A comparison of turbulence closure models for transonic flows about airfoils
Navier-Stokes transonic airfoil calculations using three different turbulence closure models are presented and compared with available experimental data. Two of the models, Cebeci-Smith and Baldwin-Lomax, are equilibrium models in the sense that the turbulent shear stress is assumed to depend only on the local properties of the mean flow. The third model, Johnson and King, is a nonequilibrium model in which an ordinary differential equation is employed to account for the streamwise development of the maximum Reynolds shear stress. An eddy viscosity distribution across the boundary layer is assumed which is functionally dependent on this stress. For attached flows with little inviscid-viscous interaction, little difference in the results with the different models is noted. With stronger interactions and with separation occurring on the airfoils, the nonequilibrium model is shown to perform better.