appears to owe its origins to the specific nature of crystallographic twinning in NdP{sub 5}O{sub 14}, which causes strain that needs alleviating; squashing the 8/4 cage in NdP{sub 5}O{sub 14} would be the most susceptible option towards this end, since its cage manifests the weakest structural construct. GdP{sub 5}O{sub 14} succumbs to a gradual contraction of its 8/4 cage only with increasing temperature above 300 K; this is well below its second-order monoclinic-to-orthorhombic phase transition at 420–430 K; which is 420 K for NdP{sub 5}O{sub 14}. Fortunately, the volumes of heavy metal ions that arise from spent nuclear fuels do not match the size requirements of cages with 8/4 topology in RP{sub 5}O{sub 14} hosts needed for encapsulation; otherwise, radiation leakage of such containment would present a risk. Both NdP{sub 5}O{sub 14} and GdP{sub 5}O{sub 14} would therefore seem to offer good prospects as host media for nuclear waste storage.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Systems and Tools to Facilitate Aging Management Inspections of Used Nuclear Fuel Dry Storage Systems - 18382

The Used Nuclear Fuel (UNF) dry storage systems (DSSs) are currently used at almost all the nuclear plants in the USA for the storage of their UNF as the spent fuel pools are running out of capacity to store any additional discharged fuel. Even though these DSSs are supposed to be at the reactor site for a short amount of time, they are expected to be at the reactor sites for an extended duration due to the unavailability of Interim Storage Facilities (ISF) or a permanent disposal sites like Yucca Mountain. Maintaining the integrity of the DSS canisters and storage overpacks so they can safely protect the fuel and maintain the integrity of UNF is of utmost importance during storage at reactor site ISFSI or at the ISF. Comprehensive and robust Aging Management Program (AMP) is an important aspect for DSSs to satisfy these requirements. In order to address this industry need, TN Americas have developed an enhanced NUHOMS{sup R} DSS licensed by NRC under 10 CFR Part 72 regulations and a comprehensive AMP development which includes prevention, inspection, monitoring and mitigation of any corrosion or degradation of DSS components. For DSC and HSM inspection, two remotely operating delivery systems have been developed using non-destructive examination (NDE) methods including robotic crawler and inspection ring system. This paper describes details of these developments and status of their deployment for implementation at various utility ISFSI sites. TN Americas completed the detailed design of the DSC inspection system and conducted functional tests of the inspection system on a DSC mockup and the system is ready for deployment at any NUHOMS{sup R} ISFSI site. TN Americas is committed to offer the most robust and comprehensive AMP systems, tools and services to the industry to assure the safety of the deployed DSS at the utility sites. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Calcined Waste Storage at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center

This comprehensive report provides definitive information regarding the volume, mass, and composition (chemical and radioactivity) of the calcined waste stored at the Idaho Nuclear Technology and Engineering Center on the Idaho National Laboratory Site. The calcine composition data are required for current regulatory compliance and safe operation of the INTEC’s six Calcined Solids Storage Facilities (CSSFs), as well as future retrieval, treatment, and shipping the calcine to an off-Site facility (such as a geologic repository). This report also contains a description of the calcine storage bins that compose each of the CSSFs, emphasizing the features that may be of concern to future calcine retrieval. The CSSFs were designed by different architectural engineering firms and built at different times. Each CSSF has a unique design, reflecting varying design criteria and lessons learned from historical CSSF operation. The varying CSSF designs will affect future calcine retrieval processes and equipment. This revision (5) of the report presents refinements of the databases used to calculate the volume, mass, chemical content, and radioactivity of calcined waste produced and stored within the CSSFs. This revision corrects minor errors and inconsistencies noted in an extensive validation and verification effort of the prior version of the Microsoft Excel workbooks upon which the calcine composition described in this report is based. Historical calcine samples are insufficient in number and scope of analysis to fully characterize the entire inventory of calcine in the CSSFs. Sample data exist for all of the liquid wastes that were calcined. This report provides calcine composition data based on liquid waste sample analyses, the volume of liquid waste calcined, calciner operating data, and CSSF operating data using several large Microsoft Excel (Microsoft 2010) databases and spreadsheets. The Excel spreadsheets are collectively called the Historical Processing Model (HPM). The calcine composition determined by this method compares favorably with historical calcine sample data.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2016

