Search NASA⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search NASA

Results for “solvent transfer”

Search indexed NASA NTRS and DOE OSTI research on propulsion, heat transfer, battery materials and energy systems. Follow report and document links to the original sources.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

561 records · Page 32
All sourcesNASA NTRSDOE OSTI
DOE OSTI2026

Isopentane Disproportionation in Lewis Acidic Chloroaluminate Ionic Liquid

Lewis acidic chloroaluminate ionic liquid diluted in dichloromethane catalyzes the disproportionation of alkanes, such as isopentane, via carbenium ions in a reaction readily initiated by carbenium ion precursors such as tert-butyl chloride (TBC). The carbenium ion-AlCl 4 – ion-pairs stabilized by the ionic liquid-dichloromethane solution are the key intermediates in two distinctive kinetic regimes, i.e., a transient regime (0–5 min) and a steady-state regime (after 5 min). The transient regime constitutes the majority of isopentane conversion and is governed by the initial carbenium ion concentration. In the steady-state regime, disproportionation occurs at a considerably lower rate, affected by the carbenium ion concentration, the concentration of the ionic liquid, and the reaction temperature. The formation of alkenes observed in the 1 H NMR spectra of the reacting substrates, along with the DFT calculations, suggests that deprotonation of carbenium ion-pairs reduces their concentration, decreasing, in turn, the reaction rate. Kinetic modeling indicates that the transient regime is significantly controlled by the hydride transfer (k HT ) and the deprotonation rate constants (k DP ), while the steady-state regime is additionally influenced by the alkene protonation rate constant (k –DP ). The overall activation energy of the reaction at the steady state, expressed as E a,steady-state regime = E a,HT – E a,DP + E a,–DP , was 54 kJ/mol. The reaction mechanism and the kinetics highlight the potential of Lewis acid-catalyzed conversions of hydrocarbons under remarkably mild conditions.

Deprotonation↗
DOE OSTI2025

Assessing the Effect of Explicit Polarizability on Models of Carbon Dioxide Solvation in Ionic Liquids

Ionic liquids are an important possible carbon capture material because of their anomalously high sorption selectivity for carbon dioxide over other gases common in air. Many research groups have investigated the molecular origins of this property and provided important insights, including using 1D and 2D-IR spectroscopy. Molecular dynamics simulations have been indispensable to the interpretation of these experiments. In prior molecular dynamics simulation work, charge-scaled force fields have typically been used to provide a mean-field treatment of effects vital to ionic liquid systems such as charge transfer and polarization. Here, we compare models of carbon dioxide solvated in ionic liquids with explicit polarization to models of the same with implicit polarizability through charge-scaling. We calculate structural, dynamical, and spectroscopic properties, and make comparisons to the same items measured in experiment. In this study, we focus on two ionic liquids: 1-butyl-3- methylimidazolium (BMIM + ) paired with bis(trifluoromethane sulfonyl imide) (Tf 2 N − ) and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium (BMIM+) paired with hexafluorophosphate (PF 6 − ). We find that many structural, dynamical, and spectroscopic properties are changed when polarization is modeled explicitly. We also find that explicit polarizability softens local ion cages around the carbon dioxide and that the long-time diffusion of the carbon dioxide is gated by the reorganization of the ionic liquid molecules. Comparisons to experiment show modest improvement of many observables compared with experiment for the explicitly polarizable model over the charge-scaled model. Overall, our results show that charge-scaled force fields are likely sufficient to compute spectroscopic properties of carbon dioxide in ionic liquids and suggest some interpretive rules for understanding their structural and dynamical properties. Those using charge-scaled force fields should generally assume that the ion cages around solutes such as carbon dioxide are too stiff and cation-rich in their models and adjust their interpretations and predictions accordingly.