Consolidating Data on Spent Nuclear Fuel into a Unified Database

This paper describes the comprehensive commercial spent nuclear fuel (SNF) database, the Unified Database (UDB), and discusses the UDB's (1) content and design with limited data examples and potential applications, (2) external interfaces, and (3) planned enhancements to streamline national SNF data collection and preservation. The UDB is the nucleus of the Used Nuclear Fuel Storage, Transportation and Disposal Analysis Resource and Data System (UNF-ST and DARDS). The UDB is being developed for the US Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE) to provide a credible, controlled data source for key information for: various analytical purposes, including assessing issues and uncertainties related to the extended storage and transportability of SNF after extended storage; supporting research and development (R and D) prioritization; and preserving SNF related information for future generations. The UDB will serve as a national resource for use by DOE-NE or a future management and disposal organization in planning for future storage, transport, and disposal of SNF. The UDB is also being designed with the flexibility to provide information on greater-than-class C (GTCC) waste, government-owned SNF, and high-level radioactive waste (HLW). (authors)

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2014

Strategy for Fuel Rod Receipt, Characterization, Sample Allocation for the Demonstration Sister Rods

The U.S. Department of Energy Office of Nuclear Energy (DOE-NE), Office of Fuel Cycle Technology, has established the Used Fuel Disposition Campaign (UFDC) to conduct the research and development activities related to storage, transportation, and disposal of used nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. The mission of the UFDC is to identify alternatives and conduct scientific research and technology development to enable storage, transportation and disposal of used nuclear fuel (UNF) and wastes generated by existing and future nuclear fuel cycles. The UFDC Storage and Transportation staffs are responsible for addressing issues regarding the extended or long-term storage of UNF and its subsequent transportation. The near-term objectives of the Storage and Transportation task are to use a science-based approach to develop the technical bases to support the continued safe and secure storage of UNF for extended periods, subsequent retrieval, and transportation. While low burnup fuel [that characterized as having a burnup of less than 45 gigawatt days per metric tonne uranium (GWD/MTU)] has been stored for nearly three decades, the storage of high burnup used fuels is more recent. The DOE has funded a demonstration project to confirm the behavior of used high burnup fuel under prototypic conditions. The Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) is leading a project team to develop and implement the Test Plan to collect this data from a UNF dry storage system containing high burnup fuel. The Draft Test Plan for the demonstration outlines the data to be collected; the high burnup fuel to be included; the technical data gaps the data will address; and the storage system design, procedures, and licensing necessary to implement the Test Plan. To provide data that is most relevant to high burnup fuel in dry storage, the design of the test storage system must closely mimic real conditions high burnup SNF experiences during all stages of dry storage: loading, cask drying, inert gas backfilling, and transfer to an Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI) for multi-year storage. To document the initial condition of the used fuel prior to emplacement in a storage system, “sister ” fuel rods will be harvested and sent to a national laboratory for characterization and archival purposes. This report supports the demonstration by describing how sister rods will be shipped and received at a national laboratory, and recommending basic nondestructive and destructive analyses to assure the fuel rods are adequately characterized for UFDC work. For this report, a hub-and-spoke model is proposed, with one location serving as the hub for fuel rod receipt and characterization. In this model, fuel and/or clad would be sent to other locations when capabilities at the hub were inadequate or nonexistent. This model has been proposed to reduce DOE-NE’s obligation for waste cleanup and decontamination of equipment.