37 INORGANIC, ORGANIC, PHYSICAL, AND ANALYTICAL CH↗
DOE OSTI2024

Retrofitting Holcim Ste. Genevieve Cement Plant with CO2 Capture Plant Using Air Liquide Cryocap™ FG Technology

The global cement manufacturing industry is a major contributor to carbon dioxide emissions. The International Energy Agency's "Net Zero Emissions by 2050 Scenario" identifies CCS as a major strategy for meeting that goal. This project is among the first attempts to transfer capture technology developed at coal-fired power plants to the cement industry. The main objective of the project is to execute and complete a front-end engineering and design (FEED) studies for commercial-scale, carbon capture projects that separates 95% of the total CO2 emissions at the Holcim (US) Ste. Genevieve cement manufacturing facility using Air Liquide’s Pressure Swing Adsorption system (PSA) assisted Cryocap™ technology. The Holcim Ste. Genevieve cement plant in Missouri, US, boasts one of the largest single cement production lines in the world, with a capacity of approximately 12,000 t/day. The plant currently uses traditional fuels, namely coal and petcoke. The captured CO2 will be pipeline and geological storage grade. The industrial host site emits approximately 3.0 million tonne CO2/yr. Air Liquide’s Cryocap™ technology has been developed over the last 18+ years for CO2 capture applications. It has been shown to be applicable to a variety of industrial applications (e.g., steel, cement, SMR, Fluidized Catalytic Crackers (FCCs)). Cryocap™ FG consists of a Pressure Swing Adsorption (PSA) unit coupled with a Cryogenic System. The PSA pre-concentrates the CO2 from the flue gas, while the cryogenic unit enables the CO2 purity to be increased to the desired level. The project team is led by the Prairie Research Institute at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. The tasks include: complete FEED study for retrofitting the industrial facility with a carbon capture system to support developing a detailed cost estimate; business case analysis outlining the anticipated revenue and credits if projects was built and operated; technoeconomic analysis (TEA) outlining how capture system achieves DOE capture goals; and life cycle (LCA) analysis demonstrating zero net carbon emissions. The FEED study was successfully completed. This includes completing the process basis of design; preliminary engineering; outside battery limits (OSBL) detailed engineering including a Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) wastewater treatment system; inside battery limits (ISBL) detailed engineering [1]. An overall project capital cost estimate within a -20%/+30% accuracy was developed. The major contributors to the Total Plant Cost (TPC), by system, are the costs associated with the Outside Battery Limit (OSBL) section of the plant which includes a new river water intake structure and a Zero Liquid Discharge (ZLD) system. By cost category, the major contributors to the TPC are equipment and subcontractor costs, followed closely by engineering, construction management, home office and contractor fees. The TEA has been created to reflect the findings of the project. It analyzes the economic performance of the Cryocap™ technology by reviewing the estimated capital costs, operating cost, and revenue. The Cost of Capture (COC) associated with the Cryocap™ technology for 95% CO2 capture, when considering NETL 2018 economic assumptions (42/58 debt/equity ratio, 5.15% interest on debt and 1.42% return on equity in real dollars) and 2022 economic assumptions (42/58 debt/equity ratio, 8.82% interest on debt and 4.90% return on equity in real dollars) was found to be much lower than that for the DOE-NETL’s base-line cases. The highest contributors to the COC are annualized capital expenditures (CAPEX) and electricity consumption which can be offset by using lower cost renewable sources. The LCA was conducted using OpenLCA which is an open-source software that is recommended by NETL. The database utilized for this study was a modified version of TRACI 2.1 (developed by the US. Environmental Protection Agency’s National Risk Management Research Laboratory and modified by NETL). The Cryocap™ FG technology does not consume fuels in significant quantities and does not utilize specialized chemical solvents subject to decomposition, such as those utilized in amine-based carbon capture systems. The Cryocap™ FG technology mainly utilizes electricity as its energy input; hence, its calculated emissions are mainly associated with the generation of electricity offsite and are dependent on the energy matrix of the grid at the time of project implementation. The water consumption impact of the Cryocap™ FG is mostly for makeup of the water lost by evaporation in the cooling tower; however, the carbon capture plant will be equipped with a ZLD system to avoid effluent streams and minimize water consumption. The successful construction and operation of this plant based on this study results will provide a means to demonstrate an economically attractive and transformational capture technology that can be used to retrofit existing plants and be deployed at new plants.

01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT↗