11 NUCLEAR FUEL CYCLE AND FUEL MATERIALS↗
DOE OSTI2016

Issues and Challenges for the Disposal of Solid Radioactive Waste in the UK - 16597

The latest UK radioactive waste inventory describes the UK as having roughly 4.5 million m{sup 3} of solid radioactive waste - waste that either exists now or which will arise in future. This quantity excludes the potential waste that could be generated from the final site clearance of nuclear sites, estimated to be at least 3 times the current inventory volume. Most solid radioactive waste (by volume) is managed in the near-surface, at the national Low Level Waste Repository (LLWR) or in other appropriately permitted landfill sites. The UK has yet to develop solutions for the final disposal of Higher Activity Radioactive Waste (HAW) but has established arrangements for packaging of waste now for storage while maximising the probability that these packages will be disposable once a solution is provided. Irrespective of the final disposal solution, the principles that govern the safe management of solid radioactive waste are common across the UK. Recent experience in the UK, including from the review of the environmental safety case for the LLWR, identified a number of issues relevant to solid waste disposal which are pertinent to other existing Low Activity Radioactive Waste (LAW) disposal sites as well as the development of safety cases for HAW disposal facilities. These issues include: scoping the extent of 'wastes' included in any assessment (e.g. whether to include the 'package' as well as its contents); the importance of understanding the waste heterogeneity; non-radioactive characteristics of waste, and understanding of external factors such as climate and landscape change. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2019

Waste is our Product. Developing, Implementing and Optimising Waste Management at Dounreay - 19039

The UK's Fast Breeder Reactor Research programme was centred at Dounreay, in the very north of Scotland, from 1955. Since 1994, the site has been focused on decommissioning, and represents one of the most complex, technically challenging and hazardous nuclear clean-up projects in Europe. Since 2012, Dounreay Site Restoration Ltd (DSRL) has been contracted by the NDA as the Site License Company to deliver the defined scope of work, under a Target Cost contract, to decommission the site to achieve the Interim End State by 2030-2033, whilst managing the transition of its people. All parties, including DSRL's Parent Body Organisation Cavendish Dounreay Partnership Ltd (a consortium of Cavendish Nuclear, AECOM, and Jacobs), recognise that there are significant technical and regulatory challenges to achieve this, as well as safely managing the transition for our workforce on what is effectively a 'closure' contract. The product of decommissioning is waste; over the course of the programme, a full range of higher activity and lower level radioactive wastes will be generated, and must be safely managed. This paper will address: - The Policy issues relating to radioactive waste management at Dounreay, including particular issues relating to implementation of Scottish policy, including how Waste Management is Optimised. - An overview of the decommissioning programme and the delivery of an Interim End State; - The type, range and nature of radioactive wastes requiring safe management at Dounreay; - Higher Activity Wastes (HAW): - Setting higher activity waste strategy; defining products and interim storage requirements; - Technical, regulatory and stakeholder issues for HAW strategy; - Lower Activity Wastes: - Setting Low Level Waste (LLW) strategy; defining a disposal product and development and status for Dounreay's LLW Disposal Vaults; - Implementing LLW strategy; - Technical, regulatory and stakeholder issues for LLW strategy; - Optimising Waste Management -Optimising waste from generation (from decommissioning workfaces) through to disposal -why, and how; - The Waste Informed Decommissioning model as a methodology and approach; - Impact and importance of Waste Management on a target cost contract; - Establishment of a Waste Optimisation Programme to drive ownership, delivery and culture change; - Management responsibilities and informing organisational design; - Sharing and learning from Best Practice; - The Challenge - how to ensure workforce and teams are engaged in delivering optimisation requirements; - Conclusions. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2021

An Assessment of the Materials of Construction for the Transfer Lines and Unit Operations Equipment Associated with the Recycle Diversion Process

The Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) processes and vitrifies radioactive waste that it receives from the Concentration, Storage, and Transfer Facility (CSTF) and Salt Waste Processing Facility (SWPF). As a result of the evaporation of water during both the melter feed preparation and the melter feed vitrification steps in DWPF, a recycle waste stream is generated, neutralized, and sent back to the CSTF. The recycle waste is a dilute water stream originating from the collection of condensate liquids containing some minor sludge and frit solids and other waste components primarily resulting from entrainment into the condensate during foam-over events. The recycle stream volume is significant and is expected to approach 3 million gallons per year once the SWPF reaches full operation. Diverting the bulk of the recycle waste stream from the CSTF is essential for the eventual closure of the waste tanks, and hence the completion of the SRS liquid waste mission.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2024

Organic Evaporation, Oxidation, and Hydrolysis Testing in Support of Hanford Sample-and-Send

The Hanford site has approximately 54 to 56 million gallons of radioactive mixed waste stored in 156 unretrieved underground storage tanks. The Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) is being built to treat and immobilize the tank waste. The baseline method for immobilization of Low Activity Waste (LAW) through the WTP is vitrification, but additional immobilization capacity is needed to supplement the initial LAW melters. An alternative cementitious waste form is being investigated for that future immobilization method. However, one impediment to a cementitious waste form is the presence of Land Disposal Restricted (LDR) organic chemicals in tank waste, which are regulated on a concentration based standard in the final waste form. Hence, if the quantity of organics in LAW is high enough, they must be destroyed or removed to make a waste form compatible with disposal in a mixed low level waste landfill. This work evaluates potential avenues for treatment of LDR organics to eliminate the impediment and permit possible use of a cementitious waste form. Vacuum evaporation testing to remove LDR organics consisted of preparing a non-radioactive LAW simulant, spiking that simulant with organic chemicals, and evaporating the mixture via differential distillation. The apparatus was a laboratory-scale vacuum evaporator operated at 60 ±5 torr absolute (vacuum evaporation). The LAW simulant represented the liquid expected to be retrieved from the Hanford tank farms at approximately 4.0 M [Na+] total sodium ion concentration. The concentration of the organic chemicals added was significantly higher than typically found in the tank waste samples since the higher levels were necessary to assist in analytical measurement and tracking of the spiked species.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

A Novel Mobile Examination and Remediation Facility for On-Site Remediation of Dry Storage Systems - 18389

Most of the spent nuclear fuel (SNF) in dry storage in the United States is safely and securely stored in dual-purpose (i.e., storage and transportation) canisters [1]. However, some of the SNF is stored in storage-only (i.e., non-transportable) packages, or packages that may become nonconforming for continued storage or transportation for a variety of reasons. Currently, the capability to remediate dry storage systems (DSSs) for SNF that are not transportable or that need to be repaired to maintain confinement boundary integrity during storage service does not exist without on-site access to a spent fuel pool. Hence, there is a potential future need for a mobile facility with remediation capabilities that can be used at multiple storage installations. These capabilities would permit needed repairs to an existing DSS to support continued storage or for the dry transfer of fuel to a new conveyance suitable for transport, if necessary. This is a technical paper that does not take into account the contractual limitations under the Standard Contract for Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel and/or High-Level Radioactive Waste (Standard Contract) (10 CFR Part 961). Under the provisions of the Standard Contract, DOE does not consider spent nuclear fuel in canisters to be an acceptable waste form, absent a mutually agreed to contract amendment. To the extent discussions or recommendations in this paper conflict with the provisions of the Standard Contract, the Standard Contract provisions prevail. A novel design concept for a Mobile Examination and Remediation Facility (MERF) is proposed with functions and capabilities to remediate a DSS. The proposed MERF would be a multi-purpose facility, remotely operated and computer-controlled with semi-automated equipment to allow trained operators to safely perform remediation activities while keeping worker radiation dose as low as reasonably achievable. It would include a shielded rotating platform with support towers and would use commercial off- the-shelf examination and repair equipment. A slip ring arrangement underneath the rotating platform would allow for the power supply without impeding the continuous rotation and would simplify cable management. The support towers would be mounted on the rotating platform, and each tower would have vertical and horizontal positioning capability for axial and radial tool location. The rotating platform would be attached to the main MERF structure. Capabilities would include visual, surface, and volumetric examinations to fully characterize physical conditions on canister surface before and after a repair; repair techniques, e.g., laser beam welding, friction stir welding, or cold spray, to perform needed remediation activities; and associated equipment for surface preparation such as cutting and grinding equipment. The proposed design would be simple, modular, robust, economically viable, and easily transportable and would have a small footprint. The modular design would present several advantages including compatibility with a variety of different DSSs, on-site assembly, and transportability; it also would be built in interchangeable sections to facilitate decontamination. Further, shielding would be supplemented through interface with the existing transfer cask and storage overpack. Robustness and canister stability would be achieved using pneumatic holders and steel support structures designed with vibration absorbers to reduce impacts and/or a 'pendulum' effect during a seismic event. Thus, the proposed MERF would be designed to: (i) minimize handling of an affected DSS to the extent practicable, (ii) provide radiation shielding and minimize dose to operators and the public during remediation activities, and (iii) enable examination, repair, and repackaging. This paper describes the proposed MERF design concept and capabilities, main components, equipment, different modes of operation, and operating procedures. Structural and safety assessments would need to be performed before final design, licensing, and deployment. The MERF is evaluated with respect to regulatory impact (first of a kind, prior experience), operational impact (safety, security, staffing, ongoing operations, constraints), worker dose (low, medium, high), cost (low, medium, high), schedule (duration, time sequence), and technology readiness level. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2023

Organic Evaporation, Oxidation, and Hydrolysis Testing in Support of Hanford Sample-and-Send

The Hanford site has approximately 56 million gallons of radioactive mixed waste stored in 156 unretrieved underground storage tanks. The Hanford Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP) is being built to treat and immobilize the tank waste. The baseline method for immobilization of Low Activity Waste (LAW) through the WTP is vitrification, but additional immobilization capacity is needed to supplement the initial LAW melters. An alternative cementitious waste form is being investigated for that future immobilization method. However, one impediment to a cementitious waste form is the presence of Land Disposal Restricted (LDR) organic chemicals in tank waste, which are regulated on a concentration-based standard in the final waste form. Hence, if the quantity of organics in LAW is high enough, they must be destroyed or removed to make a waste form compatible with disposal in a mixed low level waste landfill. This work evaluates potential avenues for treatment of LDR organics to eliminate the impediment and permit possible use of a cementitious waste form.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2020

Development of Remote Cutting Tools for use at ATR - 20438

As a result of years of operations of the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) at the Idaho National Lab (INL), the ATR canal has become congested due to the storage of materials including waste consisting of highly irradiated remote handled (RH) metals. In order to support its continuing nuclear mission the ATR requires canal space to support fuel storage and future core internal change out (CIC) components. INL staff determined that the canal must be cleaned out and waste removed to efficiently utilize the valuable canal floor space. It was determined that a methodology for processing, packaging, characterizing, and removing current and future irradiated hardware from the ATR canal is needed. Orano Federal Services (OFS) and its subcontractor Babcock Services Inc. (BSI) were selected to provide remote tooling in order to safely and efficiently size reduce the material currently stored in the ATR canal. INL developed detailed requirements that established the design and performance requirements for the tooling. Orano TN and BSI had recently successfully completed similar tasks in clearing highly activated materials from spent fuel pools and canals at commercial nuclear plants. That experience directly translated into a proven approach that could be used at the ATR thereby saving time and money and lowering risks. Based on BSI's demonstrated proficiency in the design and deployment of remote size reduction specialty tooling at comparable commercial facilities, Orano Federal Services was confident that a solution to INL's requirements could be delivered. The tooling had to be designed to be compatible with the operational requirements of the ATR canal as well as the functionality needed by the facility operators that will use the equipment. Some of the major design requirements and functions of the equipment included remote operations, capability to shear highly irradiated sections of aluminum and steel tubing, pipe, and components ranging in size from 0.6 cm to 16.5 cm diameter into 1.5 m -1.8 m lengths, utilizing buoyancy compensation to assist with underwater operations, and use commercially available existing technology and components as much as practical. The design team evaluated and selected commercially available equipment that could be modified to meet the design and performance specifications. In addition, a waste sizing table (WST) was designed and fabricated to further ensure the size reduction equipment would perform as expected and give the facility operators a stable and usable remote, underwater work platform. After successful development of the tooling, a mock up test and operator training was conducted to ensure the tooling performed as expected and met the requirements of INL. (authors)

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗
DOE OSTI2018

Off-Gas Condensate and Cast Stone Analysis Results

A sample of off-gas condensate produced during a demonstration test of the direct-feed low-activity waste (DFLAW) Radioactive Waste Test Platform using waste retrieved from Hanford storage tank AP-105 waste was analyzed for major cations, anions, total cyanide, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals, selected radionuclides, and selected organic compounds. The remaining off-gas condensate was concentrated through evaporation and then used to produce Cast Stone waste forms. After the solid waste forms cured for 28 days, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 1311 (EPA 1992) Toxicity Characteristic Leach Procedure (TCLP) tests were conducted on two samples. The TCLP leachates were analyzed for RCRA metals, fluoride, and total cyanide. These chemical analyses were conducted to collect data on the waste form performance and to determine if the waste form will meet the disposal requirements of the Waste Control Specialists LLC (WCS) Federal Waste Disposal Facility (FWF) in Texas (WCS 2015) and the Integrated Disposal Facility at Hanford. The radionuclide results in the off-gas condensate were used to estimate concentrations in the Cast Stone waste forms; these estimates were then compared to Class C limits (30 TAC 336.362 Appendix E). With the possible exception of U-232, all measured radionuclides were determined to be below their respective Class C limits. Inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was used to measure most of the radionuclides. It is not possible to differentiate the isotope measured at mass 232 between U 232 and Th-232 by mass spectroscopy. Class C limit comparisons were made by assuming two maximum possible scenarios; one in which all the isotope at mass 232 occurred as Th-232, and another assigning the entire mass contribution to U-232. If the isotope at mass 232 is all Th-232 then the waste form is well below its Class C limit; however, if the isotope at mass 232 is all U-232, then the Class C limit would be exceeded by more than a factor of 8. A chemical procedure to separate uranium from thorium followed by reanalysis by ICP-MS would be required to resolve this issue. A similar issue occurs at mass 238, which could be U-238 or Pu-238; however, in this case Pu-238 can be ruled out as a contributor to the isotope measured at mass 238 for the following reasons. Pu-238 has a half-life of 87.7 years and its daughter product (U-234) has a half-life of 2.5 × 105 years and a measured concentration of < 0.002 µg/L. If significant concentrations of Pu-238 were present in this waste, then the amount of measurable U 234 would have increased over the decades of storage in the Hanford tanks. Because this was not observed, it is concluded that the isotope measured at mass 238 is all U-238. A total of 68 organic compounds were targeted for analysis in the off-gas condensate. Of these compounds, only nine were measured above their respective minimum reportable concentration. These compounds were acenaphthene, acetone, n-butyl alcohol, p,p’-DDT, methyl ethyl ketone, nitrobenzene, o nitrophenol, pyridine, and toluene. Of the detectable compounds, only acenaphthene, acetone, o nitrophenol, and pyridine were above wastewater standards (40 CFR 268.48 - Universal Treatment Standards). None of the organic compounds exceeded the non-wastewater standards (40 CFR 268.48 - Universal Treatment Standards). Analysis of the TCLP leachates from the Cast Stone waste forms indicated that none of the analytes exceeded the Universal Treatment Standard and, in general, all were well below the standards.

12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE AND NON-RADIOACTIVE W↗